South Korea considers permanent crypto investigative unit

Sejong Telecom and Hyosung TNS to Collaborate on Real Estate Security TokensSejong Telecom said Tuesday that it has signed a business deal with Hyosung TNS, the infrastructure and finance arm of South Korean conglomerate Hyosung Group, to boost the profitability of its real estate investment service BBRIC and collaborate in security token offering (STO) services.Photo by Tierra Mallorca on UnsplashIntegrated servicesUnder the deal, Sejong Telecom will integrate the BBRIC platform into NFTtown — Hyosung TNS’ portal service dedicated to providing information, news, and educational content on non-fungible tokens (NFTs). BBRIC aims to expand its user base and modes of marketing by promoting its investment products, events, and services within NFTtown’s fractional real estate investment channel.Furthermore, users can conduct their transactions in a secure and convenient manner through BBRIC without paying intermediary fees. This promotion strategy is expected to ultimately increase profitability, BBRIC said.“Through this deal, we will create an ecosystem where anyone can readily find and compare information on fractional investments and invest accordingly,” said Park Hyo-jin, Head of Sejong Telecom’s blockchain division. “BBRIC will diversify its promotional and sales channels to create real estate financial investment products that are not only stable and reliable but also accessible to a wide range of customers.”Hyosung TNS’ venturesHyosung TNS is a leading player in the automated teller machine (ATM) market both in Korea and overseas. It operates in 46 countries, supplying a variety of financial automation solutions. NFTtown is part of the company’s blockchain endeavors, through which it plans to provide information about various security tokens, including real estate.

Terraform Labs Accuses Citadel Securities of Stablecoin SabotageTerraform Labs, the bankrupt Singaporean blockchain firm, is pointing fingers at American market maker Citadel Securities, alleging that it played a role in an orchestrated effort to destabilize Terraform’s TerraUSD (UST) stablecoin back in May 2022.In its pursuit of justice, Terraform Labs has now called upon the United States District Court in the Southern District of Florida to compel Citadel Securities to furnish vital documents concerning their trading activities during that critical period, when the stablecoin underwent a depegging crisis, now referred to as TerraUSD Classic (USTC).Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashAllegations of intentional destabilizationThat’s according to a motion filed by Terraform in the United States District Court in the Southern District of Florida, earlier this week. As alleged by Terraform Labs, the catastrophic depegging event in May 2022, which saw UST plummet from $1 to a mere $0.02, was not solely due to inherent instability in the algorithm supporting the UST stablecoin. Instead, the firm contends that it was a result of the deliberate and collaborative actions of specific third-party market participants who engaged in “shorting” to trigger the depegging.Terraform stated in its motion:“Movant [Terraform] contends that the market destabilization that occurred did not result from instability in the algorithm underlying the UST stablecoin. Instead, Movant contends that the market was destabilized due to the concerted, intentional effort of certain third party market participants to ‘short’ and cause UST to depeg from its one dollar price.”The motion also alludes to “publicly available evidence” hinting at Citadel’s intention to short the stablecoin at the time of the depegging event. In particular, it references a Discord channel chat screenshot where a pseudonymous trader purportedly had a conversation with Citadel head Ken Griffin. Griffin allegedly remarked:“They were going to Soros the f*** out of Luna UST,” seemingly drawing a connection to George Soros’ trading strategies, which often involve highly leveraged, one-way bets.Citadel refuted allegations previouslyNotably, Citadel Securities has previously refuted allegations of trading the TerraUSD stablecoin in May 2022, according to Forbes.In its motion, Terraform refers to the importance of these documents for its defense in a lawsuit filed by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in February. The SEC lawsuit alleges that Terraform Labs and its founder, Do Kwon, played a significant role in orchestrating a multi-billion dollar cryptocurrency securities fraud.The motion concludes with Terraform arguing that its defense would be substantially hampered if Citadel Securities were to successfully withhold the requested information. In the event that the court fails to compel Citadel, Terraform has requested that the matter be transferred to the US District Court for the Southern District of New York.The matter has been the subject of debate within the crypto community in recent months. In May a community member stated:“As I’ve been saying. People blamed Citadel et al. This was nothing but a rug pull. Wake up. Do Kwon says the dissolving of Terraform Labs in Korea days before the $LUNA and $UST crash is ‘purely coincidental.’”With the matter now being raised in the courts, it looks like the legal system will be the final adjudicator regarding the issue.

