Raon Whitehat Launches Cloud-Based NFT Wallet for OmniOne Marketplace

Hong Kong’s Largest Bank in Lackluster Crypto EmbraceFor all of its pro-crypto initiatives Hong Kong has been struggling with banking crypto companies. A recent report from the Hong Kong Economic Journal cited Lin Yansheng, Director of Commercial Banking at Hang Seng Bank, Hong Kong’s largest local bank, in outlining that the bank will accommodate crypto but that support is conditional.Photo by Florian Wehde on UnsplashCrypto in a high rates environmentYansheng shared his insights on interest rates, stating that he believes that interest rates will rise but reassures that any increase will be temporary in nature.The Commercial Banking Director acknowledged that Hong Kong’s current high-interest rates, in contrast to those of mainland China and neighboring regions, have caused a slowdown in the overall demand for bank loans. He predicts that loan growth will face pressure this year. However, he also offers a glimmer of hope, stating that a reduction in interest rates may not be far off. He suggests that next year’s expected interest rate cuts could lead to an improvement in loan growth.Data published recently by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) shows that annualized loan growth has been negative since May. It currently stands at -1.1%. Yansheng explained that as borrowing rates decrease in mainland China, Hong Kong’s banking industry is experiencing a downturn in loan growth. The high Hong Kong dollar interbank offered rate (HIBOR) currently limits the volume of corporate borrowing.The rising concerns over interest rates have prompted Hang Seng Bank to acknowledge the importance of cryptocurrencies.Unconvincing crypto embraceThe bank recently outlined the regulatory framework for virtual asset businesses seeking to operate within its purview. To open standard banking accounts, these businesses must obtain an Approval-in-Principle (AIP) license from the Securities Regulatory Commission (SRC), as per the bank’s announcement.The first issue is that obtaining an AIP license has proven to be incredibly difficult. Currently, only OSL and HashKey, two virtual asset trading platforms, have managed to obtain the required clearance. Hang Seng Bank acknowledges that it hasn’t received many inquiries about crypto-banking, attributing it to that challenging process of obtaining AIP certification. Meeting the demanding requirements for such permission poses a significant hurdle for most businesses.Getting beyond this obstacle, Yansheng clarified that even then crypto companies will only be able to obtain a “simple” bank account. He didn’t clarify what services would be excluded but Hang Seng’s embrace of crypto-related business sounds very much like it’s lacking in conviction.Both the China Securities Regulatory Commission and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority have conducted roundtable meetings to address the difficulties faced by virtual asset businesses. Yansheng reiterated Hang Seng’s commitment to complying with the regulators’ instructions and accommodating these companies. However, it’s clear that difficulties remain.Last month, it was reported that Hang Seng Investment Management Co., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hang Seng Bank and the largest exchange-traded fund (ETF) manager in Hong Kong, was looking to add digital assets to its product line.

Kuwait Implements Full Ban on Crypto ActivitiesIn a significant move to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, Kuwait has taken a decisive step by announcing a complete ban on all crypto-related activities.Photo by Jan Dommerholt on Unsplash“No legal status”According to a circular issued by the Capital Markets Authority (CMA), Kuwait’s top financial regulator, earlier this week, cryptocurrencies are deemed to have “no legal status” and lack the support of any government or any asset. As a result, the prices of these digital assets are vulnerable to speculative swings, exposing investors to potential substantial losses. Consequently, the CMA asserts that engaging in crypto activities can lead to adverse consequences and financial risks for individuals and businesses alike.The ban extends beyond trading and mining. It also prohibits public companies from offering any cryptocurrency-related services. The CMA emphasized that it has never granted approval for crypto services in the past, and this outright ban reinforces the country’s commitment to curbing illicit financial activities facilitated by cryptocurrencies.Aligning with FATFThe decision comes in the wake of Kuwait’s determination to align with the Financial Action Task Force’s (FATF) global requirements for handling crypto assets. The country is attempting to demonstrate its compliance with international anti-money laundering guidelines by clamping down on digital assets.Kuwait’s approach towards cryptocurrencies diverges significantly from other Gulf states that have embraced the nascent industry with more openness. The likes of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Saudi Arabia, and Bahrain have previously engaged with crypto assets in various ways.For example, Bahrain granted approval to global crypto exchange platform Binance to provide digital asset services within the country. It’s keen to embrace digital assets as it pivots away from an oil-based economy. The Kingdom recently welcomed plans by Singapore-based private equity firm Whampoa Group to establish a crypto-friendly digital bank there.Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund has also invested in several US-based venture capital funds which are focused on crypto and blockchain technologies.Dubai, in particular, has been actively working on establishing a regulatory framework for digital assets, aiming to position itself as a digital hub in the region. The UAE as a whole has recognized crypto assets as securities for several years, fostering a favorable environment for crypto businesses.CriticismNews of the ban also provoked criticism, including commentary from Alex Gladstein, Chief Strategy Officer with the Human Rights Foundation. Gladstein, taking to Twitter, stated: “ Not surprising. I expect all authoritarian regimes (especially gulf tyrannies like the UAE and Saudi Arabia) to follow in Kuwait’s footsteps and eventually pass severe restrictions on citizen use of Bitcoin.” While the UAE trends in the opposite direction, Gladstein is not optimistic about the free use of decentralized cryptocurrencies in the UAE over the longer term.As the global crypto landscape continues to evolve, each country in the Gulf region is adopting unique approaches to address the opportunities and challenges posed by digital assets. While there may be opposition to the technology, decentralized digital assets will benefit from jurisdictional arbitrage in efforts to get this innovation rolled out for the benefit of ordinary people around the world.

