Vietnam sets out blockchain strategy with goal of regional leadership by 2030

The Chinese authorities are reportedly mulling over the possibility of approving the use of stablecoins pegged to and backed by the Chinese yuan. That’s according to a report published by Reuters on Aug. 20, with the publication citing “sources familiar with the matter.”Photo by Eric Prouzet on UnsplashInternationalization of the Chinese yuanChina’s State Council, its cabinet and primary administrative authority, has scheduled a review of yuan-backed stablecoins for later this month, a development that could potentially lead to their approval. The Chinese have been leaders in recent years in the development of a central bank digital currency (CBDC), the digital yuan. The digital yuan was further along in its development than any other CBDC globally, with the Chinese making concerted efforts to bring the digital currency into use at home, with an eye toward global use for international trade. While the U.S. dollar has enjoyed an extended period as the world’s reserve currency, the weaponization of the currency by the U.S., particularly through the application of sanctions, has led BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) nations to consider alternatives. One of Reuters sources asserted that the Chinese authorities are now homing in on the potential to internationalize the yuan via stablecoins. Setting the tone for stablecoin useMembers of the Chinese government leadership are expected to establish the tone for stablecoin use following their upcoming review, outlining the parameters within which the Chinese authorities will permit their use. Reacting to this development, Robin Brooks, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, asserted that China’s newfound interest in yuan-backed stablecoins is a sign of “how insecure China is in the global financial system.” Brooks added that the way to internationalize a sovereign currency is to promote the rule of law and property rights rather than pursue the use of stablecoins, which he described as “ridiculous.”  Growing global interestWhile the Brookings Institution is not directly backed by the U.S. government, the organization is nevertheless a Washington, D.C.-based think tank. Despite Brooks’ objection to the use of stablecoins, China is not the only nation to show interest in using them.Taking to X, Raphaël Bloch, co-founder of crypto media platform The Big Whale, pointed out that increasingly, nations around the world are embracing stablecoins due to the efficiency of global currency distribution that is possible via public blockchain networks.  Additionally, stablecoins offer an effective means of government debt financing, given that stablecoin reserves are backed by government bonds. In the U.S., President Donald Trump has ruled out the pursuit of a CBDC. Last month, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Anti-CBDC Act to prohibit the development of a CBDC by the Federal Reserve. Instead, Trump has said that a stablecoin regulatory bill working its way through the legislative system will ensure global dominance for the U.S. in the crypto sector. In June a Deutsche Bank strategist claimed that the legislation would strengthen the U.S. dollar’s global dominance, with several American politicians having since expressed the same view.Earlier this week, Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) signaled that it is likely to approve the issuance of a yen-pegged stablecoin. Meanwhile, the authorities in South Korea are working on a bill related to won-pegged stablecoins.

