Korean Financial Authority Orders Suspension and Levies $1.4M Fine on Crypto Lender Delio

Indian Supreme Court Scolds Government over Crypto Regulation DelayThe Indian Supreme Court did not mince words recently as it criticized the Union government for its failure to establish clear cryptocurrency regulations in the country.Photo by Studio Art Smile on PexelsLack of crypto clarityThat’s according to a report published by local media outlet, the Hindustan Times, on Friday. It’s understood that the Supreme Court is frustrated with regard to the lack of guidelines surrounding cryptocurrencies. That frustration has arisen as crypto is increasingly coming to the attention of the courts due to it being associated with a rising number of criminal activities.The court directed the government to provide information about any plans to set up a dedicated federal agency to investigate crypto-related crimes. During the proceedings, Justices Surya Kant and Dipankar Datta expressed their disappointment, pointing out the absence of any concrete laws pertaining to cryptocurrencies.Crypto bill failingsThe context for the court’s remarks was the ongoing hearing of petitions related to cryptocurrency fraud cases across different states in India. In light of the gravity of these cases, the court demanded a response from the government regarding its capability to establish an effective mechanism to investigate crypto-related crimes.The struggle for clear and comprehensive crypto regulations in India has been long-standing. As far back as 2018, the government was instructed by the Supreme Court to draft a crypto bill, but progress has been slow. The government has continually promised to provide legislative clarity over the past few years. Despite this, the final draft of the crypto bill has not been produced.Crypto taxesGovernments may drag their feet when it comes to regulatory clarity relative to unfolding innovations but they’re far more responsive when it comes to taxes. The Indian government acted swiftly to impose crypto taxation laws, which took effect in April 2022.During that bull market period, India emerged as one of the leading crypto markets, witnessing the rise of several crypto unicorns and significant trading volumes amounting to billions of dollars. However, the introduction of tax laws had an adverse impact on the thriving crypto industry. Added to that, the lack of regulatory clarity caused many established firms to relocate from India, seeking more favorable environments for their operations.Market potentialDespite the government’s lethargic legislative response and heavy-handed tax policy, there are still reasons for optimism with regard to the development of crypto in India. India’s fintech sector is the third largest in the world, driven more recently by rapid digital adoption, together with efforts to bring about financial inclusion.Last month, Xapo Bank, a Gibraltar-based crypto bank, was sufficiently encouraged by the potential offered in India to enter the Indian market. Earlier this week, the world’s largest asset manager, BlackRock, announced that it was partnering with Jio Financial and re-entering the Indian market after a six-year hiatus.The move could have implications for crypto in India given that BlackRock has changed its tack on crypto, having recently filed an application to launch a bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) in the United States.Notwithstanding these developments, concrete regulatory guidelines will not only protect against criminal activities but also foster a conducive environment for legitimate innovation and growth in the cryptocurrency space.

China’s GAPP proposes ban on gaming crypto token conversionChina’s gaming industry hit a significant speed bump on Friday as the General Administration of Press and Publication (GAPP) unveiled a draft proposing substantial changes to the regulation of in-game tokens, signaling a strategic shift in the country’s stance on digital currencies in gaming.Photo by blurrystock on UnsplashImplementing more stringent controlsThe proposed regulations by GAPP bring about a ban on the conversion of game tokens into physical goods or legal tender. These guidelines, spanning 64 articles, impose stringent requirements on gaming companies. These include mandatory licensing in China, a two-year data retention policy, adherence to national and socialist values in content and the eradication of anonymous user registrations.One significant aspect of the guidelines is Article 23, which specifically addresses the use of game tokens. It proposes restrictions on exchanging them for physical goods, services or legal tender.The regulatory landscape becomes more complex due to the ambiguity surrounding cryptocurrencies, which are not recognized as legal tender in China. Although a warning was issued about the risks inherent in non-fungible tokens (NFTs), they remain legal in China. NFTs feature prominently within blockchain-based gaming.Game providers are also confronted with new limitations on inducements, such as bonuses for registration or daily logins, and are mandated to implement measures against irrational consumer spending.Gaming sector falloutIn the wake of these developments, several Chinese tech giants experienced a significant market downturn in Hong Kong. Tencent, a global gaming powerhouse and one of China’s most valuable companies, saw a 12.4% drop on Friday, marking its worst day since October 2008. This decline erased a massive 367 billion Hong Kong dollars ($47 billion) from Tencent’s market value.NetEase, another gaming giant, witnessed a 25% dive in Hong Kong afternoon trade, recording its most substantial daily loss since its listing in June 2020. Additionally, Bilibili and Kuaishou, prominent players in video-sharing and short-video platforms, experienced declines of 9.7% and 7.2%, respectively, given their involvement in online gaming.Market uncertaintyWith this latest development, the future of gaming crypto tokens remains uncertain in China, with investor confidence having been hit hard. Putting the matter in context on Friday, Stansberry Research Analyst Brian Tycangco took to the X social media platform, stating:”Govt regulation will effectively render prevailing business models irrelevant due to uncertainty regarding monetization. Games are inherently reward-based and if you clamp down on the use of rewards/incentives, you turn an entire industry on its head.”The guidelines, open for public consultation until Jan. 22, 2024, have not yet been legally enacted. This time frame allows for feedback and potential adjustments before enforcement.Notably, the Web3 gaming sector has witnessed substantial activity, with approximately a million unique active wallets engaged daily over the past three months, according to DappRadar. Industry experts, including Yat Siu of Animoca Brands, anticipate a potential surge in user engagement, emphasizing the potential impact of these regulations on the gaming industry’s trajectory.

