Dunamu Loses Lawsuit Seeking $19M in Corporate Tax Refunds After Venture Status Removal

Seoul Prosecutors to Establish Dedicated Division to Combat Crypto CrimesSeoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office announced that by the end of this month, it will establish a specialized division dedicated to investigating cryptocurrency crimes, according to local news agency Yonhap. This move marks the introduction of the first-ever cryptocurrency-focused investigation organization within South Korea’s prosecution system.Photo by Markus Winkler on UnsplashInvestigation and legal analysisThe newly formed joint cryptocurrency investigation division will prioritize its efforts on combating various crypto-related crimes, including fraudulent activities. Furthermore, the division will examine legal documents to determine whether certain virtual assets constitute securities.This introduction of a specialized division by the public prosecution is expected to streamline and expedite ongoing investigations into cryptocurrency-related cases, demonstrating the authorities’ dedication to addressing the emerging challenges associated with illicit activities in the crypto sphere.Investor protection effortsSouth Korea has been ramping up its initiatives to safeguard crypto investors. Notably, last month, the National Assembly’s plenary session passed the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill, which is scheduled to take effect in July of next year. Further strengthening the protective framework, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) recently announced a plan to require companies to disclose their virtual asset holdings in the footnotes of financial statements.

Singaporean takes helm at Binance as CZ steps asideIn a significant leadership shift, Richard Teng, a seasoned professional with an extensive background in regulatory affairs, has assumed the role of Chief Executive Officer at Binance.News of the appointment came on Tuesday, in a tumultuous day in the crypto sector that saw Binance Founder and CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) step down following criminal charges in the U.S.Photo by Syed Hussaini on UnsplashStarting out at Binance SingaporeTeng, a Singaporean industry veteran, initially joined Binance in 2021 as the CEO of Binance Singapore, demonstrating his efforts at bolstering global compliance for the crypto giant. His trajectory within the organization has been noteworthy, progressing from leading regional markets to ultimately becoming the CEO. Binance’s official statement highlights Teng’s diverse experience, overseeing regions such as the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) and Europe, culminating in his responsibility for all markets outside the U.S.Before joining Binance, Teng held the position of CEO at the Financial Services Regulatory Authority at Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM). He had taken up that role following a spell as Chief Regulatory Officer at SGX, a Singapore-based multi-asset exchange, where he showcased his leadership in regulatory divisions, specifically shaping policies related to listing trading and clearing activities.Teng’s career is further distinguished by a 13-year tenure at the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), where he served in various capacities, including Director of Corporate Finance. His involvement in regulatory matters spanning banking, insurance and capital markets, particularly during the late 1990s transformation of Singapore’s financial services sector, underscores his deep understanding of industry dynamics.In a statement, Teng expressed his commitment to leveraging his three decades of financial services and regulatory experience to guide Binance’s innovative team. Taking to the X social media platform, he stated:”We operate the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange by volume. The trust placed on us by our 150m users and thousands of employees is a responsibility that I take seriously and hold dear. With CZ, and our leadership team’s support, I have accepted this role so that we can continue to meet and exceed the expectations of stakeholders while achieving our core mission, the freedom of money.”Setting prioritiesWhile the broader crypto community was still digesting the settlement that had been struck by Binance and CZ with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), the U.S. Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) in charges related to money laundering, unlicensed money transmission and sanctions violations, Teng was already setting out his objectives going forward.Teng outlined that his focus will turn towards “reassuring users that they can remain confident in the financial strength, security and safety of the company.” Secondly, the industry veteran intends to concentrate efforts on “collaborating with regulators to uphold high standards globally that foster innovation while providing important consumer protections.” Lastly, Teng highlighted “working with partners to drive growth and adoption of Web3” as another area where he will focus his attention.Analysts from American multinational financial services giant JPMorgan said on Wednesday that they see the Binance settlement as a positive for the crypto space as it removes uncertainty and risk from the company and the sector overall.

BitMEX CEO Calls for an End to Internal Market MakersIn a recent interview, Stephan Lutz, the acting CEO and group CFO of 100x Group, the parent company of Seychelles-headquartered global crypto exchange BitMEX, expressed his belief that crypto exchanges should phase out their internal market-making teams.Photo by Joe Roberts on UnsplashProp trading desks unnecessarySpeaking with The Block, Lutz argued that with the growth of institutional liquidity providers and high-frequency traders (HFTs) in the market, proprietary trading desks are becoming unnecessary.Lutz stated: “You have enough HFTs out there and prop shops that can perform that function.” He was referring to the role of liquidity providers in filling gaps in the market. He made these comments in response to the emergence of information earlier this week that raised questions about internal trading practices at Crypto.com, a Singapore-based exchange.BitMEX, once the world’s largest crypto derivatives exchange, also used to employ internal traders who acted as market makers. However, Lutz explained that BitMEX’s internal trading team, named Arrakis Capital, now functions primarily as a “treasury desk.” He sees this transition as a natural evolution for crypto exchanges in a market that has matured and attracted more institutional liquidity providers.Arrakis Capital currently performs limited functions, including converting commission fees earned in Bitcoin into fiat currency for operational purposes, hedging BitMEX’s exposure to tokens held as inventory, and making markets for BitMEX’s token $BMEX. Lutz clarified that Arrakis’s market-making activities are limited because external market makers find the token’s liquidity insufficient.Regarding profitability, Lutz stated that Arrakis earns “very minor returns” of up to $100,000 per month from holding T-Bills, but it incurred losses last year. He noted that Arrakis used to play a more significant market-making role when BitMEX dominated the crypto futures market. However, he assured that the trading desk was always segregated, despite accusations in the past.Fee structuresLutz acknowledged that exchanges with internal trading teams have faced increased scrutiny since the controversies surrounding Alameda Research and FTX. To differentiate between benign internal trading teams and hedge fund-like operations, Lutz highlighted several factors, including the separation of client funds and house funds, access to sensitive data, and the ability to move markets on their own exchange. Fee structures also play a role, with low or no transaction fees potentially signaling a market-making motive rather than serving as a counterparty.Lutz’s perspective suggests that crypto exchanges should rely on external liquidity providers and HFTs rather than maintaining internal market-making teams. He argues that the market has evolved. At this point he feels that these teams are no longer necessary, due to the presence of established players within the digital assets space.As regulatory scrutiny grows, ensuring transparency and avoiding conflicts of interest become crucial for maintaining trust within the crypto exchange ecosystem. The digital assets industry is far from arriving at a mature stage in its development. While many in the industry have found the stance taken by regulators to be unhelpful, the industry itself must also demonstrate its ability to iteratively move towards best practice, without that being a knee-jerk response to regulatory enforcement.