Kazinform, the state-owned official news agency of Kazakhstan, has reported that the central Asian republic is working towards the establishment of a national crypto reserve. The news agency revealed that in answering an inquiry from a member of the Kazakhstan parliament, Timur Suleimenov, Governor of the National Bank of Kazakhstan, said that the central bank is currently studying information related to the formation and management of a national crypto reserve. Photo by engin akyurt on UnsplashFollowing best international practicePlans are being devised for a crypto reserve on the basis that best international practice as applied to sovereign wealth fund management is adopted. In this respect, guidelines related to transparency of accounting and secure crypto custody will be followed. The reserve will be established through an affiliate entity of Kazakhstan's central bank, specializing in alternative investments. In responding to the parliamentary inquiry, Suleimenov also revealed the likely source of funding for the fund. He stated: “International practice shows that the sources for such a reserve may include confiscated crypto-assets, as well as  cryptocurrencies mined by a crypto miner partially owned by the government.” Suleimenov outlined that while crypto assets have proven to be volatile and riskier than other asset classes, having the reserve controlled and managed by a central bank affiliate would result in the required levels of risk management and overall oversight being applied. According to Kursiv, a news organization focused on the Central Asian region, the authorities in Kazakhstan plan to amend relevant legislation so as to enable the effective management of the crypto reserve. Suleimenov stated that the central bank is open to discussing potential legislative amendments with members of Kazakhstan's parliament. The National Bank of Kazakhstan's governor also warned that misinformation by pseudo-business coaches related to cryptocurrencies needs to be curbed. He feels that in order to protect investors, and particularly young people, legal measures will be necessary in an effort to bring about greater transparency within the country’s crypto market. The authorities in Kazakhstan currently have a crypto regulatory framework in place that requires crypto trading platforms that extend their services to local users to have acquired a trading license from the Astana International Financial Centre (AIFC).  In May, it emerged that the Central Asian republic is planning to establish a pilot project for cryptocurrencies called “CryptoCity.” At the time, Kazakhstan’s president, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, delivered a speech at the Astana International Forum outlining that the CryptoCity project would facilitate the use of crypto for the payment of goods and services within a specific geographical zone. Crypto hub potentialEarlier that month, the country’s First Vice-Minister of Digital Development, Innovation and Aerospace Industry, Kanysh Tuleushin, said that Kazakhstan had the potential to emerge as a leading cryptocurrency hub within the Central Asian region. Following the implementation of a ban on crypto mining in China in 2021, Kazakhstan experienced an influx of miners, attracted by cheap electricity. However, the arrival of miners was unplanned for, putting extreme pressure on the local electricity grid, resulting ultimately in brownouts and protests. The country once accounted for 27% of global Bitcoin mining. However, regulations introduced in 2023 led to the activity being scaled back considerably.

Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), an independent state agency responsible for the supervision of capital markets including the digital assets sector within the Southeast Asian nation, has moved to block five cryptocurrency exchange platforms. In a statement published by the agency to its website on Thursday, May 29, the SEC outlined that it deems the five exchanges, namely OKX, Bybit, CoinEx, XT.com and 1000X.Live, to be unauthorized crypto trading platforms.Photo by REY MELVIN CARAAN on UnsplashCountering money laundering activityIt is acting against these platforms “to protect investors” and to prevent their use for money laundering purposes. In offering services to Thai users on an unauthorized basis, the exchanges were found to be in breach of Thailand’s Digital Asset Business Act B.E. 2561 (2018). The agency has asked the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society (MDES) to take measures to block local access to these online platforms. That block will be put in place on June 28. On that basis, the SEC has advised Thai users of such platforms to proceed to remove their assets from them before that June 28 deadline.  An updated version of the Royal Decree on Measures to Prevent and Suppress Technology-related Crime, (No. 2) B.E. 2568 (2025), was introduced by the Thai government in April. It facilitated the establishment of the Committee for the Prevention and Suppression of Technological Crime.  Following practices overseasThe committee met with the MDES in April, with the parties setting out the process through which unauthorized digital asset platforms would be restricted and blocked. On that occasion, similar practices carried out in other jurisdictions within the Asian region were referred to.  In December 2023 India’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) moved to block nine offshore crypto exchanges, having issued them with compliance show-cause notices.  In April 2024 the Philippines SEC requested that Google and Apple remove apps associated with global exchange Binance from the local versions of their application stores. Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) similarly ordered both companies to remove apps belonging to unregistered crypto exchanges in February of this year. Back in March, the Thai SEC filed a lawsuit against Aux Cayes FinTech Co. Ltd., an OKX affiliate company. The complaint alleged that OKX had been running an unlicensed exchange in Thailand, and was filed with the Economic Crime Suppression Division of the Thai police force. The SEC outlined on March 21 that a similar criminal complaint had been filed against XT.com. It’s understood that Bybit, CoinEx and 1000X.Live have also been recipients of complaints on the same basis. Earlier this year, the Economic Crime Suppression Division considered taking action against Polymarket, a crypto-based prediction market, on the basis that the platform violated Thailand’s gambling laws, and in doing so, posing a risk to economic and social stability in Thailand. In April 2024, the SEC issued a warning to crypto exchange platforms against the use of misleading advertising, drawing their attention to the fact that advertising of that nature would potentially place those platforms in breach of regulatory guidelines.