Vietnam sets out blockchain strategy with goal of regional leadership by 2030

South Korea: Crypto Exchange Execs Indicted on Manipulation ChargesA number of executives at Coinone, one of South Korea’s leading cryptocurrency exchanges, have been indicted on charges related to market manipulation.That’s according to a report published by South Korean news outlet, The JoongAng, on Monday. The complaint details no less than forty-six coins that are alleged to have been the subject of manipulation in some form. That represents one in four of the total number of coins that the exchange has enabled for trading on the platform.Photo by Burak The Weekender on PexelsFour executives indictedThe indictment lists four Coinone executives, Mr. Jeon, Mr. Kim, Mr. Ko, and Mr. Hwang. The four have been charged with employing illegal mechanisms to manipulate coin listings, resulting in the four executives profiting to the tune of 2.98 billion Korean Won, which amounts to $2.26 million dollars according to current fx exchange rates.The complaint specifies that these offenses were committed between December 2019 and November 2022. South Korean prosecutors further allege that prior to various projects obtaining a token listing on Coinone, company executives made them sign third-party market-making contracts. That in and of itself is not unusual.One of the key aspects of a new coin listing (and an ongoing listing for that matter), is the need to have sufficient liquidity in place to ensure that the coin can be traded without being susceptible to market manipulation. Low liquidity conditions open the door to bad actors moving the market relative to a particular token.Cross tradingThe indictment is far more specific in calling out illegal cross trading activity. It’s likely that these key Coinone employees would have been expecting such an indictment to land at their doors. Last week, it emerged that LUNA tokens associated with Terraform Labs’ failed Terra USD (TUSD) algorithmic stablecoin project, had been illegally cross traded on three South Korean crypto exchanges: Bithumb, GoPax and Coinone.Cross trading is the practice of trading an asset on an exchange without recording the transaction transparently on the exchange. Strictly speaking, the activity can be legitimate although most exchanges prohibit the practice as it can be used to affect market manipulation.A cross trade could be permitted in a scenario where the price is deemed to be competitive at the time that the trade takes place. While this can more easily be determined in conventional markets as the practice is covered by specific regulation, that’s not the case in most jurisdictions right now where digital asset trading is concerned. By extension, there’s a complete lack of transparency and a lack of reporting.As other market participants don’t have visibility of this type of trading activity, they are unaware as to whether a better price is available on the market or not. In an unregulated state, the practice undermines trust.In the case of Coinone, the executives enabled the practice in order to provide an illusion with regard to trading activity. That meant that trading volumes claimed were inaccurate, misleading ordinary traders and exchange users. Along with trading volume in these coins being artificially boosted, so too were token prices.In the indictment, prosecutors explicitly alleged that cross trading was being employed in an illegal manner:“This price manipulation causes misunderstandings about the trading volume and market price among general members of the exchange, and induces [service users] to participate in the coin transaction and buy the coin.”

OKX is set to compensate users after its native exchange token, OKB, experienced a rapid 48% flash crash on Tuesday. OKB price fluctuationThe crash occurred within a brief three-minute window, triggered by a series of liquidations resulting from an abnormal price fluctuation. During the event, OKB's diluted market capitalization plummeted by $6.5 billion. At around 9 a.m. GMT on Tuesday, the price of OKB dropped from $46.80 to $25.10, representing a 48% decrease within 15 minutes. However, the token has since recovered, currently trading at $47.63 at the time of writing. The crash led to the triggering of liquidations for large leverage positions, causing a cascading effect on pledged loans, leverage transactions and cross-currency transactions.Photo by Nicholas Cappello on UnsplashCompensation planOKX responded promptly, pledging to fully compensate users for any additional losses incurred due to abnormal liquidation. The exchange aims to launch a specific compensation plan within the next three days, taking into account users who engaged in on-chain trades. In a statement on Tuesday, the platform suggested that it is committed to enhancing "margin position tier rules, risk management controls and liquidation mechanism" to prevent similar issues in the future. The flash crash coincided with a day of notable price swings across cryptocurrency markets, partly driven by the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust's (GBTC) sale of bitcoin to meet investor redemption demands on its exchange-traded fund (ETF). Additionally, the bankrupt crypto exchange FTX has been selling nearly $1 billion worth of GBTC ETF shares recently, further contributing to market volatility. Focusing on complianceOKX has been actively focusing on regulatory compliance in recent times. On Dec. 29, the exchange announced the delisting of several privacy coins, including Monero (XMR), Zcash (ZEC), Dash (DASH) and Horizen (ZEN). Subsequently, on Jan. 2, the platform introduced additional requirements for United Kingdom users to comply with the new Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) regulations, including the mandatory completion of risk assessment questionnaires before engaging in trading activities. Flash crashes are a common occurrence in cryptocurrency markets, often attributed to thin liquidity distributed across multiple venues. The 2% market depth for OKB indicates that a sell order exceeding $224,000 could potentially trigger another price cascade. Notwithstanding that, oftentimes it can be difficult to pinpoint the precise reason for a flash crash. In 2021 global crypto exchange Kraken experienced a flash crash that saw token prices drop by in excess of 50% over the course of one hour before recovery was achieved. While some suggested it was caused by a technical glitch, Kraken founder Jesse Powell dismissed that notion, pointing instead to the possibility of a large-scale sell-off by a service user. Despite this recent challenge, OKB remains a significant player in the cryptocurrency space, boasting a market cap of $2.8 billion, making it the fourth-largest exchange token in circulation, according to CoinGecko. 

