Mt. Gox moves $9B in Bitcoin for first time in years

Okto commits $5 million treasury fund to support Vauld usersOkto, the self-custody DeFi wallet app offered by Indian crypto exchange CoinDCX, has pledged a $5 million treasury fund to provide support to Vauld users.Vauld, a Singapore-based crypto lending platform, brought a halt to all trading, withdrawal and deposit activities in 2022 as it ran into liquidity issues. The business has been undergoing a process of restructuring under the protection of the courts in Singapore ever since.Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on UnsplashIncentivizing user asset transferIn response, Okto has stepped forward with a proactive approach to assist Vauld users in their transition. Okto is offering a 2% bonus to users who opt to transfer their assets from Vauld to Okto.Neeraj Khandelwal, the Founder of Okto, emphasized the company’s overarching mission while unveiling this $5 million initiative. He said: “While this $5 million fund represents one of our initiatives to support the crypto ecosystem, our overarching vision is to empower the Web3 community through cutting-edge technology-backed platforms and apps designed to tackle the broader challenges within the ecosystem.”Self-custody assurance featureIn addition to this incentive, Okto is also offering a self-custody assurance feature. This feature allows users to gain complete ownership of their private keys, ensuring that access to their funds remains exclusively in their hands. Moreover, users can benefit from round-the-clock access to monitor their assets. That delivers a reassuring sense of control and peace of mind regarding the users’ cryptocurrency holdings, against a backdrop of those users having had the experience of being unable to withdraw their funds when the Vauld platform paused trading.The concept of self-custody is central to what crypto was supposed to be about. It grants complete ownership of assets to the user. Khandelwal outlined that Okto was established on the basis that it could strike a balance between security, convenience and custody. In this way, it felt that it could resolve what could be termed as the crypto wallet trilemma. “Okto’s enduring mission has been to provide users with a secure and user-friendly app, and we will persistently strive to achieve this objective,” Khandelwal added.Mitigating riskLaunched globally earlier this year, Okto is a keyless, self-custody Web3 wallet that ensures secure access to DeFi services while prioritizing the safety of users’ funds. This all-in-one Web3 app approach eliminates the cumbersome need to safeguard seed phrases, ensuring users have full control of their funds.Moreover, it mitigates the risk of a single point of failure through its state-of-the-art, custom-built, consensus-driven Multi-Party Computation (MPC) technology. With MPC, private keys required for fund access and control are never fully exposed, guaranteeing the constant security of users’ assets.Vivek Gupta, Chief Technology Officer at Okto, elaborated on the technology behind Okto’s product offering, stating:“Okto uses state of the art Multi-Party-Computation algorithms to create users’ private keys. Our MPC algorithm never produces a complete private key. Our MPC algorithm uses three nodes which communicate with each other under proprietary encryption channels and create a unique sensitive material on each node.”In addition to its security measures, Okto wallet boasts compatibility with multiple Web3 chains such as Polygon, BSC and Avalanche, along with protocols like Stader and WooFi, among others.

