Top

Indian Supreme Court Scolds Government over Crypto Regulation Delay

Policy & Regulation·July 29, 2023, 12:04 AM

The Indian Supreme Court did not mince words recently as it criticized the Union government for its failure to establish clear cryptocurrency regulations in the country.

Photo by Studio Art Smile on Pexels

 

Lack of crypto clarity

That’s according to a report published by local media outlet, the Hindustan Times, on Friday. It’s understood that the Supreme Court is frustrated with regard to the lack of guidelines surrounding cryptocurrencies. That frustration has arisen as crypto is increasingly coming to the attention of the courts due to it being associated with a rising number of criminal activities.

The court directed the government to provide information about any plans to set up a dedicated federal agency to investigate crypto-related crimes. During the proceedings, Justices Surya Kant and Dipankar Datta expressed their disappointment, pointing out the absence of any concrete laws pertaining to cryptocurrencies.

 

Crypto bill failings

The context for the court’s remarks was the ongoing hearing of petitions related to cryptocurrency fraud cases across different states in India. In light of the gravity of these cases, the court demanded a response from the government regarding its capability to establish an effective mechanism to investigate crypto-related crimes.

The struggle for clear and comprehensive crypto regulations in India has been long-standing. As far back as 2018, the government was instructed by the Supreme Court to draft a crypto bill, but progress has been slow. The government has continually promised to provide legislative clarity over the past few years. Despite this, the final draft of the crypto bill has not been produced.

 

Crypto taxes

Governments may drag their feet when it comes to regulatory clarity relative to unfolding innovations but they’re far more responsive when it comes to taxes. The Indian government acted swiftly to impose crypto taxation laws, which took effect in April 2022.

During that bull market period, India emerged as one of the leading crypto markets, witnessing the rise of several crypto unicorns and significant trading volumes amounting to billions of dollars. However, the introduction of tax laws had an adverse impact on the thriving crypto industry. Added to that, the lack of regulatory clarity caused many established firms to relocate from India, seeking more favorable environments for their operations.

 

Market potential

Despite the government’s lethargic legislative response and heavy-handed tax policy, there are still reasons for optimism with regard to the development of crypto in India. India’s fintech sector is the third largest in the world, driven more recently by rapid digital adoption, together with efforts to bring about financial inclusion.

Last month, Xapo Bank, a Gibraltar-based crypto bank, was sufficiently encouraged by the potential offered in India to enter the Indian market. Earlier this week, the world’s largest asset manager, BlackRock, announced that it was partnering with Jio Financial and re-entering the Indian market after a six-year hiatus.

The move could have implications for crypto in India given that BlackRock has changed its tack on crypto, having recently filed an application to launch a bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) in the United States.

Notwithstanding these developments, concrete regulatory guidelines will not only protect against criminal activities but also foster a conducive environment for legitimate innovation and growth in the cryptocurrency space.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Aug 24, 2023

China Unveils Blockchain-Powered Data Exchange

China Unveils Blockchain-Powered Data ExchangeChinese government officials have announced the launch of a data exchange leveraging blockchain technology during the 2023 Hangzhou Summit in China on Wednesday.According to local media reports, the Hangzhou Data Exchange, introduced at the summit held in Hangzhou, aims to facilitate seamless buying and selling of Web3 data across enterprises. The event garnered participation from over 300 companies, including tech giants Alibaba Cloud and Huawei, marking a significant step towards embracing decentralized technology for data management.Photo by Xiaolin Zhang on UnsplashEnabling Web3 data tradingIt’s understood that the Hangzhou Data Exchange has been established with the aspiration of revolutionizing the trading landscape for enterprise information technology data by harnessing the capabilities of distributed ledger technology. Officials emphasize that the platform’s implementation will ensure that transactions conducted through the exchange remain unalterable and traceable.Chen Chun, the Director of the National Laboratory of Blockchain and Data Security, provided insights into the exchange’s advanced features, stating that it integrates research blockchain, privacy computing, and other cutting-edge technologies to establish a secure and confidential environment for sharing and utilizing data across departments and regions.Hangzhou’s digital economy sector has demonstrated significant growth, surpassing 500 billion Chinese yuan (equivalent to $69 billion) in 2022. This accounted for nearly 27% of the city’s total GDP. It suggests that the city is putting a strategic focus on technological development and innovation.Complex blockchain strategyChina’s stance on blockchain technology has been complex. While the Chinese authorities have been rigorous in regulating private blockchain enterprises, they have simultaneously championed government-led blockchain initiatives.President Xi Jinping, during the inauguration of the 2023 Shanghai Cooperation Organization Conference (SCO), highlighted the significance of central bank digital currencies (CBDC) in expanding the use of local currencies for settlements among SCO member countries. In a move to stimulate domestic spending, the Chinese government recently distributed over 100 million yuan worth of digital yuan CBDC to its residents.China’s promotion of its digital yuan has been unrivaled. Over the course of recent months, various initiatives have been launched to further the use of the CBDC. These initiatives have included paying state employees with the currency in Changshu, integration of the currency into the education system in Jiangsu province, and the installation of digital yuan ATMs in Hainan, among many other such projects.Likewise, when it comes to metaverse development, a series of initiatives have been established recently. Henan province established a metaverse fund in May to support metaverse-related projects. In the same month, a National Blockchain Center was established to develop talent within the sector. Around the same time frame, the city of Zhengzhou announced proposals geared towards supporting the growth and development of metaverse companies.The unveiling of the Hangzhou Data Exchange underscores China’s ongoing determination to harness blockchain’s potential, in this case relative to enhancing data trading and management within the Web3 ecosystem.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Dec 23, 2023