Vauld Implements Key Leadership Changes Amid Bankruptcy ProceedingsFailed Singaporean cryptocurrency lender Vauld has unveiled a comprehensive overhaul of its board structure.Photo by Yibei Geng on UnsplashOngoing restructuringThe platform, which faced financial turmoil leading to its declaration of bankruptcy last year, is introducing fresh leadership to spearhead its restructuring efforts. The move involves the appointment of a new CEO, a creditor representative, and a scheme manager.The current CEO and Co-Founder of Vauld, Darshan Bathija, announced the proposed changes via a post on X (formerly Twitter) on Thursday. He emphasized that the new appointees would take charge of orchestrating a much-needed bailout.The challenges faced by the company through its ongoing bankruptcy proceedings have prompted Vauld to secure court approval for this new organizational scheme. In his social media post, Bathija stated:“Vauld (Defi Payments Pte Ltd) got its scheme of arrangement passed in Singapore courts. As part of the scheme, the current board will be replaced with a new CEO, a creditor representative, and a scheme manager.” Additionally, Bathija noted that the exchange’s customers are actively updating their Know Your Customer (KYC) details.This announcement comes almost a year after Vauld came under scrutiny due to a money laundering investigation. The cloud of suspicion surrounding the firm at the time led to the freezing of assets worth $46.4 million from its domestic operations by Indian authorities.Nexo acquisition failureIn February of this year, the Singapore High Court granted Vauld an extension until March 24 to formulate a comprehensive strategy for repaying its creditors. The extension became crucial after a potential acquisition deal with Nexo fell through. However, despite this reprieve, the exchange was unable to secure a further extension, fueling discussions within the community about the challenge of meeting creditor obligations within a relatively short time frame.In a step to facilitate the resolution of outstanding amounts, the court established a committee of creditors (CoC). This move was prompted by allegations from a faction of creditors that Vauld was impeding communication and implementing unwarranted corrective measures. Notably, the exchange owes more than $2.2 million to these creditors.Vauld has contracted the services of risk and financial advisory firm Kroll as part of the restructuring efforts. In an isolated instance of good fortune, it appears that Vauld creditors are unaffected by a data breach which occurred recently at Kroll, while creditors of the Genesis, FTX, and BlockFi crypto bankruptcy processes have had their data compromised.Charting a path forwardBathija conveyed that more updates regarding the platform’s path forward would follow soon. Vauld’s financial instability can be attributed to several factors, chief among them being the ripple effect of Terra’s downfall. Further complications arose due to economic issues tied to the Celsius Network and Three Arrows Capital (3AC) defaulting on their loans. These cumulative challenges led to Vauld’s operational suspension.Despite this failure and similar issues relative to crypto lender Hodlnaut and 3AC, which were also based in the city state, Singapore continues as a jurisdiction that effectively balances regulatory control with the drive to foster innovation. Its central bank and financial regulator, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), recently unveiled a comprehensive framework for stablecoins.