Top

Huobi Falls Foul of Malaysian Regulator

Policy & Regulation·May 23, 2023, 1:16 AM

Malaysia’s Securities Commission, the regulator responsible for investor protection and market integrity in the South East Asian country, has closed down the Malaysian operations of Seychelles-headquartered global crypto exchange Huobi.

Photo by Zukiman Mohamad on Pexels

The regulator announced the shutdown via a press release published to its website on Monday. The Commission outlined that it has taken action against both the exchange, Huobi Global Limited, and its CEO Leon Li. It cites “operating illegally in Malaysia,” given that it was operating as an unregistered digital asset exchange (DAX) as the rationale for the decision.

With the enforcement action has come an order to Huobi from the regulator to “cease circulating, publishing or sending any advertisements, whether in email or on social media platforms, to Malaysian investors, and to stop its operations in the country, including to disable its website and mobile application on several platforms such as Apple Store, Google Play and any other digital application platform.”

 

Compliance concerns

The Securities Commission is putting the onus on the Huobi Global CEO to ensure that this order is complied with. The regulator said that it had concerns about the platform’s compliance with local regulatory requirements. It further outlined that it is an offense in Malaysia to operate a DAX without having completed registration with the Commission as a Recognized Market Operator (RMO) under Section 7 (1) of the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007.

The Malaysian regulator also took the opportunity to warn citizens that they should only seek to trade on platforms that are registered RMOs and that for right now, those that have funds on the Huobi platform should withdraw their assets and cease trading on the platform.

 

Expected news

Huobi doesn’t seem to have made an official statement relative to the Malaysian Security Commission’s decision via its official media channels. However, it did provide the following response to CoinTelegraph on Monday:

“In response to recent reports, we would like to clarify that the situation outlined pertains to the previous Huobi entity and former shareholders. This is not associated with the current Huobi platform, which adheres to strict regulatory compliance globally.”

Taking that response at face value, the company doesn’t seem to be particularly bothered about the enforcement action. It seems as if Huobi were already prepared for this eventuality, by starting a new corporate entity from scratch.

In August 2022, the Malaysian regulator issued Huobi Global with a lesser enforcement action by adding the company to its investor alert list. It chastised the firm for operating without regulatory approval.

Malaysia hasn’t been a hotbed of activity where crypto and digital assets have been concerned and certainly doesn’t compare with Asian centers like Hong Kong and Singapore who are actively chasing crypto business. However, in March of last year, the country’s Deputy Minister of Communications and Multimedia, Zahidi Zainul, said that the Southeast Asian country should recognize crypto assets like Bitcoin as legal tender.

In 2021, Malaysia’s central bank joined a Bank of International Settlements (BIS)-led trial to explore the proof of concept of a central bank digital currency (CBDC), in order to enhance technical and policy capabilities should there ever be a need to issue one.

