Top

Indian government claims Binance isn’t tax compliant

Policy & Regulation·December 05, 2024, 3:52 AM

According to India’s Finance Ministry, Binance and a number of other virtual asset service providers (VASPs) are not tax-compliant in India.

 

Cases of tax evasion detected

News of this matter emerged via written answers, published on Dec. 2, provided in response to parliamentary questions which had been put to India’s Finance Minister, Pankaj Chaudhary. The minister confirmed that a “few cases of evasion of Goods and Services Tax (GST) by cryptocurrency exchanges and investors” had been detected.

 

The document goes on to list 17 crypto entities who are currently being investigated on that basis, with Binance being the most well-known among them. Notable Indian exchanges listed include WazirX, CoinDCX and CoinSwitch.

 

Chaudhary included details of cases booked against these exchanges. In Binance’s case, it was required to pay 722 crore Indian rupees, which amounts to around $85.2 million. While Binance doesn’t appear to have incurred penalties, in the case of WazirX, the exchange had an assessed tax shortfall of 40.51 crore Indian rupees ($4.78 million), but after fees and interest, it was provided with a demand for 49.19 crore Indian rupees ($5.8 million).

 

CoinDCX and CoinSwitch were also assessed with a demand for 20.86 crore Indian rupees ($2.46 million) and 19.38 crore Indian rupees ($2.28 million), inclusive of penalties and interest. In the case of WazirX, CoinDCX and CoinSwitch, the exchanges have had to pay an additional 21%, 24% and 37% respectively in fees and interest over and above their original tax liabilities.

https://asset.coinness.com/en/news/851ceb06bf8b5966bc7f7601d5278730.webp
Photo by Naveed Ahmed on Unsplash

Previous tax and regulatory issues

To date, the Finance Ministry has recovered 122.3 crore rupees ($14.4 million) as part of these investigations. Binance has as yet not paid the funds demanded by the authorities. It emerged in August that India’s Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (DGGI) had imposed an $86 million tax demand on the company, with Binance contesting the assessment.

 

The global crypto exchange platform had previously paid a $2.5 million fine for having engaged with Indian customers despite not having been approved by the authorities to trade within the country. After a number of months during which it didn’t trade within the Indian market, in August Binance regularized its standing and gained approval to trade.

 

In a request for comment on the matter from Cointelegraph, a Binance representative stated:

 

“We continue to work closely with regulatory authorities and attend necessary hearings to address any concerns and questions. Binance remains responsive and cooperative and is committed to addressing all necessary tax inquiries.”

 

The company recently hired UK-based accounting and business advisory firm Grant Thornton to assist with accounting, tax and audit preparedness.

 

In the case of WazirX, a spokesperson said that “GST law on cryptocurrencies was not clear in India,” and that on this basis, the company found itself being assessed for non-payment of the applicable taxes.

More to Read
View All
Web3 & Enterprise·

Jul 21, 2023

Shinhan Bank and SCB TechX Succeed in Stablecoin Remittance Pilot

Shinhan Bank and SCB TechX Succeed in Stablecoin Remittance PilotSouth Korean banking institution Shinhan Bank, Thai Siam Commercial Bank’s tech arm SCB TechX, and a Taiwanese financial institution recently announced the successful completion of a proof-of-concept (PoC) pilot of stablecoin remittances. The PoC was built on the hashgraph consensus-based public ledger, Hedera. Hashgraph consensus is a technology that provides an alternative to the more commonly used blockchain consensus mechanisms.Photo by Lea L on UnsplashThree currenciesThe pilot test was conducted to assess the feasibility and functionality of a system involving real-time settlement and real-time foreign exchange (FX) rate integration. The test was successful in implementing these capabilities for three currencies: the Thai Baht (THB), the New Taiwan dollar (NTD), and the South Korean won (KRW). Since the PoC is compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), EVM-based stablecoins should be able to join the PoC framework without significant modifications.More efficient and affordableIn November 2021, Shinhan Bank developed this PoC on the Hedera network in collaboration with an international bank outside Korea, employing stablecoins for cross-border remittances. The success of the subsequent pilot test this year represents a major achievement in the pursuit of more efficient and affordable cross-border payments, especially given that the financial industry has been increasingly recognizing the transformative possibilities of blockchain and distributed ledger technology.These banks expect that this stablecoin solution will allow individuals and organizations to conduct transactions in locally denominated stablecoins, benefiting from remarkably low fees.Kim Byung-hee, Chief of the Blockchain Division at Shinhan Bank, said, “The successful completion of this second PoC marks an important step forward in our efforts to make cross-border payments faster, cheaper, and more accessible to people around the world.”SCB TechX’s CEO Trirat Suwanprateeb echoed this sentiment, stating that this endeavor can help “increase financial inclusion and improve access to financial services for individuals and businesses in underserved communities.”

