HAQQ Network co-founder points to Indonesia’s crypto hub potential

Hong Kong’s SFC Issues Warning Against Unlicensed Crypto PlatformsIn a move to safeguard its financial ecosystem, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) issued a stern warning recently, cautioning against the activities of unlicensed cryptocurrency exchanges involved in what it termed “improper practices.”In a statement published to its website on Monday, the regulatory authority underscored the gravity of engaging in unlicensed operations within the crypto trading sphere, categorizing such activities as a “criminal offense” under Hong Kong jurisdiction.Photo by Chi Hung Wong on UnsplashDeceptive tacticsFurthermore, the SFC exposed the deceptive tactics employed by certain unlicensed crypto trading platforms, which misleadingly assert that they have submitted license applications to the commission. The reality, however, is quite the opposite, as these platforms remain unregulated.The warning coincides with the SFC's ongoing establishment of a novel regulatory framework for overseeing retail crypto trading. Notably, the SFC made it clear that applicants who fail to adhere to pertinent regulations might find themselves ineligible for licensing under the newly instituted regime.This initiative from the SFC aligns with the broader efforts undertaken by Hong Kong authorities to instill effective oversight and regulation within the cryptocurrency market. The primary objective remains the protection of investors’ interests and the preservation of the integrity of the overall financial system.Platforms must demonstrate ability to complyThe SFC emphasized, “VATPs (Virtual Asset Trading Platforms) which consider themselves eligible for deeming under the transitional arrangements are reminded that the SFC may decide that deeming is inapplicable if it does not see a reasonable prospect for the VATPs to successfully show that they are capable of complying with the applicable legal and regulatory requirements.”This development follows closely on the heels of Hong Kong’s recent announcement outlining plans to grant licensed cryptocurrency platforms the permission to cater to retail investors within the new regulatory framework.These comprehensive guidelines encompass critical facets such as cybersecurity protocols, asset custody safety standards, and the segregation of client assets. This regulatory evolution commenced on June 1, synchronizing with the launch of the novel licensing regime for virtual asset platforms.Drawing attention to the growing influence of the sector, it’s worth noting that in April, cryptocurrency exchange OKX registered an astonishing surge of over 10,000 new user sign-ups within a mere month of launching its operations in Hong Kong.Web3 implementationIn a recent tweet, Chris Lee, former CEO of both the Huobi and OKX crypto exchanges, said that “if Hong Kong wants to implement Web3 well, it still needs to complete the basic requirements, such as Web3 foundation laws and bills.” Lee added that “Hong Kong’s competitors will always be itself, not New York or Singapore.”The Hong Kong SFC’s warning to unlicensed crypto platforms is another step in creating the right foundation for Web3 in the city. It underscores the concerted effort to maintain a regulated and secure environment for cryptocurrency transactions within the Chinese autonomous territory.As the regulatory landscape continues to evolve, industry participants are gradually being compelled to adhere to the stipulated legal and compliance requirements in an effort to foster a robust crypto ecosystem.

