JPEX Exchange Scandal Sees Crypto Regulation Under Scrutiny in Hong Kong

Singapore proposes additional rules to safeguard retail crypto investorsSingapore announced on Thursday its intention to implement new regulations aimed at protecting individuals by limiting their ability to trade cryptocurrencies.Photo by Daniel Welsh on UnsplashRules follow public consultation processIn a press release published to its website on Thursday, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), the city-state’s central bank and financial regulator, finalized these measures following a yearlong public consultation and review of cryptocurrency platforms, also known as digital payment token (DPT) service providers.Effective in phases from mid-2024, one key measure will prevent operators from accepting purchases through locally issued credit cards. Along the same lines, the regulator wants operators to discourage the use of margin and leverage transactions, or borrowing to facilitate trading activity. Market commentators, such as Custodia Bank Founder and CEO Caitlin Long, have long warned of the havoc that leverage has played in the crypto sector. Last year Long commented:”SO MUCH of the garbage in #crypto during this cycle was just leverage dressed up as tech innovation.”Additionally, incentives that encourage individuals to trade digital tokens will be banned. Such incentives could include providing free trading credits or digital assets as rewards during sign-ups or referrals.Curbing speculationWhile the MAS acknowledges the speculative and highly risky nature of cryptocurrency trading, it asserts that these regulations aim to help cryptocurrency operators protect customer interests. However, the MAS emphasizes that the regulations “cannot insulate customers from losses associated with the inherently speculative and highly risky nature of cryptocurrency trading.”Ho Hern Shin, the Deputy Managing Director for Financial Supervision at the MAS, urged consumers to exercise caution, stating:“We urge consumers to remain vigilant and exercise utmost caution when dealing in DPT services and to not deal with unregulated entities, including those based overseas.”The MAS expanded the scope of these measures to include all retail customers, regardless of their residency, following public feedback. This includes individuals who are not accredited investors or institutional investors. Accredited investors are those with over $1 million in net financial assets, among other criteria.Responding to crypto platform failuresThese regulatory steps come in response to the increasing access of individuals to the risky asset class, driven in part by the collapse of several unlicensed cryptocurrency companies in Singapore such as Hodlnaut and Vauld last year. The resulting calls for greater oversight prompted the MAS to initiate a feedback-gathering exercise in October, seeking input from industry players on proposed measures and other framework-establishing proposals.The bankruptcy filing of cryptocurrency group FTX the following month further accelerated the need for regulatory action globally, including in Singapore. In July, the MAS published the initial set of measures based on the consultation, requiring operators to keep customer assets in a trust and limiting their lending and “staking” of digital payment tokens.Staking, a process enabling investors to earn yields by depositing crypto assets for use in blockchain transactions, is among the activities facing restrictions. MAS Managing Director Ravi Menon criticized cryptocurrencies recently, stating that they have “failed the test of digital money,” citing poor performance as a medium of exchange or store of value and susceptibility to sharp speculative swings, leading to significant losses for many investors.

