Asia Web3 Alliance Japan seeks collaboration with U.S. SEC

Almost 60K Korean Crypto-Holding Households Owe $389M in Unpaid Social Insurance PremiumsThe National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) in South Korea is intensifying its efforts to collect overdue premiums. Many high-income individuals who can afford to pay premiums for social insurance, including health insurance, have been neglecting their dues.Photo by Hush Naidoo Jade Photography on UnsplashVirtual assets for seizureAccording to the documents submitted on October 18 by the NHIS to lawmaker Jung Choun-sook, a member of the National Assembly’s Health and Welfare Committee, the NHIS is actively identifying a range of assets, including copyrights and virtual assets, that can be seized from these individuals. The NHIS aims to recover overdue premiums through stringent measures such as confiscation and government auctions. This move is designed to deter high-income earners from neglecting their obligations, ensuring fairness for those who consistently pay their premiums.Almost 60,000 crypto-holding householdsThis year, the NHIS discovered that 59,513 households, despite owning virtual assets, had outstanding social insurance premiums amounting to KRW 525 billion ($389 million). The NHIS has initiated collection efforts. In 2021, the insurance agency identified 5,336 households with virtual assets that had unpaid social insurance premiums totaling KRW 62.2 billion. Of this, the NHIS successfully collected KRW 6.92 billion, representing 11.13% of the total arrears.On this matter, lawmaker Jung highlighted that the government should strive to bolster the NHIS’s financial health. She underscored the importance of identifying concealed income sources or assets, like cryptocurrency holdings, of premium defaulters to ensure the collection of their overdue premiums.

Korbit Report: SEC Commissioner Shares Insights on Crypto RegulationKorbit Research Center, a division of South Korea’s cryptocurrency exchange Korbit, on Monday, released a report that provides a comprehensive summary of its interview with Hester M. Peirce, a Republican Commissioner at the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which took place on August 18. The interview was conducted by Peter Chung, the head of research at Korbit Research Center.Photo by Joshua Hoehne on UnsplashKorbit’s meeting with US crypto expertsIn August, Chung made a trip to the United States, where he met with prominent figures and companies within the cryptocurrency industry to gain a deeper understanding of the ongoing institutionalization of cryptocurrencies in the United States. Through this opportunity, Korbit intends to release a series of reports that will encapsulate the valuable insights garnered during these interactions in the US.His first interviewee of the series was Commissioner Peirce, who serves as one of the five commissioners at the SEC. These commissioners are appointed by the President of the United States with the confirmation of the US Senate. To maintain political balance and impartiality, it is mandated that no more than three commissioners belong to the same political party.Peirce assumed her role as a Commissioner at the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in January 2018, following her appointment by President Trump. Before her tenure at the SEC, she held the position of Senior Counsel on the United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. She is known as an advocate for technological innovation.Token safe harbor proposalPeirce earned the nickname “Crypto Mom” due to her advocacy for encouraging innovation within the cryptocurrency industry through the implementation of reasonable regulations. One notable initiative that exemplifies her perspective is the token safe harbor proposal. This proposal suggests giving blockchain network developers a three-year grace period during which they can work on building a decentralized network while being exempted from complying with the registration rules of federal securities laws, as long as certain conditions are met.During the interview, Peirce expressed concerns about recent actions taken by the SEC, which have added to the uncertainty surrounding cryptocurrency regulations. She also emphasized the need for swift legislative action to establish a framework for cryptocurrency regulation. Peirce noted that there appears to be a tendency to prioritize the classification of virtual assets over investor protection.Suggestions for KoreaAlthough Peirce hasn’t engaged in any direct interactions with Korean regulators, she suggested the Korean government optimize regulations for its own cryptocurrency industry. Her suggestion was to minimize unnecessary intervention and instead foster an environment where the sector can naturally evolve in accordance with the principles of a free-market economy.Furthermore, Peirce delved into detailed discussions on three pivotal topics: the classification of virtual assets as securities, the need for disclosure requirements, and the significance of assessing the extent of decentralization within a network.Classification of cryptocurrenciesThe Commissioner said that it is inappropriate for the SEC to contend that most cryptocurrency projects should fall under its regulatory purview. The SEC’s argument is based on the assertion that cryptocurrencies may constitute securities because they function as a medium of value exchange in fundraising activities, much like investment contracts in traditional financial markets. Despite this, she expressed optimism regarding the recent US court’s ruling on the Ripple vs. SEC case, which she believes may help rectify misconceptions surrounding the classification of investment contracts.Balancing investor protection and investor choiceMeanwhile, she expressed her viewpoint that regulations aimed at protecting investors should stay true to the disclosure principles introduced back in 1934 when the SEC was first established. However, she also argued that the SEC should avoid imposing arbitrary restrictions on investors’ choices. During the initial phases of a cryptocurrency project, there tends to be an inherent information asymmetry between crypto project leaders and individual investors. To ensure a fair investment environment, she advocated for legal mandates for disclosure. Notably, both her token safe harbor proposal and the Responsible Financial Innovation Act proposed by US Senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Cynthia Lummis incorporate such disclosure requirements.Decentralization assessmentCommissioner Peirce also approached the assessment of decentralization with a thoughtful perspective. Her Token Safe Harbor Proposal 2.0 states that after the three-year grace period, “token transactions may not constitute securities transactions if the network has matured to a functioning or decentralized network.” However, she admitted to grappling with the challenge of precisely defining what constitutes sufficient decentralization. During the conversation, she sought Mr. Chung’s perspective on this matter. In response, Mr. Chung shared that the Korbit Research Center regularly conducts measurements and assessments of the degree of decentralization for major blockchain networks every six months.Regarding the interview, Peter Chung expressed his admiration for the high-ranking official’s openness to innovation and strong communication skills. He also voiced his hope for more open discussions in Korea that could promote sustainable growth of the country’s crypto industry.

