BitGo Singapore launched to serve APAC region

Metaplanet, the Tokyo-headquartered Bitcoin corporate treasury firm, has purchased an additional 696 BTC, following a stock split, bringing its total Bitcoin holding to 4,046 BTC.Photo by Kanchanara on Unsplash$341 million in BitcoinThe company publicized details of its latest Bitcoin purchase on X on April 1. It outlined that funding of this purchase was enabled through the allocation of cash held by the firm as a consequence of the sale of put options.  The average purchase price of the 696 BTC was 14,586,230 yen ($97,694). The average price the firm has paid per Bitcoin in relation to its entire holding of the leading digital asset is 12,943,181 yen ($86,689). Its overall Bitcoin holding has a total value of approximately $341 million. Taking to X, the firm’s CEO, Simon Gerovich, said that Metaplanet’s Bitcoin Income Generation business achieved 770 million yen ($5.2 million) in Q1 revenue, while year-to-date its Bitcoin yield has reached 95.6%. Stock split & bond issuanceThis purchase follows both a stock split and the issuance of bonds worth 2 billion yen ($13.3 million). On March 31, Metaplanet filed a disclosure outlining details of the bond issuance. The company issued the zero interest bonds via its Evo Fund. Buyers will be permitted to redeem the newly issued bonds at face value by Sept. 30. In an X post, Gerovich suggested that the bond issuance was being implemented in order to facilitate the company “buying the dip,” taking advantage of a downturn in the Bitcoin unit price over recent weeks. In a notice filed on Feb. 18, Metaplanet outlined details of its 10-to-1 stock split. The company described how it executed a reverse 10-to-1 stock split last August. This has created a problem for investors as in the interim, the stock price has increased significantly. Consequently, the share price is unwieldy, placing a substantial financial burden on investors. On that basis, the latest stock split will enable greater investor accessibility and improved liquidity. Arising from that, Metaplanet expects that it will gain a broader investor base. On March 30, Gerovich reported that Metaplanet stock is now a component within Betashares’ Crypto Innovators ETF. Betashares is an Australian asset manager with over $50 billion in assets under management.  The Metaplanet CEO suggested that the development pointed towards “growing interest from institutional investors,” while expressing his satisfaction with Australians now having access to Metaplanet’s Bitcoin First Strategy via the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX). The ‘Asian MicroStrategy’Metaplanet is being regarded by many industry commentators as the “Asian MicroStrategy,” referring to the American Bitcoin treasury firm that recently rebranded to Strategy, having pioneered a particular approach to building a position in Bitcoin within a corporate treasury. Metaplanet appears to have adopted the same Bitcoin playbook. In an appearance on the Coin Stories Podcast recently, Metaplanet’s Gerovich said that he encourages his friends to put “100% of their net worth into Bitcoin.” Last month, the company confirmed that it was pursuing a strategy to accumulate 10,000 Bitcoin in 2025 and 21,000 Bitcoin by 2026. The firm is now ranked ninth in the world as a corporate Bitcoin holder. Within Asia, it is the leading corporate holder of the world's largest digital asset.