Chinese Pull Crypto TV Video Following Binance CEO’s CommentsEarlier this week, a Chinese state-owned TV channel featured a segment shedding light on Bitcoin, emphasizing its surging popularity and widespread adoption. The piece, broadcast on China Central Television (CCTV) on Wednesday, was met with enthusiasm from crypto proponents. However, on Thursday the video was removed from the TV broadcaster’s platform.Photo by Road Trip with Raj on UnsplashA perceived policy shiftThe segment sought to provide viewers with a comprehensive overview of digital assets, their diverse applications, and potential benefits. The reaction of Changpeng Zhao (CZ), CEO of global crypto exchange Binance, stoked up further community interest. Taking to Twitter, CZ stated:“CCTV (China Central Television) just broadcasted crypto. It’s a big deal. The Chinese speaking communities are buzzing. Historically, coverages like these led to bull runs.”CZ’s tweet reverberated throughout the crypto space, leaving many curious about his perspective on the TV segment’s significance. A highly influential personality in the crypto sector, CZ later clarified his stance, asserting that the segment signaled a shift in China’s approach to cryptocurrencies. He proposed that the state media’s coverage reflected a more positive sentiment and hinted at a potentially evolving regulatory landscape.Video removalSoon after CZ’s comments, the Chinese state media broadcaster removed the video segment focusing on Bitcoin. This development raised eyebrows and fueled speculations regarding the motives behind its removal. Within the crypto community, many speculated that CZ’s mention of the segment might have prompted Chinese authorities to take it down. However, the precise reasons behind the removal remain uncertain.One of the events that triggered the video segment appears to have been news earlier this week that Hong Kong is moving to enable crypto trading at a retail level. There’s been significant reporting on crypto developments related to Hong Kong over the course of the past six months. There has been a notable policy shift, and it appears that Chinese authorities are happy to see Hong Kong compete openly to become a regional hub for the crypto sector.There’s no doubt that people in the crypto sector would like to see signs of a softening of the approach to crypto in mainland China too. Many might have perceived this TV airtime as an indicator of that. However, it’s more likely that the Chinese are pursuing a dual-pronged strategy. They’re very cleverly participating in the developing innovation in digital assets via the Chinese autonomous territory of Hong Kong, while at the same time, maintaining a hardline stance against crypto on the mainland.The crypto sector continues to progress, and the regulatory landscape is ever-changing within various jurisdictions. On that basis, and given the importance of the Chinese market, it’s worthwhile to continue to closely monitor China’s actions. Any changes in the country’s approach to cryptocurrencies can have far-reaching consequences for the industry.Whether this recent event signals a more optimistic outlook or merely underscores the persisting regulatory uncertainty, it serves as a reminder that the crypto landscape is in constant evolution, holding surprises around every corner.

The Need to Distinguish Between Security and Non-Security Virtual AssetsWith the recent enactment of the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill in South Korea, there is a need to lay out criteria for determining whether virtual assets qualify as securities, says Kim Ja-bong, a senior research fellow at the Korea Institute of Finance, in his report titled “The Implications of Determining Which Virtual Assets Constitute Securities and Investor Protection” released on Saturday.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashThe implications of the Virtual Asset User Protection ActThe Virtual Asset User Protection Act — which will take effect in July of next year — aims to protect customer assets, establish regulations against unfair trading practices, and enforce penalties. Notably, it will target virtual assets that are not securities, deeming it necessary for regulators to determine if virtual assets qualify as securities or not in order to enforce the bill. Assets with characteristics of securities will fall under the jurisdiction of the Capital Markets Act.Therefore, if the Virtual Asset User Protection Act does not provide sufficient investor protection, issuers may be incentivized to issue non-security assets rather than security assets to avoid the regulations of the Capital Markets Act. This further necessitates the act of distinguishing between virtual assets that are securities versus those that are not.Determining if a virtual asset is a security or notThere are two approaches to do this, according to Kim: the passive approach, which avoids considering a virtual asset as a security whenever possible, and the active approach, which treats a virtual asset as a security whenever applicable.He argues that it is better to focus on whether an investment contract qualifies as a security if it is considered an investment contract, rather than simply selecting a specific approach.Furthermore, the nature of virtual assets renders them unbound by national borders, so it is necessary to establish assessment criteria that correspond with international standards, such as those used in the US and Europe.This is especially important because if the criteria differ from international standards, there is a risk of domestic investors suffering damages due to an issuer’s pursuit of regulatory arbitrage between countries.Equitable recognition and potential for security tokensAccording to Kim, the importance of determining whether virtual assets are securities lies in ensuring that security tokens receive the same recognition and trading treatment as traditional securities such as stocks. With such a measure, security token offerings can serve as an efficient and reliable method for raising funds. Although there may be concerns that such a regulation may hinder the development of virtual assets, it may well be an opportunity for security tokens to be qualified and trusted as high-quality financial instruments just like existing securities, Kim claims.Even for virtual assets that are not considered securities, there are many types of assets that are financial in nature, such as e-money tokens — therefore, it is necessary to actively protect investors in non-security virtual assets through financial regulations such as reinforcing disclosure obligations, which is being done in the EU through the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).Empowering regulators for enhanced investor protection and market integrityKim underscored that investor protection and healthy growth of the virtual asset market are made possible mainly through expanding regulators’ authority to protect economic interests and prevent damages. The author also suggested institutional reforms that grant regulators substantial authority, which would enhance their ability to protect investors effectively and provide compensation for damages.He added that regulators should also have the authority to enforce liability for damages or impose civil penalties for unfair trading practices conducted using classified information.