US Treasury Sanctions Gaza-Based Crypto Operator

At the Foresight 2024 Hong Kong Summit on Aug. 11, Gary Tiu, director and head of regulatory affairs for OSL, a crypto market custodian, exchange and prime brokerage, outlined in a panel discussion that the crypto exchange-traded fund (ETF) market in the Chinese autonomous territory is challenged insofar as it lacks market incentives.Photo by Cecelia Chang on UnsplashThe intermediary problemTiu’s company hosted the event, alongside Foresight News and crypto publication The Block, who reported on Tiu’s comments. The OSL executive said that when it comes to funds and structured products in Hong Kong, there’s a “very rich layer of intermediaries— brokers, banks, private banks, retail banks, etc.” involved. Tiu explained that they make a lot of money from the distribution of such products, resulting in unlisted products being marketed far more effectively by comparison with listed products. It’s against that backdrop of misaligned incentives that Tiu identifies challenges for crypto ETFs on the public markets in Hong Kong. He stated: “So I think the incentive system in Hong Kong is one of the reasons why ETFs do have a bit of a hard time growing as a financial instrument.” In the case of ETFs, the OSL executive explained that equity brokers take just a few basis points in commission, only about 1-2% of what they make on the sale of structured products. Bias against Bitcoin and EtherTiu is also of the belief that cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ether have a reputational problem among Hong Kong’s investment community, stating: “I think there is still a bit of a bias in the eyes of the regulators and also in the eyes of the financial institutions, that somehow bitcoin ETF is just this unique class of risk that you need to be extra cautious about.” Chen Zhao, who heads up the digital assets section of Hong Kong-based independent financial advisory firm Fosun Wealth, chimed in with his own concerns. According to Zhao, the crypto ETF products currently marketed in Hong Kong are lacking in terms of the depth of dealers and brokers offering the products. Zhao explained that there are three main types of market participant active on the Hong Kong markets, namely western institutions, Hong Kong-based institutions and their counterparts from mainland China.  Zhao stated: “Chinese brokers and dealers, they’re not allowed or they choose not to deal with the product, and for the western financial institutions, they don’t have the necessity of dealing the products because they acquire more fees and incentives, and have easier access to the U.S. ETFs.” While progress is far more modest by comparison with the U.S. market, the Hong Kong crypto ETF market continues to develop, with spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs setting a record trading volume last week. In the same week, Mox Bank, a subsidiary of British banking multinational Standard Chartered, launched trading services relative to spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF products in Hong Kong. Last month, OSL CEO Patrick Pan, anticipated that an Ethereum ETF product that incorporated staking would launch in Hong Kong within six months. Many commentators have suggested that institutional interest in Ethereum ETFs will begin in earnest once a yield-producing staking product hits the market.

