Tether Alters ToS in Singapore Restricting USDT Redemption

Survey Reveals Over Half of Korean Financial Firms Eyeing Both Issuance and Distribution of Security TokensIn a recent survey conducted by fintech solution provider Koscom, it was found that more than half of South Korean financial companies interested in security token businesses are planning to undertake both the issuance and distribution of security tokens. This result reflects the belief of the financial firms that if they engage only in the secondary market, they will experience reduced profitability due to the necessity of lowering transaction fees amidst fierce competition, as per local business newspaper Hankyung.Photo by Shubham Dhage on Unsplash62% of financial firmsAt a seminar held today, Koscom revealed the result of this survey it conducted among a total of 95 entities interested in security tokens, consisting of 30 securities firms, three banks, one asset management company, and 61 token issuers. Among the financial firms that belong to the first three categories, 62% answered that they will conduct both the issuance and distribution of security tokens. 31% expressed a preference for conducting only issuance, while 7% were inclined towards distribution alone.The survey also highlighted that 38% of financial companies hold a positive outlook on the security token market, although they acknowledge insufficient understanding. Additionally, 34% of respondents anticipate that the security token market will rival the exchange-traded fund (ETF) market in terms of size, while only 10% believe it will eventually replace the initial public offering (IPO) market.Cultural contentWhen it comes to the underlying real-world assets (RWAs) for security tokens, cultural content emerged as the most preferred option, with 71% of respondents selecting it. Real estate followed closely at 66%, with energy (55%), artworks (41%), and agriculture and fisheries (21%) also garnering interest. Respondents were allowed to choose multiple options for this section.Similarly, cultural content remained the top choice among token issuers, favored by 21% of respondents. It was followed by real estate (16%), artworks (14%), intellectual property (14%), and agriculture and fisheries (9%).A Koscom official attributed the preference for cultural content and real estate as underlying assets to their accessibility and profitability.This seminar, organized by Koscom, aimed to create a supportive environment for issuers and distributors struggling to promote security token businesses. Hong Woo-sun, CEO of Koscom, said the company will leverage its expertise in the capital market and blockchain technology to collaborate with authorities and relevant organizations in lowering barriers to entry for market participants who need technical infrastructure.

South Korean lawmakers are moving to seize control of the nation’s stalled second phase of digital asset legislation, aiming to bypass months of interagency gridlock and introduce a comprehensive regulatory framework by January. The legislative acceleration comes as Seoul races to align with global standards following the implementation of the U.S. GENIUS Act in July, a shift that has intensified pressure on local regulators to formalize oversight of the crypto sector. According to a report from the Maeil Business Newspaper, the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) plans to introduce the Digital Asset Basic Act as a lawmaker-sponsored bill rather than wait for a government submission. The procedural move is intended to ensure that formal deliberations can begin during the February provisional session. Lawmaker Kang Jun-hyeon, a DPK member of the National Policy Committee, told reporters on Dec. 11 that relying on the government’s timeline would jeopardize passage of the bill in the first half of next year. Kang cited points of disagreement among the parliament, the government, and industry stakeholders. Among the authorities, in particular, a standoff between the Bank of Korea (BOK) and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) over monetary policy and issuance authority has been a key source of delay.Photo by Lauren Seo on UnsplashDraft sets ‘major’ stablecoin requirementsAt the heart of the legislation is a new classification system for stablecoins. The government delivered its draft for the Digital Asset Basic Act to DPK’s Digital Asset Task Force, outlining its intention to classify won-denominated stablecoins exceeding a certain issuance threshold as “major digital payment tokens.” According to Blockmedia, citing sources familiar with the closed-door briefing to the task force, these assets would fall under a rigorous oversight framework developed in consultation with the central bank. Under the draft rules, issuers would be required to maintain 100% reserves, prohibited from making interest payments to holders, and obliged to submit detailed issuance plans to the FSC. Foreign-issued stablecoins would only be permitted to circulate domestically if the issuer establishes a local branch. Although the government ultimately submitted its draft to the DPK, the delivery was delayed by two days, missing the Dec. 10 deadline set by the party. Officials attributed the postponement to unresolved interagency disagreements. The central bank had argued that any issuance should require unanimous approval from all relevant agencies, including itself, but the government agreed to involve the bank only when a token is designated as “major.” The Bank of Korea continues to advocate for a bank-led consortium issuance model, highlighting the coordination challenges that have complicated the bill’s preparation. Supply thresholds emerge as fault lineCritics warn that the proposed regulations could inadvertently tilt the market against domestic innovation. Analysts argue that if the threshold for the "major" designation is set too low, new won-based issuers may face compliance costs that could undermine their business viability before they reach meaningful scale. They added that setting the bar for entrenched dollar-backed issuers such as USDT and USDC is also complex, given that their combined global issuance already exceeds $250 billion. Market participants said concerns about triggering the “major” designation could prompt Korean issuers to cap supply to avoid heightened scrutiny, effectively stifling growth from the outset. Despite these concerns, political will to close the policy vacuum is hardening. The DPK intends to move the legislation forward on its own timetable, incorporating the government’s input but steering the process through parliament. Lawmaker Kang emphasized that while numerous issues remain, the task force aims to narrow the debate to a few essential questions before the bill’s planned introduction in January. Industry representatives have largely welcomed the clearer timeline, viewing the move as a necessary step to reduce uncertainty as the global crypto sector comes under more formal regulatory oversight. 

Sui Token Debuts on Korea’s Top Five Crypto ExchangesThe native token of Sui, a layer 1 blockchain platform, has debuted on South Korea’s five leading cryptocurrency exchanges — Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax. This marks the first time a token has been listed simultaneously on all five exchanges, according to Korean news agency Newsis.Photo by Sigmund on UnsplashAptos’ successThe decision by these exchanges to list Sui may have been influenced by the success of the APT token, which belongs to Aptos, another scalable layer 1 blockchain platform also developed by former Meta employees. APT was listed on Binance two days after the launch of the Aptos’ mainnet on October 17 last year, and its price skyrocketed to $100 on the first day, a hundred times its listing price. Within a week, the trading volume of APT reached $1.3 billion.Sui’s mainnet launchWith the launch of its mainnet on May 3, Sui is garnering significant interest in the crypto sphere. An official from a notable Korean venture capital firm told Newsis that Sui and Aptos, both developed with the Move programming language, involve many top-tier investors and are highly anticipated by ecosystem participants.