news
Policy & Regulation·

Jan 12, 2026

India expands identity and tax controls on digital asset activity

In Mumbai, users of cryptocurrency exchanges are increasingly being asked to prove they are real people—by moving their eyes or turning their heads in front of a camera—before they can open an account. In Tokyo, meanwhile, exchange operators are collecting a different kind of identity marker: each customer’s country of tax residence, recorded for reporting to authorities at home and abroad. Governments across Asia are tightening oversight of the crypto sector, with India and Japan pursuing parallel efforts to boost compliance, strengthen tax enforcement, and curb financial anonymity. Together, these measures are pushing digital assets closer to conventional financial standards.Photo by Rowan Heuvel on UnsplashIndia mandates biometric-style checksAccording to the Times of India, India’s Financial Intelligence Unit has required crypto exchanges to adopt more stringent know-your-customer (KYC) and anti-money-laundering (AML) procedures, including liveness checks designed to prevent accounts from being created using deepfakes. Under the guidelines, platforms must also record information such as geolocation data, IP addresses, and timestamps during onboarding, and link users to bank accounts through verification steps that include test transactions and government-issued identification like passports or voter IDs. The measures come as tax authorities continue to face obstacles in monitoring crypto activity. India taxes crypto profits at a flat rate of 30% and applies a 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) on transfers. According to a separate report by the Times of India, the Income Tax Department (ITD) told lawmakers that the pseudonymous and cross-border nature of crypto transactions can complicate compliance—particularly when funds move through offshore exchanges, private wallets, or decentralized finance platforms. Despite international information-sharing efforts, officials say tracing crypto holdings across jurisdictions remains challenging when transactions bypass regulated intermediaries. India’s central bank has also continued to argue in favor of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) over privately issued stablecoins. In its December financial stability report, the Reserve Bank of India said CBDCs can offer efficiency and programmability within a sovereign framework, while warning that stablecoins may introduce risks during periods of market stress. Japan implements OECD crypto tax rulesJapan, meanwhile, has moved to formalize international data exchange. On Jan. 1, 2026, it implemented the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF), a standard developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to address cross-border tax evasion by automating the exchange of crypto transaction data between tax authorities. Under the new rules, users of Japanese crypto exchanges must declare their country—or countries—of tax residence. Exchange operators are required to collect and submit data to Japan’s tax authorities by April 30 of the following year, including transaction volumes, consideration received from purchases and sales, and asset-type breakdowns covering cryptocurrencies as well as security tokens and non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Information related to non-resident users is also intended to be shared with relevant foreign tax authorities under existing tax cooperation arrangements. While both nations pursue stricter oversight and transparency, their broader policy trajectories differ. In India, regulatory tightening reinforces a restrictive environment focused on risk containment. In Japan, by contrast, the new compliance frameworks appear to be laying the groundwork for a broader economic embrace of digital assets. Japanese Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama, speaking at the Tokyo Stock Exchange last week, framed 2026 as the “inaugural year of digital.” Unlike her Indian counterparts, who remain wary of private crypto assets, Katayama argued that established market infrastructure should play a larger role in adoption. Pointing to the U.S. market, she suggested Japan could move toward exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and integration with stock and commodity exchanges to capture the benefits of blockchain-based assets. This pro-growth shift is reinforced by the prospect of fiscal relief. Tokyo is considering an overhaul that would reclassify crypto gains—currently taxed as miscellaneous income at rates of up to 55%—to a flat 20%, aligning them with stocks. The changes, however, are not expected to take effect until 2028, given the extent of the required legal and regulatory revisions. India, meanwhile, has indicated that it plans to adopt CARF by 2027, suggesting that its current emphasis on domestic controls may eventually be supplemented by deeper international cooperation—bringing offshore crypto activity more firmly into the view of tax authorities. 

news
Policy & Regulation·

Oct 12, 2023

Crypto.com Complies with UK FCA’s New Digital Asset Rules

Crypto.com Complies with UK FCA’s New Digital Asset RulesWhile some Asian crypto platforms are struggling to comply with the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) regarding new marketing-related rules that took effect on October 8, Singapore’s Crypto.com has confirmed its successful compliance. The firm is registered as FORIS DAX UK LIMITED on the FCA website.Photo by Paul Fiedler on UnsplashContinuing support for UK customersAs a result, UK customers can continue to access Crypto.com’s products and services without disruption. The company emphasized its commitment to strengthening its platform and presence in the UK market. Crypto.com stated that it fully supports measures aimed at enhancing consumer safety and security in the cryptocurrency industry. The company also expressed its ongoing cooperation with UK and international regulators to foster consumer confidence in the crypto sector.Effective from October 8, the FCA’s updated guidelines mandate that all crypto firms marketing their services to UK consumers must register with the FCA and adhere to relevant standards concerning risk disclosures and marketing practices.Regulatory compliance challengesWhile Crypto.com has managed to remain compliant, that’s not the case for all large and well-known crypto platforms. The FCA recently expanded its scrutiny of digital currency exchanges by adding Huobi and KuCoin to its list of unapproved and unregistered firms.The FCA alerted clients to the fact that these service providers were offering various crypto services in the UK without obtaining regulatory approval. This development follows a recent warning from the FCA, which highlighted several other crypto-focused companies.Binance’s compliance difficulties2023 has seen global crypto platform Binance struggle with regulatory compliance in various markets worldwide. In some jurisdictions where it has either decided to withdraw from the market or been asked to leave, the firm has taken the approach of still maintaining exposure to that market by establishing a partnership with a locally registered firm.In the UK, Binance has partnered with Rebuildingsociety.com, a peer-to-peer lending platform. However, its local partner has fallen foul of the UK's FCA. On Tuesday, the UK regulator issued a notice clarifying that Rebuildingsociety.com was not authorized to “approve the content of any financial promotion for a Qualifying Cryptoasset for communication by an unauthorized person.”Dubai-headquartered crypto exchange Bybit is another crypto business that has struggled with the FCA's new regulatory requirements. Last month the exchange denied reports that it was preparing to leave the UK market due to the new strict marketing rules. The following week the exchange confirmed that it would be leaving the UK market, ahead of the introduction of the new crypto marketing regulations.Crypto.com had received registration approval from the FCA in August 2022. At the time, CEO Kris Marsazalek stated:“We are committed to the UK market and we look forward to developing our platform and presence in the UK further by expanding our offering to customers, while continuing to work with regulators.”In June, the firm acquired a Major Payment Institution (MPI) license in its home market of Singapore from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). Around the same timeframe, the firm received a minimum viable product (MVP) license from the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) in Dubai.

news
Loading