Top

Further JPEX Controversy Due to DAO Plan

Policy & Regulation·October 06, 2023, 1:57 AM

Dubai-headquartered crypto exchange JPEX, which has recently found itself at the center of controversy in Hong Kong, has moved forward with a plan to transition the platform into a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO).

Photo by Clint Adair on Unsplash

 

Disputed voting outcome

The firm’s management envisages converting user assets into dividend shares, with an incentive to lock them up for two years. While the exchange claims that the majority of its users voted in favor of the plan, some users are alleging that their assets have been converted without their knowledge or consent.

The company announced the outcome of its DAO Shareholder Dividend Scheme referendum on its website on Wednesday. According to JPEX, voting on the program concluded on September 28. The company alleges that 68% of users voted to support the proposed scheme.

 

Asset conversion

Under this plan, users can convert their currently frozen assets into DAO Stakeholder dividends at a 1:1 ratio. JPEX also offers a repurchase option at 30% of the conversion price after one year and a 100% repurchase option after two years.

In a prior announcement, JPEX stated that users who agreed to the scheme would receive dividends from the exchange through a new token listing, trading fees, and a distribution of JPEX Coin (JPC), the platform’s native token, in proportion to their shareholder dividends.

The scheme seems to encourage users to keep their funds on the exchange, which has been grappling with liquidity issues. Previously, the exchange had taken to putting in place unreasonably high withdrawal fees to discourage users from attempting to withdraw their funds from the platform.

 

Ongoing fallout

There has been ongoing fallout from the exchange businesses' difficulties over recent weeks. At first, a number of influencers who had promoted the exchange were arrested. Later, Hong Kong regulators suggested they were giving further scrutiny to crypto trading regulations in light of the scandal.

Further arrests were made in connection with the exchange’s activities. Regulators have suggested that they would create a public listing of platforms that are actually regulated within the Chinese autonomous territory and the licensing status of those businesses. On Thursday the South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported that a further six people have been arrested in relation to the scandal, including the company’s CEO.

In another report on Wednesday the SCMP had cited one platform user who maintained that her assets had already been converted to JPC tokens without her consent or prior knowledge. She and other users discovered that they could no longer withdraw their assets following JPEX’s announcement to proceed with the plan.

“All of my [Tether] USDT and other cryptocurrencies are gone, all transferred to JPC,” she lamented, noting that her assets had been converted to JPC, a token with low liquidity and limited use cases. She expressed concern about the unknown price of JPC and the inability to withdraw, suggesting their assets had become worthless.

On Wednesday, Hong Kong’s police and securities regulator jointly launched a crypto-focused task force aimed at combating illicit activities by cryptocurrency exchanges in the region.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

May 21, 2023

Pakistan Implements Ban on Cryptocurrency

Pakistan Implements Ban on CryptocurrencyPakistan has moved to ban cryptocurrency once more, with the country’s Minister of State for Finance and Revenue, Aisha Ghaus Pasha disclosing the move last week.According to multiple local media reports within Pakistan, on May 16 Ghaus Pasha stated at a session of the Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Revenue, that cryptocurrencies are banned and “will never be legalized in Pakistan.”Photo by Hamid Roshaan on UnsplashFATF Grey ListGhaus Pasha supported this position by outlining that the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) had set the banning of crypto as a condition for Pakistan’s removal from its “Grey List.”FATF is an initiative of the G7 group of countries, first established in 1989. Its mandate is to develop policies geared towards combating money laundering, and most especially, terrorist financing. The FATF grey list includes those jurisdictions who are deemed to require increased monitoring relative to their efforts to keep money laundering and terrorist financing to an absolute minimum.Pakistan had found itself on the FATF grey list over the course of a number of years. That meant reputational damage on an international basis, together with loss of investor confidence. It also signals the likelihood of weaknesses in a country’s financial system and in its financial controls. The categorization would have had an impact on the country’s ability to access international finance, impacted trade relations, and involved increased compliance costs.Against that background, there may be a certain logic to the Finance Minister’s stance, despite it naturally being distasteful to those of us that support the development of decentralized systems, blockchain, and cryptocurrency. After an extended period on that Grey List, Pakistan was only removed from it in October of last year.Currency devaluationNotwithstanding that, governments in the developing world may have added incentives in banning cryptocurrencies. Their currencies are oftentimes unstable, and the Pakistani rupee is no exception. Cryptocurrencies like bitcoin find their greatest use case in countries that have their currencies devalued or economies that fall into the trap of hyperinflation relative to the sovereign currency.In Pakistan’s case, the rupee plummeted to a record low against the US dollar in January. Naturally, that hurts ordinary citizens and provides the conditions under which people are more likely to investigate decentralized cryptocurrencies. On that basis, we shouldn’t be surprised to learn that the Pakistani government’s decision to ban crypto was publicly supported by Sohail Jawad, Director of the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP).Pakistani banks are naturally following the government and the central bank’s lead, in implementing the ban. One circular obtained by CoinDesk stated: “As per regulatory instructions from the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), any remittance of foreign exchange directly/indirectly outside Pakistan to overseas foreign exchange trading, margin trading, and CFD trading apps/websites/platforms through any payment channel is not allowed/permitted by SBP and such payments are inherently risky and illegal.”Community reactionNaturally enough, the crypto community internationally and locally, is not enamored by the move. However, people who have been in the space over the last few years are accustomed to ever-changing stances taken by governments as a reaction to a technology that they simply don’t know how to deal with.Waqar Zaka, a Pakistani who works within the Web3 space commented previously on a ban that was implemented in Pakistan in 2017, only later to be found to be unconstitutional. Another Pakistani community member took to Twitter in taking a stand against the decision. Others still immediately considered how they could circumvent the ban.Crypto has always benefited from jurisdictional arbitrage, and while bans are not in any way helpful, in the longer run, they will never stop the roll out and further development of this innovation.

