KakaoBank to Conduct Routine Due Diligence on Crypto Exchange Coinone

Two Russian nationals have been referred to prosecutors in South Korea for allegedly facilitating the illegal transfer of roughly 58 billion won ($42.2 million) to Russia using USDT, a U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoin. According to a report by KBS News, the Seoul branch of the Korea Customs Service (KCS) announced the charges on May 22, citing violations of the country’s Foreign Exchange Transaction Act. The suspects, a man and a woman both in their 40s, reportedly operated an unauthorized money exchange business to carry out the transactions.Photo by Polina Tankilevitch on PexelsOver 6K transactionsAuthorities suspect the pair of repeatedly using USDT to conduct cross-border transfers between South Korea and Russia. From January 2023 to July 2023, the duo allegedly completed 6,156 illegal remittance transactions, either sending funds abroad or receiving payments on behalf of others, totaling the full 58 billion won in question. Investigators revealed that the two suspects, who hold permanent residency in South Korea and have overseas Korean status, used the messaging app Telegram to solicit clients. When transferring money to Russia, they reportedly collected funds via kiosks in convenience stores that allow users to send money without a bank account. The collected cash was then used to purchase USDT to complete the remittances. According to customs officials, the suspects would either send the cryptocurrency directly to a crypto wallet specified by the customer, or forward it to accomplices in Russia. These accomplices would then convert the crypto to cash and distribute rubles to recipients through local channels. Illicit crypto use by businesses The operation also handled export payments for South Korean businesses. The suspects reportedly accepted payments from Russian importers on behalf of Korean used car dealers and cosmetics exporters. In these cases, associates in Russia would collect ruble payments from importers, convert the funds into USDT and send the cryptocurrency to contacts in Korea. The funds were then exchanged for Korean won and deposited into the accounts of the businesses. Customs officials believe that the group’s services became particularly appealing after the start of the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022. In the wake of U.S. and international sanctions against Russia, legitimate financial channels for cross-border transactions became restricted, prompting some companies and individuals to turn to illegal alternatives. The Korean export companies involved in these transactions have been fined. The Seoul Customs Office emphasized that illegal money exchange operations are often exploited for criminal activities such as drug trafficking, voice phishing and gambling. In response, the agency committed to stronger enforcement and pledged to spare no effort in combating unlawful financial operations. Scams grow inside the borderThe surge in crypto-related financial crimes in South Korea extends beyond cross-border transactions. According to a recent report by Maeil Business Newspaper, Kakao Pay—a local mobile payment platform—has detected around 70,000 cases of malicious apps linked to virtual assets over the past month. Of those, 80% were associated with Ponzi schemes, where fraudsters lure victims with promises of high returns before disappearing with the funds. A Kakao Pay spokesperson noted that new forms of security threats are emerging alongside the rapid growth of the crypto market, adding that the company is prioritizing the development of stronger security systems. 

