Hong Kong gearing up to give crypto derivatives the go-ahead

Intella X Joins Hands with Chainlink Labs to Enhance SecuritySouth Korean gaming company Neowiz announced Wednesday that its blockchain gaming platform, Intella X, has forged a partnership with Chainlink Labs, the founder of the Chainlink blockchain oracle network, to further solidify its position as a secure and transparent blockchain gaming platform.Chainlink’s decentralized oracle network connects data both within and outside of the blockchain — also referred to as on-chain and off-chain — which enables developers to build Web3 applications with access to real-world data and off-chain computation across any blockchain.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashEnhancing security and transparencyThe joint collaboration aims to apply Chainlink Labs’ on-chain and off-chain data connection technology to Intella X. By doing so, they plan to enhance the security of Intella X’s various services, including blockchain games and non-fungible tokens (NFTs).To ensure transparency within its blockchain gaming platform, Intella X will utilize Chainlink Labs’ verifiable random function technology to generate random values during game operations without compromising security or usability, supporting fair gameplay for all users.Scaling the platformAdditionally, they are considering technical collaborations to increase the platform’s scalability by using Chainlink Labs’ Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol, which enables connectivity between different blockchain networks through a single interface.Operating on the Polygon blockchain platform, Intella X offers various in-house platform services, such as its decentralized exchange (DEX) and its NFT launchpad and marketplace. The platform has also soft-launched the Android and web versions of its IntellaX Wallet — a Web3 wallet for Web2 and Web3 gamers — and is ready to expand its ecosystem.

It emerged on Wednesday that the Indian version of the Apple App Store has blocked access to eight crypto exchanges that were recently subject to a show cause notice from an Indian government agency, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU). The development occurred only two weeks after these global firms were flagged for allegedly operating "illegally" in the country. The FIU had cited non-compliance with India's anti-money laundering rules. In its statement on Dec. 28, the FIU urged India's IT Ministry to block the websites of all nine services in the country. The affected exchanges include Huobi, Gate.io, Bittrex, Binance, Kraken, Kucoin, MEXC Global and Bitfinex. Binance acknowledged the issue in a social media post, stating that it will continue to work with local regulators. Interestingly, Bitstamp, another exchange mentioned by the FIU, remained operational on the App Store in India. While these apps have been removed from the Apple App Store, they are still available on the Google Play Store in India and their websites remain accessible within the country. Users who had previously installed these apps on their devices can still access them. Photo by Naveed Ahmed on UnsplashTax avoidanceThe backdrop for this action involves a trend where many Indian traders had shifted to global cryptocurrency platforms rather than native digital asset exchanges. India initiated cryptocurrency taxation last year, imposing a 30% tax on gains and a 1% deduction on each crypto transaction.  While Indian-based exchanges like CoinSwitch, CoinDCX and WazirX maintain compliant know-your-customer verifications, global platforms have not followed suit. Notably, WazirX has experienced a drastic 97% drop in trading volume over two years as many traders migrated to global apps. It’s thought that as many as five million crypto users have shifted their trading activity to offshore exchanges. The tax has proven to be controversial and according to Dr. Vikash Gautam, the author of a report on the tax measure published last November, “it just isn’t enforceable . . . It is possible to be done with international cooperation, but we do understand it is a long process. Some of the other countries have some arrangements with international exchanges to track that." Leveling the playing fieldIt’s amid that competitive backdrop that native Indian exchanges lobbied the Indian government through the Bharat Web3 Association (BWA) to take action against unregulated offshore exchanges recently. CoinSwitch's co-founder and CEO, Ashish Singhal, urged offshore exchanges to comply with local regulations, suggesting registration with the FIU and adherence to India's Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorist Financing (CFT) measures. Singhal, whose CoinSwitch platform is a founding member of the BWA industry advocacy group, highlighted that this would not only benefit offshore exchanges but also enhance consumer protection in India through increased regulatory oversight. Earlier warnings from Indian cryptocurrency exchanges foresaw users shifting to decentralized exchanges or non-compliant services due to the New Delhi government's taxation policy on crypto. In response, CoinDCX announced incentives for customers transferring their crypto assets from global exchanges to its India-based platform. Taking to social media on Wednesday, CoinDCX founder Sumit Gumpta stated:”This is a defining moment for [virtual digital assets] in India, and we're dedicated to facilitating a seamless and secure transition for investors navigating these changes.”   

U.S. regulator, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), has fined Seychelles-headquartered crypto prime brokerage Falcon Labs as part of an overall settlement with the company.  The CFTC had found that the company had operated as an unregistered futures commission merchant (FCM) and furthermore, that it had enabled access to digital asset exchanges without the requisite registration.Photo by Joshua Hoehne on UnsplashSettlement termsIn a press release published to its website on May 13, the CFTC set out the nature of its settlement with Falcon Labs. The parties have agreed that Falcon Labs must discontinue its activities in acting as an unregistered FCM, with particular emphasis on it having provided U.S. individuals with access to digital asset derivatives trading.  Furthermore a fine of $1,179,008 has been applied in disgorgement and in addition, Falcon will have to pay a civil monetary penalty of $589,504. These penalties have been significantly reduced by comparison with the CFTCs original ask, on the basis that Falcon Labs cooperated fully with the CFTC’s Division of Enforcement over the course of the regulator’s investigative process into the activities of the company. In its statement the regulator set out its intent relative to enforcement going forward. Ian McGinley, the CFTC’s Director of Enforcement, stated:”The CFTC is taking the fight one step further by, for the first time, charging an intermediary that inappropriately facilitated access to those exchanges. Today’s action highlights that the CFTC will not hesitate to charge any entities—exchanges or intermediaries—who are providing customers access to digital asset products and services that require registration but have failed to appropriately register.” McGinley added that “the CFTC’s enforcement program has made clear it will not tolerate digital asset exchanges that fail to register with the CFTC or comply with the agency’s rules that maintain integrity in the derivatives markets.” No admission of guiltIn responding to the CFTCs original complaint, Falcon Labs tried to up the ante in terms of compliance. It moved to improve customer identification controls. As a consequence of its market position as a trading intermediary Falcon Labs enabled customer trading on a number of digital asset exchange platforms.  That activity included facilitating U.S.-based institutional customers relative to crypto derivatives trading. It allowed its own account with various digital asset trading platforms to be used, through a system of sub-accounts, by its customers, oftentimes without adequate customer information having been sought. In reaching this settlement with the CFTC Falcon Labs has not made any admission of guilt relative to the regulator’s findings. Alongside paying the agreed upon fines, it will voluntarily agree to adhere to the implementation of improved controls and to withhold its services from user groups that are deemed to be restricted, including all U.S. nationals. Taking to the X social media platform to comment on the matter, Mike Sellig, a partner at New York-based law firm Willkie Farr & Gallagher, claimed that the settlement demonstrated that the CFTC was following in the footsteps of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), establishing “a body of widely applicable precedent.”