SynFutures Completes Series B Funding Round and V3 Launch

China’s central bank and seven other ministries have released a sweeping new policy tightening controls on cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, and the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA), citing mounting speculative activity and risks to financial order, public asset safety, national security, and social stability. The move builds on warnings issued late last year. At a Nov. 28 meeting on crypto regulation, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) reaffirmed that all commercial activities involving digital assets remain illegal, citing the proliferation of speculative trading that was complicating financial risk management. Officials said enforcement against crypto-related illegal financial activity would be stepped up to safeguard economic stability, and flagged stablecoins as a particular concern due to deficiencies in customer identification and anti-money laundering (AML) controls, as well as risks of fraud and unregulated cross-border capital flows.Photo by William Olivieri on UnsplashCrypto not legal tender in ChinaIn the latest notice, regulators again stress that digital assets such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and USDT have no legal tender status in China and cannot circulate as money. All crypto-related activities—including trading, exchange services, token issuance, derivatives, pricing, information brokerage, and related financial products—are classified as illegal financial activities and are strictly prohibited. Overseas entities and individuals are also barred from providing crypto-related services to users in China. The document further tightens oversight of stablecoins, warning that fiat-pegged tokens effectively perform some functions of sovereign currency. It explicitly bans the issuance of offshore yuan-linked stablecoins without regulatory approval. RWA tokenization deemed illegalChinese regulators laid out a comprehensive framework addressing RWA tokenization, defining it as the use of blockchain or similar technologies to tokenize ownership or income rights of assets. Authorities say that domestically conducted RWA tokenization, or the provision of related services, may constitute illegal securities issuance, illegal fundraising, or unauthorized financial business, and is prohibited unless explicitly approved and conducted via designated financial infrastructure. Offshore RWA tokenization targeting Chinese entities is also banned. The policy establishes a coordinated enforcement mechanism led by the central bank and securities regulator, involving development, industry, public security, cybersecurity, judicial, and foreign-exchange authorities, while placing primary enforcement responsibility on local governments. Financial institutions, payment firms, intermediaries, technology providers, and internet platforms are ordered not to provide accounts, clearing, custody, marketing, IT support, or online access for crypto or unauthorized RWA tokenization activities. Companies are also prohibited from using terms such as “cryptocurrency,” “stablecoin,” or “RWA tokenization” in business registration or advertising. China will continue its strict campaign against crypto mining, requiring all remaining mining projects to be shut down and banning the domestic manufacture and sale of mining equipment. The document also tightens supervision of overseas activities by Chinese entities, requiring regulatory approval for offshore token issuance or RWA tokenization involving onshore assets or rights, and imposing enhanced compliance, risk management, and AML requirements on overseas subsidiaries of Chinese financial institutions. The new rules take effect immediately and replace a notice issued in 2021, when China introduced a broad ban on crypto trading and mining, broadening the restrictions to explicitly cover RWA tokenization. 

