Credit Saison launches $50M blockchain fund, deepening push into emerging markets

One Store’s App Market to Support Polygon-Based dAppsSouth Korean native app market One Store said Friday that it has signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Polygon Labs, the operator of the Polygon blockchain network, to provide robust support for Web3 games and decentralized applications (dApps) as part of its upcoming global service expansion.The signing ceremony for the MOU took place on Thursday at One Store’s headquarters in Seongnam, Gyeonggi Province. Peter Chun, CEO of One Store, and Marc Boiron, CEO of Polygon Labs, were in attendance.Polygon is a layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, with numerous domestic and international gaming companies already partaking in the Polygon ecosystem for a variety of purposes, such as Web3 game development and technological collaborations.Elevating user experienceThis new partnership is part of One Store’s efforts to offer enhanced choices for mobile users worldwide, setting its sights on overseas expansion and the creation of a global platform. With a focus on supporting Web3 games, the platform aims to cater to the blockchain gaming and app user base on an international scale, thus contributing to the expansion of the Web3 gaming ecosystem.Photo by Jonas Leupe on UnsplashAccording to the agreement, One Store will support marketing for Web3 games that have onboarded the Polygon platform, while Polygon Labs will encourage game developers that use its platform to enter One Store’s global market.“Through the upcoming global One Store platform, we will connect with users worldwide who are eagerly anticipating Web3 games and apps,” CEO Chun said.This marks a significant step towards the realization of a vibrant Web3 gaming and dApp landscape on a global scale. The collaboration is expected to bring about new opportunities and experiences for users seeking innovative and engaging digital content.Polygon’s collaboration with Korean industry leadersPolygon Labs has been teaming up with other Korean companies as well, including the telecommunications giant SK Telecom, in efforts to further nurture the ever-growing Web3 ecosystem.

BitMEX CEO Calls for an End to Internal Market MakersIn a recent interview, Stephan Lutz, the acting CEO and group CFO of 100x Group, the parent company of Seychelles-headquartered global crypto exchange BitMEX, expressed his belief that crypto exchanges should phase out their internal market-making teams.Photo by Joe Roberts on UnsplashProp trading desks unnecessarySpeaking with The Block, Lutz argued that with the growth of institutional liquidity providers and high-frequency traders (HFTs) in the market, proprietary trading desks are becoming unnecessary.Lutz stated: “You have enough HFTs out there and prop shops that can perform that function.” He was referring to the role of liquidity providers in filling gaps in the market. He made these comments in response to the emergence of information earlier this week that raised questions about internal trading practices at Crypto.com, a Singapore-based exchange.BitMEX, once the world’s largest crypto derivatives exchange, also used to employ internal traders who acted as market makers. However, Lutz explained that BitMEX’s internal trading team, named Arrakis Capital, now functions primarily as a “treasury desk.” He sees this transition as a natural evolution for crypto exchanges in a market that has matured and attracted more institutional liquidity providers.Arrakis Capital currently performs limited functions, including converting commission fees earned in Bitcoin into fiat currency for operational purposes, hedging BitMEX’s exposure to tokens held as inventory, and making markets for BitMEX’s token $BMEX. Lutz clarified that Arrakis’s market-making activities are limited because external market makers find the token’s liquidity insufficient.Regarding profitability, Lutz stated that Arrakis earns “very minor returns” of up to $100,000 per month from holding T-Bills, but it incurred losses last year. He noted that Arrakis used to play a more significant market-making role when BitMEX dominated the crypto futures market. However, he assured that the trading desk was always segregated, despite accusations in the past.Fee structuresLutz acknowledged that exchanges with internal trading teams have faced increased scrutiny since the controversies surrounding Alameda Research and FTX. To differentiate between benign internal trading teams and hedge fund-like operations, Lutz highlighted several factors, including the separation of client funds and house funds, access to sensitive data, and the ability to move markets on their own exchange. Fee structures also play a role, with low or no transaction fees potentially signaling a market-making motive rather than serving as a counterparty.Lutz’s perspective suggests that crypto exchanges should rely on external liquidity providers and HFTs rather than maintaining internal market-making teams. He argues that the market has evolved. At this point he feels that these teams are no longer necessary, due to the presence of established players within the digital assets space.As regulatory scrutiny grows, ensuring transparency and avoiding conflicts of interest become crucial for maintaining trust within the crypto exchange ecosystem. The digital assets industry is far from arriving at a mature stage in its development. While many in the industry have found the stance taken by regulators to be unhelpful, the industry itself must also demonstrate its ability to iteratively move towards best practice, without that being a knee-jerk response to regulatory enforcement.

3AC Co-Founder Disputes US Jurisdiction Citing Singaporean CitizenshipKyle Davies, the Co-Founder of the failed Singaporean crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC), has asserted that he is solely a citizen of Singapore and not of the United States.Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on PexelsEvading pursuit of damagesThe assertion may have relevance as it may mean that Davies can evade actions taken against him in a US court on the basis of a lack of jurisdiction. In a recent filing with the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), Davies presented documents demonstrating that he had renounced his US citizenship in December 2020. He emphasized that he obtained citizenship in Singapore after being issued a passport in early 2021 and that he does not subject himself to the jurisdiction of US courts.$3.5 billion owedIn June it emerged that liquidators appointed for 3AC were seeking to recover $1.3 billion from the fund’s co-founders, Davies and Su Zhu. The firm reportedly owes creditors a staggering $3.5 billion.In the midst of public criticism surrounding the events leading to 3AC’s collapse, Zhu and Davies launched a platform called Open Exchange (OPNX), allowing trading claims against bankrupt crypto firms. Despite a deficit of goodwill for the duo in the crypto sector, they have been putting all their energies into the new venture.Last month, they outlined that they would donate future earnings from OPNX to 3AC creditors. It’s difficult to reconcile that claim when with this action, Davies is trying to evade contributing to creditors via the 3AC bankruptcy process and this legal action taken by the liquidator.Renounced citizenshipAccording to court documents, Davies officially renounced his US citizenship at the US Embassy in Singapore, citing his decision to reside in the country on a long-term basis. He revealed that he got married to a Singaporean national in 2017 and subsequently gained permanent residency in Singapore. Because Singapore does not permit dual nationality, Davies chose to renounce his US citizenship to establish himself fully as a Singaporean citizen.The submission of these documents came after 3AC’s liquidators requested a subpoena to gather information on the crypto hedge fund’s collapse. Both Kyle Davies and Zhu, were subpoenaed on Twitter, as their whereabouts were unknown. However, while Zhu, being a Singaporean national, might not be subject to the subpoena while residing outside the United States, Davies’ refusal to comply with the order led to discussions about holding him in contempt of court.In response to the subpoena controversy, Davies’ legal representatives claimed that he cannot be validly served with process as a non-party in the case, as he has not been a US citizen or resident since well before the case was initiated. They stated that the court lacks personal jurisdiction over him due to his renunciation of US citizenship. Accordingly, they requested that the Service Order and Compel Order, which were based on the assumption that Davies was a US citizen, be vacated.