Japan's Monex acquires majority stake in Canadian crypto firm

Gyeonggi Officials with Cryptocurrencies Clear of Professional Conflicts in Virtual AssetsGyeonggi Province, South Korea’s most populated province surrounding the national capital of Seoul, announced on October 26 (local time) that the duties of all crypto-holding officials ranked 4 or higher in the provincial government are not associated with virtual assets. In Korea, public officials are ranked from nine to one, with one being the highest position.In anticipation of the amended Public Service Ethics Act coming into effect on December 14, the Gyeonggi provincial government introduced a revised employee code of conduct in August. This required officials of rank 4 or higher to report their crypto holdings within 10 days starting from August 21.Photo by Nattu Adnan on UnsplashReported crypto ownershipThe result indicated that out of 228 officials, 23 reported owning virtual assets. Among these, 15 officials held cryptocurrencies valued at less than KRW 1 million ($738), while the remaining 8 had holdings exceeding that amount.To determine any potential involvement with cryptocurrencies in their official duties, the Gyeonggi government examined the roles and responsibilities of these officials within their respective departments. Following this review, the matter was forwarded to the Gyeonggi Public Service Ethics Committee for further scrutiny.Ethics committee reviewOn October 20, the committee convened to assess the relationship between the officials’ duties and their crypto holdings. They unanimously concluded that none of the 23 officials had any ties to crypto in their official roles.The newly revised code of conduct elaborates on the conditions under which a public official’s responsibilities are associated with virtual assets. Specifically, an official’s duties are considered linked to virtual assets if they are involved in formulating or implementing crypto-related policies or laws; conducting related investigations, inquiries, or inspections; engaging in the registration and oversight of cryptocurrency exchanges; or if they are involved in supporting or overseeing the development of crypto technologies.In light of these definitions, officials who engage in any of the above roles are strictly prohibited from capitalizing on any crypto-related information they encounter during their professional duties for personal trading or investment. Furthermore, officials who either currently shoulder or have previously carried out such responsibilities are required to disclose any crypto holdings they acquire.In the future, once the revised Ethics Act is implemented, the Gyeonggi government will remain fully committed to preventing conflicts of interest among public officials. To bolster these efforts, Gyeonggi will introduce additional measures, including a thorough verification process for the accuracy of their cryptocurrency holdings reports.In situations where a public official with cryptocurrency holdings is assigned a position related to virtual assets, Gyeonggi will issue individualized instructions. These directives may entail either the liquidation of their cryptocurrency holdings or their removal from the specific role in question.Meanwhile, Gyeonggi will enhance its endeavors to furnish educational resources pertaining to virtual asset reporting. Moreover, the local government will restrict officials from holding virtual assets if they fall under financial disclosure obligations and are deemed to possess information about or exert influence on virtual assets.

