Abu Dhabi Approves M2 for Crypto Services

The Legal Future of South Korea’s Crypto Industry: Necessary Legislation and SystemsA recent National Assembly symposium organized by South Korea’s Digital Asset Policy Forum brought experts together to discuss the challenges and prospects of the implementation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act at the National Assembly Members’ Office Building in Seoul on Tuesday.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashInternational modelsReferences were made to global examples, such as the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) — the world’s first standalone virtual asset legislation enacted in the EU — which ensures transparency, disclosure, authorization, and supervision of crypto-asset transactions. However, unlike the capital market, MiCA does not impose regular disclosure reporting requirements or corrections on them. Firms in Japan, on the other hand, are asked to provide disclosure under autonomous regulation through the Japan Virtual and Crypto Assets Exchange Association (JVCEA).Notably, in its recent Policy Recommendations for Crypto and Digital Asset Markets Consultation Report, the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) states that it is “seeking to encourage optimal consistency in the way crypto-asset markets and securities markets are regulated within individual IOSCO jurisdictions, in accordance with the principle of ‘same activities, same risks, same regulatory outcomes’.” This principle refers to the concept that any crypto-asset activity that has a similar function and poses similar risks to those in the traditional financial system — such as operating a trading platform or providing custody services — is subject to regulation that ensures equivalent outcomes, as defined by the UK Parliament.The IOSCO report also suggests that crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) should disclose information regarding ownership and control of crypto-assets, issuer and business-related information, issuer management teams, transaction history and operational description of crypto-assets, token ownership concentration, transfer protocols, and a given CASP’s treatment of the client crypto-assets and their respective rights and entitlements during events like hard forks and airdrops.Hurdles to overcomeExperts at the forum reflected these considerations in their sentiments. Han Suh-hee, a lawyer at Barun Law Firm, emphasized that it is important to determine what kind of information should be disclosed. She argued that it is necessary to discuss to what extent information about virtual asset issuers should be disclosed and whether mandating firms to disclose their financial and business conditions is efficient.In particular, Han underlined the need to consider the differences between virtual assets and stocks when establishing a framework for the disclosure of virtual assets holdings. Unlike stocks, virtual assets possess distinctive characteristics like their borderless and decentralized nature, unclear issuer backgrounds, and the ability to conduct peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions.Lee Han-jin, a lawyer at Kim & Chang Law Firm, added that the enactment of Korea’s Virtual Asset User Protection Act was aimed at establishing a system directly targeted at regulating virtual assets and virtual asset service operators (VASPs) — a significant development from the Financial Transaction Reporting Act, which had until now been the only legal framework responsible for regulating VASPs along with other entities like casino business operators. Virtual assets are now subject to a more systematized regulatory approach.However, he said that the Virtual Asset User Protection Act still has its setbacks because it is undergoing a two-stage legislative process. Lee criticized the fact that the same definition of VASPs outlined in the Financial Transaction Reporting Act had been brought over, which limits their identity to transaction intermediaries, wallet operators, and custodians while overlooking their other roles like crypto management, crypto deposits, and crypto collective investments.Lee also pointed out another weakness: the scope of prohibition on using undisclosed information and market manipulation is broader in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act than in the Capital Markets Act. He argued that enforcement decrees should stipulate the definition of insiders and exceptional cases when deliberating on the prohibition of insider virtual asset trading.Lee thus emphasized the need for a clear definition of virtual assets in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, as it is yet unclear whether they are objects or assets. All things considered, he believes there must be a law that can encompass blockchain-based decentralization, outline the similarities and differences between digital assets and financial products, and accommodate new services that utilize smart contracts.“We are in the process of creating a regulatory system similar to those being adopted in other countries based on their respective markets,” said Lee Seok-ran, head of the Financial Innovation Bureau at the Financial Services Commission (FSC). “Unlike the stock market, which is equipped with regulations to prevent fraudulent transactions and misconduct, virtual assets are traded on multiple exchanges, so we are considering how to interpret unfair trading activities and conduct market surveillance.”She explained that the commission is prioritizing user protection measures and subordinate regulations. “I believe we will be able to create a system for subordinate regulations on disclosure once an overall global trajectory is established. But before that happens, we are working on guidelines for defining unfair trading activities with regulators and the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA).” Unfair trading activities associated with virtual assets include not only those conducted on exchanges but also under other circumstances.The FSC officer said that the financial authority is set to establish legal criteria to distinguish cases such as false statements in white papers of crypto projects. She added that enforcement decrees will define both the conditions for restricting deposits and withdrawals on crypto exchanges and the corresponding limits.

