Nibiru Chain forges ahead with expansion into Asia

Antpool overtakes Foundry as largest bitcoin mining poolAntpool, a Singapore-headquartered open access mining pool that supports ten cryptocurrencies, has recently surpassed Foundry USA to become the foremost bitcoin mining pool in terms of monthly blocks mined.That’s according to a report published by TheMinerMag, a bitcoin mining industry publication run by New York public relations firm BlocksBridge Consulting.This development indicates a shift in bitcoin mining pool dynamics since January 2022. According to Bitcoin network data, Antpool mined 1,219 blocks in November, slightly edging out Foundry USA’s 1,216 blocks. The total rewards for Antpool’s miner clients reached 8,672 BTC, excluding the 83.6 BTC designated for refunds.Photo by Norman Wozny on UnsplashBitmain affiliateAntPool is an affiliate company of leading crypto mining equipment manufacturer, Bitmain. This surge in Antpool’s hashrate aligns with Bitmain’s substantial importation of over 4,800 metric tons of Antminer S19XP and S19XP Hydro to its U.S. subsidiary in Georgia between June and November. These imports have contributed to an estimated total hashrate exceeding 37 EH/s. The exact activation status of Bitmain’s imported hashrate and whether it is utilized for its own purposes, remains unclear.Foundry USA had previously held the leading position in mining pools since early 2022, benefiting from the rise of North American mining operations following China’s crackdown in 2021. While Antpool consistently secured the second position, its hashrate began closing the gap on Foundry USA around June this year.China vs. U.S. competitive dynamicThe two companies dominate bitcoin mining. With one having a parent company headquartered in China and the other being U.S.-centric, their positioning in terms of overall blocks mined is being seen by some as a reflection of competition between entities in China and the United States in terms of bitcoin mining dominance. Addressing that dynamic in response to CoinDesk recently, CryptoQuant Web3 Analyst Bradley Park wrote:“China is aggressively mining ahead of the approval of a Bitcoin ETF. As the Bitcoin halving nears, I anticipate a competitive surge between China and the US in mining machine productivity. This is because the unit cost of mining Bitcoin is likely to escalate due to increasing power expenses and rising mining difficulty.”The bitcoin hashrate has been climbing continuously throughout 2023, reaching new all-time highs along the way.It’s worth noting that despite Antpool’s dominance in blocks mined, data from BTC.com reveals that the company’s self-reported real-time hashrate consistently lags behind Foundry USA’s over the past three months. The cause of this discrepancy remains uncertain, raising questions about variance or reporting errors affecting Antpool’s real-time hashrate.Bitmain established Antpool in 2014, and it was later spun out of Bitmain to become an independent entity in 2021. Meanwhile, Foundry is a wholly owned subsidiary of Digital Currency Group (DCG). Both Bitmain and DCG have been facing financial challenges over the course of the past year.In a separate development, Foundry took to social media platform X on Thursday to confirm that it is discontinuing support for The Graph protocol, Axelar Network, Polkadot and Flow. The firm said that the changes were decided upon in order to better align the business with its strategic business goals.

