Upbit’s reach hits one in four South Koreans, XRP emerges as top traded token

BitMEX CEO Calls for an End to Internal Market MakersIn a recent interview, Stephan Lutz, the acting CEO and group CFO of 100x Group, the parent company of Seychelles-headquartered global crypto exchange BitMEX, expressed his belief that crypto exchanges should phase out their internal market-making teams.Photo by Joe Roberts on UnsplashProp trading desks unnecessarySpeaking with The Block, Lutz argued that with the growth of institutional liquidity providers and high-frequency traders (HFTs) in the market, proprietary trading desks are becoming unnecessary.Lutz stated: “You have enough HFTs out there and prop shops that can perform that function.” He was referring to the role of liquidity providers in filling gaps in the market. He made these comments in response to the emergence of information earlier this week that raised questions about internal trading practices at Crypto.com, a Singapore-based exchange.BitMEX, once the world’s largest crypto derivatives exchange, also used to employ internal traders who acted as market makers. However, Lutz explained that BitMEX’s internal trading team, named Arrakis Capital, now functions primarily as a “treasury desk.” He sees this transition as a natural evolution for crypto exchanges in a market that has matured and attracted more institutional liquidity providers.Arrakis Capital currently performs limited functions, including converting commission fees earned in Bitcoin into fiat currency for operational purposes, hedging BitMEX’s exposure to tokens held as inventory, and making markets for BitMEX’s token $BMEX. Lutz clarified that Arrakis’s market-making activities are limited because external market makers find the token’s liquidity insufficient.Regarding profitability, Lutz stated that Arrakis earns “very minor returns” of up to $100,000 per month from holding T-Bills, but it incurred losses last year. He noted that Arrakis used to play a more significant market-making role when BitMEX dominated the crypto futures market. However, he assured that the trading desk was always segregated, despite accusations in the past.Fee structuresLutz acknowledged that exchanges with internal trading teams have faced increased scrutiny since the controversies surrounding Alameda Research and FTX. To differentiate between benign internal trading teams and hedge fund-like operations, Lutz highlighted several factors, including the separation of client funds and house funds, access to sensitive data, and the ability to move markets on their own exchange. Fee structures also play a role, with low or no transaction fees potentially signaling a market-making motive rather than serving as a counterparty.Lutz’s perspective suggests that crypto exchanges should rely on external liquidity providers and HFTs rather than maintaining internal market-making teams. He argues that the market has evolved. At this point he feels that these teams are no longer necessary, due to the presence of established players within the digital assets space.As regulatory scrutiny grows, ensuring transparency and avoiding conflicts of interest become crucial for maintaining trust within the crypto exchange ecosystem. The digital assets industry is far from arriving at a mature stage in its development. While many in the industry have found the stance taken by regulators to be unhelpful, the industry itself must also demonstrate its ability to iteratively move towards best practice, without that being a knee-jerk response to regulatory enforcement.

