MiCA may force crypto firms into Middle East relocation

Stables Money, an Australian platform that claims to be on a mission “to make stablecoins usable for everyday use,” has partnered with Philippines-based digital assets platform Coins.ph to use the latter’s peso-pegged stablecoin (PHPC) for remittances. Peso-denominated stablecoinIn a press release published to the Coins.ph website on Aug. 28, the firm laid out details of the deal. PHPC is a retail stablecoin which is backed by Philippine peso-denominated cash reserves and pegged to the peso on a 1:1 basis. The stablecoin was launched by Coins.ph in July.  It’s an ERC-20 token which runs on the Ethereum virtual machine (EVM)-compatible Ronin blockchain network. The stablecoin was accepted into the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas’ regulatory sandbox in May.Photo by Aeron Oracion on Unsplash$35 billion in remittancesThe Philippines has always been seen as a lucrative remittance market due to the high number of Filipinos who work outside of the country, sending funds home to family on a regular basis. In 2020, remittances back to the Philippines from overseas were just shy of $35 billion, according to data from the World Bank. It appears that Australia’s Stables Money has identified this opportunity, with the company entering the Philippine market back in March. The Philippine peso already accounts for over 25% of all outward transactions sent via the platform. Stables Money CEO Bernardo Bilotta spoke to the opportunity that the company is trying to exploit. He stated: "Recognizing the Philippines as a key player in global remittances, we expanded to deliver smooth PHP transactions. With 28.44% of our send transactions now in PHP, this move highlights our commitment to making cross-border payments hassle-free for those sending money to the Philippines.” Coins.ph has the intention of engaging in further industry partnerships in an effort to expand the reach of PHPC. That will mean additional collaborations with crypto exchanges, digital asset wallet providers and those financial institutions who are increasingly delving into the world of stablecoins. Commenting on this latest development, Wei Zhou, Coins.ph CEO, stated:”We’re encouraged to see growing adoption of PHPC among our user base. Our partnerships with Stables and Ronin underscore the vast potential of PHPC in cross-border transactions, trading and other financial activities.” Stables has also made efforts to expand through the use of Circle’s USDC stablecoin. Last month, it partnered with global payments card platform Mastercard in a collaboration which facilitates Stables users in purchasing goods using USDC at locations across 27 European countries where Mastercard is accepted. The firm’s partnership with Mastercard dates back to March 2023 when it entered into a similar collaboration relative to the Asia-Pacific region. Previous peso-based stablecoin projectsCoins.ph is not the first entity to try and drive adoption of a Philippine peso-based stablecoin. The Southeast Asian country’s UnionBank launched a similar product back in 2019. However, the product failed to find product-market fit and ultimately, it was withdrawn from the market. The company tried once again in 2022, attempting to launch a similar product through its digital bank subsidiary UnionDigital, in an effort that seems to have failed. More recently still, UnionBank subsidiary company UBX launched a peso-based stablecoin on Polygon back in March.

