Binance launches Sharia-compliant staking product

Turkey has decided not to tax profits from stocks and cryptocurrencies but is considering implementing a “very limited” tax on transactions, according to Treasury and Finance Minister Mehmet Şimşek. In a recent interview in Ankara, Şimşek stated the government's intention to ensure every financial sector contributes to the national revenue without specifying the size of the potential tax. He emphasized that the approach aims to enhance fairness and effectiveness in the taxation system. Historically, in 2008, Turkey lowered its tax rate on stock market profits from 10% to 0%, promoting investment in the stock market. Despite earlier reports from Bloomberg suggesting new taxes on gains from stock and cryptocurrency trading, the government has clarified its position to only consider transactional taxes.Photo by Engin Yapici on UnsplashCrypto tax regulationsCurrently, Turkey lacks specific regulations for taxing cryptocurrencies but is actively working to establish a comprehensive legal framework for digital assets. A bill introduced by Turkey’s ruling party on May 16 mandates crypto businesses to obtain licenses and adhere to international standards. This includes regulation by capital markets boards and mandatory revenue collection from crypto service providers. The bill also aims to ban foreign crypto brokers, fostering a locally regulated ecosystem and addressing concerns from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) to remove Turkey from its "gray list." According to a report by Chainalysis, a blockchain analytics firm, Turkey ranks fourth globally in cryptocurrency market activity, with an estimated trading volume of $170 billion between July 2022 and June 2023, surpassing countries like Russia, Canada and Germany. Since 2021, Turkish regulations have prohibited the use of cryptocurrencies for payments, reflecting a cautious approach towards the integration of digital assets into the financial system.   

Thai Opposition Party Offers Election Crypto SweetenerThailand’s opposition party, the Pheu Thai Party (PTP), has made a controversial move ahead of next month’s general election by offering 10,000 baht (approximately $300) in digital assets to citizens above 16 years old in exchange for their votes.©Unsplash/Markus WinklerThe stated intention of the policy is to spread the use of blockchain-based assets and attract international digital currencies, as well as to distribute products made in Thailand abroad using blockchain technology. Prommin Lertsuridej, who runs the party’s economic policy committee has claimed that 55 million Thai citizens will benefit from the measure if the PTP wins the election.Populist policiesThe plan will cost $15 billion and it is claimed that it will serve to revive the country’s struggling economy while providing relief to those struggling with debt. Additionally other populist measures will be pursued including an increase in the minimum wage and a minimum monthly household income guarantee.The policy has been met with mixed reactions from citizens, with some welcoming the extra cash and others accusing the party of blatant, cynical manipulation. The PTP has tried to sidestep accusations of manipulation by stating that the money will be limited to spending on local economic stimulus projects. Additionally, it cannot be used for gambling or debt repayment, and must be spent within a four-kilometer radius. The party’s chief adviser on public participation and innovation, Paetongtarn Shinawatra, called this policy an attempt to draw the attention of international currencies to Thailand.New crypto regulationsThis policy announcement comes just two months after the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of Thailand issued new regulations for crypto service providers. The regulations were implemented to prevent a situation similar to the recent FTX collapse and hack, which resulted in the loss of millions of dollars’ worth of digital assets. The SEC has required service providers to establish a digital wallet management system to ensure efficient custody and to have a contingency plan in case of a security breach.Unintended consequencesWhile the PTPs policy has been met with criticism, it has also been seen as a bold move towards promoting the use of blockchain-based assets and digital currencies in Thailand. By offering citizens an incentive to use digital assets, the policy may encourage more people to explore this emerging market, which has the potential to create new opportunities for investment and economic growth.Populist politics and policy comes with a heavy longer term cost. The PTPs policy may be successful in achieving its intended goals, or it could ultimately lead to unintended consequences. Regardless of the outcome, the PTPs policy is a significant development in Thailand’s growing digital asset market and may set a precedent for other countries seeking to promote the use of blockchain-based assets and digital currencies.From an international perspective, even if the move backfires economically within Thailand, ever greater use and normalization of digital assets as in this case can only lead to greater overall adoption.

Terraform Labs Co-Founder Daniel Shin Denies Wrongdoing in LUNA CollapseShin Hyun-seong, popularly known as Daniel Shin, has refuted accusations against him related to the $40 billion collapse of the stablecoin TerraUSD and its companion token, LUNA, according to a report by local news outlet Newspim. He presented this defense during his initial trial at the Seoul Southern District Court on October 30 (local time).Shin co-founded Terraform Labs, the company responsible for issuing TerraUSD and LUNA. His co-founder, Do Kwon, is currently serving a four-month prison sentence in Montenegro for passport forgery.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashProsecution’s allegationsKorean prosecutors allege that since 2018, Shin and his colleagues have concealed the fabricated nature of the “Terra project.” By manipulating trades and releasing misleading information, they purportedly misled investors into thinking the project was successful. It’s believed they sold off their tokens before the LUNA crash in May 2022, earning KRW 462.9 billion ($343.3 million) from these activities. They are suspected of personally taking KRW 376.9 billion from this amount.Prosecutors are focusing on Shin as the potential orchestrator of the LUNA crash. They speculate he began selling LUNA tokens around when Terraform Labs launched the Anchor Protocol in March 2021. This DeFi protocol increased the popularity and value of LUNA tokens. Before the crash, Shin is alleged to have gained at least KRW 154.1 billion.Defense argumentHowever, Shin’s legal team countered by asserting that Shin had cut ties with Kwon in 2020. They argued the decline of TerraUSD and LUNA was due to Kwon’s mishandling of the Anchor Protocol and an external attack, neither associated with Shin. Regarding the exploit, Terraform Labs has pursued legal action in the United States Southern District of Florida, claiming that American market maker Citadel Securities played a part in undermining TerraUSD in May 2022.Defending Shin, his lawyers emphasized that at the inception of the Terra project, there were no legal guidelines specifically for cryptocurrency transactions. Additionally, unlike Do Kwon who kept fleeing abroad, Shin willingly came back to Korea and has been cooperating with the investigation. They also noted he received only 32% of the 70 million LUNA tokens initially promised. Regarding classification, they stated LUNA isn’t legally recognized as a security.Shin’s lawyers further argued the prosecution hasn’t clearly identified victims or adequately outlined the components of fraud in this case. They said the prosecution’s case hinges on viewing LUNA as a security. However, Shin’s legal representatives maintained that under the Korean Capital Markets Act, LUNA isn’t a security, making its trades non-fraudulent.To counter a US court ruling the prosecution presented — that a token is a security — Shin’s defense highlighted that the verdict is from a lower court and remains contested. Earlier, prosecutors had cited a ruling from the United States Southern District Court of New York, which classified the XRP tokens sold to institutional investors as securities.