Uniswap Competitor Maverick Protocol Raises $9M in Funding

Singapore Gets with Banks to Provide Guidance on Crypto BusinessesIn a move to provide clarity and guidance to financial institutions dealing with cryptocurrencies, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) is reportedly working with banks to develop new vetting procedures for crypto clients.According to a recent Bloomberg report, the MAS plans to provide more detailed guidance to banks on how to properly screen and monitor customers involved in cryptocurrency transactions.©Pexels/PixabayRegulatory clarityThe decision to provide guidance on crypto businesses comes as regulators around the world struggle to keep up with the rapidly-evolving digital currency industry. Many governments have been grappling with how to regulate cryptocurrencies in the face of concerns over money laundering, fraud, and other illicit activities.Singapore, however, has taken a more progressive stance on digital currencies, with the MAS recently announcing plans to create a regulatory framework for crypto derivatives trading. The country’s financial watchdog has also been working to improve AML (anti-money laundering) and CFT (combating the financing of terrorism) measures relative to crypto transactions.The MAS’s efforts to provide guidance to banks on crypto businesses are part of this broader push to promote responsible use of digital currencies in Singapore. By providing clear and detailed guidance to financial institutions, the regulator hopes to prevent illegal activities from taking place while also promoting the growth of the crypto industry.The MAS’s approach is seen as a positive development for the crypto industry, as it provides a clear framework for financial institutions to work within. This could help to boost confidence in the crypto market, potentially leading to increased investment and adoption.Striking the right balanceAt the same time, however, some industry observers have expressed concerns that overly strict regulations could stifle innovation and limit the potential of cryptocurrencies. They argue that a balance must be struck between protecting consumers and promoting innovation in the digital currency industry.Despite these concerns, the MAS’s efforts to provide guidance on crypto businesses are likely to be welcomed by financial institutions and industry participants alike. As the use of digital currencies continues to grow, it is becoming increasingly important for regulators to provide clear and comprehensive guidance on how to operate within this rapidly-evolving industry.Previous failuresSingapore hasn’t always gotten its approach to cryptocurrency right. In 2021, the MAS put global crypto exchange Binance on its investor alert list. Binance felt compelled to curb its service offering in the city state. The consequence of that action was that a disproportionate number of Singaporeans proceeded to open accounts with FTX only later to get caught up in the collapse of the exchange.The Monetary Authority of Singapore’s decision to provide guidance on crypto businesses is bullish for the digital currency industry. By providing clear and detailed guidance to financial institutions, the regulator is promoting responsible use of cryptocurrencies in Singapore while also boosting confidence in the market. However, there is a need to strike a balance between protecting consumers and promoting innovation in the industry, as overly strict regulations could stifle growth and limit the potential of cryptocurrencies.

Roger Ver sues Matrixport over frozen crypto fundsRoger Ver, often referred to as “Bitcoin Jesus,” finds himself embroiled in a legal dispute with Jihan Wu, the co-founder and chairman of Matrixport, a Singapore-based digital assets financial services platform.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash$8 million disputeThe crux of the matter is a contentious $8 million that Ver claims Wu withheld from him in connection with the fallout of the unrelated failure of the CoinFLEX crypto platform. This conflict has led to a lawsuit filed by Ver’s counsel in the Seychelles.The legal complaint, which originated last year, revolves around bit.com, a crypto exchange owned by Matrixport, refusing to allow Ver to withdraw his $8 million. Wu, a creditor of CoinFLEX, contends that he incurred financial losses due to the exchange’s restructuring.However, Ver asserts that the insolvency of CoinFLEX, an unrelated entity, should not be tied to the funds owed to him by Matrixport. Off the back of that assertion, Ver confirmed to The Block that in August 2022, he sued Smart Vega Holding Limited, a Seychelles-incorporated subsidiary company of Matrixport, for $8 million.Ver asserts CoinFLEX collapse innocenceRoger Ver maintains that he is not to blame for CoinFLEX’s collapse. He states that the narrative emerged due to breaches of confidentiality regarding the arbitration between CoinFLEX and himself. It emerged last month that creditors of CoinFLEX had taken legal action against its CEO, Mark Lamb, as well as Ver. It’s understood that Ver had benefited from a settlement negotiated with Lamb. Creditors are seeking to recover any benefit realized by Ver as a consequence of this settlement.Ver told Coindesk in an email that he initiated arbitration proceedings against CoinFLEX in June 2022, seeking $200 million in damages. He maintains he was the plaintiff in this case, not CoinFLEX, which later filed a counterclaim for $84 million.Confidentiality is a key aspect of arbitration proceedings, especially in Hong Kong where the arbitration took place. Despite this, it is alleged that Lamb broke this confidentiality, which led to the misrepresentation that CoinFLEX was the plaintiff in the case. Ver firmly believes that CoinFLEX’s insolvency was primarily due to market turmoil in May 2022 and poor risk management on the part of its co-founders.Matrixport standing firmWhile Matrixport does not deny withholding the cryptocurrency from Ver, it argues that Ver should repay his debt to CoinFLEX, which is a creditor of Ver. Once this is done, CoinFLEX will release monies owed to Wu.The dispute also touches on the terms of service. Matrixport maintains that it has the right to withhold funds for penalties related to defaulted margin calls and legal fees and it is committing significant legal resources to defend its position. Ver’s attorney counters this argument, stating that Matrixport’s terms of service do not permit such penalties and that there is no legal justification for withholding the funds.Matrixport claims that the funds are being held because of an investigation into Ver’s “margin trading irregularities.” The company’s Head of Public Relations and Brand, Ross Gan, said that Ver “continues to make unreasonable demands.” Gan added:“We will respect the legal process and the ultimate Court ruling on this case and reserve all our rights to take further legal action in this ongoing dispute with Mr. Ver.”

Coinbit suspends operations, marking second crypto exchange shutdown this monthCoinbit, a South Korean cryptocurrency exchange operated by blockchain service provider AXIASOFT, has suspended its services according to an official announcement on its website posted on Thursday (local time). This development comes just over a year after it became a virtual asset service provider (VASP) on Sept. 1 last year. It is also the second crypto exchange in the country that has ended its operations after Cashierest on Nov. 6, indicating that troubled predictions previously projected by industry sources are becoming a reality.Photo by Andrew Winkler on UnsplashBusiness transitionCoinbit explained that, despite its efforts to create an environment optimized for transparent crypto transactions, it was pushed by ongoing changes in regulatory policies to make changes to its business. It intends to shift its focus to establishing a securitized transaction system.Membership registration and deposits will no longer be allowed starting at 5 p.m. next Friday. Transactions and withdrawal services will be suspended from 1 p.m. on Dec. 29. The exchange advised its users to withdraw their virtual assets accordingly.Earlier, it was reported that Coinbit was facing difficulties maintaining smooth operations due to its exceedingly low trading volume. Industry sources believe that the realization of the previously speculated closure of coin market exchanges.More shutdowns to come?“Much of the workforce at crypto exchanges have been taking hits, leading to challenging business conditions,” stated an unnamed industry expert, proposing conjecture that more announcements of service suspensions may be imminent. According to a survey conducted earlier this year by the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), 10 out of 21 crypto exchanges reported zero revenue from transaction fees, and 18 were in a state of complete capital impairment.