How will Binance’s criminal case affect its presence in South Korea?Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, has reached a settlement with the U.S. government to pay a fine of more than $4.3 billion after the exchange was accused of anti-money laundering (AML) and sanctions violations. Co-founder and CEO Changpeng Zhao also pleaded guilty to violating the Bank Secrecy Act, which requires financial institutions to submit documentation to prevent them from becoming mediums for criminal funding. Binance will thus be withdrawing completely from the U.S.Photo by Vadim Artyukhin on UnsplashNews of this incident has sparked keen interest within the South Korean crypto industry regarding the impact it could have on Binance’s presence and influence in the country.Murky future for Binance as Zhao resignsBinance allegedly failed to report transactions involving criminal entities such as terrorist groups, ransomware perpetrators and money launderers without implementing a system to prevent such crimes. In particular, organizations like the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades — the armed wing of the Palestinian militant group Hamas — as well as the Palestinian Islamic Jihad and ISIS were found to have utilized Binance as a channel for their funds. Furthermore, the exchange also facilitated transactions with users in sanctioned territories such as Iran, North Korea and Syria.Zhao has subsequently decided to step down as Binance’s CEO, taking to his X (formerly Twitter) account to state that he believes it is the right move. However, he also emphasized that the U.S. government did not accuse Binance of misappropriating user assets or engaging in market manipulation.Despite this fiasco, some insights have painted Binance’s future in a positive light. JPMorgan, the largest bank in the U.S., stated that the uncertainty surrounding Binance itself would diminish. “For crypto investors, the prospect of settlement would see the elimination of a potential systemic risk emanating from a hypothetical Binance collapse,” the bank said, according to an article published by digital asset news outlet The Block.GOPAX reaffirms partnership with Binance despite concernsGOPAX, a Korean fiat-to-crypto exchange that was acquired by Binance in February, also maintained a rather unexpected positive outlook. The acquisition had been followed by a complicated string of events hindering Binance’s full-fledged expansion in Korea, including delayed approval from the country’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) to become a virtual asset service provider (VASP) and multiple leadership changes as a result.Investors in GOFi — GOPAX’s decentralized finance (DeFi) service — subsequently responded by filing a lawsuit at the end of June, claiming that financial authorities unjustly delayed the approval. They argued that, by approving the request, the FIU would enable Binance to provide the capital that GOPAX had struggled to gather to pay principal and interest payments on GOFi in the wake of last year’s FTX collapse.However, these circumstances did not sway GOPAX’s decision to work with Binance. “We learned of the news about Binance’s fine through articles from foreign media platforms,” GOPAX said. “Regardless, we are still in a business and technical partnership with the exchange.”Prospects for Binance’s landing in KoreaIn contrast to GOPAX’s seemingly positive outlook, the Korean crypto community has voiced mixed opinions about the effect of this development, especially on Binance’s successful entry into the domestic market.If GOPAX’s VASP approval had been delayed due to concerns about Binance’s suitability as its largest shareholder — incited by the legal risks it posed in the U.S. — the possibility of the approval going through may be more plausible as some of these risks have since been alleviated, said Yoon Seung-sik, an analyst at Seoul-based research firm Tiger Research.However, Jang Hye-won, an analyst at crypto data research platform Xangle, pointed out that interpretations may differ depending on the reasons behind FIU’s hesitation in approving the GOPAX acquisition. “If the concerns revolved around legal risks, then the path for Binance’s entry into Korea may seem cleared since those risks have been resolved. But if the concerns are about Binance’s capital inflow into the country, then this incident (Binance’s criminal case) will have no effect,” she explained.On the other end of the spectrum, some experts believe that this incident may have negatively affected the GOPAX acquisition. Hwang Suk-jin, a professor at Dongguk University’s Graduate School of International Affairs & Information Security and a member of the ruling People Power Party’s committee for virtual assets, stated, “Since criminal punishment for Zhao and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) lawsuit are still pending, it’s hard to conclude that legal risks have been completely resolved. Binance paying a fine for money laundering may actually reinforce the FIU’s concerns about legal risks, making the GOPAX acquisition decisively unfavorable.”These statements come after a public opinion survey conducted earlier in June by Cratos, a Korean blockchain-based polling app, revealed that a 64.6% majority of respondents favored approving the GOPAX acquisition.