Korean crypto faces retail slowdown while eyeing institutional future

Bank of Japan Publishes Results of CBDC PoCThe Bank of Japan (BoJ) recently concluded the second phase of its central bank digital currency (CBDC) proof of concept (PoC) project, which began in April. The results of this phase were published on Monday, and they shed light on key aspects such as the comparison between account-based and token-based CBDCs and the management of holding limits for users with multiple accounts.Photo by Manuel Cosentino on UnsplashToken-based CBDCsThe experiments conducted by the central bank covered a wide range of topics. Among the most intriguing findings were the advantages and disadvantages of token-based CBDCs and how to effectively impose holding limits for users with multiple CBDC balances.Token-based CBDCs have garnered interest from various central banks, with some adopting the UTXO token model used by Bitcoin without the use of a distributed ledger. A UTXO or unspent transaction output, defines where a blockchain transaction starts and finishes. The Bank of Japan explored this model and analyzed its pros and cons.In the initial proof of concept, both account-based and token-based CBDCs were examined, considering scenarios where the central bank managed the ledger or shared it with intermediaries like banks. In the token-based model, fixed token denominations were used, similar to physical cash in countries like India, and a centralized ledger was employed. However, in the recent phase, the central bank utilized flexible value tokens similar to UTXO and shared ledger functions with intermediaries.The Bank of Japan favored the flexible value token model due to its ability to handle multiple requests simultaneously. However, it acknowledged that this model may require more technical resources compared to the account-based approach. Challenges may arise when implementing additional functions, such as holding limits, while maintaining optimal performance. The European Central Bank (ECB) also noted in a recent report that most payment providers are accustomed to account-based payments and would incur costs to adapt to token-based systems.Another significant aspect explored by the BoJ was how to impose holding limits when users have multiple CBDC balances through different intermediaries. The challenge lies in determining if the overall holding limit has been breached without compromising user privacy.Homomorphic encryptionOne possible solution discussed in the report is the use of homomorphic encryption, which enables computations to be performed on encrypted data without it first needing to be decrypted. That allows for the necessary checks without intermediaries accessing the specific data being checked. Although this solution may slightly increase processing time, it could introduce a higher risk of data inconsistencies.Alternatively, a simpler approach proposed by the central bank is to establish a per-account holding limit and a limit on the number of accounts a single user can hold, rather than imposing global limits. Ideally, users with multiple accounts would have a higher per-account holding limit compared to those with fewer accounts.Phase 3 underwayWith the next pilot phase already underway, the BoJ aims to test the end-to-end process flow and identify challenges related to integrating with external systems. Additionally, they are creating a CBDC Forum to gather input from the private sector, ensuring a collaborative approach to CBDC development.While investigation and research into CBDCs continues, the BoJ has said that it will make a final decision on CBDC implementation by 2026.

Genesis Ordered to Comply with Subpoena in Terraform Labs CaseGenesis, the troubled crypto lender and trading company, has been issued a compelling directive by a New York court. The court has mandated Genesis to comply with a subpoena within five days, following a failure to respond to previous requests by the October 9 deadline, relative to a case involving Singapore’s Terraform Labs.Photo by Michael Discenza on UnsplashTerraUSD collapse falloutThese requests are related to the 2022 collapse of the TerraUSD stablecoin, a cryptocurrency which was supposed to maintain a peg to the US dollar’s value until it lost that peg and collapsed. At the time, the demise of TerraUSD reverberated throughout the cryptocurrency markets.In response to this collapse, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) initiated a legal action against Terraform Labs, the company responsible for the token, and its co-founder Do Kwon, alleging that investors had been misled. Both Do Kwon and Terraform subsequently tried unsuccessfully to have the case dismissed.As part of the progression of this case, the SEC sought to question Do Kwon and gain access to company records held by the Singapore-headquartered firm. The defendants were ultimately unsuccessful in arguing their case in that instance on jurisdictional grounds.Failure to respondJudge Jed Rakoff, in a court order filed on Friday, highlighted Genesis’s non-compliance with the subpoenas, stating:“As of today, the Genesis Entities have failed to produce any documents in response to the Subpoenas.”These subpoenas were issued by the defendants to seek specific information from Genesis Global Capital, Genesis Global Holdco, and Genesis Global Trading on September 12.The court order does not specify the nature of the information sought. It is worth noting that Genesis extended substantial loans to the now-defunct hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC), which was heavily exposed to the TerraUSD stablecoin. In January 2023, three Genesis entities filed for bankruptcy, and its trading arm ceased its US spot market operations in September.In addition to the challenge posed by Genesis’ non-compliance, Judge Rakoff is also wrestling with obtaining information from Do Kwon in connection with the legal proceedings. Kwon’s legal representatives have argued that he cannot physically come to the US as he is serving a jail sentence in Montenegro for possession of a counterfeit passport.However, Judge Rakoff has expressed his determination to ensure Kwon’s availability for cross-questioning and stated that Kwon will not be allowed to provide any declarations in the case without being subject to cross-examination.Citadel under scrutinyIn a related development, it emerged last week that Terraform Labs is accusing American market maker Citadel Securities of having sabotaged its TerraUSD stablecoin. As part of the Singaporean company’s pursuit of justice, it has called upon the United States District Court in the Southern District of Florida to force Citadel to furnish specific documents that relate to their trading activities during the period within which TerraUSD collapsed.Should it fail in that endeavor, Terraform has said that it will look to have the matter heard in Judge Rakoff’s court in New York.This legal development concerning Genesis marks a crucial juncture in the ongoing investigation into the TerraUSD stablecoin’s collapse and the actions of the entities involved, with Genesis now facing increased pressure to cooperate fully with the legal process.

