NS Studio and Factor Labs to Enhance Military Security with Blockchain Technology

News emanating from the Central Asian republics of Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan in recent days points to further rollout and development of cryptocurrency sector infrastructure. A press release published on March 26 outlined that Kyrgyzstan is working on various initiatives in order to copper-fasten its position as a regional crypto hub. Those efforts include the advancement of digital asset regulation, enabling the launch of licensed crypto platforms and ongoing trials of legal frameworks relative to crypto. Photo by Steve Johnson on UnsplashA7A5 stablecoinOne initiative that may aid in the development of the digital assets sector in Kyrgyzstan is the rollout of the A7A5 stablecoin. A7A5 is pegged to the Russian ruble, with the token having been issued by Kyrgyz company Old Vector. The product was first launched in February, with the intention for it to be used on the A7 cross-border payment platform of Russian state-owned bank Promsvyazbank. Garantex, a Russian crypto exchange which had been sanctioned by U.S. and European authorities and was recently shut down, announced on Feb. 19 the listing of the A7A5 stablecoin. The stablecoin’s backers claim that it was issued “in complete accordance with the new national legislation - under the control of regulatory authorities and directed to an officially registered, regulated broker.” The stablecoin is being promoted on the basis of an annual yield of up to 20%, which has been established due to its link to the refinancing rate of the central bank of the Russian Federation. Kazakhstan crypto bank proposalMeanwhile, lawmakers in Central Asian neighbor Kazakhstan have proposed the creation of a national crypto bank. According to The Times of Central Asia, an English-language daily newspaper, Azat Peruashev, leader of the Ak Zhol political party within Kazakhstan’s lower house of parliament, put forward the proposal, which would implicate the involvement of the National Bank of Kazakhstan and a number of the country’s commercial banks. Peruashev addressed the proposal to Kazakhstani Prime Minister Olzhas Bektenov. However, the Central Asian country may have some fundamental issues to address before a crypto bank can become a reality. Currently, Kazakhstan has yet to establish a legal framework for the use of digital assets.  Last year, the authorities shut down 36 cryptocurrency exchanges which were deemed to have been operating illegally. In total, 3,500 illegal crypto exchanges have been shut down in Kazakhstan. Leading American crypto exchange business Coinbase faced a setback in the Central Asian country in November 2023 when the government cut access to its website within the country. While these crypto businesses have struggled to operate in Kazakhstan, Binance Kazakhstan successfully obtained a trading license from the Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA) in September of last year. Earlier this month, the company added options trading and futures copy trading to the platform. Blockchain industry pioneer Kyle Chasse took to X to report on this most recent development. He suggested that given that 90% of crypto activity in Kazakhstan is off the books, the authorities are interested in launching a crypto bank so as to bring it all under their control. 

Accused of one of the world's largest cryptocurrency scams, Andreas Szakacs, a Swedish national who became a Turkish citizen under the name Emre Avcı, was detained in Istanbul. The alleged international fraud scheme, led by Szakacs, began in 2019 under the guise of OmegaPro, a company dealing in forex and cryptocurrency trading. OmegaPro claimed to generate significant profits for its investors through complex financial algorithms and high-risk leveraged trading. The company, registered in opaque jurisdictions like Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and headquartered in Dubai, promised returns as high as 300% within 16 months, attracting investors from across the globe. High-profile endorsements and lavish eventsTo bolster credibility, Szakacs and his partners, including well-known figures in the finance and crypto sectors like Dilawar Singh and Mike Sims, organized extravagant events. These included the OmegaPro Legends Cup, a football tournament featuring former stars like Ronaldinho, Kaka and Iker Casillas, who were branded as OmegaPro ambassadors. The company also sponsored car races and held opulent conferences in luxury hotels, where gifts and prizes were distributed to participants, further enticing new investors. OmegaPro's operations spanned multiple continents, with representatives in countries such as Colombia, Mexico, the UK and Nigeria. Over time, the company claimed to have attracted 1.5 million investors. However, in late 2022, as withdrawals were suddenly halted, suspicions grew. By July 2023, the company had shut down, leaving an estimated three million investors defrauded and $4 billion unaccounted for.Photo by Xiaoyi Huang on UnsplashAs OmegaPro collapsed, investors from around the world began filing complaints. In France alone, over 1,500 victims have initiated a class-action lawsuit. Similar legal actions have been reported in countries including Mexico, Congo and Myanmar. Despite multiple investigations, the whereabouts of Szakacs and his partners remained unknown—until recently. A tip-off leads to arrest in IstanbulThe breakthrough came on June 28, when an anonymous informant tipped off Turkish authorities about Szakacs' presence in a luxury villa in Istanbul's Acarkent neighborhood. Following an investigation, the Istanbul Gendarmerie identified 18 complainants connected to OmegaPro. On July 9, Szakacs was arrested in a raid on the villa, where authorities found 32 cold wallets containing cryptocurrencies, along with extensive documentation related to OmegaPro’s operations. During questioning, Szakacs denied all allegations, claiming that OmegaPro was a legitimate business that went bankrupt in late 2022, resulting in significant losses for him and his partners. He also refused to provide access to the cold wallets and the encrypted data on his devices. Despite his defense, Szakacs was charged with fraud using information systems and detained by the Beykoz Criminal Court of Peace on July 10. Ongoing legal battles and future implicationsAs the investigation continues, authorities are scrutinizing Szakacs' digital transactions, which reportedly involve $160 million in movements over a single month. His legal team argues that investors knowingly took on risks in the forex market, but the sheer scale of the losses—especially the $103 million claimed by a Dutch complainant representing 3,000 victims—has intensified the case. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how international crypto-related fraud is handled, particularly in an era where digital currencies and high-risk investments are increasingly intertwined. 