The blockchain network underpinning Bitcoin, the world’s largest cryptocurrency, requires an energy volume comparable to the annual consumption of Thailand. According to Digiconomist’s Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index, the protocol utilized roughly 204.44 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity between Nov. 18, 2024, and Nov. 18, 2025.Photo by Fré Sonneveld on UnsplashFiscal losses drive Malaysian oversightAmid these intense energy demands, Malaysia’s primary electricity utility has recorded substantial financial impairments attributed to illicit activities. Tenaga Nasional Bhd (TNB) reported losses totaling 4.57 billion ringgit ($1.1 billion) from illegal crypto-mining operations over a five-year span. In a Nov. 19 report by The Edge Malaysia, the Ministry of Energy Transition and Water Transformation (Petra) disclosed these figures to parliament, specifying that the unauthorized mining occurred at 13,827 locations between 2020 and August of this year. To counter these infractions through regulatory channels, Petra has formed a special committee scheduled to convene before year-end. This body aims to recommend enhancements to the Electricity Supply Act, which currently delineates penalties based on the offender's classification. Domestic violators face fines ranging from 1,000 to 50,000 ringgit ($240 to $12,000), imprisonment of up to one year, or both. Penalties escalate for non-domestic entities, involving fines between 20,000 and one million ringgit ($480 to $240,000) and potential prison terms of up to five years. Despite these provisions regarding electricity theft, a specific legal code regulating the act of crypto mining remains absent, creating a jurisdictional void. International bans and grid reallocationStrategies to curtail electricity usage by crypto miners are becoming evident elsewhere in Southeast Asia as well. Laotian Deputy Energy Minister Chanthaboun Soukaloun told Reuters last month that the nation intends to suspend electricity supplies to crypto miners by early 2026. He cited the sector's minimal economic contribution and low job creation as primary factors. Consequently, the state plans to redirect power to high-priority sectors, including AI data centers, metals processing, and electric-vehicle manufacturing. Parallel restrictions are emerging globally. In October, the government of British Columbia enacted a permanent prohibition on new BC Hydro connections for crypto miners to safeguard the Canadian province’s energy reserves. Officials pointed to the industry’s "disproportionate energy consumption and limited economic benefit" as the rationale for the policy. The debate over thermal innovationConversely, some enterprises are exploring methods to capture thermal output from Bitcoin mining to heat residential and commercial properties. If viable, such repurposing could utilize the considerable thermal byproducts of mining. A K33 Research study cited by CNBC indicates the industry generates roughly 100 TWh of heat annually, a figure sufficient to warm the entirety of Finland. However, industry consensus on the feasibility of these applications remains elusive. Proponents suggest that mining infrastructure could be situated in proximity to heat consumers. Skeptics, however, contend that the reliance on application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chips makes this impractical, arguing that the technical difficulty of mining a block renders household participation unfeasible. Despite these differing views, the concept continues to attract attention as a potential avenue for innovation in energy distribution. As jurisdictions like Malaysia and British Columbia tighten regulatory oversight, the cryptocurrency sector faces mounting pressure to address its energy footprint. The divergence between government restrictions and industry-led efficiency proposals underscores the complex relationship between digital asset infrastructure and global energy resources. Given the shifting landscape of policy and technology, the outlook for sustainable large-scale crypto mining remains uncertain, as governments weigh energy demands against economic benefits and the industry searches for more efficient ways to operate.

Hong Kong's Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data (PCPD) has issued a directive for the Worldcoin Foundation to cease its operations within the region, citing violations of local privacy laws. The decision comes after the PCPD found that Worldcoin had improperly collected facial and iris data from approximately 8,302 individuals. The agency’s investigation included ten covert visits to six different Worldcoin locations between December 2023 and January 2024. According to the PCPD, the extent of data collection by Worldcoin was deemed "unnecessary and excessive" failing to adhere to the Data Protection Principles.Photo by Claudio Schwarz on UnsplashConcerns over data retentionThe privacy watchdog criticized Worldcoin for its intention to retain personal data for up to 10 years. This retention period was intended for training AI models for user verification processes but was judged by the PCPD to be excessively long, amounting to prolonged retention of personal data. Following the findings, the PCPD has issued an enforcement notice to Worldcoin, mandating the cessation of all its activities in Hong Kong. Privacy Commissioner Ada Chung has called on the public to report any ongoing operations by Worldcoin in the city. In response to growing international scrutiny, Worldcoin announced in March that it would halt the collection of personal data and is planning to introduce a new feature titled "Personal Custody," which would purportedly allow users to store their data on their devices. This change comes as Worldcoin faces additional challenges in other jurisdictions, including Spain and Portugal, which have also expressed concerns over the project's data collection practices. The project was also scrutinized in South Korea but it recently resumed services. As of now, Worldcoin has not provided comments regarding the recent regulatory actions.