Top

Crypto.com faces criticism for forcing through 2021 token burn rollback

Web3 & Enterprise·March 20, 2025, 12:37 AM

Recent developments relative to governance of the CRO token, a native token belonging to the Cronos blockchain, have proven controversial, with many in the community unhappy with the actions of Singapore-headquartered Crypto.com.

https://asset.coinness.com/en/news/76503b128a5c6ec4bebdbb91dc377122.webp
Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash

Proposal controversy

The controversy surrounds a proposal put forward by Crypto.com, which originally developed the Cronos blockchain in 2021, to mint 70 billion CRO tokens. The move would effectively roll back a CRO token burn that took place in 2021.

 

The governance process applicable to the proposal meant that CRO token holders could vote on the proposal between March 2 and March 16. For the majority of that voting period, the outcome appeared to be uncertain. The “yes” vote had a narrow lead, but it would have been insufficient to reach the required 33.4% quorum of eligible votes.

 

Exceeding the quorum

However, at 14:00 UTC on Sunday, a last-minute influx of 3.35 billion tokens tipped the balance firmly in favor of the proposal while well exceeding the minimum turnout as 70.18% of eligible votes were cast. 61.18% voted in favor, with 17.61% against.

 

Many CRO token holders who opposed the proposal are aggrieved at the manner in which this late voting surge came about. It’s understood that these last-minute votes came from blockchain validators controlled by Crypto.com.

 

Crypto.com is understood to hold in the region of 80% of the voting power. In exercising that voting clout, many CRO holders feel that it has undermined the will of the community. Some commentators believe that increasing the token supply will result in a loss of trust in the project, damaging investor confidence going forward.

 

Earlier this month, Crypto.com CEO Kris Marszalek responded to community pushback against the proposal. Marszalek suggested that the proposal ties in with an overall strategy for the success of the Cronos blockchain and its CRO token in the long term. 

 

He pointed to four items that are relevant in achieving success for an altcoin like CRO. These included finding product-market fit, the need to redeploy free cashflows, successfully launching exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and participating in reserve-building initiatives. 

 

‘Free to vote and free to sell’

The strategy relies upon building demand in order to achieve longer-term success. On X, Marszalek wrote:

 

“People who do not agree that this is the right approach are free to vote & free to sell. We will stay laser focused on building towards new ATHs [all-time-highs].”

 

In another X post on March 19, the Crypto.com CEO outlined that the company generated $1.5 billion in revenue in 2024 while servicing the needs of 140 million users on the platform. The company spent $700 million on branding, user acquisition and user incentives in 2024. Its operations turned a net profit of $300 million. 

 

Crypto.com has also made further headway on the compliance front over the course of the past week. The company received licensing approval in Dubai to offer derivatives from the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA). On March 17 the company announced that it had successfully achieved Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) registration with the Argentine regulator.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Jun 04, 2024

Hong Kong lawmaker criticizes strict crypto exchange regulations

Duncan Chiu, a member of Hong Kong's Legislative Council, has expressed concerns over the stringent regulations imposed on cryptocurrency exchanges by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). In an opinion piece for the Hong Kong Economic Journal, Chiu argued that these rigorous standards have deterred major global exchanges from entering the Hong Kong market, undermining confidence in the region's commitment to developing Web3 technologies. He highlighted the recent withdrawal of license applications by prominent exchanges such as OKX, Gate.io and HTX as indicative of the flaws in the current regulatory framework.Photo by Chapman Chow on UnsplashLicensing system and industry developmentChiu criticized the fragmented approach to policy development for Hong Kong’s virtual asset market, noting that various aspects like VATP (Virtual Asset Trading Platforms), stablecoin issuance and virtual asset over-the-counter trading are managed by different departments without strategic industry consideration. He also mentioned feedback from license applicants who feel that the authorities lack a forward-thinking vision for fintech and are applying traditional financial principles too rigidly to the dynamic and innovative sector of Web3. Furthermore, Chiu pointed out the disconnect between the industry and regulators, particularly in the experience required of management in licensed crypto operations versus the practical experience of regulators in Web3, complicating effective communication and progress. 