BitMEX CEO Calls for an End to Internal Market MakersIn a recent interview, Stephan Lutz, the acting CEO and group CFO of 100x Group, the parent company of Seychelles-headquartered global crypto exchange BitMEX, expressed his belief that crypto exchanges should phase out their internal market-making teams.Photo by Joe Roberts on UnsplashProp trading desks unnecessarySpeaking with The Block, Lutz argued that with the growth of institutional liquidity providers and high-frequency traders (HFTs) in the market, proprietary trading desks are becoming unnecessary.Lutz stated: “You have enough HFTs out there and prop shops that can perform that function.” He was referring to the role of liquidity providers in filling gaps in the market. He made these comments in response to the emergence of information earlier this week that raised questions about internal trading practices at Crypto.com, a Singapore-based exchange.BitMEX, once the world’s largest crypto derivatives exchange, also used to employ internal traders who acted as market makers. However, Lutz explained that BitMEX’s internal trading team, named Arrakis Capital, now functions primarily as a “treasury desk.” He sees this transition as a natural evolution for crypto exchanges in a market that has matured and attracted more institutional liquidity providers.Arrakis Capital currently performs limited functions, including converting commission fees earned in Bitcoin into fiat currency for operational purposes, hedging BitMEX’s exposure to tokens held as inventory, and making markets for BitMEX’s token $BMEX. Lutz clarified that Arrakis’s market-making activities are limited because external market makers find the token’s liquidity insufficient.Regarding profitability, Lutz stated that Arrakis earns “very minor returns” of up to $100,000 per month from holding T-Bills, but it incurred losses last year. He noted that Arrakis used to play a more significant market-making role when BitMEX dominated the crypto futures market. However, he assured that the trading desk was always segregated, despite accusations in the past.Fee structuresLutz acknowledged that exchanges with internal trading teams have faced increased scrutiny since the controversies surrounding Alameda Research and FTX. To differentiate between benign internal trading teams and hedge fund-like operations, Lutz highlighted several factors, including the separation of client funds and house funds, access to sensitive data, and the ability to move markets on their own exchange. Fee structures also play a role, with low or no transaction fees potentially signaling a market-making motive rather than serving as a counterparty.Lutz’s perspective suggests that crypto exchanges should rely on external liquidity providers and HFTs rather than maintaining internal market-making teams. He argues that the market has evolved. At this point he feels that these teams are no longer necessary, due to the presence of established players within the digital assets space.As regulatory scrutiny grows, ensuring transparency and avoiding conflicts of interest become crucial for maintaining trust within the crypto exchange ecosystem. The digital assets industry is far from arriving at a mature stage in its development. While many in the industry have found the stance taken by regulators to be unhelpful, the industry itself must also demonstrate its ability to iteratively move towards best practice, without that being a knee-jerk response to regulatory enforcement.