RAK Properties has signed a strategic agreement with Hubpay that will allow international buyers to pay for homes in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) using digital assets, the real estate developer said in a Sept. 1 statement on its website. Under the arrangement, customers can settle property purchases with major cryptocurrencies, including USDT, Bitcoin (BTC), and Ethereum (ETH). Payments will be processed on Hubpay’s regulated platform, converted into UAE dirhams, and transferred directly to RAK Properties’ account. The company said it will not handle digital assets directly. Instead, all transactions will be processed by Hubpay and its partners, who are licensed by Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), to ensure compliance and transparency. The initiative is aimed at drawing new categories of overseas investors to Ras Al Khaimah, the UAE’s sixth-most populous city, including the developer’s Mina waterfront community.Photo by Precondo CA on UnsplashUAE’s crypto market expands amid rising risksThe move comes amid growing crypto activity in the UAE. A Chainalysis report last year ranked the Middle East & North Africa as the seventh-largest crypto market and noted that the UAE’s decentralized finance adoption was above the global average, citing regulatory clarity. From July 2023 to June 2024, crypto inflows to the UAE leaned heavily toward stablecoins, which represented 51.3% of value received, compared with 44.7% worldwide. Bitcoin’s share was smaller than the global average at 16.5% versus 22.3%, while altcoins and Ethereum showed little difference at 24.4% and 7.8%, respectively. At the state level, the UAE itself has emerged as a significant player. Based on Arkham’s tracking, it is the world’s fourth-largest government Bitcoin holder, with about 6,352 BTC ($703 million). In contrast to the U.S. and U.K., whose holdings largely stem from law enforcement seizures, the UAE’s reserves come from mining through Citadel Mining. The firm is majority-owned by 2PointZero under the International Holding Company (IHC), which is chaired by Sheikh Tahnoun bin Zayed al-Nahyan, the UAE’s national security adviser and a prominent member of the ruling family in Abu Dhabi. As crypto use has grown, so too have the risks. In the first half of this year, the UAE recorded the world’s largest average per-victim losses from crypto crime, with nearly $80,000 stolen per individual, according to Chainalysis. Only the U.S. came close to that figure, while Chile, India, Lithuania, Japan, Iran, Israel, Norway, and Germany rounded out the global top ten. Harmonizing crypto rulesAmid a shifting crypto landscape, regulatory structures in the UAE are continuing to evolve. At the federal level, the Securities and Commodities Authority (SCA) supervises virtual asset services, while the Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE) oversees payment tokens. The Dubai International Financial Centre and the Abu Dhabi Global Market operate their own frameworks. Last month, the SCA and VARA introduced a cooperation framework to harmonize oversight and allow mutual recognition of licenses, though the system stops short of automatic passporting in order to preserve national security controls. In related developments, the National Bank of Ras Al Khaimah (RAKBANK) became the first bank in the UAE to partner with Bitpanda Technology Solutions, a Vienna-based crypto exchange and digital assets infrastructure provider. The partnership, which builds on earlier work exploring the issuance of digital payment tokens, is expected to give RAKBANK customers access to a variety of crypto use cases. 

The Philippines' central bank has confirmed it has no plans to issue a retail version of a central bank digital currency (CBDC) but that it has definite plans to introduce a wholesale-level CBDC, albeit without using blockchain as the underlying technology. Avoiding retail-level bank run riskThe bank expressed concerns that a retail CBDC could potentially trigger bank runs, given the velocity at which digital currency can be transacted. However, in an interview with local media outlet, the Inquirer, the central bank governor Eli Remolona clarified that within the next two years, the country has definite plans to roll out a wholesale CBDC. CBDCs come in retail and wholesale forms, with the former accessible to the general public and the latter exclusively for institutional use. While the Philippines central bank initiated an exploratory study previously relative to CBDC use, concerns have been raised by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) about the readiness of institutions to handle the risks associated with CBDCs.Photo by Krisia on PexelsDismissing blockchainDespite this move, the bank does not intend to utilize blockchain or digital ledger technology, which are fundamental to many virtual assets. Remolona stated: "Other central banks have tried blockchain, but it didn’t go well." Instead, the CBDC will operate on a payment and settlement system owned by the central bank, with a focus on wholesale transactions mediated by banks. This marks a shift in the central bank's approach to underlying technology where a CBDC is concerned. The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) initially embarked on an exploratory study regarding CBDCs in 2022, known as Project CBDCPh. Upon completion of that study, it followed up with a pilot project called Project Agila, concentrating on a wholesale CBDC. Project Agila leaned on the use of the Hyperledger Fabric blockchain, considering it for use on the first wholesale CBDC.  Hyperledger Fabric is an open-source blockchain framework hosted by the Linux Foundation. Companies like IBM, SAP and Intel have all contributed to the development of the enterprise-grade permissioned blockchain network. However, it appears that the BSP is shying away from using any type of blockchain-based solution in establishing its CBDC. Regional steps towards CBDC useThe central bank of the Philippines is among several in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region that are working towards the introduction of a CBDC. Earlier this month an official from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) outlined that the central bank will move forward with CBDC development while working towards addressing privacy concerns that citizens may have with a digital rupee. Towards the end of last month, the Japanese government, in collaboration with the Bank of Japan, appeared to be gearing up for the rollout of a CBDC. In a recent meeting between both parties, several legislative matters were identified as key to ensuring a smooth path to the unobstructed launch of a digital currency. There has also been a lot of activity relative to attempts to utilize CBDCs for cross-border trade over the course of the past year. In the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the country announced the first-ever use of its CBDC or digital dirham in a trade deal with China using mBridge, a multi-CBDC platform that supports peer-to-peer, cross-border payments in real time.