Huobi Falls Foul of Malaysian RegulatorMalaysia’s Securities Commission, the regulator responsible for investor protection and market integrity in the South East Asian country, has closed down the Malaysian operations of Seychelles-headquartered global crypto exchange Huobi.Photo by Zukiman Mohamad on PexelsThe regulator announced the shutdown via a press release published to its website on Monday. The Commission outlined that it has taken action against both the exchange, Huobi Global Limited, and its CEO Leon Li. It cites “operating illegally in Malaysia,” given that it was operating as an unregistered digital asset exchange (DAX) as the rationale for the decision.With the enforcement action has come an order to Huobi from the regulator to “cease circulating, publishing or sending any advertisements, whether in email or on social media platforms, to Malaysian investors, and to stop its operations in the country, including to disable its website and mobile application on several platforms such as Apple Store, Google Play and any other digital application platform.”Compliance concernsThe Securities Commission is putting the onus on the Huobi Global CEO to ensure that this order is complied with. The regulator said that it had concerns about the platform’s compliance with local regulatory requirements. It further outlined that it is an offense in Malaysia to operate a DAX without having completed registration with the Commission as a Recognized Market Operator (RMO) under Section 7 (1) of the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007.The Malaysian regulator also took the opportunity to warn citizens that they should only seek to trade on platforms that are registered RMOs and that for right now, those that have funds on the Huobi platform should withdraw their assets and cease trading on the platform.Expected newsHuobi doesn’t seem to have made an official statement relative to the Malaysian Security Commission’s decision via its official media channels. However, it did provide the following response to CoinTelegraph on Monday:“In response to recent reports, we would like to clarify that the situation outlined pertains to the previous Huobi entity and former shareholders. This is not associated with the current Huobi platform, which adheres to strict regulatory compliance globally.”Taking that response at face value, the company doesn’t seem to be particularly bothered about the enforcement action. It seems as if Huobi were already prepared for this eventuality, by starting a new corporate entity from scratch.In August 2022, the Malaysian regulator issued Huobi Global with a lesser enforcement action by adding the company to its investor alert list. It chastised the firm for operating without regulatory approval.Malaysia hasn’t been a hotbed of activity where crypto and digital assets have been concerned and certainly doesn’t compare with Asian centers like Hong Kong and Singapore who are actively chasing crypto business. However, in March of last year, the country’s Deputy Minister of Communications and Multimedia, Zahidi Zainul, said that the Southeast Asian country should recognize crypto assets like Bitcoin as legal tender.In 2021, Malaysia’s central bank joined a Bank of International Settlements (BIS)-led trial to explore the proof of concept of a central bank digital currency (CBDC), in order to enhance technical and policy capabilities should there ever be a need to issue one.

Planetarium Labs’ blockchain MMORPG Nine Chronicles M launches worldwideWeb3 gaming company Planetarium Labs has officially released its mobile game Nine Chronicles M worldwide, which is now available for download on Google Play and the App Store.Photo by Jonas Leupe on UnsplashRedefining the MMORPG genreNine Chronicles M is the mobile version of the popular Nine Chronicles, a fully on-chain open-source massively multiplayer online role-playing game (MMORPG) — the first of its kind in the world — set against the backdrop of Norse mythology. The PC version of the game has consistently topped the ranks of dApp store DappRadar’s blockchain game listings with more than 200,000 users worldwide. Building on this experience, Planetarium Labs stated that the mobile version would provide an even more immersive game experience surpassing that of the original version.“With Nine Chronicles M, we aim to create an experience where the community not only enjoys the game but actually owns it,” said Kim Jae-seok, CEO of Planetarium Labs, referring to the game’s fully decentralized format and interactive open-source protocol. “From various events to creative and enhanced gameplay and the largest reward pool known in PvP battlegrounds, we promise to deliver an exciting and thrilling gaming experience.”Successful pre-registration turnoutThis latest release comes after the global pre-registration event that recently ended on Wednesday (UTC), which attracted some 200,000 gamers. Various rewards will be distributed to participants through a gacha game dubbed “Dvergr’s Gacha Workshop”. Such rewards include rare character costumes and allotted amounts of the in-game currency Nine Chronicles Gold (NCG), which can be used to purchase in-game items or staked to earn additional rewards. They can be claimed by downloading and logging into the game, Planetarium Labs explained.