Incheon Empowers Korean Blockchain Startups with Binance and Undefined Labs as Accelerator…

In a recent blog post, Christopher Hui, Hong Kong's Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB), announced a stringent deadline for unlicensed virtual asset service providers (VASPs) to submit licensing applications, as well as outlining the intention to develop a regulatory framework for over-the-counter (OTC) venues.Photo by Manson Yim on UnsplashUnlicensed VASP deadlineThe Hong Kong government's financial services department has set Feb. 29 as the cutoff date for applications from VASPs that are currently unregistered and unregulated. Those not approved must cease operations by May 31. The move comes as the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) established a licensing system for VASPs, acknowledging a transitional period for those operating before its implementation. Midway through last year, the SFC issued a stern warning to unlicensed crypto trading platforms engaging in what it termed as “improper practices.” Hui emphasized that VASPs wishing to continue operations in Hong Kong must submit their license applications by the end of this month. Failure to meet the relevant requirements outlined by the SFC could result in the issuance of a "no-deeming notice" for existing service providers. This notice mandates that they must halt operations either by May 31 or three months after receiving the notice. Service providers failing to submit their applications by the February deadline are also expected to cease operations by the end of May. As the deadline approaches, Hui highlighted that the SFC is actively preparing for enforcement work, including issuing notices to disapproved service providers and intensifying publicity efforts. Proposed regulatory framework for OTCsHighlighting the specific role OTC venues played in some fraud cases involving unlicensed VASPs in 2023, Hui announced that the SFC plans to launch a consultation on a proposed regulatory framework for OTC crypto venues. The consultation will encompass virtual-asset outlets, including shops and online platforms. Hui emphasized the necessity of regulating OTC venues to prevent investor deception and protect against fraudulent activities. This move aligns with Hong Kong's ongoing efforts to create a vibrant sector and ecosystem for virtual assets. The city implemented a licensing regime for crypto companies in June of the previous year, with companies requiring approval before June of the current year to continue operations. Cautioning investorsHui also took the opportunity to caution investors about the volatility and value of virtual assets. He stressed that many digital assets lack intrinsic value and exhibit price volatility, urging investors to thoroughly understand details and assess associated risks before engaging in related investments. Furthermore, Hui emphasized that only platforms officially licensed by the SFC should be used for virtual asset transactions. Additionally, Hong Kong is exploring a regulatory regime for stablecoin issuers, proposing that fiat-backed stablecoin issuers obtain a license from the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. As Hong Kong strengthens its regulatory framework, it aims to create a secure and compliant environment for the evolving landscape of virtual assets.  

South Korea's Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) plans to introduce a bill this week aimed at establishing a legal framework for digital assets, according to Edaily. The move is part of the party's ongoing efforts to advance its crypto policy agenda ahead of the upcoming presidential election. The proposed law would define the legal status of digital assets and set rules for their issuance, distribution and listing. The bill is expected to keep the requirement for Korean won-pegged stablecoin issuers to obtain authorization with a minimum reserve of 5 billion won ($3.58 million), a key point of debate.Photo by Brady Bellini on UnsplashA DPK official stated that the bill has been drafted and is set to be introduced to the National Assembly this week, following feedback from internal subcommittees. Most of the provisions remain consistent with last month’s draft, but final comments are still being collected on stablecoin reserve requirements, which have been a major point of discussion. Defining digital assetsThe bill defines digital assets as "electronic records with economic value based on blockchain technology" and establishes a regulatory framework for issuers, exchanges and custodians. Key provisions include permitting initial coin offerings (ICOs) and creating a digital asset committee under the Financial Services Commission (FSC). This committee would oversee legal framework design, market monitoring, and policy promotion. Additionally, an industry association will establish a separate committee to oversee token listing practices, ensuring consistent listing standards across exchanges. The most contentious part of the draft has been the regulations for won-based stablecoins. It classifies stablecoins as digital assets akin to fiat currency, requiring a minimum reserve of 5 billion won and authorization from the FSC. It also mandates real-time reserve disclosures, secure asset custody and quarterly reporting. Divide over stablecoin reserve requirementOpinions on the reserve requirement are divided. Some industry insiders argue that the 5 billion won threshold is too high, creating a barrier for startups. Others believe a minimum capital requirement is necessary due to stablecoins' role in payments and their potential as currency substitutes. Lee Jung-yup, president of the Blockchain Law Society, stressed that stablecoins must maintain a basic level of trust, warning that those failing to meet the 5 billion won threshold could become prone to insolvency or fraud. However, Lee acknowledged concerns about the centralized regulatory approach led by financial authorities and the potential for market dominance by large corporations. He suggested exploring the creation of an independent regulatory body for cryptocurrencies, warning that overly strict regulations could stifle domestic digital finance innovation amid growing global competition. Crime surges with market growthWhile regulations continue to evolve, crypto crimes are also rising sharply amid the expanding digital asset market. According to Segye Ilbo, South Korean police arrested about 2,100 individuals for crypto-related offenses last year—17 times more than in 2017, when data collection began. The total losses from such crimes now exceed 1 trillion won ($714 million) annually. Since the election of U.S. President Donald Trump, known for his crypto-friendly stance, Korea's crypto market has experienced rapid growth. This surge has raised concerns about an increase in fraud targeting investors chasing quick profits. 

KakaoBank to Conduct Routine Due Diligence on Crypto Exchange CoinoneKakaoBank, one of South Korea’s Internet-only banks, is set to conduct a routine due diligence examination on cryptocurrency exchange Coinone from May 8 to 9, according to crypto media Digital Asset.Photo by Markus Winkler on UnsplashThe mobile bank told Digital Asset that the forthcoming due diligence is unrelated to either the alleged illicit token listings involving former Coinone employees or the exchange’s sole relisting of the WEMIX token in February, which had been delisted from major Korean crypto exchanges due to questionable information about the token’s circulating supply.In Korea, crypto trading platforms supporting Korean won trading are legally obligated to obtain real-name bank accounts from a bank. Last August, KakaoBank signed a one-year contract with Coinone to provide such accounts to the exchange, and the bank will need to decide whether it will extend the contract before August this year.A Coinone official said that the exchange has not undergone any routine due diligence checks from KakaoBank since the contract was signed last year.The upcoming examination is expected to address concerns stemming from rumors that KakaoBank might reconsider its contract with Coinone in light of the bribery scandal that involved two former Coinone personnel and two brokers.