More to Read
View All
Web3 & Enterprise·

Jul 28, 2023

Ant Group Restructuring With Implications for Blockchain

Ant Group Restructuring With Implications for BlockchainAnt Group, an affiliate company of Chinese conglomerate Alibaba, is understood to be undertaking a significant restructuring that could have broader implications for the digital asset industry.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashPotential IPOAccording to a recent report published by Bloomberg, the company is contemplating a separation of its blockchain and database management services, as well as its international business, from its core financial operations in China. It’s being speculated that the move is a precursor to Ant Group’s application for a financial holding license in China. Furthermore, it could be part of a bid to revive its suspended initial public offering (IPO) in Hong Kong.The company had been under regulatory scrutiny from the Chinese authorities over the course of the past three years. That investigation culminated in a hefty fine of 7.12 billion yuan ($995 million). The consequences of that regulatory investigation have taken a toll on the company’s valuation, plunging from a peak of $280 billion before the IPO cancellation in 2020 to a current estimated value of $79 billion.Blockchain business implicationsBy pursuing this restructuring, Ant Group seeks to refocus on its core financial services within China. It’s unclear what the outcome will be for non-core businesses such as blockchain-based ventures. Potentially spinning these businesses off could unlock hidden value in blockchain-related activities. However, such a move would also raise questions regarding the future of these non-core businesses and their potential impact on the broader digital asset industry.AntChain, the blockchain technology developed by Ant Group, holds a prominent position in China, being widely adopted across various sectors. Should Ant Group decide to spin off or divest this business, it could significantly alter the blockchain landscape in the country.Originally introduced as “Ant Blockchain” in 2017 alongside Alipay, AntChain expanded its services to provide blockchain-as-a-Service (BaaS) to Ant Group’s partners in 2018. In mid-2020, Ant Group took a step further by transforming Ant Blockchain into a separate entity and rebranding it as AntChain. Besides blockchain solutions, AntChain is also actively involved in developing Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT), risk control technologies, and other value-added tech services.The wide adoption of Ant Group’s blockchain technology has played a pivotal role in promoting blockchain implementation in China. Last year the company unveiled a blockchain storage engine called Letus, as a mechanism to lower storage costs of blockchain networks. Another project saw it partner with a Malaysian investment bank in an effort to develop a crypto trading and portfolio management app. These are individual instances of the company’s varied activities in the blockchain space.Any alterations to its blockchain operations could impact the pace and scale of blockchain adoption in the country. While the Chinese authorities have discouraged crypto trading and mining, they have very much encouraged blockchain development.The restructuring appears to be a response to the increasing regulatory pressures in the fintech industry. A further tightening of regulations on blockchain operations for fintech companies might potentially hinder innovation and growth in the sector.Most likely the guiding hand of the government in China will have a material effect on how these blockchain-based businesses develop in the event of an Ant Group restructuring that would see them being spun out.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Dec 03, 2025

Token Cat authorizes up to $1B in corporate crypto purchases

Token Cat Limited, a Nasdaq-listed Chinese automotive marketplace formerly known as TuanChe Limited, has approved a new digital asset investment policy that will allow the company to deploy up to $1 billion into cryptocurrencies as part of its treasury strategy. In a press release distributed via Chainwire, the Beijing-headquartered company said its board of directors signed off on a Crypto Asset Investment Policy authorizing the use of a portion of its cash reserves to acquire selected tokens under internal risk-management controls. Any purchased assets will be held with third-party custodians rather than managed in-house, the company said.Photo by Precondo CA on UnsplashThe initial allocation will focus on tokens tied to newer projects in areas such as artificial intelligence, RAW-to-chain infrastructure, and token–equity hybrid models. Further deployments will be evaluated over time and will remain subject to additional board approval, according to the statement. The policy will be implemented under the oversight of Sav Persico, who was recently appointed chief operating officer. Token Cat said he brings decades of experience in technology and blockchain-related businesses and emphasized that the initiative reflects a long-term approach to digital assets rather than a speculative trade. China’s regulation and softer DAT inflowsToken Cat’s decision comes even as China’s central bank continues to stress that crypto-related business activity remains off-limits domestically. According to Reuters, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) recently reiterated that services involving virtual assets constitute “illegal financial activities” and highlighted that cryptocurrencies do not have the legal status of fiat currency. The statement was issued against the backdrop of what the central bank characterized as a renewed pickup in speculative crypto trading and broader concerns about financial risks. Beyond China, Token Cat’s move fits into a wider trend of companies experimenting with so-called digital asset treasuries (DATs), in which companies commit varying portions of their balance sheets to crypto. Those strategies, however, have seen softer momentum in recent months. Cointelegraph, citing data from DefiLlama, reported that DATs drew about $1.32 billion in fresh capital in November, the lowest monthly intake of 2024. Bitcoin-focused DATs accounted for the bulk of that activity with roughly $1.06 billion of inflows, while Ethereum-based DATs saw about $37 million in outflows. Bitwise chief investment officer Matt Hougan said on X that DATs have generally moved in tandem over the past six months, but he expects that pattern to change as investors begin to differentiate between firms with clearly articulated strategies and those without. He said a limited number of DATs could emerge with more resilient valuations, while others may continue to trade at persistent discounts. Biotech Sonnet advances HYPE-token planDespite the recent slowdown in inflows, new corporate efforts to gain exposure to digital assets continue. One example is Sonnet BioTherapeutics Holdings, a North Carolina–based biotechnology company developing immuno-oncology drugs. On Dec. 2, Sonnet said its shareholders had approved a proposed business combination with Hyperliquid Strategies Inc. (HSI) and Rorschach I LLC. That vote followed an agreement reached in July for Sonnet to merge with Rorschach to form Hyperliquid Strategies, a new entity expected to hold roughly 12.6 million HYPE tokens valued at about $583 million, along with at least $305 million in cash, for a projected combined value of $888 million. Hyperliquid is a decentralized exchange (DEX) built on its own layer-1 blockchain. Its native token, HYPE, has a total supply of one billion and is used for network governance, staking, and smart contract functions on HyperEVM, the platform’s EVM-compatible environment. Sonnet’s move, together with Token Cat’s newly adopted investment policy, adds to a steady stream of corporate initiatives testing the role of digital assets in balance-sheet management. With companies ranging from biotech firms to automotive marketplaces exploring similar strategies, the coming months will show whether crypto holdings can establish themselves as durable components of corporate treasuries. 

