Temasek Cuts Pay Following FTX Autopsy

Regulatory Caution Among Asian Nations Amid Reports of Illicit FinancingWith a plethora of reports of crypto-related terrorist financing having been published in recent weeks, it’s understood that Asian nations may be looking to exercise caution when it comes to the current ongoing process of establishing regulatory guidelines for crypto.That’s according to a report published by the South China Morning Post (SCMP) on Thursday. The use of cryptocurrency by Hamas to fund its attack on Israel is being seen as the catalyst that may drive authorities in various Asian nations to take a more cautious approach to regulating digital currencies, according to analysts cited by the publication.Raj Kapoor, the founder of India Blockchain Alliance (IBA), commented on these recent developments, stating:”It is a kick on the backside for most governments. All regulatory bodies will take a closer look at crypto regulation. Governments will need to start implementing new rules and regulations.”At the recent G20 summit held in New Delhi, a joint declaration called for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of crypto assets, among other measures. The declaration emphasized the importance of supporting “a coordinated and comprehensive policy and regulatory framework.”Kapoor stressed the importance of revisiting the declaration and developing solutions to implement its objectives.Photo by Adolfo Félix on UnsplashRenewed scrutinyEvents in Palestine in recent weeks have led to renewed scrutiny when it comes to monitoring illicit financing activity via cryptocurrency. Only days following the recent Hamas attack, Israeli authorities moved to freeze specified crypto accounts.That scrutiny has continued in recent days, with more accounts having been frozen on crypto platforms such as Binance, while more still have been identified as suspicious, with requests for further information having been submitted in respect of over 200 additional accounts.On Wednesday it emerged that the United States Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) had sanctioned a Gaza-based crypto platform.Potential over-reactionWhile crypto-related terrorist financing has been widely publicized, blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis warned on Wednesday that crypto’s role in this illicit activity has likely been overstated. In its blog post on the subject, the firm stated:“Although terrorism financing is a very small portion of the already very small portion of cryptocurrency transaction volume that is illicit, some terrorist organizations raise, store, and transfer funds using cryptocurrency.”Additionally, Chainalysis stated that it had seen “overstated metrics and flawed analyses of these terrorist groups’ use of cryptocurrency.” Peter Van Valkenburgh, Director of Research at non-profit crypto advocacy group Coin Center, also believes that reporting on the matter is not balanced. Taking to X, he stated:“Sensational early reporting on the scale of Hamas crypto fundraising significantly misstated the amounts involved.”Coin Center’s Director of Communications, Neeraj Agrawal, highlighted an article which claimed that crypto “fueled Hamas’ terror attack on Israel” in its title, only to reveal within the body of the article that “cryptocurrency is still far from the largest funding source for terrorism.”Anndy Lian, a Singapore-based author and inter-governmental blockchain adviser, noted that while some countries may consider banning cryptocurrencies as a solution, this could merely drive illicit financing underground and make it more challenging to trace and halt. Lian argued that cryptocurrencies are traceable and trackable, unlike traditional fiat currencies like US dollars.