Celebrating a Decade of Crypto in South Korea: Experts Convene to Chart the FutureThe MK Virtual Asset Conference, an event held in Seoul yesterday to celebrate the 10th anniversary of South Korea’s cryptocurrency industry, convened experts, politicians, and stakeholders to discuss the future of blockchain and digital assets.The conference was hosted by Maeil Business Newspaper and its blockchain subsidiary Mblock, and sponsored by cryptocurrency exchange Korbit, the Korean Securities Association, and the Korea Derivatives Association. It served as a valuable opportunity to evaluate the current state of the crypto market and explore solutions for pressing challenges.Photo by Ciaran O’Brien on UnsplashInevitable rise of blockchainOne of the distinguished speakers at the event highlighted the inevitable rise of blockchain technology. Kim Yong-beom, CEO of Hashed Open Research, the research arm of Seoul-based crypto venture capital firm Hashed, said, “Blockchain is the antithesis of the modern financial and capital system. While traditional finance possesses its own merits, it also carries substantial transaction fees and is confined within national boundaries. It is only natural that such a counterforce has emerged to address these issues.”He continued, “Given that traditional finance properly responds to blockchain technology’s rise and overcomes its limits, blockchain may lose its competitive edge. However, if traditional finance fails to do so, blockchain will not be easily dismissed.”CEO Kim also highlighted the third section named “Blueprint for the Future Monetary System” of the Bank of International Settlements’ 2023 Annual Economic Report, which was published in June. The report states, “The BIS Innovation Hub, in partnership with central banks around the world, stands at the forefront of experimentation with CBDCs and tokenization.” According to Kim, the traditionally conservative financial institution, which had previously been skeptical about blockchain-based distributed ledger technology, has now shifted its position to be more accepting of blockchain.Importance of institutional investorsDuring the conference, an academic underscored the importance of allowing institutional investors to enter the virtual asset space. Kang Hyoung-goo, an assistant professor in the Department of Finance at Hanyang University Business School, pointed out that the crypto market, when primarily driven by retail investors, tends to favor volatile assets over stable ones. Due to this inclination, more individual investors are attracted to exchanges where speculative trading is a frequent occurrence. This dynamic creates a vicious cycle, he explained.Defining digital assetsOn a different note, Lee Han-jin, a lawyer at Kim and Chang, one of the largest law firms in the country, emphasized the crucial need to establish a legal definition of digital assets. In Lee’s view, digital assets exist in the form of data on the blockchain, setting them apart from traditional assets. He argued that without a legal definition outlining the nature of these assets, they could potentially devolve into entities that mislead the public, lacking both legal reliability and trustworthiness.Political voicesPoliticians also took the stage to share their thoughts. Back Hye-ryun, a Democratic Party of Korea member, expressed in her congratulatory speech her commitment to protecting virtual asset users through legislation. Kim Jong-min, another lawmaker from the same party, underscored the unstoppable nature of the blockchain trend. Yun Chang-hyun, a lawmaker of the ruling People Power Party, mentioned that while Bitcoin couldn’t establish itself as a key currency in an anarchic manner, stablecoins and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) are now positioned to fill that role.Regulatory considerationsMeanwhile, Kim So-young, Vice Chairman of the Financial Services Commission, stressed the ongoing uncertainty surrounding the societal impact of cryptocurrencies and how governments should oversee them. He emphasized that the Korean government aims to establish a balanced framework to facilitate the responsible development of digital assets. Furthermore, he highlighted the necessity of collaborating with major economies due to the global nature of virtual assets.