Bhutan Quietly Mining Bitcoin Since $5,000The tiny nation of Bhutan continues to be full of surprises recently where crypto is concerned, with the latest report suggesting that the kingdom has been mining bitcoin for a number of years already.© Pexels/Pema GyamtshoAccording to a recent report in The Bhutanese, a Bhutan-based publication led by investigative journalist, Tenzing Lamsing, the landlocked nation had been mining bitcoin over the course of a “few years” already, in an effort to diversify its sovereign portfolio.Long-term investment strategyUjjwal Deep Dahal, CEO of Druk Holding and Investments (DHI), told the publication that the venture was part of a long-term investment strategy. DHI is the commercial arm of the Royal Government of Bhutan. It was formed pursuant to a Royal Charter in 2007 with the mandate of making investments on behalf of Bhutan while optimizing usage of resources.The mining activity had centered on Bitcoin although there was a small provision for Ethereum-based mining when Ethereum was a mineable proof-of-work (PoW)-based blockchain network. It’s unclear of the precise timeline but the report outlines that DHI has engaged in the mining space over a number of years, and at a time in which the Bitcoin unit price was as low as $5,000.Exploiting cheap hydroNestled in the Himalayas, Bhutan has considerable hydroelectric resources. Bitcoin mining is ordinarily an expensive exercise but in scenarios where there are plentiful energy resources with a marginally cheaper cost of production than the average, it can be an attractive and profitable enterprise. Dahal outlined that these conditions enabled DHI to reinvest profits back into additional mining equipment.The precise time-frame of DHIs entry into Bitcoin mining is open to speculation. However, we do know that the Bitcoin unit price was last below $5,000 at the onset of the pandemic in March 2020. Prior to that, Bitcoin had risen above $5,000 in April 2019 following an acute bear market in 2018.Crypto lender entanglementsBhutan and DHI hit the crypto radar last month when it was revealed that the kingdom had made significant investments into and out of failed crypto lenders Celsius and BlockFi. Dahal has said that the royal charter-mandated firm had taken out loans with both crypto lenders and had fully repaid those loans. However, that may have been something that happened later than anticipated. The Bhutanese company had a $30 million loan from BlockFi. BlockFi liquidated the Bitcoin collateral associated with that loan in 2022 but it left a shortfall of $800,000. The failed lender subsequently sued DHI. As of an April 13 court filing, BlockFi submitted a voluntary dismissal of the lawsuit to the courts, presumably because the shortfall was subsequently paid by DHI.In the case of Celsius, DHI had withdrawn $65 million from the lending platform prior to it declaring bankruptcy. Consequently, the matter has been the subject of speculation relative to the potential for the Celsius bankruptcy estate to pursue DHI for a clawback of the withdrawn funds.

Terraform Labs Co-Founder Indicted in South KoreaTen individuals linked to the Terra USD collapse have been indicted in South Korea on charges associated with violations of capital markets law, including the Co-Founder of Terraform Labs, Daniel Shin. That’s according to a report published by Bloomberg on Tuesday.©Pexels/Donald TongTwo of the ten were charged with breach of trust while the remaining eight, including Shin, were charged with illegal trading. Prosecutors confirmed that all of the charged individuals have ties to Terraform Labs, the company responsible for developing the Terra protocol, and the Terra USD (TUSD) stablecoin and Luna cryptocurrency which collapsed in 2022.It’s understood that the ten individuals were also accused of illegal disclosure of clients’ payment information and the embezzlement of corporate funds. The authorities have claimed that the ten individuals are responsible for causing “astronomical damage” to investors. They estimate that all ten of them took 463 billion won, around $347 million, in profit.Business interestsShin co-founded Terraform Labs with Do Kwon in 2018. He left the project in 2020, long before its spectacular failure in 2022. However, he would have profited considerably from the project. Prior to co-founding Terraform Labs, Shin had founded lifestyle commerce company TMON in 2010. Two years later, he founded venture capital and private equity firm, Fast Track Asia while in 2017 he was a founding partner of another venture capital and private equity firm, Bass Investment.He remains involved in all of those other businesses. Furthermore, Shin founded integrated payments firm PortOne Global in January 2020, immediately upon exiting Terraform Labs. He remains CEO of PortOne Global today.$185 million frozenOn Tuesday, the Seoul Southern District Prosecutor’s Office outlined that it had frozen assets to the value of 246.8 billion won, approximately $185 million, belonging to those that it has brought charges against. South Korean authorities had previously acknowledged a difficulty in seizing assets related to Terraform Labs Co-Founder Do Kwon. It’s understood that a transfer of funds from Do Kwon to a prominent South Korean law firm is being investigated. Otherwise, the search for funds has led them overseas where it’s understood that Do Kwon purchased real estate in his mother’s name in the United States in a bid to evade asset confiscation.Free pending trialShin remains at liberty pending trial. Back in December, a South Korean court turned down a request to arrest him on the basis that he wasn’t likely to destroy evidence and wouldn’t pose a flight risk.That hasn’t proven to be the case where his former colleague Do Kwon is concerned. Do Kwon fled to Montenegro where he was recently charged with having entered the country on false documents. Both South Korea and the United States have formally applied for his extradition. In the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has sued both Do Kwon and Terraform Labs. Terraform Labs subsequently submitted a request to the courts in the US to dismiss the lawsuit, claiming the SEC lacks jurisdiction.