Ant Group Targets Web3 Developers With New Brand Launch

Korean Financial Regulator to Inspect Non-Fiat Crypto Trading PlatformThe Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) under the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) plans to launch a comprehensive inspection on crypto trading platform Fobl (previously known as Foblgate) from March 11.©Pexels/김 대정Unlike other major Korean crypto exchanges, such as Upbit or Bithumb, which allow trading between fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies, Fobl only offers trading between cryptocurrencies.Inspection on non-fiat exchangesThe FIU’s inspection of Fobl is a follow-up to the regulator’s inspection of GDAC, another Korean non-fiat crypto exchange. This suggests that the FIU will focus on inspecting non-fiat exchanges in the first half of this year.Many in the cryptocurrency industry have been paying attention to the FIU’s move after its first inspection of GDAC, as it could signal the direction in which the regulator would take. Earlier this year, the FIU announced that it would conduct inspections not only on non-fiat crypto exchanges but also on wallet solutions, custodians, and staking service providers. It is known that the FIU has been reviewing anti-money laundering (AML) systems and asset management statuses of these crypto enterprises.Fobl’s possible addition of fiat tradingThe Korean crypto industry suspects Fobl might transform itself into a fiat crypto exchange, considering the FIU’s notice that it will prioritize examining non-fiat exchanges that are preparing to support fiat trading.Fobl CEO’s take on the marketPrior to this news, Fobl CEO Ahn Hyun-joon said in a recent interview with Etnews that the platform is in talks with multiple banks to acquire real-name bank accounts and is complying with all the regulations required by the authorities. During the interview, he also raised concerns about the uncertainty that faces non-fiat crypto trading platforms, pointing out that 97% of the crypto trading in Korea is being carried out in crypto exchanges that support trading of Korean won.In Korea, the financial regulator requires virtual asset service providers (VASPs) offering trading in Korean won to hold real-name registered accounts at domestic banks as a measure to prevent money laundering.

Tether Alters ToS in Singapore Restricting USDT RedemptionTether, the issuer of the world’s largest stablecoin, USDT, has made substantial revisions to its Terms of Service (ToS), which may have a significant impact on its user base in Singapore.News of the change emerged on Monday, with Dr. Julian Hosp, CEO of Cake Group, the project team behind Singapore-based Cake DeFi, taking to social media and providing a copy of an email from Tether’s Compliance Department, confirming the change. That notification read:”Tether has changed its terms of service to, among other things, restrict its onboarding standards. Corporates controlled by; another entities, directors, shareholders residing in Singapore are no longer permitted to be Tether customers.”In his commentary, Hosp stated that he wouldn’t be in a position to confirm “if redeeming $USDT into $USD is actually possible, due to being in #Singapore.”Photo by DrawKit Illustrations on UnsplashToS Change in ContextWithin the cryptocurrency ecosystem, eyebrows have been raised regarding the timing of Tether’s ToS change, as it has coincided with a major instance of crypto-related money laundering. Conversely, some argue that the issue could be specific to Cake DeFi. The DeFi protocol had been flagged for enhanced due diligence (EDD), suggesting that the modification in Tether’s ToS might potentially be a result of a partnership issue between the two entities.Stablecoins like USDT play a pivotal role in the digital asset ecosystem, serving as a bridge between the volatile world of cryptocurrencies and the stability of traditional fiat currencies like the US dollar. Any disruption in their usage can trigger a domino effect in the crypto markets.The cryptocurrency sector is grappling with regulatory uncertainties worldwide, and Singapore is no exception. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has been actively reviewing and updating its crypto-related regulations to align with international standards and mitigate risks to financial stability.The precise motive behind Tether’s decision to restrict USDT redemption for specific customers in Singapore remains unclear. Notwithstanding that, Tether’s Chief Technology Officer (CTO) Paolo Ardoino expressed the view that the matter is being misunderstood. He tweeted:Spreading FUD”Before spreading FUD [fear, uncertainty and doubt] it would be great if you guys did take a look at webarchive… This is Jan 2022…. And if you open the link below: Last updated: May 12, 2020… Again, take a moment to search and verify information before YOLO [you only live once] posting.”Clearly Ardoino is making the point that the ToS change is consistent with existing compliance policy which has been in place since 2020. Notwithstanding that, in reviewing related records, media outlet Protos found that USDT issuance and redemption after May 2020 demonstrate that the firm continued to do business with Singapore-based entities. The publication cited UQPAY specifically, a Singapore-based payments processor. It was found to have issued USDT between May 14 and May 18 in 2020.

The Asia Web3 Alliance Japan, an agency that regards itself as a bridge between the Web3 ecosystem in Asia and Japan’s broader business sector, has reached out to the Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States with a view towards establishing a strategic collaboration.Photo by Clement Souchet on UnsplashFocus on Web3 regulatory innovation & tokenizationThe President of the organization, Hinza Asif, wrote to SEC Crypto Task Force Chairperson and SEC Commissioner, Hester Peirce, on the subject, on March 25. The letter, subsequently published by the SEC, sets out a proposal that centers on a strategic U.S.-Japan partnership relative to Web3 regulatory innovation and tokenization. The Japanese agency, which has set out cross-border synergy as one of its objectives, calls for collaboration between Japan’s Financial Services Agency, the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and the Bank of Japan with the U.S. regulator. The Alliance proposes that the goal of that partnership would be the establishment of regulatory clarity in respect of the Web3 sector, together with the fostering of interoperability between a developing Web3 ecosystem in the U.S. and the one that’s developing in Japan. Token classification frameworkDelving deeper into proposal specifics, Asif sets out the formation of a harmonized token classification framework as a key objective. The proposal suggests that a distinction needs to be made between tokenized securities, utility tokens and non-security digital assets.  The alliance believes that right now, token classification is unclear, with projects struggling to understand what category their token falls within from a regulatory perspective. There’s a lack of token offering frameworks. While it sees that further work is required, the Asia Web3 Alliance Japan is encouraged by progress made by the SEC’s Crypto Task Force in identifying security categories. With this cross-border collaboration, the Japanese crypto advocacy group believes that there is an opportunity to achieve regulatory interoperability on an international basis. That would facilitate compliant cross-border token issuance. On that basis, the alliance suggests that standards be developed such that regulatory consistency is achieved internationally when it comes to items such as digital asset trading, custody and token issuance. The proposal sets out a need for reciprocal disclosure requirements between the two jurisdictions where cross-border token issuance is concerned. It advocates for mutual recognition of what it terms “compliant tokenized offerings.” Bringing safe harbor to JapanAnother focus area contained within the proposal is the suggestion of a need to implement a safe harbor approach in Japan for early-stage token projects in line with what has been put forward in the U.S. Peirce first put forward a token safe harbor proposal in the U.S. in 2020. It sets out to provide exemptions over a defined initial period for certain token issuances. The idea behind it is to enable these early-stage projects to innovate and mature without getting bogged down in a regulatory quagmire. The establishment of a U.S.-Japan Web3 regulatory roundtable is another strand contained within the proposal. This would provide a mechanism for ongoing dialogue between stakeholders such as regulators, industry leaders and legal experts.