Blockchain-powered donation platform collaborates with NPO Yana to hold charitable bazaar

China’s Legal Daily, a publication that falls under the supervision of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Central Commission for Political and Legal Affairs, has sounded an alarm regarding cryptocurrencies, raising concerns about their use as potential avenues for corruption. In the newspaper’s New Year’s Day edition, it quoted legal scholars, who had convened at the annual China Integrity and Legal Research Association meeting, who underscored the urgency of addressing the emerging threat posed by digital assets.Photo by Max van den Oetelaar on Unsplash‘Hidden channels’ for briberyIn particular, it focused on views expressed by Associate Professor Zhao Xuejun from Hebei University Law School. Zhao Xuejun warned against the use of virtual currency and electronic gift cards as “hidden channels” for bribery. Notably, these forms of payment, often stored in “cold storage” devices, offer a convenient means for transporting funds abroad, the academic claimed. This development aligns with recent warnings from state agencies, including the Supreme People’s Procuratorate and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, cautioning against the use of stablecoin Tether in yuan-related foreign exchange transactions, deeming such actions illegal. Anonymity and traceability concernsProfessor Mo Hongxian from Wuhan University Law School explicitly mentioned Bitcoin, highlighting the challenges associated with virtual currencies, such as their anonymity and difficulty in traceability, which can facilitate illegal activities. Despite lacking official recognition in China, Professor Hongxian stressed the need for judicial attention to transactions involving virtual currencies. Although China maintains a cryptocurrency ban, it actively explores blockchain technology for identity verification. The country’s central bank digital currency, e-CNY, still in the pilot stage, has witnessed significant development. Despite its limited geographic distribution, the digital yuan recorded transactions totaling nearly $250 billion in China as of June 2023, with international use noted in commodities sales. Varying degrees of enforcementChina has demonstrated that it can at times take a very hard line on restricting cryptocurrency trading and related activities, while at others, it seems to tolerate such activity or turn a blind eye. Last month China’s Supreme Procuratorate provided details on the nature of the prosecution of over-the-counter (OTC) crypto trader and RenrenBit founder, Zhao Dong. Zhao was handed down a seven year sentence for carrying out illicit crypto business operations. By contrast, an investigation carried out by the Wall Street Journal last year found that business has been thriving for the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange Binance in China, despite the ban. Other crypto-related activity has been uncovered, flouting capital controls. BitMEX founder Arthur Hayes suggested recently that all wealthy Chinese individuals have access to banking in Hong Kong, allowing them to access, trade and use cryptocurrency. As part of the CCP’s intensified anti-corruption efforts, the focus on cryptocurrency’s potential role in financial crimes underscores the evolving landscape as use of digital currency unfolds. The Legal Daily article emphasizes the need for vigilance and regulatory measures to counteract the perceived threat of corruption facilitated by cryptocurrencies and electronic payment methods.  