Hacking Attempts on Upbit Reach 160,000 in First Half of the YearThere have been approximately 160,000 hacking attempts on Upbit, Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, in the first half of this year alone, according to a report submitted by Upbit’s operator Dunamu to lawmaker Park Sung-joong of the National Assembly’s Science, ICT, Broadcasting, and Communications Committee.“Cryptocurrency hacking incidents are increasing both domestically and internationally, and hacking attacks on exchanges such as Upbit, which have daily trading volumes exceeding KRW 2 trillion, are a serious issue,” Park said.Photo by Clint Patterson on UnsplashAn uptick in hacking attemptsThe data revealed that the number of cyber breach attempts in the first half of the year totaled 159,061–2.17 times higher than the number of attempts in the first half of last year, which stood at 73,249.Hacking attempts on Upbit have been steadily increasing in recent years, from 8,356 in the second half of 2020 to 34,687 and 63,912 in the first and second half of 2021, respectively. In the first half of last year, there were 73,249, and 87,242 in the second half. Notably, the exchange suffered losses of approximately KRW 58 billion (approximately $43 million) from a hacking attack in 2019.Ramping up securitySubsequently, Dunamu has taken action to enhance security by managing over 70% of its assets in cold wallets and operating hot wallets in a distributed structure instead of a singular one. Hot wallets refer to online crypto wallets, whereas cold wallets are crypto wallets that are offline and disconnected from the internet. Hot wallets offer the advantage of direct deposits and withdrawals, but they have weaker security levels — most known exchange hacks have thus occurred through this medium. On the other hand, cold wallets store private keys on offline sources like external hard drives and portable storage devices, making real-time trading difficult but providing better security and stability.“We have taken various preventive measures since the hacking incident in 2019, such as operating hot wallets in a distributed manner. There have not been any successful cyber breaches to date,” Upbit said.Regarding the role of the Ministry of Science and ICT in managing and overseeing crypto hacking incidents, Park pointed out that this still remains ambiguous. “The Ministry should conduct large-scale white-hat hacking tests and security assessments for crypto exchanges that are frequently faced with hacking attempts, as well as for hospitals and subway systems that manage large amounts of personal information,” he said.