news
Policy & Regulation·

May 06, 2024

Turkish crypto legislation: anticipated reforms await clarity

Turkey, a significant player in the global cryptocurrency market, has been anticipated to introduce comprehensive crypto-related legislation in 2024. Despite initial announcements suggesting an early rollout, the specifics of the anticipated regulatory framework remain pending, leaving stakeholders in anticipation. Currently, Turkey operates with limited crypto regulations. While some measures exist, such as those imposed by the Central Bank and the Ministry of Finance’s financial intelligence unit, others remain informal, such as guidance from the Capital Markets Board. These regulations primarily focus on prohibiting certain activities and implementing anti-money laundering (AML) measures.Photo by Dima Rogachevskiy on UnsplashAnticipated reforms and their purposeThe forthcoming legislation is expected to address various aspects of the crypto market, including licensing requirements for exchanges, investor protection measures and taxation. The aim is to align with international standards, potentially aiding Turkey in exiting the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF) "gray list." The regulations aim to enhance investor protection, especially in light of past incidents like the collapse of the Thodex exchange, while also providing a legal framework for crypto taxation. Timing of implementationDespite expectations for an early introduction, the exact timeline for the enactment of the crypto legislation remains uncertain. Industry observers speculate potential connections between the legislation's timing and Turkey's efforts to exit the FATF's "gray list." While some anticipate a release by mid-year, others suggest a delay until later in the year, underscoring the complexity and importance of the regulatory reforms for Turkey's crypto ecosystem. 

news
Policy & Regulation·

May 17, 2023

Banking Difficulties Remain in Hong Kong for Crypto Start-Ups

Banking Difficulties Remain in Hong Kong for Crypto Start-UpsWhile Hong Kong has demonstrated a very clear crypto-friendly stance over the course of the past six months, crypto start-ups are still struggling with banking in the Chinese autonomous territory.Photo by Manson Yim on UnsplashLicensing backlogAll the signs are that Hong Kong is striving to develop itself as a regional hub for crypto and blockchain related business. Encouraged by that stance, against a background of the United States becoming openly hostile to crypto over that very same time frame, applications are streaming in from international firms to be licensed to operate their businesses in the city.In discussion with crypto start-up applicants, CoinDesk has established that the issue extends to firms that have already obtained a license to operate. To compound matters, the Hong Kong regulator, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), has a shortage of manpower, with just eight officials currently working on the applications of eighty crypto firms.Speaking to that backlog, Amy Yu, APAC CEO for Swiss crypto financial services company, SEBA Bank, stated: “This probably would have been a different story six or nine months ago.”A known problemIt appears that both the SFC and its regulatory peer, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) were aware of the issue and tried to get out ahead of it. Late last month, both regulators convened a meeting with bank officials and virtual asset service providers (VASPs).The objective was to try to forge a path forward such that banks could amend their approach, enabling greater facilitation and acceptance of crypto businesses such that the banks would be more inclined to approve bank account applications from those fledgling businesses.Arthur Yuen, Deputy CEO of the HKMA addressed the matter in a blog post published to the regulator’s website on April 27. Yuen was clear in calling on the banks to enable banking for VASPs:“With the implementation of the regulatory regime for VA [virtual assets] activities in Hong Kong and the strengthening of supervisory regimes in different jurisdictions according to the international standards, and as the banking industry develops a better understanding of the VA industry over time, we expect that regulated virtual asset service providers (VASPs) will be able to successfully apply for a bank account through a reasonable process.”Banker resistanceElaborating on the matter further, it’s clear that Yuen and his colleagues understand the importance of banking in enabling this nascent business sector such that the broader strategy of a pro-crypto business environment is affected in Hong Kong. “To attract businesses from new markets, it is crucial to have high quality financial services, while enhancing corporate access to bank accounts would be one of the key priorities,”he stated.An attendee at that regulator-organized round-table last month said that “It was more like a wish list from the regulator,” and that “whether the banks fully embrace it is another matter.” The issue remains as a major impediment to the ability of crypto start-up companies to operate, Some are being forced to try and work around the stumbling block, relying instead on overseas banking partners.

news
Loading