Woo X launches tokenized T-Bills for retail investors

Binance Takes P2P Service Measures in Response to Sanctioned Russian BanksGlobal crypto exchange Binance has removed the option for users to conduct transactions via sanctioned Russian banks on its peer-to-peer (P2P) platform, a decision that comes on the heels of a Wall Street Journal exposé published earlier this week, shedding light on the platform’s involvement in facilitating the movement of funds for Russian users.Previously, Binance’s peer-to-peer service featured five Russian banks under sanctions as a method for ruble transfers between users. However, the company swiftly acted to address potential compliance concerns. Fittingly, this latest news was also broken by the Wall Street Journal on Friday.Dmitry Sidorov on PexelsSailing too close to the windWhen approached regarding the omission of these banks, a Binance spokesperson stated: “We regularly update our systems to ensure compliance with local and global regulatory standards. When gaps are pointed out to us, we seek to address and remediate them as soon as possible.”The Wall Street Journal’s article outlined how Binance’s peer-to-peer platform facilitated ruble-to-crypto trades that frequently involved the sanctioned Russian banks, with Rosbank and Tinkoff Bank being prominent examples.These trades often utilized layers of intermediaries to convert funds from these banks into Binance balances, as detailed by various company resources, user screenshots, and messages in official chat groups. Despite these revelations, Binance’s exchange had continued to handle significant volumes of ruble trading, according to data compiled by digital asset research firm CCData.US DoJ probeBinance’s activities in Russia could potentially contribute to its ongoing legal challenges in the United States. The US Justice Department (DoJ) has been probing the company’s actions for potential violations of American sanctions on Russia. In response to such concerns, the Binance spokesperson emphasized:“Binance aims to diligently comply with the global sanctions rules and enforces sanctions on people, organizations, entities, and countries that have been blacklisted by the international community, denying such actors access to the Binance platform.”WorkaroundsTraders, however, had reportedly found workarounds to the bank removals, as observed in the official Telegram chat group for Russian clients. Many shared that they could still engage with sanctioned banks by selecting alternative payment methods and then manually inputting their Rosbank or Tinkoff bank details.Earlier this year, an investigative report by CNBC alleged that employees of the company had told it that Binance staff regularly helped Chinese customers to bypass Know Your Customer (KYC) controls in order to access the platform. More recently, another report, once again by the Wall Street Journal, found that business in China was booming, which surprised many given that China banned crypto trading within the country in 2021.It’s apparent that the company is reacting to regulatory and legal pressures in taking the decision to make these changes to its P2P service. Perennial crypto critic US Senator Elizabeth Warren took to X (formerly Twitter) on Friday, stating:“I rang the alarm about sanctions evasion by Russia using the crypto platform Binance — and urged [the DoJ] to investigate potentially false statements it made to Congress. We need stronger crypto regulations to rein in illicit finance.“

