Korea Insurance Institute eyes Bitcoin treasury move

Japan’s financial authority has decided to regulate cryptocurrencies under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, classifying them as financial instruments. According to a report by The Asahi Shimbun, the Financial Services Agency (FSA) intends to include this reclassification in an amendment scheduled for submission during next year’s regular Diet session. Under the revised framework, local crypto exchanges will be required to provide detailed disclosures on the 105 tokens they handle. This includes the existence of issuers, underlying technologies such as blockchain, and price volatility risks. The proposed regulations will also subject these classified cryptocurrencies to insider trading rules. Issuers and individuals affiliated with exchanges will be prohibited from trading based on material non-public information, such as the suspension of trading or an issuer’s potential bankruptcy.Photo by Karola G on PexelsToken coverage in JapanAlthough the regulatory list contains 105 tokens, data from the Japan Virtual and Crypto Assets Exchange Association (JVCEA), cited in a New Economy report, indicates that Japanese exchanges currently list 119 cryptocurrencies, leaving unclear how the remaining digital assets will be regulated.  To enhance investor protection, the FSA will mandate specific disclosure requirements for issuers that use token launches for fundraising. These entities will be required to report on their latest business activities and future issuance plans annually. This legislative push follows a discussion paper published by the FSA in April, which proposed dividing crypto assets into two distinct categories. The first category includes tokens issued for raising capital, while the second comprises established cryptocurrencies that are not primarily used for issuer fundraising, citing Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) as primary examples. Tax cut from 55% to 20%In parallel with these regulatory changes, the FSA plans to request tax reforms similar to those applied to traditional stock trading. Under Japan’s current tax code, taxes on cryptocurrency gains can reach as high as 55%. The agency proposes reducing this rate to a flat 20% in next year’s tax reform. Responding to the news on X, Changpeng Zhao, the founder and former CEO of Binance, welcomed Japan’s initiative to lower crypto taxes. However, he noted that the proposed 20% rate remains high compared to other jurisdictions, many of which do not levy capital gains taxes on crypto at all. Crypto ETF CFDs set to closeThe government’s move to tighten regulations is already reshaping the financial product landscape. One immediate impact is visible in contracts for difference (CFDs) linked to crypto ETFs. As reported by FinanceFeeds, IG Securities, the Japanese subsidiary of the London-listed IG Group, announced changes to its offerings. The firm will stop accepting new orders for CFDs tied to BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust and its Ethereum equivalent on Dec. 1. Open positions are scheduled to be automatically closed on Jan. 31 of next year. If clients do not settle their holdings prior to this date, the final settlement will be calculated based on the official closing price of that final day. This discontinuation adheres to an FSA decision that derivatives referencing Bitcoin or Ether ETFs must be regulated as crypto-related derivatives rather than standard ETF products. These instruments, now under the crypto-related derivative classification, fall under stricter rules regarding investor protection, operational oversight, and licensing. Japan’s latest regulatory and tax initiatives reflect a broader effort to bring clarity and investor protection to the country’s growing crypto market. As the framework evolves, the industry will be watching how the new rules influence participation and market structure. With lower taxes and stricter oversight on the horizon, both investors and exchanges may need to adjust, potentially reshaping liquidity and Japan’s overall appeal while prompting trading platforms to rethink their product offerings. 

The Philippines Forging Crypto Reg. Path US Could Learn FromThe Philippines has demonstrated best practice in operating a sensible regulatory framework relative to cryptocurrency while the United States has erred by engaging in regulation via enforcement while responding after the horse has bolted in relation to a string of crypto company collapses. That’s according to Robert De Guzman, Head of Legal Compliance at Philippines-based cryptocurrency exchange Coins.ph.©Unsplash/C BuezaIn an opinion piece published in Forkcast News on Tuesday, De Guzman lays out his view as to what’s required in terms of regulation, while drawing comparisons between the application of regulation relative to crypto in both jurisdictions.The need for “sensible” regulationDe Guzman believes that the crypto industry’s recent failures are a wake-up call for the whole sector. Losses of billions of dollars affected Celsius Network, BlockFi, Voyager Digital, Genesis, and FTX, and led to Silvergate, Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), and Signature banks’ collapse in a week. To maintain consumers’ trust, he believes that sensible regulation is necessary for the crypto exchanges dealing with digital assets.The legal compliance expert cites the FTX collapse. FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried’s empire was among the largest collapses. FTX pretended to support regulation, but its true nature was an offshore exchange for global clients. Nonetheless, some businesses act on their regulation support by acquiring licenses and complying with central bank audits in the countries of operation.State-level and industry-level regulationThe crypto industry being open to self regulation is one element of the solution, he says. Regulators must proactively protect their consumers from scams and business failures, not just clean up the mess after millions of people have been harmed.Regulatory failuresDe Guzman points the finger at reactionary regulatory action. Regulators filed charges against crypto industry founders after their collapse. Previously, they missed the problems of the largest companies. FTX, based in the Bahamas, was mismanaged, and American regulators only responded after customer issues. Regulations by enforcement, preferred in several countries, wait for failure to happen before taking action. Over-regulation through enforcement pushes platforms offshore, where Wild West-type environments thrive, with clear consequences.Regulators in some countries focus on surface-level questions, like which tokens should be considered securities, while others, like in the Philippines, prioritize execution-level details to protect consumers. Anti-money laundering measures and custody are core issues, with the G-7’s Financial Action Task Force’s Travel Rule likely to be more strictly applied. Active regulation and audits are needed to ensure financial platforms act responsibly with customer deposits. Basic rules need to be put in place through a licensing regime, followed by regulation of market practices like commingling of assets, self-dealing, and trading against customers.The Philippines sensible approach to regulationThe Coins.ph legal guru holds out his home country as exemplary in terms of its approach to regulation. The Philippines’ regulatory regime requires a virtual asset service provider (VASP) license to operate a crypto exchange, as well as additional licenses for other services. The country’s central bank, BSP, directly regulates all crypto exchanges and expands its crypto regulations to adapt to market needs. KYC processes in the Philippines require recognition of valid ID documents from across 82 provinces.Additionally, the BSP expects the industry to cooperate in quarterly audits where they share balance sheet information and disclose digital assets in hot and cold wallets. Regulators in the Philippines are proactive and knowledgeable about the crypto space, which sets a sensible framework based on customer protection.

Korean Crypto Exchange Group Installs Separate Division to Prevent Money LaunderingThe Digital Asset Exchange Alliance (DAXA), a group of five major Korean crypto exchanges, announced yesterday that it has installed a division to prevent money laundering.©Pexels/Anna TarazevichAML division’s roleThe anti-money laundering (AML) division will devise suspicious transaction report types, create guidelines to assess risks at virtual asset service providers, and hold various seminars.With the new AML division installed, DAXA now has five divisions, the other four of which are responsible for trading support, market monitoring, compliance monitoring, and education.Improving listing and delisting guidelinesDAXA also plans to improve listing and delisting guidelines that exchanges can share.DAXA vice chairman Kim Jae-jin said long-term efforts are required to build a healthy virtual asset ecosystem, calling for exchanges’ stronger voluntary compliance.