Korean Lawmakers Complete First Rough Draft of Virtual Asset User Protection BillKorean lawmakers have completed the first rough draft of the virtual asset user protection bill at a National Policy Committee meeting held later last month.©Pexels/Matthias ZomerAgreeing on term usage ‘virtual assets’So far, 18 bills have been proposed to regulate cryptocurrencies, and the lawmakers and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) agreed to use the term “virtual assets” to encompass similar terms such as digital assets and crypto assets.Phased enactment of billsThe bills are likely to be reviewed under the title “Virtual Asset User Protection Act.” The bipartisan group agreed to enact the bills in phases, introducing the user protection bill in the first phase and the virtual asset listing and issuance bill in the second phase.Meanwhile, there were mixed opinions on the content of the bills. In particular, there was debate over whether the bills should stipulate that the central bank digital currency (CBDC) is excluded from virtual assets, and whether the bills should include a standard for determining if a virtual asset is a security.Debate over stipulating CBDC’s statusThe stipulation of excluding CBDC from virtual assets was the most divisive topic since it would lead to defining the conditions for other assets such as non-fungible tokens. Moreover, the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information, which currently regulates virtual asset service providers (VASPs), does not contain any stipulation on CBDC. Some raised concerns that such discrepancies could later cause confusion. In the end, assembly members decided to discuss the matter again in April after consulting with the Bank of Korea and the Ministry of Government Legislation.Criteria for classifying virtual assets as securitiesRegarding whether to include criteria for classifying virtual assets as securities, the lawmakers and financial regulators took different sides.Lee Yong-woo, a member of the Democratic Party of Korea, underlined that a clear statement of the relationship between the issuer and the recipient of virtual assets in a whitepaper can determine their security status. He added that such provisions should be included in the bills.Park Min-woo, an FSC official, on the other hand, commented on a cautious note that in case virtual assets fall under the category of securities, they may not be applicable to the virtual asset act. He explained that VASPs might deal with both securities and virtual assets, and in such cases, there could be a misunderstanding that VASPs are not subject to the virtual asset act simply because they trade securities.

Binance withdraws Abu Dhabi bid amid global licensing reevaluationLeading global crypto exchange Binance has chosen to withdraw its bid for a trading license in Abu Dhabi, according to information gleaned from the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) register and a report published by Reuters on Thursday.Photo by Demid Druz on UnsplashChange of directionThe local subsidiary company responsible for the application, BV Investment Management Limited, initially submitted its licensing bid on Nov. 15, 2022. Much has changed in the crypto space and in the fortunes of Binance over the course of the past year, leading the firm to withdraw its application on Nov. 7.This proposed license would have granted Binance the authority to pool and invest funds from professional investors. The decision to retract the bid is part of Binance’s broader reevaluation of its overall strategy going forward. “When assessing our global licensing needs, we decided this application was not necessary,” a spokesperson from the company told Reuters.Adapting to new circumstancesMuch has changed for Binance in 2023. The company has been combating regulatory pushback in multiple jurisdictions worldwide, not least in the United States, where Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) recently reached a plea agreement with U.S. prosecutors and agreed to pay $4.3 billion for violations related to money laundering and sanctions laws.As part of that process, CZ stepped down as CEO, passing the leadership to Singaporean Richard Teng. Teng is a former regulatory executive who previously oversaw the exchange’s regional operations. A spokesperson for the company maintained that this recent decision relative to licensing in Abu Dhabi is entirely unrelated to the recently agreed-upon settlement in the United States.UAE tiesWhile Binance may be dropping its attempts to gain licensing in Abu Dhabi, in July the company acquired a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) license from the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority in the United Arab Emirates’ (UAE) other major center, Dubai. The UAE is also the location where CZ has established his home.Some had speculated that the company had also established its headquarters within the UAE. However, CZ has always refused to disclose the firm’s global headquarters, instead suggesting that the firm has no global headquarters. Teng has taken a similar approach.Binance was originally founded in China in 2017. It then shifted its headquarters to Japan and later established a base in Malta to circumvent regulatory challenges in China. Similarly, it’s thought that regulatory scrutiny provides the rationale for the company’s ongoing stance in refusing to confirm the location of its corporate headquarters.Despite regulatory challenges, Binance had previously expressed a focus on expanding its operations in the Middle East, known for its crypto-friendly environment and specific regulatory frameworks. Binance holds various crypto licenses from regulators in the region. In May of last year, it acquired a Category 4 crypto-asset service provider (CASP) license from the Central Bank of Bahrain.The exchange maintains registrations and licenses across Europe, Asia and other regions. It’s had mixed fortunes in its endeavors over recent months, driven out of some markets while making in-roads in others. Earlier this week, its Binance Japan subsidiary became fully operational. Last week, regulators in the Philippines moved against the company due to regulatory irregularities.