Shinhan Bank to issue NFTs at 2023 Blockchain Grand Week in SeoulShinhan Bank, one of South Korea’s leading financial institutions, is set to issue non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and operate a promotional booth in celebration of its participation in the upcoming 2023 Blockchain Grand Week, scheduled for next Wednesday, according to a report by local news outlet Newspim.The Blockchain Grand Week, an annual event since 2018, is hosted by the Ministry of Science and ICT and organized by the Korea Internet and Security Agency (KISA), the National IT Industry Promotion Agency (NIPA) and the Institute of Information and Communications Technology Planning and Evaluation (IITP). Its objectives are to increase public awareness of blockchain technology and to facilitate the broader adoption of its ecosystem.Photo by Pete Linforth on PixabayNFTs to first 2,000 visitorsThe event is set to take place at the Convention and Exhibition Center, better known as COEX, in Seoul over two days. It will feature a conference centered around the theme “Adding Trust to Digital Platforms” and will include several academic seminars. Various blockchain companies will also be showcasing their products and services at their respective booths. For this event, Shinhan Bank is collaborating with Hexlant and Vircle to introduce their NFT project. They also plan to offer NFTs to the first 2,000 visitors to their booth.The NFTs will be distributed through Shinhan Bank’s NFT wallet, SOL Wallet, and will come with practical perks such as tickets for events at the booth and coffee coupons. Furthermore, these NFTs will be transferable to others.A representative from Shinhan Bank expressed hope that visitors will have the opportunity to experience the bank’s NFTs and gather diverse information related to blockchain technology. The official also emphasized the bank’s commitment to continually developing and introducing blockchain services that can be integrated into customers’ daily lives.Shinhan Bank’s endeavors in blockchainShinhan Bank’s efforts in the blockchain sector have been marked by various accomplishments in recent years. In 2021, the bank received the Ecosystem Transformation Award at the Enterprise Blockchain Awards, now known as the Web3 and Blockchain Transformation Awards (W3B Awards). This January, Shinhan integrated the SOL Wallet service into its financial services application. The bank remains dedicated to spearheading client-centric blockchain initiatives, one such effort being the development of NFT technology in collaboration with Hexlant and Vircle for corporate marketing purposes.Prohibition on discussing virtual assetsMeanwhile, there has been some dissatisfaction among industry insiders regarding the event’s restrictions. Those operating booths are prohibited from mentioning virtual assets in their projects. The application form for booth holders explicitly stated that exhibitions related to virtual assets are not allowed. This cautious approach is believed to be a response to recent cryptocurrency scandals, such as the $40 billion Terra-LUNA crash and the controversy surrounding a Korean lawmaker’s crypto holdings.

The Need to Distinguish Between Security and Non-Security Virtual AssetsWith the recent enactment of the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill in South Korea, there is a need to lay out criteria for determining whether virtual assets qualify as securities, says Kim Ja-bong, a senior research fellow at the Korea Institute of Finance, in his report titled “The Implications of Determining Which Virtual Assets Constitute Securities and Investor Protection” released on Saturday.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashThe implications of the Virtual Asset User Protection ActThe Virtual Asset User Protection Act — which will take effect in July of next year — aims to protect customer assets, establish regulations against unfair trading practices, and enforce penalties. Notably, it will target virtual assets that are not securities, deeming it necessary for regulators to determine if virtual assets qualify as securities or not in order to enforce the bill. Assets with characteristics of securities will fall under the jurisdiction of the Capital Markets Act.Therefore, if the Virtual Asset User Protection Act does not provide sufficient investor protection, issuers may be incentivized to issue non-security assets rather than security assets to avoid the regulations of the Capital Markets Act. This further necessitates the act of distinguishing between virtual assets that are securities versus those that are not.Determining if a virtual asset is a security or notThere are two approaches to do this, according to Kim: the passive approach, which avoids considering a virtual asset as a security whenever possible, and the active approach, which treats a virtual asset as a security whenever applicable.He argues that it is better to focus on whether an investment contract qualifies as a security if it is considered an investment contract, rather than simply selecting a specific approach.Furthermore, the nature of virtual assets renders them unbound by national borders, so it is necessary to establish assessment criteria that correspond with international standards, such as those used in the US and Europe.This is especially important because if the criteria differ from international standards, there is a risk of domestic investors suffering damages due to an issuer’s pursuit of regulatory arbitrage between countries.Equitable recognition and potential for security tokensAccording to Kim, the importance of determining whether virtual assets are securities lies in ensuring that security tokens receive the same recognition and trading treatment as traditional securities such as stocks. With such a measure, security token offerings can serve as an efficient and reliable method for raising funds. Although there may be concerns that such a regulation may hinder the development of virtual assets, it may well be an opportunity for security tokens to be qualified and trusted as high-quality financial instruments just like existing securities, Kim claims.Even for virtual assets that are not considered securities, there are many types of assets that are financial in nature, such as e-money tokens — therefore, it is necessary to actively protect investors in non-security virtual assets through financial regulations such as reinforcing disclosure obligations, which is being done in the EU through the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).Empowering regulators for enhanced investor protection and market integrityKim underscored that investor protection and healthy growth of the virtual asset market are made possible mainly through expanding regulators’ authority to protect economic interests and prevent damages. The author also suggested institutional reforms that grant regulators substantial authority, which would enhance their ability to protect investors effectively and provide compensation for damages.He added that regulators should also have the authority to enforce liability for damages or impose civil penalties for unfair trading practices conducted using classified information.