OSL raises $300M to finance expansion

The South Korean National Tax Service (NTS) is reportedly in the process of setting up virtual asset accounts for its district offices. This initiative is aimed at confiscating and liquidating the digital assets of individuals who fail to pay their taxes. This move comes after the creation of similar accounts by public prosecutors' offices, leading to speculation in the crypto industry that virtual asset accounts will soon be allowed for corporate entities as well.Photo by Nataliya Vaitkevich on PexelsDirect confiscation of virtual assetsA report by the local news outlet Etoday today has revealed that each district office of the NTS is working towards establishing a virtual asset account. This development will empower the tax agency to directly sell virtual assets confiscated from tax delinquents. Previously, the NTS would freeze the accounts of overdue taxpayers at Korean cryptocurrency exchanges, compelling them to convert their assets into Korean won. These funds were then confiscated by the NTS. The new initiative is set to streamline the process, enabling the tax authority to directly confiscate virtual assets without the intermediary step of conversion to Korean won. Speaking about this development, an NTS officer said that as each district office director holds the authority to collect taxes from taxpayers with overdue payments, it's necessary for each office to have its own account. Prosecutors’ Offices’ Upbit and Bithumb accountsThe crypto industry views this development as a potential step towards allowing the creation of virtual asset accounts for corporate entities, starting with government agencies. In December, the prosecutors' offices established their entity accounts at major cryptocurrency exchanges Upbit and Bithumb. Since then, the prosecution has utilized these accounts to sell confiscated virtual assets, aiming to recover funds that had not been collected.  An official from a cryptocurrency exchange indicated that the South Korean government is currently focusing on allowing entities that serve the public good to own virtual asset accounts. This approach is seen as the starting point, with expectations that the trend will gain momentum in the future. The official added that it's rare for the government to provide blanket permissions from the outset, suggesting a gradual and cautious approach to the integration of virtual asset accounts.Money laundering concernsMeanwhile, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission (FSC), along with other financial regulators, has remained silent on the matter of virtual asset accounts for corporate entities. This reticence stems from concerns with the financial authority that the introduction of corporate crypto accounts could potentially lead to money laundering and the creation of slush funds. An official from the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee said that they have not received any comments from the financial authority in response to inquiries about plans to allow such accounts for corporate entities. The current law doesn’t prohibit corporate entities from trading virtual assets. However, under the auspices of the financial authority, banks have refrained from offering real-name accounts to corporate entities. This policy has been a point of contention within the crypto industry. Advocates argue that allowing corporate accounts could mitigate issues of market manipulation and challenge the dominance of Upbit in the Korean cryptocurrency market.  The official from the cryptocurrency exchange pointed out that the financial authority does not have a clear legal basis for prohibiting the creation of corporate crypto accounts. They suggested that the regulator should develop clearer guidelines and enforce these rules for corporate entities. More serious discussions in AprilMore serious discussions about the introduction of corporate crypto accounts are anticipated to take place in April, following the conclusion of the general election. Last month, the main opposition party, the Democratic Party of Korea, made election promises to open the crypto market to institutional investors. Meanwhile, the ruling People Power Party has been quietly deliberating on virtual asset policy. Despite these political movements, earlier reports indicate a disconnect between the political parties' efforts to relax crypto regulations and the financial regulator's stance. Meanwhile, Hwang Seok-jin, a professor at Dongguk University’s Graduate School of International Affairs and Information Security, expects to see a conclusion on the permission of corporate crypto trading by the end of this year. He said that there has been ongoing discussion about the approval of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and that allowing the trading of such funds requires the ownership of virtual assets by institutions. 