Hong Kong regulators signal embrace of spot crypto ETFs

Hong Kong regulators signal embrace of spot crypto ETFsHong Kong has signaled its readiness to usher in spot crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs), as the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) jointly announced on Friday that they are prepared to accept applications for such funds.Photo by Oskar Kadaksoo on UnsplashUpdated virtual asset-related policyIn a set of circulars released, a joint circular representing both regulators and a separate circular published by the SFC, they outlined the updated policy for intermediaries engaging in virtual asset-related activities.The SFC, responsible for overseeing financial markets in Hong Kong, expressed its openness to applications for the authorization of funds with exposure to virtual assets, specifically mentioning virtual asset spot exchange-traded funds (VA spot ETFs).This move expands beyond the existing crypto futures ETFs, demonstrating Hong Kong’s commitment to adapting its regulatory landscape to the evolving crypto market. It also builds on positive commentary made by SFC CEO Julia Leung on the subject last month. Leung stated that the regulator was open to the notion of retail participation in spot crypto ETFs in Hong Kong.Leung stated:“We welcome proposals using innovative technology that boosts efficiency and customer experience. We’re happy to give it a try as long as new risks are addressed. Our approach is consistent regardless of the asset.”Use of license platformsFriday’s SFC circular emphasized that transactions conducted by these ETFs must occur through SFC-licensed crypto platforms or authorized financial institutions. The SFC outlined that both in-kind and in-cash subscription and redemption methods are permissible for SFC-authorized spot VA ETFs, providing flexibility in fund management.Custody requirements were also addressed, with the SFC specifying that the trustee or custodian must delegate its crypto custody function exclusively to an SFC-licensed Virtual Asset Trading Platform (VATP) or entities meeting the crypto custody standards set by the HKMA.Industry responseThese latest circulars from the regulators have prompted a response from the industry. The Hong Kong Stock Exchange has reacted, welcoming the announcement. It believes that such a move would serve to strengthen Hong Kong’s position as a digital asset hub in the region. The exchange already lists a number of crypto futures ETFs, with multinational investment bank UBS having recently extended access to these products to its Hong Kong-based high-net-worth clients.While the regulatory landscape in the United States in 2023 has proven to be hostile, one very positive development appears to be ongoing work towards spot bitcoin ETF approval. Although still a matter of speculation, many industry commentators believe that approval will come through on Jan. 10. The advent of spot bitcoin and crypto ETFs in both eastern and western markets would likely make for an extremely bullish 2024 for the industry.Hong Kong’s move towards spot crypto ETFs aligns with its proactive stance in adapting to the rapidly evolving crypto landscape. The regulatory framework, as outlined in the circulars, reflects a balance between fostering innovation and ensuring investor protection. The city’s financial authorities have taken a comprehensive approach to review and update policies, once again signaling their ongoing commitment to embracing the growing role of virtual assets in the financial world.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Nov 14, 2023

India’s judiciary turns down plea to formulate a crypto regulatory framework

India’s judiciary turns down plea to formulate a crypto regulatory frameworkThe Indian courts have declined a consideration targeting the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading, following a plea which had been brought to court by a petitioner.Photo by Naveed Ahmed on UnsplashBeyond the court’s purviewIndia’s Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Chandrachud, recently confronted a petition urging the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading. According to a local media report, the bench, which included Justices JD Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, dismissed the plea, emphasizing that the demands presented were legislative and thus beyond the court’s direct action purview. This decision points to the judiciary’s recognition of its constraints in crafting laws, particularly in intricate domains like cryptocurrency.The petitioner, Manu Prashant Wig, a former director at Blue Fox Motion Picture Limited currently in custody due to allegations of cryptocurrency fraud, sought relief through a public interest litigation (PIL) for crypto trading regulations in India.The Economic Offence Wing (EOW) of the Delhi Police accused Wig in 2020 of deceiving investors with promises of high returns from crypto investments, involving 133 reported victims of the scheme. Despite this, during the hearing, the Supreme Court advised Wig to pursue legal remedies through appropriate channels, specifically for bail, underlining its inability to issue directives under Article 32 of the Constitution for legislative matters.Judiciary criticize governmentWhile the judiciary has found that it cannot act itself in putting in place a crypto regulatory framework, the Supreme Court has been critical of the government’s inaction on the matter. In July, India’s highest court criticized the Indian government for its failure to establish clear cryptocurrency regulations.Interestingly, while the government hasn’t acted locally, it has been making efforts to drive regulation at an international level instead. The status of cryptocurrency trading in India remains uncertain, with the country developing a regulatory framework influenced by recommendations from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB), potentially leading to legal legislation within the next several months.Prime Minister Modi called on authorities internationally to establish a worldwide regulatory framework. At the recent G20 summit, it appears that member states did reach agreement on such a framework.The Supreme Court’s dismissal of the PIL marks a clear distinction between judicial and legislative responsibilities. As India moves closer to formulating a comprehensive crypto regulatory framework, this decision reinforces the imperative for legislative action to address mounting concerns and interests in the crypto market.Awaiting legislative actionThe outcome of these developments is keenly awaited by investors, legal experts and the crypto community, poised to shape the future landscape of cryptocurrency trading in India. The decision signifies the judiciary’s acknowledgment of its limitations and highlights the necessity for a legislative approach to effectively navigate the intricate landscape of cryptocurrency regulation.In this evolving scenario, the verdict amplifies the importance of a well-defined regulatory framework. As the world’s most populous country grapples with the delicate task of balancing innovation and investor protection, the Supreme Court’s decision places the ball firmly in the legislative court.

news
Loading