Global crypto fraud suspect arrested in Istanbul

North Korean Hackers Take Off With $100M Atomic Wallet HoneypotHaving reported last week on a $35 million hack of Atomic Wallet users’ funds, an update on the matter reveals that the situation is much worse than originally thought, with losses now exceeding $100 million.Photo by Kenny Eliason on Unsplash5,500 wallets compromisedThe attack has sent shockwaves throughout the crypto community, raising concerns about the security of decentralized wallets. Atomic Wallet, an Estonia-based project known for its non-custodial approach where users take full responsibility for storing their assets securely, has been hit hard by this unforeseen breach.Elliptic, a crypto compliance analysis company, published an update on the situation on Tuesday. According to that blog article, it estimates that approximately 5,500 crypto wallets have been compromised, meaning that losses have risen to more than $100 million, highlighting the severity of the attack.Despite the significant impact on users, Atomic Wallet has yet to provide an explanation regarding the root cause of these substantial losses. Users have taken to social media in frustration, demanding clarification from the company. Surprisingly, the company’s last direct update on Twitter dates back to June 7, leaving users feeling even more anxious.User frustrationOne user, Ezra Carlson, expressed frustration, questioning why Atomic Wallet didn’t warn users when they were aware of the ongoing hack. Carlson tweeted: “@AtomicWallet why won’t AM give me a straight answer about why they didn’t warn me, knowing full well that they were being hacked, that it was not safe to use AM last week before I made a transfer to my wallet that was then hacked.”Another user, “Real Deal Crypto,” criticized Atomic Wallet’s lack of updates, stating: “Your last update was five days ago — SERIOUSLY?!?!”Although Atomic Wallet acknowledged reports of compromised wallets on June 3, downplaying the impact by claiming that less than 1% of users were affected, the staggering sum of losses indicates a significant breach. Its last communication on the matter came on June 11 when, in responding to a user, the firm said that it continued to investigate and to await Twitter updates on the matter.Hack tied to North Korea’s Lazarus GroupElliptic has connected this heist to the notorious Lazarus Group, a cyber-criminal organization with ties to the North Korean regime, responsible for stealing over $2 billion in crypto assets through various thefts. This attribution marks the first time a significant crypto heist has been openly linked to the Lazarus Group since their $100 million exploit of Horizon Bridge in June 2022.In response to the heist, Elliptic has been collaborating with international investigators and exchanges, mobilizing resources to recover the stolen assets. Their efforts have reportedly led to the freezing of over $1 million worth of funds. However, the thief has adapted its behavior in response to the freezing of assets, turning to the Russia-based Garantex exchange to launder the stolen assets, as noted by Elliptic.This recent attack adds to a series of notable breaches in the crypto industry. Jimbos Protocol experienced an exploit resulting in a loss of $7.5 million, and Tornado Cash faced a malicious proposal that seized control of its governance in May. According to a report by Chainalysis, crypto hackers made off with an estimated $3.8 billion in 2022, with North Korea being responsible for a significant portion of the attacks.