Singapore Elects Crypto Skeptic as PresidentGarnering 70.4% of all votes cast on Saturday, Singaporeans chose to elect Tharman Shanmugaratnam as their next president, a move that may have implications for Singapore’s outlook when it comes to digital assets.While many had hoped that he would be the nation’s first non-Chinese prime minister, the crypto industry has greeted his rise to this largely ceremonial role with mixed feelings. Shanmugaratnam’s previous stances on cryptocurrency and digital assets have been predominantly critical.Photo by Justin Lim on UnsplashFormer MAS ChairmanIn the past, the president-elect has referred to cryptocurrency as “slightly crazy” and “purely speculative.” His ascent to the presidency comes after a distinguished career that includes serving as the former finance minister, deputy prime minister, and chairman of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), the country’s central bank, from 2011 to 2023.Crypto platform collapsesIt was during his tenure at MAS that two prominent crypto companies, Three Arrows Capital (3AC) and Terraform Labs, faced catastrophic collapses.The demise of Terraform Labs, along with its TerraUSD (UST) stablecoin, triggered a severe “crypto winter” in May 2022, from which the industry is still struggling to recover. This downfall wiped out a staggering $500 billion in value over just two weeks, devastating the portfolios of numerous retail investors.The ripple effect of TerraUSD’s fall also engulfed 3AC, a significant cryptocurrency hedge fund headquartered in Singapore. The contagion spread across the cryptocurrency market, leading to the downfall of other major entities like crypto lending platforms Celsius Network and Voyager Digital, alongside Singapore-based Hodlnaut.Given that these catastrophic events unfolded during Shanmugaratnam’s tenure at MAS, it’s plausible that he bore the brunt of the consequences. That might explain why in speaking on the subject in 2021, he appeared to be more accommodative, suggesting that there may be a useful role that crypto could play and highlighting that Singapore had allowed crypto businesses to develop within the city-state.In June of last year, MAS reprimanded 3AC for providing misleading information and exceeding the allowed assets under management (AUM) threshold, thereby breaching its status as a registered fund management company.In January, Shanmugaratnam said that regulating the crypto sector would give credibility to speculation and on that basis, it would be best to leave it unregulated. He went on to suggest that crypto should be subject to existing regulation as laid down for traditional finance.Early stage concernsBack in 2018, when he was Singapore’s finance minister, Shanmugaratnam questioned the wisdom of broad regulation potentially legitimizing a speculative and “slightly crazy” market. During the 2018 World Economic Forum, he emphasized the importance of anti-money laundering measures and advocated for educating consumers about the risks inherent in the unregulated crypto sector.Although he acknowledged blockchain’s potential to enhance global payment systems, Shanmugaratnam favored integrating existing traditional payment mechanisms as an alternative to blockchain innovations.Singapore’s new president brings with him a history of skepticism towards cryptocurrency and digital assets. However, with a largely ceremonial role relative to day-to-day governance, he’s not in a position to take direct action that could hold the sector back although he will have the power to initiate corruption investigations upon the advice of the Singaporean cabinet.