At the end of last month, social derivatives trading platform ZKX, a protocol that runs on the Ethereum-centric Starknet layer-2 network, shut down blindsiding the project’s stakeholders. That event has led to Singapore-headquartered digital assets firm Amber Group speaking out, calling for cryptocurrency projects to be more accountable and transparent going forward. Not economically viableNews of the project shutdown emerged when ZKX founder Eduard Jubany Tur took to X on July 30 to outline the discontinuation of the protocol. Tur claimed that the project was “unable to find an economically viable path for the protocol.” In a long-form post, the ZKX founder outlined that user engagement had been minimal, resulting in disappointing trading volumes. By extension, Tur claimed that revenues didn’t come anywhere close to covering cloud server expenses. “The market is undervaluing the work done and infrastructure built by appchains and dApps coming from ecosystems like ours,” Tur added. Pseudonymous blockchain sleuth ZachXBT had a different take on the matter, claiming that the shutdown represented a rug pull. Amber Group chimed in on the subject on X on Aug. 3. Amber suggested that it wouldn’t break any contractual non-disclosure obligations it had with regard to ZKX but that aside, the firm took the opportunity to share its perspective more broadly in an effort to promote transparency.Photo by Markus Spiske on PexelsAmber Group criticismAmber Group criticized the ZKX team on the basis of a lack of transparency. It stated: “The last update we received was on July 30, when the project announced the cessation of operations. This decision was made without prior communication, highlighting the importance of transparency in our industry.” Staying with that theme, it claimed that clear communication and transparency are essential for fostering trust and collaboration within the crypto community, and that such principles would guide future projects. Amber Group had acted as a market maker relative to the ZKX project. It borrowed and purchased ZKX tokens in support of the launch of the token and in an effort to support token liquidity post-launch. It had secured two million ZKX tokens from the open market, with its overall holding totaling three million ZKX tokens. Project investor HashKey Capital also took to the X social media platform on the subject. Like Amber Group it too criticized the ZKX project for its lack of accountability and transparency. It described the project’s reluctance to communicate as “disappointing,” while it asserted that Tur’s handling of the situation had been “regrettable.” Ye Su, founding partner at ArkStream Capital, expressed a similar complaint, stating on X that “when ZKX shut down, as investors, we got zero heads-up.” He also singled out Tur, claiming that “Edward took the money from early supporters without any communication, showing no moral standards and losing his right to future entrepreneurship in the industry.”

South Korean brokerage firms are expanding into the security token offering (STO) space, a sector gaining attention ahead of the upcoming presidential election in June. Photo by Raymond Yeung on UnsplashDedicated STO divisionsAccording to local outlet Kukinews, major players like Mirae Asset Securities, Hana Securities and Shinhan Securities are either establishing dedicated STO divisions or partnering with tokenization platforms to stay ahead of the curve. Some are also exploring fractional investment opportunities tied to real-world assets (RWAs) such as real estate, art and music copyrights. Security tokens are blockchain-based digital assets that represent rights to real-world assets (RWAs) and, as the name suggests, are classified as securities. The financial industry is increasingly interested in this technology for its potential to accelerate digital transformation. However, trading such tokens requires a comprehensive legal framework—something that is currently lacking in Korea. Election renews STO interestSTOs have resurfaced as a key topic, with presidential candidates from both the left and right likely to include them in their campaign agendas. The renewed interest follows the ousting of President Yoon Suk-yeol earlier this month, after the Constitutional Court upheld his impeachment by the National Assembly over his declaration of martial law. Before the presidential election became imminent, legislative discussions around STOs had stalled in the National Assembly and received little attention. Among the standout moves made by presidential hopefuls, Lee Jae-myung, a primary candidate from the Democratic Party of Korea (DPK), recently added Kim Yong-jin, an STO expert and professor at Sogang University, to his policy advisory group. Meanwhile, lawmakers across party lines have introduced amendments to the Electronic Securities Act and the Capital Markets Act, aiming to establish a regulatory framework for STOs, according to the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee. This regulatory shift in political circles favoring STOs has been anticipated by the financial industry. An unnamed official from a brokerage firm predicted that presidential candidates will propose measures such as legalizing security tokens, advancing a regulatory framework for virtual asset service providers (VASPs), promoting investment in crypto-related businesses and permitting the use of stablecoins. Some observers even expect these bills to receive final approval within the year. Brokerage meets blockchainKorean securities firms' push into the STO space is further highlighted by a recent partnership between Shinhan Securities and the Solana Foundation.According to Yonhap, the two parties signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to collaborate on expanding the digital asset ecosystem. Their cooperation will focus on STOs, RWAs, crypto custody infrastructure, stablecoin payments for both online and offline use and responses to global policies and regulations.