Atomic Wallet Hacker Uses Lazarus Crypto MixerThe stolen cryptocurrency from the recent $35 million hack of Atomic Wallet is already being moved to a crypto mixer favored by North Korea’s notorious cyber-hacking group.Photo by Micha Brändli on UnsplashSinbad.ioAccording to UK-based crypto compliance analysis firm Elliptic, the funds have made their way to a crypto mixer used by Lazarus Group, a notorious hacker group that focuses on crypto heists which is believed to have direct ties with the North Korean government.On June 5, Elliptic’s Investigations Team revealed that it had traced the funds from the Atomic Wallet hack to the crypto mixer Sinbad.io. Lazarus had previously used the mixer to launder over $100 million in stolen crypto assets.While the exact amount sent to the mixer was not specified, Elliptic noted that the stolen funds were being exchanged for Bitcoin before undergoing obfuscation through the mixer. Additionally, Elliptic reported that Sinbad.io is likely a rebranded version of Blender.io, another mixer extensively used to launder funds by the Lazarus Group. Blender.io has been sanctioned by the US Treasury.Atomic Wallet hackThe hack of several user accounts on Atomic Wallet occurred on June 3, resulting in losses of up to $35 million. News of the issue broke with the following tweet from the project team (which has subsequently been deleted): “We have received reports of wallets being compromised. We are doing all we can to investigate and analyze the situation. As we have more information, we will share it accordingly.”In a follow-up tweet the next day, the team confirmed that it was investigating the matter with the assistance of a number of “leading security companies.”However, Atomic Wallet later downplayed the incident, stating that less than 1% of its monthly active users were affected. The project team was castigated by users for trying to present the hack as a minor incident. One user took to Twitter to call out the Atomic Wallet team for “having the nerve to come to the networks and say that only 1% of wallets were affected.”The Atomic Wallet project is based out of Tallinn, Estonia, having been founded in 2017. It claims to provide a non-custodial decentralized multi-currency crypto wallet. The product supports over fifty coins and two hundred tokens. It also offers atomic swaps between digital assets, while also supporting integrations with instant exchanges such as Changelly, ShapeShift, and others.Roland Säde, the Chief Marketing Officer of Atomic Wallet, assured users that the team is working tirelessly to recover the stolen funds. He emphasized the need to complete the investigation to develop a concrete plan.Despite the ongoing efforts, Säde urged victims to track the illicit transfers and report them to popular crypto exchanges. By doing so, it was thought that may hinder the scammers from exchanging the funds.Crypto hacking menaceLazarus Group hackers have been the bane of the crypto space in recent years. Elliptic released a report last month that identified Japan as having been the country most adversely affected by the North Korean hackers. It’s understood that the estimated $721 million in stolen crypto from Japan-based entities amounts to nearly nine times the value of North Korea’s exports based on 2021 data.While Atomic Wallet is directly reporting the incidents, Säde believes that having more individuals monitoring the hackers’ activities will make it more challenging for them to move the funds undetected. Unfortunately, Elliptic’s recent findings suggest that for many victims, it may already be too late to prevent further misuse of their stolen cryptocurrency.