China to outline clear directions for NFT & Web3 developmentEarlier this week, China’s Ministry of Science and Technology announced a decision to work towards releasing a comprehensive strategy document aimed at clarifying the future path for the development of NFTs and Web3.Photo by Christian Lue on UnsplashFurthering Web3 innovationIn a communication published online on Tuesday, the ministry outlined its plan to enhance collaboration between relevant departments, emphasizing the promotion of Web3 innovation, increased research deployment and the strengthening of talent within the industry. Despite the regulatory challenges in the crypto space, the ministry acknowledged the growing interest in NFTs among Chinese citizens.The strategy document, developed in collaboration with the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the China Association for Science and Technology, will address key issues such as inheritance, innovation, security and government responsibilities.Ban not suppressing interestDespite the country’s ban on cryptocurrencies, the ministry expressed a commitment to the development of the Web3 industry, particularly focusing on non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Earlier this year, a Wall Street Journal investigation found that leading global crypto exchange Binance was thriving in China.One gray area that Chinese citizens are exploiting relative to the ban is that of NFTs. Crypto trading and mining were banned a couple of years ago. However, NFTs remain legal with the result that there has been a surge in adoption of digital collectibles in China. That prompted China’s top procuratorial agency, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate of China, to issue a warning relative to a number of attributes and risks relative to NFTs in May.Web3-related initiativesSeveral Web3 initiatives have already been underway in China. The Ministry of Science and Technology, in conjunction with the Cyberspace Administration of China, has released important policy documents, including the “Guiding Opinions on Accelerating the Application of Blockchain Technology and Industrial Development” and the “Blockchain Information Service Management Regulations.”Additionally, collaborative efforts involving the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Propaganda Department of the Central Committee, the Supreme People’s Court and other departments have conducted blockchain pilot actions, specifically in areas such as energy, rule of law, copyright and trade finance.The metaverse is another Web3 segment that the Chinese seem to be targeting for growth. A report by POLITICO published last August found that Chinese authorities and state-owned companies appeared to be seeking to mold and develop the metaverse in line with Chinese values. Efforts are being made to effect further development in the regions also, with the city of Zhengzhou announcing in May a set of metaverse-related policy proposals.Looking ahead, China’s Web3 strategy aims to concentrate on key sectors such as government affairs and industry. The plan seeks to encourage the development of novel business models, including NFTs and decentralized applications (dApps), while also accelerating the innovative application of Web3 and the construction of a digital ecosystem.The ministry’s recent response to Wu Jiezhuang, a member of the CPPCC National Committee, the country’s political advisory body, indicated that the delay in releasing the strategy document is part of a meticulous approach to ensure the strategic framework aligns with the evolving nature of the industry.While the postponement may be met with some disappointment, the overall tone remains optimistic, pointing towards the likelihood that China is committed to fostering innovation within the Web3 sector.

Polymesh’s APAC Digital Asset Regulation Report Highlights ChallengesThe project team behind Polymesh, an institutional-grade permissioned blockchain built specifically for regulated assets, released a report on digital asset regulation within the Asia Pacific (APAC) region on Tuesday, highlighting several challenges that regulators are attempting to overcome.In a press release, the company outlined that the report covers recent regulatory developments in South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong, and the broader APAC region.Photo by Jéan Béller on UnsplashProgressive regulatory effortsRegulators within the APAC region are currently striving to introduce legislation for digital assets, while several centers within the region are vying to establish themselves as hubs for digital asset-related business.The report explores the individual efforts of regulators in various APAC nations as they work towards crafting regulatory frameworks tailored to their jurisdictions. Those efforts encompass implementation, investigation, and enforcement of legislation in a borderless industry.Regulators in South Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong have all embarked on formulating rules for emerging asset categories, albeit using different terminologies such as “digital assets,” “digital payment tokens,” and “virtual assets.” Their focus lies in striking a balance between consumer protection, market integrity, and industry development.Additionally, all three regulators adhere to the principle of “same activity, same regulations, same risks” when it comes to tokenized securities. They argue that regulatory requirements do not significantly differ solely because a security is in tokenized form. Each state has been actively engaged in local and global activities surrounding security tokens, including state involvement in the advancement of security token technology and cross-border transactions.Main findingsThe report’s main findings emphasize that while regulators in the APAC region are making strides in introducing digital asset legislation, the road ahead will not be without challenges.Legislating a cross-border industry poses difficulties that necessitate harmonization to foster a robust and interconnected ecosystem. Digital assets originating in Asia can be traded globally and vice versa. Merely identifying the asset’s place of origin is no longer sufficient.Although the report delves into the efforts of individual regulators, it emphasizes the need for long-term collaboration to establish a unified vision and practical implementation of regulations for this borderless phenomenon.Regulatory challengesThe regulatory challenges faced by South Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong in driving the growth of digital assets in the APAC region are multifaceted. They include the intricacies of legislating an inherently cross-border industry. In turn, that can lead to the potential violation of legislation from other jurisdictions.The lack of harmonization among different jurisdictions, and variations in regulatory approaches among the three regulators are likely to be problematic. Furthermore, there are push-pull dynamics between the industry and regulators, with even the regulators themselves not always in agreement.However, despite these challenges, all three regulators have initiated the formulation of rules for new asset categories, with a strong emphasis on safeguarding consumer interests, maintaining market integrity, and fostering industry development.