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Dec 02, 2023

Antpool overtakes Foundry as largest bitcoin mining pool

Antpool overtakes Foundry as largest bitcoin mining poolAntpool, a Singapore-headquartered open access mining pool that supports ten cryptocurrencies, has recently surpassed Foundry USA to become the foremost bitcoin mining pool in terms of monthly blocks mined.That’s according to a report published by TheMinerMag, a bitcoin mining industry publication run by New York public relations firm BlocksBridge Consulting.This development indicates a shift in bitcoin mining pool dynamics since January 2022. According to Bitcoin network data, Antpool mined 1,219 blocks in November, slightly edging out Foundry USA’s 1,216 blocks. The total rewards for Antpool’s miner clients reached 8,672 BTC, excluding the 83.6 BTC designated for refunds.Photo by Norman Wozny on UnsplashBitmain affiliateAntPool is an affiliate company of leading crypto mining equipment manufacturer, Bitmain. This surge in Antpool’s hashrate aligns with Bitmain’s substantial importation of over 4,800 metric tons of Antminer S19XP and S19XP Hydro to its U.S. subsidiary in Georgia between June and November. These imports have contributed to an estimated total hashrate exceeding 37 EH/s. The exact activation status of Bitmain’s imported hashrate and whether it is utilized for its own purposes, remains unclear.Foundry USA had previously held the leading position in mining pools since early 2022, benefiting from the rise of North American mining operations following China’s crackdown in 2021. While Antpool consistently secured the second position, its hashrate began closing the gap on Foundry USA around June this year.China vs. U.S. competitive dynamicThe two companies dominate bitcoin mining. With one having a parent company headquartered in China and the other being U.S.-centric, their positioning in terms of overall blocks mined is being seen by some as a reflection of competition between entities in China and the United States in terms of bitcoin mining dominance. Addressing that dynamic in response to CoinDesk recently, CryptoQuant Web3 Analyst Bradley Park wrote:“China is aggressively mining ahead of the approval of a Bitcoin ETF. As the Bitcoin halving nears, I anticipate a competitive surge between China and the US in mining machine productivity. This is because the unit cost of mining Bitcoin is likely to escalate due to increasing power expenses and rising mining difficulty.”The bitcoin hashrate has been climbing continuously throughout 2023, reaching new all-time highs along the way.It’s worth noting that despite Antpool’s dominance in blocks mined, data from BTC.com reveals that the company’s self-reported real-time hashrate consistently lags behind Foundry USA’s over the past three months. The cause of this discrepancy remains uncertain, raising questions about variance or reporting errors affecting Antpool’s real-time hashrate.Bitmain established Antpool in 2014, and it was later spun out of Bitmain to become an independent entity in 2021. Meanwhile, Foundry is a wholly owned subsidiary of Digital Currency Group (DCG). Both Bitmain and DCG have been facing financial challenges over the course of the past year.In a separate development, Foundry took to social media platform X on Thursday to confirm that it is discontinuing support for The Graph protocol, Axelar Network, Polkadot and Flow. The firm said that the changes were decided upon in order to better align the business with its strategic business goals.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Jan 23, 2026

Korean lawmakers eye crypto to lift secondary KOSDAQ market as KOSPI hits 5,000

South Korea’s benchmark stock index, the KOSPI, crossed the 5,000 mark for the first time on Jan. 22, sparking excitement across the market. With investor sentiment improving, the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) has floated the idea of using digital assets to help boost the KOSDAQ—Korea’s secondary stock market—toward the 3,000 level.Photo by Burak The Weekender on PexelsThe proposal was raised during a luncheon at the Blue House attended by DPK members and President Lee Jae-myung. During the meeting, DPK lawmaker Min Byeong-dug highlighted the role cryptocurrencies could play in expanding the KOSDAQ, according to the Maeil Business Newspaper. While the KOSPI is home to large, established firms with strict listing requirements, the KOSDAQ operates under looser standards and primarily lists small and medium-sized companies, including startups. Leveraging STOs and stablecoinsMin’s argument is that the KOSDAQ could grow further if these companies begin using digital asset tools such as security token offerings (STOs), won-pegged stablecoins, and other crypto-based products. The lawmaker also pushed back against the idea that traditional banks should be the principal force behind won-backed stablecoin initiatives—putting him at odds with the direction favored by the Bank of Korea. The Korean government and the DPK aim to finalize legislation covering won-pegged stablecoins by March, as debate continues over which entities should be allowed to issue them. Citing financial stability concerns, regulators have signaled that early issuance should be restricted to bank-led consortia in which lenders maintain a controlling stake. However, the push to frame digital assets as a new engine for market growth comes at a time when South Korea’s crypto trading activity has cooled sharply. Data from CoinGecko, cited by the Maeil Business Newspaper's Telegram channel, showed that combined daily trading volume across the country’s five largest exchanges—Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax—totaled 3.46 trillion won ($2.36 billion) on Jan. 18, down more than 80% from a year earlier. Average daily trading volume in January 2025 hovered near 10 trillion won ($6.8 billion), driven in part by optimism that Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency would boost the market. Exactly a year later, that momentum has faded, with daily volume falling below five trillion won ($3.4 billion) and only briefly rising above that level on Jan. 6 and Jan. 14. The slowdown is also visible in pricing. Bitcoin, the world’s largest cryptocurrency, is currently trading at around $89,000, roughly 30% below its all-time high recorded on Oct. 7, 2025, and has fallen 6.58% over the past week. Investors demand utility as hype fadesRegardless of price fluctuations, the legislative push suggests an ongoing interest in treating digital assets as a functional layer of the financial system. For Min’s proposal to translate into real support for the stock market, however, the crypto products linked to KOSDAQ growth would need to prove clear practical value. That emphasis is echoed in investor sentiment. A recent weekly survey by CoinNess and Cratos of 2,000 Koreans found that the most common belief about what altcoin projects need to survive is real-world usefulness and the ability to generate revenue: 37.5% of respondents chose that option. Another 21.8% pointed to listings on major exchanges, while 20.2% cited the importance of a compelling narrative aligned with market trends. Meanwhile, 10.9% said a large community mattered most, and 9.6% said altcoins are unlikely to succeed under any circumstances. 

news
Loading