SEBA Bank Receives Conditional Approval for Crypto Services in Hong KongSwiss-based crypto-centric SEBA Bank has secured conditional approval from Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) to offer crypto services within the autonomous Chinese territory.While there are stipulations yet to be met before the license is fully granted, the development marks a significant progression when it comes to SEBA’s global business ambitions.Photo by Ruslan Bardash on UnsplashExpanding in AsiaThe “approval-in-principle” comes as part of SEBA’s strategic efforts to expand its foothold in the Asian crypto market. Once the conditions are fulfilled and the license is formalized, SEBA will be well positioned to provide Hong Kong with a range of comprehensive crypto services.This includes securities dealing encompassing crypto-related structured products, as well as consultation and management of both digital assets and traditional securities. SEBA sees potential in the offering of derivative products as it has identified demand for derivatives and structured products within the Asian crypto market.This step forward for SEBA follows earlier reports that the bank was actively growing its workforce in pursuit of digital asset licenses for both Hong Kong and Singapore. The company has grown its headcount from seven to 20 across these locations, as it looks to establish a strong presence in the Asian market.The move aligns with Hong Kong’s evolving stance on cryptocurrency and digital finance. Introduced in June, the virtual asset service provider (VASP) license was intended to regulate virtual asset services within Hong Kong’s legal framework. Currently, only two crypto exchanges have secured these licenses.Cryptocurrency exchange HashKey, alongside digital assets platform OSL, became one of the first licensed crypto exchanges in Hong Kong recently. Since then, it has expanded its offerings to retail users, allowing them to purchase Bitcoin and Ethereum using US dollars. Leading up to that licensing approval, it had also launched a wealth management service for high-net-worth individuals and institutional investors. The majority of publicly accessible VASPs remain unregulated, according to a recent statement by the SFC.Regulatory balanceThe Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has also shown interest in fostering relationships between established financial institutions and crypto exchanges, further signaling the region’s growing engagement with the crypto space. It’s also pointing towards getting the balance right between enabling digital asset innovation and having sufficient regulation in place to protect investors. In May, its CEO, Eddie Yue, stated that Hong Kong wouldn’t be a place for light touch regulation.The licensing process in Hong Kong hasn’t been without its difficulties. The interest in obtaining crypto trading licenses caught the SFC flat footed as it found itself understaffed to work through the licensing applications that arrived at its door. The backlog prompted commentary from SEBA’s CEO for the Asia Pacific (APAC) region, Amy Yu, back in May, with Yu highlighting that the backlog had increased significantly over the course of nine months.While SEBA has broken into the market in the APAC region via its efforts in Hong Kong, it’s understood that the bank has plans to develop its business in Singapore further over the course of the coming months.

Victory Securities granted approval for retail crypto trading in Hong KongHong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has given the green light to Victory Securities, a well established investment firm headquartered in the Chinese autonomous territory, for retail virtual asset trading.Photo by Carlos Alberto Gómez Iñiguez on UnsplashFirst licensed corporationThe license will allow the investment firm to expand its crypto trading and advisory services to retail investors. The publicly traded company announced its crypto licensing achievement via a press release published to its website on Friday. In that statement, the company expressed the hope that “by connecting traditional finance with virtual assets, customers can configure assets in a flexible and convenient way, and [we] can provide general investors with investment advice on virtual assets and publish relevant research reports.”This approval marks Victory Securities as the first licensed corporation in Hong Kong to offer such services to the retail market, joining the ranks of already approved firms like HashKey Exchange and OSL Digital Securities. It builds upon previous licensing approval that the company received from the SFC to offer a full range of trading and advisory services in respect of virtual assets to institutional clients in November 2022.The move reflects Hong Kong’s commitment to crypto regulation, as earlier this year, the region established a framework enabling the provision of crypto services to retail clients. This development positions Hong Kong as a key player in the Asian crypto market, where firms seem to be receiving more regulatory clarity compared to their counterparts in the United States. The regulatory initiative gains significance in light of the recent JPEX scandal, involving an alleged HK$1.6 billion ($204 million) fraud.Bringing retail into cryptoVictory Securities, currently listed as an applicant on the SFC’s recently published roster of virtual asset trading firms, is navigating this regulatory landscape to bring retail investors into the crypto market. In parallel, HashKey Group, another Hong Kong-based cryptocurrency firm, has launched the city’s first SFC-approved trading app since the JPEX incident. HashKey Exchange’s app, boasting “full mobile trading capabilities,” became operational this month, a notable progression given its prior limitation to professional investors.Through HashKey’s app, local traders can now engage in bitcoin and ether transactions using funds from their Hong Kong or U.S. dollar bank accounts. In addition to pioneering retail crypto trading, HashKey has introduced its crypto over-the-counter (OTC) trading service, HashKey Brokerage, aligning with local securities regulations and the recently implemented cryptocurrency regulatory framework by the SFC.The Hong Kong regulator is also believed to be currently weighing up whether to allow retail investors the ability to access spot crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Despite these advancements, the SFC maintains restrictions on retail traders engaging in stablecoin transactions until new regulatory arrangements are established. This decision follows the SFC’s consultation paper on regulating crypto activities, emphasizing the need to address risks associated with stablecoins and their regulation.The regulator aims to ensure appropriate management of stablecoin reserves to maintain price stability and safeguard investors’ redemption rights, underscoring the potential significant implications for stablecoin stability if these risks are not effectively managed.As Hong Kong solidifies its position in the evolving crypto landscape, Victory Securities’ approval signifies yet another milestone in the region’s journey toward fostering a regulated and inclusive crypto market for retail investors.