Top

China mulls yuan-pegged stablecoin approval

Markets·August 21, 2025, 2:33 AM

The Chinese authorities are reportedly mulling over the possibility of approving the use of stablecoins pegged to and backed by the Chinese yuan.

 

That’s according to a report published by Reuters on Aug. 20, with the publication citing “sources familiar with the matter.”

https://asset.coinness.com/en/news/cf8b7f92c82a395ababfae664b500dbc.webp
Photo by Eric Prouzet on Unsplash

Internationalization of the Chinese yuan

China’s State Council, its cabinet and primary administrative authority, has scheduled a review of yuan-backed stablecoins for later this month, a development that could potentially lead to their approval.

 

The Chinese have been leaders in recent years in the development of a central bank digital currency (CBDC), the digital yuan. The digital yuan was further along in its development than any other CBDC globally, with the Chinese making concerted efforts to bring the digital currency into use at home, with an eye toward global use for international trade.

 

While the U.S. dollar has enjoyed an extended period as the world’s reserve currency, the weaponization of the currency by the U.S., particularly through the application of sanctions, has led BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) nations to consider alternatives.

 

One of Reuters sources asserted that the Chinese authorities are now homing in on the potential to internationalize the yuan via stablecoins.

 

Setting the tone for stablecoin use

Members of the Chinese government leadership are expected to establish the tone for stablecoin use following their upcoming review, outlining the parameters within which the Chinese authorities will permit their use.

 

Reacting to this development, Robin Brooks, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, asserted that China’s newfound interest in yuan-backed stablecoins is a sign of “how insecure China is in the global financial system.”

Brooks added that the way to internationalize a sovereign currency is to promote the rule of law and property rights rather than pursue the use of stablecoins, which he described as “ridiculous.” 

 

Growing global interest

While the Brookings Institution is not directly backed by the U.S. government, the organization is nevertheless a Washington, D.C.-based think tank. Despite Brooks’ objection to the use of stablecoins, China is not the only nation to show interest in using them.

Taking to X, Raphaël Bloch, co-founder of crypto media platform The Big Whale, pointed out that increasingly, nations around the world are embracing stablecoins due to the efficiency of global currency distribution that is possible via public blockchain networks. 

 

Additionally, stablecoins offer an effective means of government debt financing, given that stablecoin reserves are backed by government bonds.

 

In the U.S., President Donald Trump has ruled out the pursuit of a CBDC. Last month, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Anti-CBDC Act to prohibit the development of a CBDC by the Federal Reserve. Instead, Trump has said that a stablecoin regulatory bill working its way through the legislative system will ensure global dominance for the U.S. in the crypto sector.

 

In June a Deutsche Bank strategist claimed that the legislation would strengthen the U.S. dollar’s global dominance, with several American politicians having since expressed the same view.

Earlier this week, Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) signaled that it is likely to approve the issuance of a yen-pegged stablecoin. Meanwhile, the authorities in South Korea are working on a bill related to won-pegged stablecoins.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Nov 28, 2023

