South Korea maintains single-bank policy for crypto exchanges

US DOJ Charges Two Russians With Mt. Gox HackTwo Russian nationals have been charged by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) for their involvement in hacking of the Japanese cryptocurrency exchange Mt. Gox, and in causing the collapse of the infamous exchange.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashCulpable for collapseThe indictment, which has been unsealed, was originally filed on June 7, and identifies the individuals as Alexey Bilyuchenko, 43, and Aleksandr Verner, 29. They are accused of not only hacking the exchange but also conspiring to launder approximately 647,000 bitcoins, which is valued at around $17.1 billion based on Bitcoin’s unit price on Friday.Additionally, Bilyuchenko has been charged with collaborating with Alexander Vinnik to operate the illicit exchange known as BTC-e between 2011 and 2017. BTC-e was shut down by U.S. law enforcement in 2017, and Vinnik was later extradited from Greece to the U.S. in 2022 on charges of running BTC-e and engaging in money laundering.Mt. Gox, which experienced a major theft, declared bankruptcy and closed its operations in 2014. Bilyuchenko and Verner played a significant role in the theft, leading to the exchange’s insolvency, according to Assistant Attorney General Kenneth A. Polite, Jr. of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. The indictment states that “in or about September 2011, [the defendants] and their co-conspirators gained and caused others to gain unauthorized access to the Mt. Gox server in Japan.”BTC-e exchange money launderingFurthermore, it is alleged that Bilyuchenko utilized his ill-gotten gains from the Mt. Gox theft to establish the BTC-e exchange, which facilitated global money laundering activities for criminals. US Attorney Ismail J. Ramsey for the Northern District of California stated that Bilyuchenko and his co-conspirators operated a digital currency exchange that enabled criminal entities, including hackers, ransomware actors, narcotics rings, and corrupt officials, to launder billions of dollars.In March, there were reports from CoinDesk about movements of BTC-e funds on the blockchain. An exchange wallet linked to BTC-e made its first transaction since 2017, transferring approximately 3,299 bitcoins to a crypto wallet in November 2022. Additionally, six years ago, the exchange wallet sent around 10,000 bitcoins to two unidentified recipients. However, the recent DOJ filing does not specify whether these recipients were Bilyuchenko and Verner.Slow processMeanwhile, the long-suffering creditors of the hacked exchange are only beginning to reach the final stages of the bankruptcy process. Japan’s bankruptcy process is incredibly slow and it’s taken the best part of ten years for it to reach the distribution phase. It became apparent in April that the bankruptcy estate was moving to distribute $4.5 billion in cash and digital assets to creditors. It’s understood that the process will be completed in October.While creditors are taking a haircut in bitcoin terms, on a US dollar basis, they are not fairing out badly given that the leading cryptocurrency has seen massive dollar price appreciation in the intervening years.

Hong Kong Urged to Issue HKD StablecoinA new policy proposal is urging the Hong Kong government to take a bold step by issuing its own stablecoin, HKDG, pegged to the Hong Kong dollar. The aim is to compete with established stablecoins like USDT and USDC, according to a paper co-authored by notable experts in the field.The proposal, co-authored by Wang Yang, Vice Chancellor of the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and Chief Scientific Advisor of the Hong Kong Web3 Association, angel investor Cai Wensheng, BlockCity founder Lei Zhibin, and Ph.D. student Wen Yizhou, stresses the significance of stablecoins as a link between traditional finance and the digital economy.Photo by Chapman Chow on UnsplashHKD stablecoin benefitsThe authors believe that a Hong Kong Dollar-pegged stablecoin can enhance financial inclusiveness, improve transaction efficiency, reduce costs, strengthen payment systems, and boost Hong Kong’s fintech capabilities.The experts argue that the current plan of allowing private institutions to issue stablecoins is not ambitious enough and may result in limited market share. They draw a comparison with Singapore’s XSGD stablecoin, issued by Xfers, which only has a market cap of $65 million, compared to the combined market capitalization of over $110 billion for USDT and USDC. With Hong Kong’s foreign exchange reserves surpassing $430 billion as of March, an HKDG stablecoin backed by the government would offer higher credibility and lower risk.Private vs. public issuanceWhile the proposal acknowledges potential risks, such as legal and regulatory challenges, technical risks, and short-term exchange rate fluctuations, it argues that government-issued HKDG would bear lower risks compared to stablecoins issued by private institutions. The authors assert that HKDG would benefit from government regulation and the transparency provided by blockchain technology.Furthermore, the paper suggests that HKDG could aid in Hong Kong’s de-dollarization efforts and challenge the dominance of the US Dollar in the crypto ecosystem. It is believed that HKDG could provide additional liquidity for government investment projects, facilitate the digitization of traditional assets, foster financial innovation and competitiveness, and increase transparency.Recent months have seen Hong Kong demonstrate its intention to establish itself as a global hub for the crypto industry. To support this, a Web3 task force has been set up to cultivate a thriving ecosystem in the region.There has been plenty of activity of late relative to stablecoin development in Asia. At the end of May, Hong Kong-based qualified custodian and trust company First Digital Trust, announced plans to introduce a US dollar stablecoin, issued and regulated in Hong Kong. Last month it emerged that Japan’s largest bank, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG), is in discussions regarding the issuance of stablecoins on its blockchain network.Competing internationallyIssuing a government-backed stablecoin could be a transformative move for Hong Kong’s fintech landscape. By leveraging its substantial foreign exchange reserves and embracing blockchain technology, Hong Kong could create a stablecoin that not only competes with established players but also promotes financial inclusiveness and strengthens its position as a fintech leader.With the potential benefits appearing to outweigh the identified risks, it still remains to be seen whether the Hong Kong government will adopt this proposal and pave the way for an HKDG stablecoin in the near future.

