Japanese Security Token Platform Alterna Surpasses 10,000 Pre-Registrations

North Korea Using DeFi for Money LaunderingThe United States Treasury issued a warning on Thursday where it identifies North Korea as a user of DeFi services for money laundering. According to the Treasury, both North Korea and criminal organizations have been using DeFi platforms to launder dirty money.©Pexels/PixabayWhile DeFi has been praised for its potential to democratize finance and provide greater financial freedom to users, it has also been criticized for its lack of regulatory oversight. According to the Treasury, this lack of oversight has made DeFi platforms an attractive target for money launderers and other criminal organizations.In its warning, the Treasury noted that North Korea has been using DeFi platforms to launder money and evade international sanctions. The country is believed to have developed a sophisticated system for laundering money through cryptocurrency exchanges, and it is now turning its attention to DeFi platforms.Illicit money movementCriminal organizations are also using DeFi services for money laundering, according to the Treasury. These groups are said to be using DeFi platforms to move money around the world, in order to avoid detection and to launder the proceeds of their illicit activities.The use of DeFi for money laundering poses a significant challenge for law enforcement agencies, as these platforms operate outside of the traditional banking system and are often difficult to track. The Treasury has urged DeFi platforms to implement strong anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) policies, in order to prevent their services from being used for criminal activities.The warning from the Treasury comes at a time when DeFi is becoming increasingly popular among investors and users. According to data from DeFi Pulse, the total value locked in DeFi protocols recently surpassed $100 billion, indicating a significant level of interest and investment in the sector.Calls for greater regulationHowever, the lack of regulatory oversight and the potential for DeFi to be used for money laundering and other criminal activities have raised concerns among regulators and policymakers. Some have called for greater regulation of the sector, in order to prevent its abuse by criminal organizations.Despite these concerns, many proponents of DeFi argue that the sector has the potential to transform the financial industry and provide greater financial freedom to users. They point to the benefits of decentralized systems, such as greater transparency, lower fees, and faster transaction times.The use of DeFi for money laundering is a complex issue that requires a multifaceted approach. While regulators and policymakers must work to implement strong AML and KYC policies, users and investors must also take responsibility for ensuring that they are using DeFi platforms in a responsible and legal manner.Ultimately, the future of DeFi will depend on how the sector is able to balance innovation and regulation. While DeFi has the potential to transform the financial industry, it must also be subject to appropriate oversight and accountability in order to prevent its abuse by criminal organizations.By working together, regulators, policymakers, and industry stakeholders can help to ensure that DeFi is used for its intended purpose — to provide greater financial freedom and empowerment to users around the world.

Cebu Meeting of FSB Highlights Crypto RisksThe Regional Consultative Group for Asia of the Financial Stability Board (FSB) has highlighted the risks implicated by crypto assets in a series of meetings held on Thursday and Friday in Cebu, the Philippines.The FSB is an international body with a mandate to monitor the global financial system, as well as make recommendations in respect of that system. The agency was established by the G20 group of countries in April 2009, replacing its forerunner, the Financial Stability Forum.Photo by John Alvin Merin on UnsplashA regulatory framework for cryptoThe two-day event focused on non-bank financial intermediation (NBFI) in Asia and the development of an effective global regulatory framework for crypto-assets. It discussed recent developments in financial markets, together with their regional impact.In opening remarks, Philippine Central Bank Governor, Felipe Medalla, stated: “Crypto, the biggest issue there is, whether we like it or not is quite a lot, especially younger people who are actually gambling. They have huge losses, our view right now. Well, you’re there, it’s your problem and the regulation becomes strict the moment crypto meets banking.”International participants highlighted the need for the development of an effective global regulatory framework for crypto-assets. Particular concern exists with regard to the potential for systemic risk in relation to crypto and a potential overflow into the traditional financial system.Earlier this year, the FSB proposed a complete regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, with the report having been originally submitted in October of last year. Among its key components is the imposition of tighter controls. It proposed the guiding principle of “same activity, same risk, same regulation” for crypto assets, mirroring the approach taken for traditional financial assets.Global approach to taming cryptoThis approach has proven to be problematic for people working within the digital assets space. Many of the core facets of cryptocurrencies are entirely different to anything we see in traditional finance. Trying to frame crypto within an existing approach and standard has been perceived by many to be akin to trying to fit a square peg in a round hole.It’s not the FSB's role or place to affect policy directly. That responsibility lies with policymakers and regulators in each individual country. However, the organization is seeking to influence those individuals and entities in the hope that they will employ its suggested regulatory framework.Klaas Knot, Chair of the FSB and President of the Dutch Central Bank, provided this view on crypto: “We will come up with a global regulatory framework. It also only makes sense to regulate this from a global perspective. Because, nowadays you can take a server and put it anywhere in the world and start issuing these digital assets.”From Knot’s take, it’s clear that governments and central bankers are cottoning on to the fact that individual nation-state regulation is futile to an extent where decentralized innovations like cryptocurrency are concerned. Others such as European Central Bank (ECB) President Christine Lagarde and Mark Branson, President of German financial markets regulator BaFin, similarly have called for a globally enforced regulatory approach over the course of the past year.Ongoing struggleWhile regulation can be helpful, particularly when it comes to the points at which crypto meets the traditional system, there’s no doubt that this emerging innovation will disrupt the conventional system to some degree or other. That may place an incentive before central bankers and governments to try and stymie the further development of digital assets.While a truly global approach to regulating digital assets could retard development of the sector, there is rarely total consensus among world governments on a single issue. Therefore, by its very nature, crypto, and the digital assets sector will likely continue to develop regardless. It’s more a question of how long that process takes.

The Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) of Taiwan has disclosed its intention to introduce a fresh draft of digital asset regulations for the nation come September 2024. The forthcoming draft bill seeks to establish more robust regulations for digital asset markets, prioritizing investor safety, as announced by Huang Tien-mu, the chairman of FSC. That’s according to a March 4 report by local media outlet, United Daily News (UDN).Photo by Kelly Sikkema on UnsplashAddressing customer protectionIn October, Taiwanese legislators introduced the Virtual Asset Management Bill to parliament, a move aimed at fortifying customer protection and ensuring effective industry supervision. The bill encompasses provisions that could impose fines ranging from two million Taiwanese dollars ($63,000) to 20 million Taiwanese dollars on unlicensed virtual asset service providers (VASPs). Around that time, the authorities had a particular concern with regard to the operation of foreign and offshore VASPs within the Taiwanese market. Like Hong Kong, Taiwan also had seen some negative impact due to the fraudulent activity of the Dubai-based JPEX crypto platform.The FSC has already barred foreign VASPs from operating in Taiwan without requisite approvals from the regulator. These measures were instituted following the establishment of a self-regulatory association by major cryptocurrency exchanges in the country, aiming to foster collaboration with regulators. Stricter regulationsPer the latest report, Chairman Huang Tien-mu outlined the FSC's plan to propose a draft bill targeting virtual currencies in September of the current year. This initiative seeks to bolster investor safeguarding and enhance regulatory oversight over the virtual currency sector. Concern has also been raised relative to native exchanges, in addition to offshore VASPs. In November, an investigation was opened into the Bitgin exchange, amid alleged money laundering activity. Shortly afterwards, another probe was launched into the ACE Exchange, amid allegations of money laundering and fraud. Highlighting the imperative for stricter regulations, Huang underscored the potential fraud risks tied to digital currencies. He issued a stern warning, signaling severe administrative penalties for merchants engaged in fraudulent activities aimed at investors. Moreover, the regulator expressed concerns about the growing interconnection between digital assets and the conventional financial system. He emphasized the need for laws to shield the stability of traditional financial systems from the inherent risks posed by digital assets. Addressing apprehensions regarding the misuse of virtual currencies for fraudulent endeavors, Huang cautioned of stringent administrative penalties awaiting both domestic and foreign currency traders found guilty. ETF considerationsTaiwan's Chamber of Commerce is poised to unveil a study on Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in April. Gao Jingping, Deputy Director of the Securities and Futures Bureau at the Financial Supervisory Commission, indicated Taiwan's contemplation of endorsing spot Bitcoin ETFs under regulatory oversight. However, he advised against investing in foreign crypto-based exchange-traded products. Reports from local media in December suggested that the FSC will closely monitor Bitcoin ETFs to assess their potential and gauge public demand. The FSC intends to release research findings in April, which will influence the fate of Bitcoin ETFs in Taiwan. Positive findings may pave the way for Taiwanese investors to resume acquiring overseas Bitcoin ETFs. This initiative unfolds amid heightened global demand for Bitcoin ETFs, which recently contributed to Bitcoin's surge to almost $69,000.