Zipmex Thailand halts crypto trading citing SEC compliance

Zipmex Thailand halts crypto trading citing SEC complianceTroubled cryptocurrency exchange Zipmex Thailand has recently announced the temporary suspension of digital asset trading until early next year.Photo by Anh Tuan To on UnsplashTrading and deposits suspendedThe decision, outlined by the firm in a Facebook post on Saturday, is attributed to the platform’s efforts in ensuring full compliance with the standards set by Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).In the Facebook post, Zipmex Limited addressed its customers, stating:“Dear customers, Zipmex Limited would like to ensure the proper and compliant conduct of the company’s business operations in accordance with the criteria set by Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).”The suspension of digital asset trading and deposits of all types became effective from Nov. 25.Withdrawals remain openDespite the suspension, customers will retain the ability to withdraw Thai baht and digital assets from their Trade Wallet through the website and mobile application until Jan. 31, 2024. However, for digital assets categorized as “Trade Only,” customers are instructed to contact Customer Support for withdrawal. Beyond Jan. 31, 2024, when the withdrawal feature through the website and mobile application is suspended, customers will need to seek assistance from Customer Support.Zipmex Thailand also emphasized that the withdrawal process for digital assets may take between seven to 14 days, requiring customers to provide supporting documents for identity and account ownership verification.As a cryptocurrency exchange headquartered in Singapore and operating in multiple countries, including Thailand, Australia and Indonesia, Zipmex has already fallen foul of Thailand’s SEC. Earlier this year, it was hit with penalties related to allegations of improper use of a digital asset custodian service and the redirection of customers to the Singapore-based exchange, Zipmex Pte, creating a conflict of interest.Financial difficultiesThe exchange has faced financial challenges, including difficulties in repaying creditors after losses incurred from exposure to crypto lenders Babel Finance and Genesis in 2022. A planned $100 million buyout earlier in the year fell through when the buyer, reportedly V Ventures, withdrew from the purchase.Zipmex’s troubles date back to last summer when the exchange halted withdrawals due to volatile market conditions and a liquidity crunch resulting from exposure to the troubled crypto lender Babel Finance. Despite facing financial difficulties, the exchange expressed its commitment to maintaining the integrity of its platform.In August of the same year, Bloomberg reported that Zipmex intended to meet with potential investors and Thailand’s financial regulator to discuss a recovery plan. By November, the platform was in advanced discussions with venture capital fund V Ventures for the sale of a majority stake.Earlier this year, the Thai Securities and Exchange Commission announced an investigation into whether Zipmex breached local rules in its offering of certain digital-asset products. In April, the company filed a request to extend the moratorium period to enable the firm to work towards restructuring. Later that month, it appeared that the V Ventures investment deal had fallen through. By July, the beleaguered firm had sued the investor for breach of contract.The ongoing challenges faced by Zipmex underscore the complex landscape and regulatory scrutiny surrounding cryptocurrency exchanges in various jurisdictions.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Nov 15, 2023

Taiwanese cryptocurrency exchange under investigation for money laundering

Taiwanese cryptocurrency exchange under investigation for money launderingBitgin, a cryptocurrency exchange in Taiwan, is currently under police investigation for alleged money laundering, with its Chief Operating Officer, Yuting Zhang, arrested in connection to the infamous “88 Guild Hall” money laundering incident. The exchange is cooperating fully with the investigation and has assured users that its operations remain unaffected.Photo by Adam Jang on Unsplash‘88 Guild Hall’ scandalThe “88 Guild Hall” scandal, which unfolded from late 2021 to March 2022, implicated Zhang in a massive money laundering network. The controversy exposed a multi-billion dollar operation orchestrated by local businessmen Zhemin Guo and Chengwen Tu, utilizing a network of foreign exchange offices and crypto exchanges.Yuling Tsai, General Counsel of the Taiwan VASP Association, addressed the situation, stating: “This time, a member of the preparatory group was involved in the investigation case. The preparatory group immediately held a meeting and issued a public response. The members involved in the case also took the initiative to suspend participation in the work of the preparatory group.”Business as usualIn an official statement, Bitgin confirmed Zhang’s association with the scandal and clarified that the ongoing investigation has not disrupted its operations. The exchange emphasized its commitment to cooperating with authorities, providing all necessary assistance to facilitate a smooth investigation process.The statement reads: “At present, Bitgin is fully cooperating with the investigating unit and actively providing all necessary assistance to ensure the smooth conduct of the investigation and hopes that the facts can be clarified as soon as possible.”Bitgin also confirmed that in light of the charges, the COO has ceased all communications with counterparties.Focus on regulationTaiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) outlined earlier this year its intention to restrict the activity of non-compliant offshore crypto exchanges. While cryptocurrency exchanges are not officially regulated yet, local operators have taken cues from the FSC to move towards self-regulation. A preparatory group was formed in September with Bitgin participating as a founding member.While Taiwan still doesn’t have a regulatory framework in place, it has applied anti-money laundering (AML) regulation to crypto businesses. In August, leading crypto exchange Binance initiated steps to register for AML compliance in Taiwan.Earlier this year, Taiwanese officials suggested that they would foster self-regulation while proposing the classification of crypto regulations within their own unique business category. Efforts were furthered last month when legislators introduced a cryptocurrency bill for its inaugural reading.JPEX falloutBeyond Bitgin, Taiwan is grappling with the fallout from wayward crypto exchange JPEX, which is accused of orchestrating Hong Kong’s largest financial scam. The authorities raided the local office of JPEX and identified suspects involved in the alleged fraud. To compound matters, local police also uncovered a $320 million crypto money laundering operation earlier this month.The incidents highlight the ongoing challenges faced by regulators in the region as they strive to protect investors from fraudulent activities.As the investigation unfolds, the Taiwanese cryptocurrency industry, along with its self-regulatory initiatives, remains under scrutiny, emphasizing the broader need for regulatory frameworks to safeguard the interests of investors and maintain the integrity of the market.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Nov 07, 2023