OSL Parent Company Denies Sale PlansBC Technology Group, a Hong Kong-based investment holding company, has firmly denied recent reports suggesting it is exploring the sale of its licensed digital asset business, OSL, for up to HK$1 billion (US$137.3 million).Photo by Nextvoyage on PexelsCompany stock plummetsThis comes in response to a report that emerged via Bloomberg on Monday. The news of the possible sale had a significant impact on the company’s stock, which plummeted by over 22% to HK$3.35 the following day.BC Technology Group, which has been listed on the Hong Kong stock exchange since 2012, is the parent company of OSL. The reports hinted at the possibility of selling off parts of the business, citing undisclosed sources.In response to these rumors, BC Technology Group issued a formal statement to clarify the situation, deeming the article “factually inaccurate and highly misleading.” It vehemently refuted any intention to sell OSL, a key player in the cryptocurrency exchange sector.First licensed exchangeOSL was the first cryptocurrency exchange to be licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) in Hong Kong in 2020, initially operated under a voluntary scheme and was limited to serving professional investors. However, the recent licensing requirement broadened its scope, allowing it to cater to retail investors as well, including popular cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum.Both OSL and HashKey had their licenses upgraded this year, enabling them to serve retail investors as per the new policy. However, the reception to this new regulatory framework has been somewhat lukewarm, with only five local exchanges applying for the new virtual asset trading platform (VATP) license. The SFC had to publish a list of applicants following a financial scandal involving the JPEX crypto exchange, which led to over 2,500 complaints and losses totaling approximately HK$1.5 billion.The backdrop of this unfolding situation is Hong Kong’s efforts to establish itself as a significant virtual asset hub. The city announced its ambition to transform into a hub for digital assets a year ago, drawing considerable attention from cryptocurrency exchanges. These efforts included implementing new regulations in June that mandated licensing for cryptocurrency exchanges.Several companies with connections to Hong Kong and mainland China have expressed their intent to obtain a license, potentially taking advantage of Hong Kong’s favorable stance toward virtual assets when compared to mainland China’s strict regulations.High compliance costsNonetheless, high compliance costs in Hong Kong continue to pose a barrier, potentially preventing the city from becoming the primary base of operations for crypto businesses. Industry insiders estimate that the cost of compliance from start to finish can be as high as HK$60 million for a company. Firms have reported that obtaining a trading license in Hong Kong can involve an outlay of between HK$20 million and HK$200 million.As per BC Technology Group’s mid-year report, the company reported a net loss of HK$94.7 million in the first half of 2023. This marked a notable improvement compared to the HK$312.1 million in losses during the same period the previous year. OSL remains a significant source of income for the company.

Hong Kong Broadens Pilot Program for China’s Digital YuanA senior Hong Kong official announced last week that the Chinese autonomous territory plans to expand its pilot program of the e-CNY, China’s digital yuan, to include additional banks and payment platforms.Photo by Chi Lok TSANG on UnsplashDriving cross-border payment efficiencyThe e-CNY project is China’s ambitious endeavor to bring a digital counterpart to its national currency, the yuan, into mass market, everyday use. The primary objectives of this latest initiative are to enhance the efficiency and convenience of cross-border payments and to bolster greater use of the digital yuan on an international basis.Given Hong Kong’s status as a special administrative region of China and bearing in mind that it is a global financial hub, its role in the e-CNY project is likely to be of paramount importance to the Chinese administration.Hong Kong has been actively involved in the e-CNY project for some time. Previously, the local regulator, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), and the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) jointly explored and tested e-CNY’s feasibility and interoperability in cross-border scenarios.Ongoing collaborationOver the years, these two authorities have conducted numerous technical trials to assess the practicality of implementing the e-CNY. The PBOC initiated e-CNY testing in mainland cities in 2019, followed by cross-border trials involving Hong Kong and Macau. Collaboration between Hong Kong and the mainland relative to the digital yuan was initiated in December 2020 when a pilot program was launched.That program enabled Hong Kong residents to utilize e-CNY wallets for purchases at specified merchants in Shenzhen, aligning at the same time with a separate initiative, the objective of which is to achieve closer economic and social integration between Hong Kong, Macau, and nine cities in Guangdong province.Hong Kong and Mainland China had also partnered on technical testing in 2021 aimed at evaluating the technical feasibility, operational efficiency, regulatory implications, and legal considerations of employing the e-CNY for cross-border trade settlement between the two areas. That testing program is likely to be providing valuable insights, which Chinese authorities can use to expand the e-CNY’s scope and use cases relative to cross-border transactions.Completion of initial testing phaseHong Kong recently successfully concluded the first phase of its e-CNY trial, featuring local banks and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA). This phase primarily focused on assessing the technical feasibility of employing the e-CNY for cross-border payments between Hong Kong residents and mainland merchants.What Christopher Hui, Secretary for Hong Kong’s Financial Services and the Treasury, was referring to last week at a fintech event, is effectively the second phase of that overall trial program. This upcoming phase will involve a broader array of banks, payment service providers, and use cases, expanding the scope of e-CNY testing.Taking this latest development into account from the point of view of e-CNY development by the Chinese government, it’s patently obvious from the myriad of initiatives that keep coming week after week that the Chinese authorities are determined to drive the e-CNY towards ever greater real-world use.