Qatar Criticized for Regulatory Inaction Against Crypto CompaniesThe Qatari Central Bank (QCB) has come under fire from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) for its lack of efforts in enforcing regulations that prohibit virtual asset service providers.In a report released earlier this week, the global watchdog for money laundering and terrorist financing highlighted the need for Qatar to enhance its capabilities in effectively combating evolving forms of criminal activity, including taking action against virtual asset service providers.Photo by Akbar Nemati on PexelsContinuous improvement neededAlthough acknowledging “substantive improvements” applied to its control system, the FATF report emphasized that Qatar must further improve its understanding of more complex forms of money laundering and terrorist financing.While Qatar has shown positive progress in gathering beneficial ownership information through its unified register, which consolidates data on its citizens, the FATF report emphasized the need for stronger controls to ensure the accuracy and currency of the collected information. The report also criticized Qatar’s authorities for underutilizing their sophisticated analysis capabilities in identifying instances of money laundering.Lack of control despite VASP banDespite the Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority’s (QFCRA) announcement in December 2019 that virtual asset service providers (VASPs) are not allowed within or from the Qatar Financial Centre, the country’s regulatory authority has made little progress in penalizing firms that facilitate or provide crypto asset services.Interestingly, while Qatar has banned virtual asset service providers, it has expressed interest in exploring the potential use cases of a central bank digital currency (CBDC). In June 2022, it was reported that the QCB is in the early stages of developing a CBDC.Sheikh Bandar bin Mohammed bin Saoud Al Thani, the governor of Qatar’s central bank, revealed that the QCB is evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of CBDCs and determining the appropriate technology and platform.As the country explores the potential of a CBDC, it must ensure that its regulatory framework aligns with international standards and best practices. By doing so, Qatar can strike a balance between fostering innovation in the digital currency space and safeguarding its financial system from illicit activities.Global coordinationThrough the Paris-based money-laundering watchdog, and calls from the G7, the European Central Bank, and others to regulate on a global basis, the official response to controlling digital assets and VASPs is becoming more globally coordinated. Central bankers and government officials have learned that decentralized finance has the ability to be borderless.FATF has been active in getting more countries on board. Effective from Thursday, Japan now implements FATF’s “travel rule” with respect to digital assets. That action was taken following a FATF finding that Japan wasn’t following best practice relative to anti-money laundering (AML) measures. Pakistan recently banned cryptocurrencies in an effort that appears to have been motivated by wanting to stay off the FATF’s gray list of non-compliant countries.While Pakistan managed to get itself off that list, the United Arab Emirates found itself on the gray list. The UAE’s Central Bank issued guidance on AML relative to virtual asset companies, in an effort to come back into FATF compliance.It remains to be seen how Qatar will respond to the FATF’s critique and whether it will take concrete actions to address the concerns raised. The international community will be closely monitoring Qatar’s efforts to combat financial crimes in the virtual asset sector and to establish a robust regulatory framework for its future CBDC endeavors.