amana makes 300 additional cryptocurrencies available to app users

Korea to introduce more effective guidelines for crypto listing and delistingThe South Korean cryptocurrency industry is expected to see standardized guidelines for listing and delisting cryptocurrencies on trading platforms by the first half of next year, according to a report by local news outlet ETnews. This move is a response to the current self-regulatory guidelines among cryptocurrency exchanges, which have been found inadequate in effectively managing the listing and delisting of digital currencies.Photo by Mathew Schwartz on UnsplashA dedicated task forceThe Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) in South Korea has reportedly initiated a task force dedicated to creating standardized rules and regulations for cryptocurrency listing and delisting. This team includes both government officials and experts from the private sector.An official from the FSS noted that the task force is aiming to present the final version of the guidelines to the National Assembly before the implementation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act in July of next year. Operating under the oversight of the financial regulator, these standardized guidelines are expected to enhance their effectiveness and aid crypto businesses in maintaining self-regulation.Frequent listing and delistingThe decision by the Korean financial authorities to formulate these guidelines was prompted by the frequent listing and delisting of cryptocurrencies on trading platforms, which pose risks and cause confusion for customers. An earlier report from the Financial Services Commission’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) highlighted that the number of tokens listed in the first half of 2023 increased to 169, up from 95 in the first half of 2022, while the number of delisted tokens rose from 78 to 115.The WEMIX controversyThe cycle of listing, delisting, and relisting cryptocurrencies has sparked controversies, with WEMIX serving as a notable example. WEMIX is the native token of blockchain gaming company Wemade’s Wemix blockchain network. In December, WEMIX was collectively delisted by the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA), which includes South Korea’s top five crypto exchanges: Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax. The reason cited was Wemade’s breach of disclosure rules regarding token distribution.However, in a turn of events, Coinone relisted WEMIX on its platform in February this year. Following this, DAXA established self-regulatory guidelines concerning the relisting of tokens. Despite these guidelines, Gopax also proceeded to relist WEMIX earlier this month. As a result of this move, DAXA criticized Gopax for not complying with the self-regulatory guidelines. Gopax faced a restriction on its voting rights within the alliance for three months, and a cautionary note was issued against them.An industry insider noted that despite the efforts of DAXA, their self-regulation measures for cryptocurrency trading services, including the listing process, have not been particularly effective. However, the upcoming rules are expected to be more impactful as they will be in line with the forthcoming Virtual Asset User Protection Act.

South Korea is holding a joint two-day conference with the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) on Monday to discuss digital finance in the member countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).  Held in partnership with Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC) and the Korea Institute of Finance (KIF), the event was titled “OECD-FSC-KIF Roundtable on Digital Finance in ASEAN.” The roundtable intends to bring together many financial experts and high-ranking regulators worldwide, sharing the trend of digital financial frameworks in the ASEAN region while seeking solutions to emerging risks following financial digitalization.  Photo by Evangeline Shaw on UnsplashTwo-day event focusing on digital assets and AI The first day focused on the global market trend relative to digital assets such as central bank digital currency (CBDC) and virtual assets. FSC Vice Chairman Kim So-young, KIF Chairman Lee Hang-yong and OECD Director for Financial and Enterprise Affairs Carmine Di Noia delivered opening remarks, followed by discussion sessions joined by expert panelists. Among the first day’s roundtable agendas were: “Digital assets, CBDCs, tokenization and DLT-based finance: the Asian perspective,” “The limits of DeFi in terms for financial inclusion: Lessons from ASEAN,” “DeFi and crypto assets in ASEAN and beyond” and “Cyber-security in the financial sector.”  The second day focuses on leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) in financial sectors, with sessions titled “Artificial intelligence in Finance: the Asian perspective” and “Generative Artificial Intelligence in Finance in Asia and ASEAN.”  South Korea’s commitment to bolstering global financial cooperation During the roundtable, the FSC Vice Chairman Kim vowed to strengthen global financial cooperation with ASEAN countries. “(We) will continue strengthening our cooperation with other global partners, including ASEAN countries and international organizations, to share latest trends in finance and maintain our system in line with the international regulation norms,” said Kim. 

Polymesh’s APAC Digital Asset Regulation Report Highlights ChallengesThe project team behind Polymesh, an institutional-grade permissioned blockchain built specifically for regulated assets, released a report on digital asset regulation within the Asia Pacific (APAC) region on Tuesday, highlighting several challenges that regulators are attempting to overcome.In a press release, the company outlined that the report covers recent regulatory developments in South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong, and the broader APAC region.Photo by Jéan Béller on UnsplashProgressive regulatory effortsRegulators within the APAC region are currently striving to introduce legislation for digital assets, while several centers within the region are vying to establish themselves as hubs for digital asset-related business.The report explores the individual efforts of regulators in various APAC nations as they work towards crafting regulatory frameworks tailored to their jurisdictions. Those efforts encompass implementation, investigation, and enforcement of legislation in a borderless industry.Regulators in South Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong have all embarked on formulating rules for emerging asset categories, albeit using different terminologies such as “digital assets,” “digital payment tokens,” and “virtual assets.” Their focus lies in striking a balance between consumer protection, market integrity, and industry development.Additionally, all three regulators adhere to the principle of “same activity, same regulations, same risks” when it comes to tokenized securities. They argue that regulatory requirements do not significantly differ solely because a security is in tokenized form. Each state has been actively engaged in local and global activities surrounding security tokens, including state involvement in the advancement of security token technology and cross-border transactions.Main findingsThe report’s main findings emphasize that while regulators in the APAC region are making strides in introducing digital asset legislation, the road ahead will not be without challenges.Legislating a cross-border industry poses difficulties that necessitate harmonization to foster a robust and interconnected ecosystem. Digital assets originating in Asia can be traded globally and vice versa. Merely identifying the asset’s place of origin is no longer sufficient.Although the report delves into the efforts of individual regulators, it emphasizes the need for long-term collaboration to establish a unified vision and practical implementation of regulations for this borderless phenomenon.Regulatory challengesThe regulatory challenges faced by South Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong in driving the growth of digital assets in the APAC region are multifaceted. They include the intricacies of legislating an inherently cross-border industry. In turn, that can lead to the potential violation of legislation from other jurisdictions.The lack of harmonization among different jurisdictions, and variations in regulatory approaches among the three regulators are likely to be problematic. Furthermore, there are push-pull dynamics between the industry and regulators, with even the regulators themselves not always in agreement.However, despite these challenges, all three regulators have initiated the formulation of rules for new asset categories, with a strong emphasis on safeguarding consumer interests, maintaining market integrity, and fostering industry development.