Hong Kong crypto executive anticipates spot crypto ETF approvals by mid-2024

Dunamu Restructures Leadership at Its Blockchain Research ArmDunamu, the operator of South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchange Upbit, has implemented leadership changes at its blockchain research arm, Lambda256. That’s according to a report by local media outlet Decenter.Photo by Lea L on UnsplashCo-leadership structureStarting this month, Lambda256 welcomes a co-leadership structure, with tech maven Chung Ui-chung and financial specialist Park Yong-shin stepping in as co-CEOs. Each CEO holds independent signing authority. Chung previously held the role of Chief Technology Officer (CTO) at internet messaging giant Kakao, while Park Yong-shin boasts a distinguished career in public administration and finance, having passed the civil service examination and later steering the helm at Heungkuk Investment Trust Management, currently known as Heungkuk Asset Management.Tech expert and gov’t affairs specialistThe reshuffle follows the departure of former CEO Park Jae-hyun, who resigned last month. Shedding light on the division of roles, a Lambda256 official mentioned that Chung will spearhead practical endeavors, whereas Park Yong-shin will liaise with government sectors. Industry analysts perceive this strategic move as Lambda256’s intensified drive to hone its technological edge and navigate the evolving government regulations surrounding security tokens and associated blockchain ventures.Dunamu, holding a dominant 60.6% ownership in Lambda256, established the company in 2018, entrusting the leadership to Park Jae-hyun, a former employee of SK Telecom and Samsung Electronics. The subsequent year saw Lambda256 evolve into a subsidiary, rolling out blockchain platforms like Luniverse. However, financial challenges loomed, with the firm recording net losses of KRW 2.1 billion ($1.6 million) in 2020, KRW 3.7 billion in 2021, and KRW 46.5 billion in 2022.

BitMEX CEO Calls for an End to Internal Market MakersIn a recent interview, Stephan Lutz, the acting CEO and group CFO of 100x Group, the parent company of Seychelles-headquartered global crypto exchange BitMEX, expressed his belief that crypto exchanges should phase out their internal market-making teams.Photo by Joe Roberts on UnsplashProp trading desks unnecessarySpeaking with The Block, Lutz argued that with the growth of institutional liquidity providers and high-frequency traders (HFTs) in the market, proprietary trading desks are becoming unnecessary.Lutz stated: “You have enough HFTs out there and prop shops that can perform that function.” He was referring to the role of liquidity providers in filling gaps in the market. He made these comments in response to the emergence of information earlier this week that raised questions about internal trading practices at Crypto.com, a Singapore-based exchange.BitMEX, once the world’s largest crypto derivatives exchange, also used to employ internal traders who acted as market makers. However, Lutz explained that BitMEX’s internal trading team, named Arrakis Capital, now functions primarily as a “treasury desk.” He sees this transition as a natural evolution for crypto exchanges in a market that has matured and attracted more institutional liquidity providers.Arrakis Capital currently performs limited functions, including converting commission fees earned in Bitcoin into fiat currency for operational purposes, hedging BitMEX’s exposure to tokens held as inventory, and making markets for BitMEX’s token $BMEX. Lutz clarified that Arrakis’s market-making activities are limited because external market makers find the token’s liquidity insufficient.Regarding profitability, Lutz stated that Arrakis earns “very minor returns” of up to $100,000 per month from holding T-Bills, but it incurred losses last year. He noted that Arrakis used to play a more significant market-making role when BitMEX dominated the crypto futures market. However, he assured that the trading desk was always segregated, despite accusations in the past.Fee structuresLutz acknowledged that exchanges with internal trading teams have faced increased scrutiny since the controversies surrounding Alameda Research and FTX. To differentiate between benign internal trading teams and hedge fund-like operations, Lutz highlighted several factors, including the separation of client funds and house funds, access to sensitive data, and the ability to move markets on their own exchange. Fee structures also play a role, with low or no transaction fees potentially signaling a market-making motive rather than serving as a counterparty.Lutz’s perspective suggests that crypto exchanges should rely on external liquidity providers and HFTs rather than maintaining internal market-making teams. He argues that the market has evolved. At this point he feels that these teams are no longer necessary, due to the presence of established players within the digital assets space.As regulatory scrutiny grows, ensuring transparency and avoiding conflicts of interest become crucial for maintaining trust within the crypto exchange ecosystem. The digital assets industry is far from arriving at a mature stage in its development. While many in the industry have found the stance taken by regulators to be unhelpful, the industry itself must also demonstrate its ability to iteratively move towards best practice, without that being a knee-jerk response to regulatory enforcement.

Poly Network Exploit Results in Billions of Nonexistent TokensPoly Network, the China-based interoperability platform, was targeted by hackers over the weekend in a major attack that resulted in the creation of billions of tokens out of thin air. It’s the second time in as many years that the cross-chain bridge has been exploited by hackers.The attacker exploited a vulnerability in Poly Network’s cross-chain bridge tool, allowing them to generate a substantial number of tokens that previously did not exist, as reported by Arhat, the Founder of 3z3 Labs, on Twitter.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashNetwork suspensionThe Shanghai-based project team behind Poly Network promptly informed its users on Sunday that its services were temporarily suspended due to the attack. The platform assured its users that it was diligently assessing the extent of the breach and the impact on assets. They emphasized their commitment to safeguarding users’ assets and urged everyone to remain calm.The hacker, at one point, held nearly $43 billion worth of cryptocurrency in their digital wallet, according to DeBank, a decentralized finance portfolio tracker. This staggering figure was corroborated by PeckShield, a blockchain data and security firm.Bridge vulnerabilitiesBridges play a crucial role in the Web3 ecosystem, enabling users to transfer assets across different networks. However, they have often been attractive targets for hackers. In this attack on Poly Network, the hackers issued themselves nearly 100 million BNB and $10 billion worth of BUSD, the Binance-branded stablecoin, on the layer-2 network Metis, revealed Colin Wu, a Chinese crypto journalist.Similarly, on the Heco network, approximately 100 trillion units of the dog-themed meme coin, Shiba Inu, were created. Additionally, a significant number of altcoins were generated on Polygon and Avalanche networks.Illiquid Metis tokensMetis clarified that the BNB and BUSD tokens issued on its network by the hackers are effectively worthless since there is no available sell liquidity. Poly Network also locked these tokens, ensuring they cannot be utilized. Arhat of 3z3 Labs acknowledged that the impact of the Poly Network attack was somewhat mitigated by the lack of liquidity, which prevented the hackers from realizing substantial gains on Metis.However, on other networks like Ethereum, the stolen tokens were exchanged on decentralized exchanges. Arhat estimated that the attacker managed to convert only a small portion of the tokens, amounting to approximately $400,000 worth of crypto, while the remaining tokens lacked liquidity and were essentially worthless.SlowMist, a blockchain security firm, suggested that the hacker’s total gains were higher. They reported that over $4 million worth of digital assets from the attack had been cashed in, including 1,500 Ethereum worth $3 million and 93 billion SHIB worth $700,000.Poly Network had previously made headlines in 2021 when it experienced a historic attack, considered the largest exploit in decentralized finance at the time. The project suffered a loss of $600 million as funds were siphoned away from Ethereum, Binance Smart Chain, and Polygon. However, the hacker eventually returned $342 million worth of stolen crypto, and Poly Network took steps to repay affected users.