Komainu acquires Singaporean digital asset custodian

SEC Opposes Motion to Dismiss Terraform Labs LawsuitLawyers representing the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have responded to a motion to dismiss the lawsuit filed by Dentons, the lawyers representing Singapore-based Terraform Labs and its Founder Do Kwon.Photo by Miguel Á. Padriñán on PexelsCourt filingAccording to its arguments, set out in a court filing lodged to the District Court of the Southern District of New York on Thursday, the SEC’s counsel claims that the additional documents provided by Dentons lack sufficient grounds for dismissing the case.It claims that the internal SEC emails presented by Dentons are irrelevant to the current lawsuit. The SEC asserts that the parameters of an “investment contract” are clearly defined by the Howey test and argue that TerraUSD ($UST) should be classified as a security.The reliance by US regulators on the Howey test, a legal test case that implicated citrus grove contracts that date back to 1946, has proven to be controversial. Naturally, there could have been no consideration of the digital innovation that digital assets present today almost eighty years ago. Notwithstanding that, the SEC maintains that the principle factors of what constitutes an investment contract are covered by the case regardless.During the court hearing held on June 15, Dentons submitted supplementary documents to strengthen their motion to dismiss the lawsuit. The primary focus of the hearing was to determine whether the digital assets developed by Terraform Labs should be categorized as securities based on the criteria of an “investment contract.”Dentons maintains that the algorithmic stablecoin, $UST, should not be considered a security and emphasizes its practical purpose rather than its classification as an investment contract. To support their motion, Dentons included additional documents such as the US House Financial Services Committee hearing on digital asset regulation and stablecoin issuance, the SEC’s request for a restraining order against Binance.US, and the Hinman emails from the SEC vs. Ripple lawsuit.Judge to decideThe defense lawyers highlighted what they perceive as a “regulatory gap” in classifying crypto assets as securities, particularly as the US Congress engages in discussions about regulatory frameworks for digital assets and stablecoin issuance. Furthermore, they argued that the SEC is exceeding the scope of securities laws and relying on internal emails related to “investment contracts” to determine the security status.A decision on the motion to dismiss will be arrived at by July 14. Judge Jed Rakoff, who is presiding over the case, will be responsible for that, once he’s weighed up the merits of the arguments presented by both parties.It is noteworthy that Dentons has previously represented Kwon in challenging the US SEC’s subpoena during the investigation of the Mirror Protocol in 2021, as well as in a class-action lawsuit in the Singapore High Court in 2022. The law firm also provides representation to Terraform Labs in other legal matters.In a separate development, the Basic Court in Podgorica, Montenegro, has granted bail for Kwon and former Terra Chief Technology Officer Han Chang-joon. However, Kwon has recently been taken into custody for extradition in Montenegro while the court deliberates on South Korea’s extradition request for the Terra founder.As the legal proceedings continue, the outcome of the motion to dismiss will have significant implications for the ongoing dispute between Terraform Labs, Do Kwon, and the SEC.

Mirae Asset Securities, South Korea’s largest asset management firm, has begun suspending trading for bitcoin ETFs, according to industry sources on Friday. This comes after an announcement made by the Financial Services Commission (FSC) stating that brokering spot bitcoin ETFs may be considered a violation of the government’s stance on virtual assets and the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act.Photo by Dmytro Demidko on UnsplashTaking preemptive measuresThe asset manager has blocked new purchases of spot bitcoin ETFs listed in Canada and Germany starting yesterday and is considering suspending trading of bitcoin futures ETFs that have been listed in overseas markets since 2021. This includes the Proshares Bitcoin Strategy ETF, Valkyrie Bitcoin Strategy ETF, Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin Strategy ETF and VanEck Bitcoin Strategy ETF. As Korean financial authorities are putting the brakes on domestic investments in the recently approved spot bitcoin ETF by the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (SEC), it is believed that Mirae Asset Securities is putting a preemptive halt to trading in other bitcoin ETFs. Spot vs futuresSpot bitcoin ETFs differ from futures ETFs in that they track the price of Bitcoin by actually holding the cryptocurrency, while the latter tracks its price through futures contracts. South Korean securities firms have been brokering futures ETFs listed in overseas market for a while now.

Netmarble’s MARBLEX Secures Whitelist Approval for MBX Token in JapanSouth Korean gaming company Netmarble made an announcement today that its blockchain subsidiary, MARBLEX, has obtained whitelist approval for its governance token MBX in Japan. This marks a significant milestone for the project, opening up new opportunities for MBX’s utilization within the Japanese market.Photo by Eliobed Suarez on UnsplashCrypto listing in JapanIn Japan, crypto assets must undergo a rigorous review conducted by the Japanese Financial Services Agency (FSA) before being listed on crypto exchanges. Boasting its stability and reliability, MBX has become the first token from a Korean blockchain gaming project to be added to the Japanese whitelist of crypto assets.As part of its expansion plan, MARBLEX is in discussions with Zaif to arrange the listing of the MBX token on the Japanese crypto exchange in October.Utility expansion planMoon Jun-ki, Business Division Director of MARBLEX, expressed confidence in MBX’s competitiveness as a verified token. He highlighted MARBLEX’s strategy to introduce a token burn policy and expand the token’s utility, all aimed at establishing a sustainable and transparent ecosystem.These comments from Moon point to MARBLEX’s overhaul plan for MBX tokenomics. As a key step in this initiative, the blockchain firm burned 67% of its total 1 billion MBX distribution on July 19.