Japan’s Remixpoint adding $3.2M in Bitcoin to its treasury

Foblgate adds Ripple market for increased investor opportunitiesSouth Korean cryptocurrency exchange Foblgate has added a Ripple (XRP) market, where cryptocurrencies can be traded for XRP, according to an article published by South Korean news outlet Blockchain Today. This is the third crypto-to-crypto market on Foblgate along with Bitcoin and Ethereum, providing users with expanded investment opportunities and convenient trading options.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashThe Ripple market opened at 10 a.m. today (local time) with a transaction fee of 0.01% and a minimum order amount of 6.5 XRP. Currently, it supports trading for EOS and BNB. Foblgate plans to add more trading pairs in the future.Ripple’s rise in South KoreaThe exchange revealed that it decided to add a Ripple market due to the cryptocurrency’s fast transaction speed and low trading fees, along with its popularity in the South Korean market. The company also emphasized the widespread expansion of Ripple’s ecosystem based on its blockchain network, XRP Ledger, and active participation from the country’s Ripple community.Foblgate’s vision“We have always been sensitive to the demands of investors and market changes,” said Ahn Hyun-jun, the CEO of Foblgate. “The launch of our XRP market aims not only to provide new investment options but also to play a role in promoting the growth and innovation of the crypto industry.”

$100M Pyramid Scheme Linked to Prominent Chinese Filecoin ProjectA courtroom showdown currently playing out in the People’s Court of Pingnan County in northeastern Fujian province in China is laying bare an intricate pyramid scheme entwined with one of China’s flagship ventures in the Filecoin ecosystem.The lawsuit thrusts five defendants into the spotlight, alleging their orchestration of an expansive pyramid scheme under the guise of their enterprise, Shenzhen Space-Time Cloud Company. The operation is purported to have siphoned off millions of dollars, leaving in its wake a trail of financial wreckage.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashAggressive project marketingAccording to a local media report published on Monday, the saga began in June 2018 when Lai Mouhang and Lai Moujun established the Space-Time Cloud Company. Subsequently, co-defendants Hu and Liang joined the ranks in the following months. However, it wasn’t until September 2019 that Lai Mouhang escalated the company’s operations, leveraging the ipfs.cn domain to aggressively market and peddle investments linked to distributed storage technology and Filecoin’s intricate economic model.Central to Filecoin’s model is its block reward system, where miners validating new blocks receive Filecoin tokens (FIL) as a reward. In a stunning revelation, the prosecution claims that Lai Mouhang and his accomplices crafted a scheme mirroring this economic structure.Their brainchild, the filpool.io platform, served as a conduit for joint mining, masquerading as a storage server vending operation for FIL mining. This platform, intrinsically linked to Space-Time Cloud Company, allegedly formed the epicenter of the defendants’ fraudulent maneuvers.Almost 60,000 usersThe gravity of the scheme becomes evident when considering the staggering numbers: a reported 57,122 members registered on the filpool.io platform and an additional 143 partners on the bpool.io platform, a sibling project of Space-Time Cloud Company. These platforms collectively amassed a jaw-dropping RMB 607 million ($83 million), alongside RMB 62 million in diverse cryptocurrencies.The modus operandi of the defendants was rooted in enticing participants with rosy prospects of exponential profits. By acquiring a minimum of 8 terabytes of cloud computing power, individuals could attain bronze membership status or higher, unlocking the ability to further recruit participants. Unsurprisingly, the magnitude of returns correlated directly with the size of investments and the recruitment spree — classic hallmarks of a pyramid scheme.The prosecution contends that the defendants exploited these platforms as bait for participants, perpetuating the myth of high returns. This alleged deception led to substantial financial losses for many unsuspecting victims. Furthermore, these actions purportedly sowed discord and upheaval in both economic and social spheres, potentially transgressing criminal law boundaries.As the investigation into this convoluted case unfurls, its implications resonate far beyond China’s territorial confines. The intertwining of cryptocurrency, blockchain, and pyramid schemes punctuates the ever-evolving narrative of financial crime. The case highlights the importance of vigilance and regulatory scrutiny in an innovative industry that has more than its fair share of bad actors.

Singaporean Researchers Devise More Effective DAO VotingResearchers at the Singapore University of Social Sciences have come up with a more efficient governance model for decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs).Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashDAO governance reviewThe scientists presented their work via a paper titled “Voting Schemes in DAO Governance,” which was published earlier this week. The paper is due to appear in the Annual Review of Fintech in due course.The research paper initially sets out with a review of the different forms of voting currently used to affect DAO governance in the various early stage projects that are already up and running. Having taken a deep dive into existing approaches, the research team of Qinxu Ding, Weibiao Xu, Zhiguo Wang and David Kuo Chuen Lee decided that they could go one better themselves.Their review encompassed eight current approaches including the following: token-based quorum voting, knowledge-extractable voting, conviction voting and reputation-based voting. Each voting scheme was then evaluated based on the following factors:Efficiency: An assessment of the speed at which proposals are selected and approved.Fairness: Each voter should have equal rights to vote.Scalability: The degree to which storage, computation and communication needs can be adjusted relative to the number of voters.Robustness: An assessment of the relative resistance of the voting scheme to attacks and collusion.Incentive Schemes: The extent to which DAO members are motivated to vote.Following on from that analysis, the scientists put forward a hypothetical voting mechanism with design considerations relative to fully decentralized and permissionless DAO governance. When it came to ratings, the holographic consensus approach scored highest, with a “high” rating in the categories of efficiency, fairness and robustness, dropping down to medium when it came to scalability. None of the other approaches came close.In trying to go one better, the team took the holographic consensus approach and set out to create their own hypothetical voting mechanism based on this model. As evidenced from the paper, they tried to effect improvements to this approach:“We know that the downside of the conviction voting mechanism is that it takes time to approve an urgent proposal. To address this concern, we introduce a blind betting mechanism: each member could choose whether to bet on any proposals with a certain number of their tokens.”The researcher’s hypothetical model allows stakeholders to gamble their tokens on the likelihood of a proposal passing or failing. The logic with this approach, they claim, is that it would speed up the governance process, while making it more robust at the same time.In concluding remarks, the researchers acknowledged that all approaches were not without their pros and cons. They point out that the further development of DAOs shouldn’t be confined to a static organizational future. While they believe that their own hypothetical scheme is in theory superior, they acknowledge that it too has flaws. With that, the realities of implementing it in the real world may be a challenge.