news
Policy & Regulation·

Sep 19, 2023

JPEX Exchange Scandal Sees Crypto Regulation Under Scrutiny in Hong Kong

JPEX Exchange Scandal Sees Crypto Regulation Under Scrutiny in Hong KongWhile Hong Kong has been developing steadily as a crypto sector hub, the focus in the Chinese autonomous territory has turned towards regulation after a recent scandal involving an unlicensed cryptocurrency exchange.Photo by Ihor Saveliev on UnsplashOngoing investigationYesterday we reported on some arrests relative to problems experienced at crypto exchange JPEX. The fallout continues on Tuesday, with the Hong Kong police now understood to have arrested eight individuals, including social media influencers who promoted the exchange and JPEX employees, on allegations of fraud. This illicit activity in and around the JPEX exchange has affected over 1,600 investors, implicating more than $150 million in assets.JPEX, in response to mounting pressure, announced the suspension of trading on its platform. In a statement, the exchange mentioned ongoing negotiations with third-party market makers to address liquidity shortages. However, JPEX also accused an unidentified third-party market maker of maliciously freezing funds, further complicating the situation.Politicians and regulators speak outResponding to the incident via a press conference on Tuesday, Hong Kong’s Chief Executive, John Lee, emphasized the significance of investing in virtual assets through licensed platforms. Lee stated:“This incident highlights the importance that when investors want to invest in virtual assets, then they must invest on platforms that are licensed.” He also pledged that the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) would closely monitor the situation to ensure investor protection.Elizabeth Wong, the Head of the SFC’s fintech unit, revealed that an investigation was underway to determine whether JPEX had violated anti-money laundering laws. The SFC had already declared JPEX unlicensed, prompting numerous complaints from investors who were unable to withdraw their virtual assets or experienced unexplained reductions in their balances.Assets frozenHong Kong authorities have taken decisive action against those involved in the scandal. They have frozen bank accounts valued at 15 million Hong Kong dollars ($1 million) and seized three properties valued at 44 million Hong Kong dollars. The police have reported receiving 1,641 complaints related to JPEX, involving a staggering $1.2 billion Hong Kong dollars. By last Wednesday, the SFC had received in excess of 1,000 complaints and at that point, they notified the general public.The JPEX scandal has drawn attention to the need for stronger cryptocurrency regulations in Hong Kong, a region that has become attractive to cryptocurrency firms since mainland China banned cryptocurrency transactions in 2021. In mainland China, trading cryptocurrencies on foreign exchanges from within the country remains illegal.Hong Kong’s response to cryptocurrency regulation has evolved. Beginning on June 1, the SFC started accepting applications from cryptocurrency exchanges, allowing licensed operators to serve retail investors, provided they understand the associated risks. Previously, only professional investors had access to such exchanges. Currently, only two exchanges in Hong Kong, OSL Exchange and Hashkey Exchange, have received approval to operate.As Hong Kong reevaluates its approach to cryptocurrency regulation, the crypto sector will hope that it strikes a balance between fostering innovation and protecting investors from fraud and market manipulation.

news
Loading