150 Web3 Firms Emerge via Cyberport Within 12 MonthsHong Kong’s Cyberport, the flagship technology hub of the Chinese autonomous territory, has experienced exceptional growth over the past year, attracting more than 150 companies operating in the Web3 space.Photo by Ruslan Bardash on UnsplashA hotbed of innovationThe latest blog post by Hong Kong Financial Secretary Paul Chan, published on Sunday, sheds light on the remarkable success of Cyberport. It currently houses over 1,900 community enterprises, with a cumulative financing figure surpassing 35.7 billion yuan ($4.98 billion).One of the notable achievements of Cyberport is its portfolio of over 480 intellectual property projects, showcasing its commitment to fostering innovation. Moreover, Cyberport has played a pivotal role in nurturing the growth of several successful ventures, including six “unicorns” that have emerged from within its vibrant community.The Web3 space at Cyberport boasts prominent firms such as Hashkey Group, a licensed cryptocurrency exchange; Animoca Brands, a Web3 venture capital and game developer; and Consensys, the renowned Ethereum software company responsible for the widely-used crypto wallet MetaMask. The presence of these industry leaders further cements Cyberport’s status as a hub for cutting-edge technologies and groundbreaking ideas.Funding allocationRecognizing the immense potential of Web3 technologies, the Hong Kong government has allocated 50 million yuan ($6.9 million) from its financial budget to support Cyberport’s initiatives. This funding injection aims to expedite research and development efforts and foster the creation of innovative applications within the third-generation internet powered by blockchain technology.In addition to its achievements in the Web3 space, Cyberport has made significant strides in virtual asset trading and other sectors. Notably, in 2022, one of Cyberport’s companies became the second licensed virtual asset trading platform approved by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) in Hong Kong. This milestone solidifies Cyberport’s position as a driving force in the advancement of the digital asset ecosystem within the city.Emerging start-up successFurthermore, several technology-driven startups incubated by Cyberport have successfully launched initial public offerings (IPOs), showcasing the hub’s effectiveness in propelling ventures towards public market success. Notable examples include a smart logistics company and a travel platform.Hong Kong’s Web3 industry is witnessing a surge in blockchain-based security products, signaling a growing interest among investors. UBS and the Bank of China’s Hong Kong-based investment arm recently unveiled a groundbreaking blockchain-based structured note, marking the city’s first private security product on a public blockchain.The development team behind layer one blockchain, the Internet Computer Protocol (ICP), indicated in April that it planned to develop a hub within Cyberport, following its participation at Hong Kong’s Web3 Festival that month. The event was a success, attracting over 10,000 attendees.This achievement follows the successful launch of a government-backed green bond in February, which utilized a private blockchain platform provided by Goldman Sachs. These developments showcase Hong Kong’s commitment to developing its Web3 industry beyond cryptocurrencies, expanding into new realms of finance and technology.To ensure a regulated and secure environment for investors to participate in the growing sector, Hong Kong introduced licensing regulations on June 1 for cryptocurrency trading platforms catering to retail investors. These regulations demonstrate the city’s proactive approach to embracing innovation while prioritizing investor protection.

Singapore Judge Says Crypto Not MoneyIn recent years, legal processes in various jurisdictions worldwide have seen judges comment on whether cryptocurrency is actually money. The latest such determination has been made by Justice Vinodh Coomaraswamy who outlined in a Singapore court that while being a component of financial transactions, cryptocurrencies are not money.The consideration emerged in a recent court hearing at Singapore’s High Court in a case involving the Algorand Foundation and failed Singapore-based hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC). Justice Coomaraswamy’s comments arose due to a discussion in the midst of the court proceedings involving the Judge and counsel representing the Algorand Foundation.©Pexels/EKATERINA BOLOVTSOVASeashells as moneyIn setting out his rationale for the need for 3AC to be wound up, Daniel Chan, a lawyer for the WongPartnership law firm that was representing the Algorand Foundation in the proceedings, told the judge that despite foreign currencies not being recognized as legal tender in Singapore, or used broadly as a medium of exchange within the city state, those foreign currencies are recognized by Singapore law as money. Using that analogy Chan suggested that by implication, the same scenario should be considered where cryptocurrencies are concerned.The judge provided a counterpoint: “What if you had a [community] in the world that used seashells as its internal medium of exchange? Would the Singapore courts have to recognize that as money.” Chan claimed that the judge had used an extreme example although Coomaraswamy remained steadfast in his view, pointing out that seashells had indeed been used as a form of money in the distant past.Coomaraswamy proceeded to dismiss the Algorand Foundation’s winding up application. He acknowledged that the Foundation did have standing in bringing the application. However, as he determined that cryptocurrency couldn’t be classed as money, on that basis he dismissed the application. In conveying his decision, he stated: “The word indebtedness, in my view, must require a debt which is in fiat currency. Determining whether or not a particular intangible, such as cryptocurrency, is money would require a detailed examination of evidence which is not appropriate in the context of insolvency.”Legal tenderThus far, bitcoin has been recognized as legal tender in two countries — El Salvador and the Central African Republic. In 2020, a French court referred to the leading cryptocurrency as money, agreeing that Bitcoin loans can be recognized as customer loans in the same way as loans denominated in fiat currencies. Earlier that year, an Australian court recognized bitcoin as a legally legitimate form of investment. In the United States, a Federal court recognized bitcoin as “money” or “funds” in a prosecution taken against Silk Road website operator Ross Ulbricht.There have been many similar instances in courts globally where judges have had to grapple with the consideration of whether bitcoin and crypto more generally can be regarded as money. Similar to the difficulty authorities are having in regulating cryptocurrency, it’s an issue that in most cases lacks complete clarity and in which we can expect further discussions on, similar to this most recent consideration in the Singaporean high court.