A Beijing-headquartered venture capital firm has invested $30 million in Hong Kong’s HashKey Exchange. That’s according to a report published by Bloomberg on Feb. 14, citing unnamed sources understood to be familiar with the matter. HashKey’s capital injection has come from Gaorong Ventures.  The Chinese VC firm was founded in 2014, initially known as Banyan Capital before rebranding as Gaorong Ventures in 2018. The VC firm focuses on early and growth-stage investments, with a specific interest in new technology.  Gaorong has 23 IPO portfolios on its books, together with 30 projects valued at in excess of $1 billion. It has been an early-stage investor in Chinese tech firms such as Chinese shopping platform Meituan and online retailer PDD Holdings.  Last year, the company participated in a funding round for Dongchedi, the car information and trading platform belonging to ByteDance, the parent company of TikTok.Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on UnsplashBeyond unicorn statusIn this instance, the funds were invested with HashKey Group weighing in with a post-money valuation in the region of $1.5 billion. That puts the company well beyond unicorn status, which it achieved in a previous $100 million funding round over a year ago. At that time, HashKey didn’t disclose the names of investors other than to state that they were “prominent institutional investors” and “leading Web3 institutions.” It’s understood that the round included both existing and new investors. Surging VC investment in crypto startups This latest investment comes amid a backdrop of a surge in venture capital investment into the crypto sector. Well-known American venture investors Sequoia Capital and Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) invested almost $1.2 billion in crypto projects last month.  In 2024, $13.7 billion was invested in crypto and blockchain startups by venture capital firms, marking a 28% increase on the previous year. In Q4 2024, the United States took first place, accounting for 46% of investment into startups across the market in general. Hong Kong weighed in with 17% in second place.HashKey is also playing its own role in crypto and blockchain startup investment. HashKey Exchange’s sister company, HashKey Capital, is an institutional asset manager that also invests in crypto startups. In recent weeks, the company has invested in SignalPlus, a crypto trading software firm focused on the Asian market, and Kelpr, a Cosmos (ATOM) ecosystem wallet project. More crypto VC investment in 2025In January, HashKey Capital CEO Deng Chao told Cointelegraph that he expected more VC capital investment in crypto startups in 2025. He stated: “As we enter into a supportive macro environment driven by stimulative US policies and the formalization of crypto regulatory frameworks, these macro tailwinds are set to drive more VC investments heading into 2025.” Meanwhile, the overarching HashKey Group is positive in its outlook with regard to the crypto and blockchain sector in 2025. Last month, it outlined that it expects Bitcoin and Ethereum to surge in price, the share of the market held by decentralized exchanges (DEXs) to increase, capital inflows into the sector from institutions to grow, the approval of more crypto ETFs and further development of layer-2 networks over the course of the year.

China’s GAPP proposes ban on gaming crypto token conversionChina’s gaming industry hit a significant speed bump on Friday as the General Administration of Press and Publication (GAPP) unveiled a draft proposing substantial changes to the regulation of in-game tokens, signaling a strategic shift in the country’s stance on digital currencies in gaming.Photo by blurrystock on UnsplashImplementing more stringent controlsThe proposed regulations by GAPP bring about a ban on the conversion of game tokens into physical goods or legal tender. These guidelines, spanning 64 articles, impose stringent requirements on gaming companies. These include mandatory licensing in China, a two-year data retention policy, adherence to national and socialist values in content and the eradication of anonymous user registrations.One significant aspect of the guidelines is Article 23, which specifically addresses the use of game tokens. It proposes restrictions on exchanging them for physical goods, services or legal tender.The regulatory landscape becomes more complex due to the ambiguity surrounding cryptocurrencies, which are not recognized as legal tender in China. Although a warning was issued about the risks inherent in non-fungible tokens (NFTs), they remain legal in China. NFTs feature prominently within blockchain-based gaming.Game providers are also confronted with new limitations on inducements, such as bonuses for registration or daily logins, and are mandated to implement measures against irrational consumer spending.Gaming sector falloutIn the wake of these developments, several Chinese tech giants experienced a significant market downturn in Hong Kong. Tencent, a global gaming powerhouse and one of China’s most valuable companies, saw a 12.4% drop on Friday, marking its worst day since October 2008. This decline erased a massive 367 billion Hong Kong dollars ($47 billion) from Tencent’s market value.NetEase, another gaming giant, witnessed a 25% dive in Hong Kong afternoon trade, recording its most substantial daily loss since its listing in June 2020. Additionally, Bilibili and Kuaishou, prominent players in video-sharing and short-video platforms, experienced declines of 9.7% and 7.2%, respectively, given their involvement in online gaming.Market uncertaintyWith this latest development, the future of gaming crypto tokens remains uncertain in China, with investor confidence having been hit hard. Putting the matter in context on Friday, Stansberry Research Analyst Brian Tycangco took to the X social media platform, stating:”Govt regulation will effectively render prevailing business models irrelevant due to uncertainty regarding monetization. Games are inherently reward-based and if you clamp down on the use of rewards/incentives, you turn an entire industry on its head.”The guidelines, open for public consultation until Jan. 22, 2024, have not yet been legally enacted. This time frame allows for feedback and potential adjustments before enforcement.Notably, the Web3 gaming sector has witnessed substantial activity, with approximately a million unique active wallets engaged daily over the past three months, according to DappRadar. Industry experts, including Yat Siu of Animoca Brands, anticipate a potential surge in user engagement, emphasizing the potential impact of these regulations on the gaming industry’s trajectory.