South Korea is expected to lift its prohibition on initial coin offerings (ICOs), permitting companies to raise funds through digital token sales for the first time since 2017. The move would mark a reversal of the country’s strict regulatory stance, which was originally implemented to curb speculation and protect investors. Regulators had imposed the blanket ban citing a proliferation of projects with unclear fundamentals, fraud, and a lack of safeguards. Authorities at the time noted that unlike initial public offerings (IPOs)—which price shares based on corporate earnings and growth potential—ICOs lacked established standards for valuing the tokens themselves, making them difficult to assess.Photo by micheile henderson on UnsplashICO limited to qualified issuersAccording to a report by Newsis, the government is preparing to allow token issuance but will restrict eligibility to corporations that meet specific thresholds. Issuers would be required to submit documentation, including white papers, to financial authorities in advance and ensure these materials are available to investors. These requirements are expected to be codified in the Digital Asset Basic Act, a second-phase crypto bill currently under preparation. The report noted that the legislation aims to protect users and mitigate market risks by clearly defining accountability for potential failures. An official from the financial regulator stated that detailed criteria, such as minimum capital requirements, would be outlined in enforcement decrees after the bill is passed. Under the proposed rules, companies would be required to file a disclosure document with financial regulators. The requirement would mirror securities filings, but with a focus on public disclosure rather than regulatory approval. The Financial Services Commission would receive the filings, while the Financial Supervisory Service would examine them. Officials are also discussing measures to hold issuing companies fully liable should problems arise after issuance, reflecting the practical challenges involved in verifying the technical aspects of token projects in advance. The regulatory shift would allow South Korean companies to issue tokens at home instead of routing offerings through jurisdictions such as Singapore or Hong Kong. Until now, Korea-based issuers have typically set up overseas entities to conduct ICOs before seeking listings on domestic exchanges. The change is expected to encourage projects that previously went offshore to return to Korea. An industry official said the return of domestic token issuance would help tech companies raise early-stage funding at home and support the launch of new businesses. The move would also intensify competition among exchanges to attract promising projects, the official said, potentially broadening product offerings and lifting trading volumes. Japan plans ETFs, industry seeks faster rolloutAs South Korea moves to allow token issuance, Japan is also easing digital asset rules, though the industry has flagged the slow pace of change. According to local media reports, Japan’s Financial Services Agency plans to revise rules governing investment trusts to allow the inclusion of digital assets. This change would pave the way for exchange-traded funds (ETFs) tracking spot crypto prices as early as 2028. Asset managers are already preparing for the shift. A Nikkei survey showed that as of last November, major firms, including Nomura Asset Management, SBI Global Asset Management, Daiwa, Asset Management One, Amova, and Mitsubishi UFJ, were considering the development of crypto-related investment trusts. However, the timeline has faced pushback. Tomoya Asakura, chief executive of SBI Global Asset Management, said on X that allowing crypto ETFs only from 2028 would be too slow for a country aiming to position itself as a global asset-management hub. He called for a faster rollout, arguing that such products could help channel household savings into investment. 

Qatar Criticized for Regulatory Inaction Against Crypto CompaniesThe Qatari Central Bank (QCB) has come under fire from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) for its lack of efforts in enforcing regulations that prohibit virtual asset service providers.In a report released earlier this week, the global watchdog for money laundering and terrorist financing highlighted the need for Qatar to enhance its capabilities in effectively combating evolving forms of criminal activity, including taking action against virtual asset service providers.Photo by Akbar Nemati on PexelsContinuous improvement neededAlthough acknowledging “substantive improvements” applied to its control system, the FATF report emphasized that Qatar must further improve its understanding of more complex forms of money laundering and terrorist financing.While Qatar has shown positive progress in gathering beneficial ownership information through its unified register, which consolidates data on its citizens, the FATF report emphasized the need for stronger controls to ensure the accuracy and currency of the collected information. The report also criticized Qatar’s authorities for underutilizing their sophisticated analysis capabilities in identifying instances of money laundering.Lack of control despite VASP banDespite the Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority’s (QFCRA) announcement in December 2019 that virtual asset service providers (VASPs) are not allowed within or from the Qatar Financial Centre, the country’s regulatory authority has made little progress in penalizing firms that facilitate or provide crypto asset services.Interestingly, while Qatar has banned virtual asset service providers, it has expressed interest in exploring the potential use cases of a central bank digital currency (CBDC). In June 2022, it was reported that the QCB is in the early stages of developing a CBDC.Sheikh Bandar bin Mohammed bin Saoud Al Thani, the governor of Qatar’s central bank, revealed that the QCB is evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of CBDCs and determining the appropriate technology and platform.As the country explores the potential of a CBDC, it must ensure that its regulatory framework aligns with international standards and best practices. By doing so, Qatar can strike a balance between fostering innovation in the digital currency space and safeguarding its financial system from illicit activities.Global coordinationThrough the Paris-based money-laundering watchdog, and calls from the G7, the European Central Bank, and others to regulate on a global basis, the official response to controlling digital assets and VASPs is becoming more globally coordinated. Central bankers and government officials have learned that decentralized finance has the ability to be borderless.FATF has been active in getting more countries on board. Effective from Thursday, Japan now implements FATF’s “travel rule” with respect to digital assets. That action was taken following a FATF finding that Japan wasn’t following best practice relative to anti-money laundering (AML) measures. Pakistan recently banned cryptocurrencies in an effort that appears to have been motivated by wanting to stay off the FATF’s gray list of non-compliant countries.While Pakistan managed to get itself off that list, the United Arab Emirates found itself on the gray list. The UAE’s Central Bank issued guidance on AML relative to virtual asset companies, in an effort to come back into FATF compliance.It remains to be seen how Qatar will respond to the FATF’s critique and whether it will take concrete actions to address the concerns raised. The international community will be closely monitoring Qatar’s efforts to combat financial crimes in the virtual asset sector and to establish a robust regulatory framework for its future CBDC endeavors.