UAE strengthens regulatory oversight of virtual asset service providersThe Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates (CBUAE) and other relevant authorities in the Middle Eastern country have issued new joint guidance for virtual asset service providers (VASPs) operating within the UAE.Photo by Thomas Drouault on UnsplashPushing back against unlicensed VASPsThese guidelines aim to prevent VASPs from operating without proper licenses in the jurisdiction, demonstrative of the country’s efforts in fighting financial crimes and maintaining the integrity of its financial system.The document outlines the penalties for VASPs operating in the UAE without a valid license. They will face civil and criminal sanctions, including financial penalties against the entity, its owners and senior managers. Moreover, the guidance cautions that licensed financial institutions (LFIs), designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs) and licensed VASPs that engage with unlicensed VASPs will be subject to law enforcement actions.The National Anti-Money Laundering and Combating Financing of Terrorism and Financing of Illegal Organizations Committee (NAMLCFTC) is the specific entity responsible for having issued the guidance in conjunction with the central bank.VASP ‘red flags’As part of those guidelines, a list of “red flags” for VASPs has been included. Through reliance on these indicators, it’s hoped that bad acting VASPs can be identified by consumers and other industry stakeholders. The document refers to red flags such as the lack of regulatory licensing, no physical presence in the UAE, pressure being applied by a platform to invest quickly and a lack of regulatory disclosure as items to look out for.Otherwise, the guidance encourages stakeholders to be suspicious of unsolicited contact being employed as a means of operation by a platform, the lack of a record of compliance, poor website and communications and the offer of unrealistic promises.Lastly, the document suggests that people should be observant of any illicit use of virtual currency, the use of fake wallets, engagement in terrorist financing and a lack of consumer protection as red flag items.The new guidance instructs all LFIs, DNFBPs and licensed VASPs to report transactions involving suspicious parties. The guidance also emphasizes that information related to unlicensed virtual asset activities can be reported through whistleblowing mechanisms.Exiting FATF ‘grey list’The release of these guidelines is part of an effort by the UAE to be removed from the Financial Action Task Force’s (FATF) “grey list.” The grey list indicates deficiencies in a country’s anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) regimes.Improving control mechanisms relative to crypto has been a theme for several countries who are similarly looking to exit the FATF grey list. Last week, it emerged that Turkey is crafting new regulations governing crypto in an effort towards “grey list” removal. Earlier this year, Pakistan announced a renewed ban on cryptocurrency, as part of its efforts to remain off the grey list it had been listed on over an extended period.The UAE was placed on the FATF’s grey list in March 2022 due to AML and CTF deficiencies. However, the country made a commitment to work with the global watchdog to improve its regulatory frameworks in these areas.

With the Chinese autonomous territory of Hong Kong having introduced its new Stablecoins Ordinance on August 1 and local taxi operators required to facilitate two forms of digital payment from April 1, 2026, a case is being made that this eventuality lends itself to an ideal test case for stablecoin payments.Photo by The Transport Enthusiast DC on UnsplashA perfect test caseIn an opinion piece published by Bloomberg on Aug. 3, columnist Andy Mukherjee asserted that Hong Kong taxis would be “a perfect stablecoin test case,” suggesting that the timing is ideal for stablecoins, given that a new licensing regime has come into effect via the city’s Stablecoins Ordinance.  In an interview, Franz Bergmueller, CEO of Switzerland-headquartered crypto bank AMINA Bank, said that “stablecoins for me are a killer use case.” On social media, AMINA Bank claimed that it would be “a major step in the right direction” if Hong Kong taxis start to accept stablecoin payments from customers. It emerged last December that the city’s taxi drivers would be required to install both electronic payment facilities and navigation systems, based on a filing made to Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The filing outlined that while some taxi drivers currently offer electronic payment options, many insist on cash payment. The city’s Transport and Logistics Bureau suggested that “drivers offer at least two electronic payment options, including both QR code and non-QR code methods.” Stablecoin payments overseasThere has been some limited use of stablecoins as a payment method by taxi services in places with unstable currencies such as Argentina and Venezuela. The world’s most popular ride-hailing service, Uber, is understood to be studying the feasibility of offering stablecoin-based payments. In 2024, Asian rival Grab commenced accepting crypto, including the USDT and USDC stablecoins, as a means of payment for ride-sharing and food delivery services in Singapore. Last month, it extended that facility to its platform users in the Philippines.In June it emerged that Tawasul Transport, a taxi service in Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), had partnered with Al Maryah Community Bank (Mbank) and Abu Dhabi’s Department of Municipalities and Transport to launch a pilot program implicating the use of AE Coin, a UAE dirham-pegged stablecoin, as a means of payment. Bloomberg’s Mukherjee suggests that for entities now applying for stablecoin licensing, this new digital payment requirement for Hong Kong’s taxi services could provide an immediate segue to onboard users and make a new stablecoin product popular. Mukherjee places specific emphasis in this regard on what actions Ant Group may take. It emerged recently that Ant Group, an affiliate of the Alibaba Group, intends to apply for stablecoin licensing across Asian markets, including Hong Kong. The company is already a leader in Asia in digital payments through Alipay, which serves 1.3 billion users.Although Ant Group is based in mainland China, Hong Kong would offer the company the opportunity to test the establishment of a stablecoin for retail payments.