OSL Parent Company Denies Sale PlansBC Technology Group, a Hong Kong-based investment holding company, has firmly denied recent reports suggesting it is exploring the sale of its licensed digital asset business, OSL, for up to HK$1 billion (US$137.3 million).Photo by Nextvoyage on PexelsCompany stock plummetsThis comes in response to a report that emerged via Bloomberg on Monday. The news of the possible sale had a significant impact on the company’s stock, which plummeted by over 22% to HK$3.35 the following day.BC Technology Group, which has been listed on the Hong Kong stock exchange since 2012, is the parent company of OSL. The reports hinted at the possibility of selling off parts of the business, citing undisclosed sources.In response to these rumors, BC Technology Group issued a formal statement to clarify the situation, deeming the article “factually inaccurate and highly misleading.” It vehemently refuted any intention to sell OSL, a key player in the cryptocurrency exchange sector.First licensed exchangeOSL was the first cryptocurrency exchange to be licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) in Hong Kong in 2020, initially operated under a voluntary scheme and was limited to serving professional investors. However, the recent licensing requirement broadened its scope, allowing it to cater to retail investors as well, including popular cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum.Both OSL and HashKey had their licenses upgraded this year, enabling them to serve retail investors as per the new policy. However, the reception to this new regulatory framework has been somewhat lukewarm, with only five local exchanges applying for the new virtual asset trading platform (VATP) license. The SFC had to publish a list of applicants following a financial scandal involving the JPEX crypto exchange, which led to over 2,500 complaints and losses totaling approximately HK$1.5 billion.The backdrop of this unfolding situation is Hong Kong’s efforts to establish itself as a significant virtual asset hub. The city announced its ambition to transform into a hub for digital assets a year ago, drawing considerable attention from cryptocurrency exchanges. These efforts included implementing new regulations in June that mandated licensing for cryptocurrency exchanges.Several companies with connections to Hong Kong and mainland China have expressed their intent to obtain a license, potentially taking advantage of Hong Kong’s favorable stance toward virtual assets when compared to mainland China’s strict regulations.High compliance costsNonetheless, high compliance costs in Hong Kong continue to pose a barrier, potentially preventing the city from becoming the primary base of operations for crypto businesses. Industry insiders estimate that the cost of compliance from start to finish can be as high as HK$60 million for a company. Firms have reported that obtaining a trading license in Hong Kong can involve an outlay of between HK$20 million and HK$200 million.As per BC Technology Group’s mid-year report, the company reported a net loss of HK$94.7 million in the first half of 2023. This marked a notable improvement compared to the HK$312.1 million in losses during the same period the previous year. OSL remains a significant source of income for the company.

Hong Kong’s OSL crypto exchange receives $91M boostBC Technology Group, the owner of the licensed OSL exchange, has secured a HK$710 million ($90.9 million) investment from BGX.Photo by Precondo CA on UnsplashBringing clarity to BitgetX market withdrawalBGX is reportedly associated with Seychelles-incorporated crypto exchange Bitget. The investment, which was announced via statements published by both BC Technology Group and BGX on their respective websites on Tuesday, brings further clarity to the rationale behind Bitget’s recent decision to withdraw its BitgetX platform from the Hong Kong market.BitgetX was believed to be working towards crypto licensing in Hong Kong. Its decision on Monday to stop pursuing a virtual asset trading platform (VATP) license and withdraw from the market entirely had been perceived as a weakness of the regulatory regimen in Hong Kong. However, it now appears that it was just clearing the way for involvement in crypto trading brought about through its investment in OSL, an entity that has already acquired a trading license within the Chinese autonomous territory.BGX has entered into an agreement to acquire a 29.97% stake in BC Technology, OSL's parent company, pending shareholder approval. According to an announcement, BGX CEO Patrick Pan Zhiyong is set to become one of two new executive directors as part of this investment. Pan, concurrently serving as the CEO of BitgetX, will also oversee the transition as Bitget steps back from the market, scheduling its platform closure for Dec. 13.Sale rumors deniedReports emerged in October that BC Technology Group was considering the sale of OSL based on a $128 million valuation. Contrary to those reports, BC Technology vehemently denied any intentions to sell OSL, emphasizing its commitment to maintaining the exchange’s operations. The company dismissed such speculation as “factually inaccurate and highly misleading,” underscoring its dedication to navigating the evolving crypto landscape.Bitget, responding to inquiries from the South China Morning Post (SCMP), asserted its independence from BGX, stating that it is “an independent entity” with no legal or commercial connections to the crypto firm.BGX is incorporated in the Cayman Islands and wholly owned by Liu Shuai, the founder of Shenzhen Qianhai Junchuang Fund Management and Singaporean crypto fund Foresight Ventures. Liu’s investment portfolio includes Bitget, as well as U.S. crypto media group The Block, which was acquired by Foresight Ventures, according to reports earlier this week.The incorporation of BGX into BC Technology’s ecosystem introduces a dynamic player with diverse investments across the crypto space. Against the backdrop of Hong Kong’s changing regulatory landscape, with the introduction of a mandatory licensing scheme last year, BC Technology’s OSL was the first exchange to obtain a voluntary license from the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) in 2020. The asset management division of the company received a trading license in May of this year. In August, OSL, along with HashKey, received approval from the SFC to upgrade their licenses, allowing them to serve retail investors.The evolving regulatory environment reflects Hong Kong’s ambition to position itself as a crypto hub, attracting both institutional and retail participants. While that endeavor is not without its challenges, the city hasn’t been adversely affected by BitgetX's withdrawal from the market, given this related investment in OSL.