Spot BTC, ETH ETFs to commence trading on April 30 in Hong Kong

Representatives from various judicial authorities in China, including the country’s Supreme People’s Court, held a seminar recently to discuss crypto-related legal issues. Speculation on easing of crypto regulationsThat event has sparked a wave of speculation within the crypto sector about a potential softening of the official stance in China relative to crypto. The Chinese government banned crypto trading and mining in 2021. However, beyond these speculative takes, no verifiable information has arisen following the seminar to indicate that the Chinese authorities are pivoting and looking to overturn the current bans on crypto trading and crypto mining. A report emerged on Feb. 25 on Chinese social media platform WeChat that the seminar was held on Feb. 23. Among the attendees was the Dean of the Law School of the Renmin University of China, the Dean of the Law and Fintech Institute (China University of Political Science and Law) and officials from the Supreme People’s Court. Photo by Mikhail Pavstyuk on Unsplash‘Virtual currency disposal issues’The research topic, “virtual currency disposal issues,” included consideration not just of the disposal path of virtual currency but also how to establish and improve digital currency supervision going forward. Participants scrutinized both criminal and civil cases that had involved digital assets, with a focus on possible future enforcement strategies. Some attendees highlighted financial security concerns at a national level relative to digital assets, proposing a strengthening of Chinese regulations in order to minimize that risk. One official from Beijing’s Third Intermediate People’s Court outlined past rulings within the Chinese judicial system in crypto-related cases, while suggesting that there was a need for further research to be carried out in order to further refine the approach taken by the courts. Some proposed a need for further research that takes into consideration legal theory together with real-world application relative to the treatment of virtual assets. This view received the backing of Zhai Chao, vice president of the Supreme People’s Court, the highest court within the People’s Republic of China.Establishing legal precedentOver the last few years, Chinese courts have had the opportunity to establish several precedents relative to digital assets. In 2023 the People’s Courts recognized the legal status of cryptocurrency, classifying it as property. Around the same timeframe, the Shanghai Second Intermediate People’s Court published a report which recognized the unique attributes of Bitcoin, with the report also considering the legal treatment of cryptocurrencies. In September of last year, the People’s Court Daily, a state-run media outlet, published an article calling for standardization in terms of the legal treatment of virtual currencies within the court system. Last August a court in the Chinese province of Hubei ruled that investors must bear their own losses from virtual asset investments where such losses were caused by the closure of a crypto exchange. November 2024 saw further crypto-related court precedent in China, with the Shanghai High Court recognizing virtual currency as property, while a court in Shenzhen ruled that an employment contract that included payment of wages using stablecoin was invalid.

Wemade to Participate as Main Sponsor in G-STAR 2023South Korean blockchain game developer Wemade will participate as the main sponsor in this year’s G-STAR 2023, the global game exhibition to take place from November 16 to 19 in the southern port city of Busan. This marks the company’s second consecutive year as a main sponsor of the event, highlighting its commitment to promoting Korea’s rapidly growing global blockchain gaming market.“We hope that G-STAR will mark a turning point for Wemade as a blockchain pioneer in the domestic gaming market,” said Henry Chang, the company’s CEO.Leading the future of gamingAt the exhibition’s B2C section, Wemade will unveil its upcoming releases set to enter the global market via WEMIX PLAY, its blockchain gaming platform. The developer said it will showcase games including the MMORPG “Legend of YMIR,” which is currently in the works at Wemade’s extended reality subsidiary Wemade XR, and the baseball game tentatively titled “Round 1 Baseball” under development by Round 1 Studio, which Wemade will publish.Photo by Jack B on UnsplashWemade also plans to participate in discussions regarding potential collaboration opportunities with other domestic and international gaming and blockchain companies in the B2B section.CEO Chang is set to deliver the opening keynote speech at G-CON 2023, a conference to be held at the exhibition, on November 17 at 10 AM. He will present his insights into the future vision for the blockchain gaming market.Moreover, various outdoor events are being prepared to create a festive atmosphere for visitors to enjoy throughout different areas of Busan.Wemade plans to publish an online page for G-STAR 2023 to provide detailed information about their showcased works and general details about the event.Success storyNotably, at last year’s G-STAR, Wemade unveiled “Night Crow,” — an MMORPG made by Madngine, a game-developing company that Wemade invested in this year — which drew the attention of the attendees. The game has since topped popularity and sales rankings following its domestic release in April. A blockchain version of the game utilizing tokenomics is also set to launch in the global market at the end of this year.

Korea’s Legislative Research Body Suggests Expanding Blind Trust System to Include CryptoThe National Assembly Research Service (NARS) of South Korea last Friday issued a report emphasizing the need to broaden the scope of the country’s blind trust system for public officials. Currently, this system primarily covers traditional stocks, but the report highlights the necessity of extending its coverage to include cryptocurrencies.Photo by O-seop Sim on PexelsPublic Service Ethics ActUnder the existing Public Service Ethics Act, public officials holding a rank of 4 or higher within the finance department of the Ministry of Economy and Finance and the Financial Services Commission are mandated to either divest themselves of stocks linked to their official duties and responsibilities or transfer them into a blind trust if the total value of these stocks exceeds KRW 30 million (about $23,000).Blind trustA blind trust is a mechanism through which a public official transfers their stock holdings to a trustee. Subsequently, the trustee handles these entrusted stocks by exchanging them for other assets and overseeing their management, administration, and disposition. Importantly, the original owner of the stock, who is the public official, is barred from participating in these aspects of the trust and is also kept uninformed about the trust property’s status or details.Debate over expansionThe current policy confines the blind trust framework exclusively to stocks. Nevertheless, there is an ongoing debate advocating for the inclusion of other assets, such as virtual assets and real estate, within its scope. The rationale behind this argument is that these types of assets can also potentially give rise to conflicts of interest. However, counterarguments have been raised, expressing concerns that extending the blind trust to these assets could excessively limit the property rights of public officials. Consequently, as of now, this broader application has not been implemented.Comparison with the USThe Korean blind trust system was inspired by the United States’ Ethics in Government Act of 1978, which does not limit the types of assets that can be included in a blind trust. In the US, a blind trust can encompass not only stocks but also bonds, mutual funds, virtual assets, and real estate. In light of this, the report recommends the expansion of the blind trust system to encompass virtual assets and real estate. This step is proposed to prevent conflicts of interest among public officials pertaining to a wider array of asset types.Enhancing trustee discretionMeanwhile, NARS also argued for broadening the trustee’s discretion in trust management to render the system more reasonable. This stems from the concern that the existing uniform property sale approach could lead public servants to incur losses. NARS has proposed potential solutions, such as extending the time limit for property sales or mandating the sale of only a portion of the assets, as viable options to address this issue.