Aave v3 Launches on Metis Scaling Network

GSR Gets on Path Towards Full Regulatory Approval in SingaporeGSR Markets Pte. Ltd., the Singaporean subsidiary of the global crypto trading firm GSR, has reached a significant milestone in its quest to become a fully licensed entity within the city-state. On Monday, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) granted GSR in-principle approval for a Major Payment Institution (MPI) license.Photo by Mike Enerio on UnsplashTrading licenses filtering throughThis development mirrors similar approvals granted to other crypto firms in the region, solidifying Singapore’s status as a hub for crypto and Web3 innovations. The approval of GSR’s MPI license follows hot on the heels of Coinbase Singapore’s announcement of securing a full Major Payment Institution license from MAS.Other companies such as Circle, Blockchain.com, and Crypto.com have also obtained MPI licenses this year. These developments underscore the competitive yet regulated landscape of the cryptocurrency market in Singapore.In-principle approvalThe in-principle approval from MAS empowers GSR to provide crypto and fiat-related services to Singaporean residents and entities. This includes the ability to conduct payment services without the limitations of single transaction thresholds (SGD 3 million) and monthly limits (SGD 6 million). GSR’s CEO, Jakob Palmstierna, expressed gratitude for MAS’s constructive oversight, which has played a pivotal role in shaping the evolving digital asset landscape in Singapore. Palmstierna stated:“We are immensely grateful to MAS for their constructive oversight, which helps shape a growing digital asset ecosystem that we feel proud to be a substantial part of.”Meanwhile, GSR’s COO Xin Song, emphasized the importance of this approval, stating that it enables them to “deepen our local client partnerships and continue in our critical role as a liquidity provider within the ecosystem.”GSR’s presence in Singapore aligns with the country’s burgeoning crypto-friendly environment. Recent surveys indicate that 25% of Singaporeans view cryptocurrency as the future of finance, with 32% having some involvement in crypto ownership. Moreover, Singapore boasts over 700 Web3 companies, positioning itself as a pivotal market for the expansion of the crypto and Web3 economy.Company ambitionsGSR, established in 2013 in New Jersey, offers a diverse range of services, including over-the-counter crypto trading, derivatives trading, market making, and venture capital investments. The firm is no stranger to regulatory compliance, holding Money Service Business licenses across several US states.The company was founded by former Goldman Sachs Executives Rich Rosenblum and Cristian Gil. At the height of the last crypto bull run, the crypto market maker had plans “to add 100 hires every six months for the next few years.” No doubt that ambition has been scaled back since then, given the protracted bear market which has followed.Last month, Gil became embroiled in a spat with Andrei Grachev of rival market making firm, Singapore-based DWF Labs.GSR’s recent attainment of in-principle approval for a Major Payment Institution license from MAS reinforces Singapore’s position as a leader in the crypto space. The firm’s interest in pursuing a compliant route forward and its role as a liquidity provider bode well for both GSR and the broader crypto community in the Asia-Pacific region.

Korea to Ban Virtual Asset Deposit Services from Next JulyDuring a recent criminal law seminar held at the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office, Park Min-woo, Director of the Capital Markets Bureau at the South Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC), underscored that starting next year, virtual asset service providers (VASPs) will no longer be permitted to offer deposit and management services for virtual assets. That’s according to a report by local crypto news outlet Digital Asset.This is seen as a response to the suspension of virtual asset deposits and withdrawals carried out by virtual asset yield platforms Haru Invest and Delio a few months ago.Photo by Mathew Schwartz on UnsplashLegal backgroundDirector Park referred to Article 7, Paragraph 2 of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, clarifying that the intention behind this provision is to ensure that VASPs have the ability to fulfill asset withdrawal requests, even in the scenario where all their customers make such requests. This Act is scheduled to go into effect in July of next year, and Article 7 prohibits VASPs from entrusting customer assets to third parties.Deposit service providers receive cryptocurrency deposits and then distribute the resulting yields to their customers. In a bull market, these entities can manage yields on their own. However, in a flat or bear market, these asset managers may face challenges in paying yields unless they can generate profits by handing over customer assets to external custodians.Signs of giving upIn fact, centralized finance (CeFi) company HeyBit made an announcement last month, stating that it will discontinue its virtual asset deposit service starting from October 2. They cited this specific provision as the reason for their decision.Fraud chargesBoth Haru and Delio have been indicted by the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office on fraud charges.As an unregistered VASP, Haru suspended its deposit and withdrawal services on multiple occasions in June, causing substantial financial losses to numerous investors. This suspension was triggered by significant losses incurred at B&S Holdings, another unregistered entity to which Haru had entrusted virtual assets.Similarly, Delio, although registered, entrusted a considerable amount of virtual assets to Haru and Traum Info Tech but was unable to recover them.

Hong Kong Pressing Banks to Facilitate Crypto ClientsHong Kong’s banking regulator is urging banks, including HSBC and Standard Chartered, to onboard crypto exchanges as clients, despite increasing regulatory scrutiny of the industry in the United States.That’s according to a report published by the Financial Times (FT) on Wednesday. The FT cited three people who it claims are familiar with the matter, together with a letter seen by the publication as the basis for the assertion.Photo by Ansel Lee on PexelsChallenging crypto banking reticenceAt a recent meeting, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) questioned these UK-based lenders, together with the Bank of China, about their reluctance to accept crypto exchanges as customers, according to sources familiar with the matter. The HKMA emphasized that due diligence on potential clients should not create unnecessary burdens, particularly for those seeking opportunities in Hong Kong. While banks do not have a ban on crypto clients, concerns over potential money laundering and illegal activities have made them cautious.The pressure faced by banks highlights the challenges Hong Kong is facing in establishing itself as a global hub for the crypto industry, especially in light of previous high-profile collapses, such as the implosion of FTX. However, the HKMA is encouraging banks to overcome their reservations, as the regulator believes there is resistance from senior executives who adhere to traditional banking mindsets.The enthusiasm of some Hong Kong officials for the sector is evident as pro-Beijing lawmaker Johnny Ng invited Coinbase and other crypto exchanges to set up operations in the city following the recent SEC lawsuit against Binance and Coinbase.Caught between opposing forcesBanks in Hong Kong find themselves walking a fine line between supporting the crypto industry as encouraged by the government and being cautious due to the US regulatory environment. They want to ensure the industry’s development aligns with government policies, but they are also concerned about potential anti-money laundering and know-your-customer issues.The HKMA and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) have been vocal about their expectations, setting them apart from regulators in other jurisdictions that may be more skeptical of cryptocurrencies. Last month it emerged that crypto startups are having difficulties in establishing banking facilities in the autonomous Chinese territory. At the time, the HKMA did convene a meeting to bring parties together in order to forge a path forward.While Hong Kong has a history as a crypto center, its position weakened after Beijing’s crackdown on the industry in 2017. However, the Hong Kong government aims to reestablish the city as a hub for digital assets, having expressed its desire to provide a supportive environment for crypto-related businesses. The introduction of a new licensing regime for crypto platforms in Hong Kong is part of the government’s efforts to attract more crypto groups to the city.HSBC, Standard Chartered, and the Bank of China hold influential positions in Hong Kong as issuers of the city’s currency and have key roles in the Hong Kong Association of Banks lobby group. Standard Chartered claims that it maintains regular dialogue with regulators on various subjects, while HSBC has claimed that it is actively engaging in policies and developments within the nascent industry.