Roger Ver sues Matrixport over frozen crypto funds

Roger Ver sues Matrixport over frozen crypto fundsRoger Ver, often referred to as “Bitcoin Jesus,” finds himself embroiled in a legal dispute with Jihan Wu, the co-founder and chairman of Matrixport, a Singapore-based digital assets financial services platform.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash$8 million disputeThe crux of the matter is a contentious $8 million that Ver claims Wu withheld from him in connection with the fallout of the unrelated failure of the CoinFLEX crypto platform. This conflict has led to a lawsuit filed by Ver’s counsel in the Seychelles.The legal complaint, which originated last year, revolves around bit.com, a crypto exchange owned by Matrixport, refusing to allow Ver to withdraw his $8 million. Wu, a creditor of CoinFLEX, contends that he incurred financial losses due to the exchange’s restructuring.However, Ver asserts that the insolvency of CoinFLEX, an unrelated entity, should not be tied to the funds owed to him by Matrixport. Off the back of that assertion, Ver confirmed to The Block that in August 2022, he sued Smart Vega Holding Limited, a Seychelles-incorporated subsidiary company of Matrixport, for $8 million.Ver asserts CoinFLEX collapse innocenceRoger Ver maintains that he is not to blame for CoinFLEX’s collapse. He states that the narrative emerged due to breaches of confidentiality regarding the arbitration between CoinFLEX and himself. It emerged last month that creditors of CoinFLEX had taken legal action against its CEO, Mark Lamb, as well as Ver. It’s understood that Ver had benefited from a settlement negotiated with Lamb. Creditors are seeking to recover any benefit realized by Ver as a consequence of this settlement.Ver told Coindesk in an email that he initiated arbitration proceedings against CoinFLEX in June 2022, seeking $200 million in damages. He maintains he was the plaintiff in this case, not CoinFLEX, which later filed a counterclaim for $84 million.Confidentiality is a key aspect of arbitration proceedings, especially in Hong Kong where the arbitration took place. Despite this, it is alleged that Lamb broke this confidentiality, which led to the misrepresentation that CoinFLEX was the plaintiff in the case. Ver firmly believes that CoinFLEX’s insolvency was primarily due to market turmoil in May 2022 and poor risk management on the part of its co-founders.Matrixport standing firmWhile Matrixport does not deny withholding the cryptocurrency from Ver, it argues that Ver should repay his debt to CoinFLEX, which is a creditor of Ver. Once this is done, CoinFLEX will release monies owed to Wu.The dispute also touches on the terms of service. Matrixport maintains that it has the right to withhold funds for penalties related to defaulted margin calls and legal fees and it is committing significant legal resources to defend its position. Ver’s attorney counters this argument, stating that Matrixport’s terms of service do not permit such penalties and that there is no legal justification for withholding the funds.Matrixport claims that the funds are being held because of an investigation into Ver’s “margin trading irregularities.” The company’s Head of Public Relations and Brand, Ross Gan, said that Ver “continues to make unreasonable demands.” Gan added:“We will respect the legal process and the ultimate Court ruling on this case and reserve all our rights to take further legal action in this ongoing dispute with Mr. Ver.”

news
Loading