KuCoin Ups Compliance via Mandatory KYCKuCoin, the Seychelles-headquartered global cryptocurrency exchange, has unveiled plans to strengthen its Know Your Customer (KYC) system by introducing mandatory identity checks.In an official announcement on Wednesday, KuCoin stated that this upgrade aims to ensure compliance with global anti-money laundering (AML) regulations. Effective from July 15, KuCoin will require all new users to undergo KYC authentication as part of the registration process. Those who fail to complete the KYC process will be unable to access KuCoin’s wide range of products and services, according to the exchange.Photo by Markus Winkler on UnsplashExisting and new usersFurthermore, existing users who registered prior to July 15, 2023, will also be required to complete the KYC process to access certain features on KuCoin. Withdrawals will remain unaffected for these users. However, they will no longer be able to deposit new funds, the announcement outlines.Despite the introduction of mandatory KYC, KuCoin’s existing non-KYC users will still be able to utilize services such as spot trading sell orders, futures trading deleveraging, and margin trading deleveraging. Additionally, other available services for existing non-KYC users include redemptions at KuCoin’s staking and lending hub, KuCoin Earn, and exchange-traded funds’ redemption.Johnny Lyu, the CEO of KuCoin, explained the KYC process, stating: “A complete KYC process requires users to provide their name, identification number, and identification photo, and undergo facial recognition.” Lyu emphasized that KuCoin carefully verifies customer identification and collects the necessary data in compliance with the laws and regulations of applicable jurisdictions.He added: “Typically, we require customer identification information including information on the customer’s name and further identifiers such as a physical address, date of birth, and national ID number.”Risk profile data collectionIn accordance with regulatory requirements, KuCoin also collects additional information regarding a customer’s business and risk profile. This includes details about the nature and volume of trading activity and the origin of virtual funds deposited, according to Lyu.Lyu underscored that KYC has always been a principle adhered to by KuCoin and that identity recognition is an established part of its process. He further highlighted that KuCoin’s KYC policy is designed to align with regulations in applicable jurisdictions, as there is no unified global KYC regulation at present.KuCoin has also made it clear that the exchange does not support the United States KYC requirements based on their current or updated KYC rules. This new mandatory KYC update will impact a significant number of cryptocurrency users globally. As of July 2022, KuCoin reported over 20 million registered accounts on its platform.Leading global exchangeKuCoin is also recognized as one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges in terms of trading volumes. At the time of writing, KuCoin’s daily trading volumes exceed $540 million, with more than 8 million monthly visits, according to data from CoinGecko. For comparison, major United States-based exchange Kraken receives approximately 5 million visits per month, with a daily trading volume of around $380 million.This move by KuCoin follows a trend of increasing KYC policies among cryptocurrency exchanges. In May, Dubai-based Bybit restricted non-KYC users from withdrawing more than 20,000 Tether (USDT) monthly. It has been reported that cybercriminals have taken advantage of KYC requirements, selling hacked and verified crypto accounts on the darknet for as low as $30 as of April 2023.

Singapore Judge Says Crypto Not MoneyIn recent years, legal processes in various jurisdictions worldwide have seen judges comment on whether cryptocurrency is actually money. The latest such determination has been made by Justice Vinodh Coomaraswamy who outlined in a Singapore court that while being a component of financial transactions, cryptocurrencies are not money.The consideration emerged in a recent court hearing at Singapore’s High Court in a case involving the Algorand Foundation and failed Singapore-based hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC). Justice Coomaraswamy’s comments arose due to a discussion in the midst of the court proceedings involving the Judge and counsel representing the Algorand Foundation.©Pexels/EKATERINA BOLOVTSOVASeashells as moneyIn setting out his rationale for the need for 3AC to be wound up, Daniel Chan, a lawyer for the WongPartnership law firm that was representing the Algorand Foundation in the proceedings, told the judge that despite foreign currencies not being recognized as legal tender in Singapore, or used broadly as a medium of exchange within the city state, those foreign currencies are recognized by Singapore law as money. Using that analogy Chan suggested that by implication, the same scenario should be considered where cryptocurrencies are concerned.The judge provided a counterpoint: “What if you had a [community] in the world that used seashells as its internal medium of exchange? Would the Singapore courts have to recognize that as money.” Chan claimed that the judge had used an extreme example although Coomaraswamy remained steadfast in his view, pointing out that seashells had indeed been used as a form of money in the distant past.Coomaraswamy proceeded to dismiss the Algorand Foundation’s winding up application. He acknowledged that the Foundation did have standing in bringing the application. However, as he determined that cryptocurrency couldn’t be classed as money, on that basis he dismissed the application. In conveying his decision, he stated: “The word indebtedness, in my view, must require a debt which is in fiat currency. Determining whether or not a particular intangible, such as cryptocurrency, is money would require a detailed examination of evidence which is not appropriate in the context of insolvency.”Legal tenderThus far, bitcoin has been recognized as legal tender in two countries — El Salvador and the Central African Republic. In 2020, a French court referred to the leading cryptocurrency as money, agreeing that Bitcoin loans can be recognized as customer loans in the same way as loans denominated in fiat currencies. Earlier that year, an Australian court recognized bitcoin as a legally legitimate form of investment. In the United States, a Federal court recognized bitcoin as “money” or “funds” in a prosecution taken against Silk Road website operator Ross Ulbricht.There have been many similar instances in courts globally where judges have had to grapple with the consideration of whether bitcoin and crypto more generally can be regarded as money. Similar to the difficulty authorities are having in regulating cryptocurrency, it’s an issue that in most cases lacks complete clarity and in which we can expect further discussions on, similar to this most recent consideration in the Singaporean high court.