Top

Regulatory crackdown as Hong Kong authorities act against crypto entities

Policy & Regulation·December 08, 2023, 12:58 AM

In a recent move, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong has issued a public warning against suspected virtual asset-related frauds involving HongKongDAO and BitCuped, marking a significant crackdown on deceptive practices in the crypto space.

The action taken by the SFC in conjunction with the Hong Kong Police Force was outlined in a notice published on Wednesday. The notice stated:

“The SFC suspects HongKongDAO may be disseminating false and misleading information about itself and its business through online channels.”

In relation to BitCuped, it stated: “The SFC notes that BitCuped claims on its website that ‘Laura Cha’ and ‘Nicolas Aguzin’ serve as its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer respectively, when in fact none of them has any affiliations with BitCuped.”

Photo by Teodor Kuduschiev on Unsplash

 

HongKongDAO’s alleged misinformation

Operating under the name “Hong Kong Digital Research Institute,” HongKongDAO has faced accusations of disseminating false and misleading information. The SFC expressed concerns about the claims made by HongKongDAO, including assertions of licensing by the SFC, engagement in regulated activities since July 2020, and bids for a “Hong Kong Digital Currency Exchange Licence” related to the government’s stablecoins framework.

The SFC contends that these claims are unfounded and could potentially mislead the public into believing that HongKongDAO’s services are officially sanctioned and legitimate.

HongKongDAO seems to manage at least two Telegram groups, one in Chinese with over 10,000 members and the other in English with over 1,700 members. Within these groups, there appears to be a promotion of the purported “market” price and future market value of the HKD token, enticing investors to make purchases.

 

Allegations of BitCuped false affiliations

Simultaneously, BitCuped has been accused of making fraudulent claims to enhance the credibility of its operations. The company falsely asserted affiliations with prominent figures Laura Cha and Nicolas Aguzin, claiming them as its chairman and CEO, respectively. However, the SFC has refuted these affiliations. Laura Cha is the Chairman of Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX), while Nicolas Aguzin is the Executive Director and CEO of HKEX.

Taking proactive measures, the SFC has requested the Hong Kong Police Force to block access to the websites of both HongKongDAO and BitCuped. Cease and desist letters have also been issued to the operators of these websites, demanding the cessation of the sale of HKD Tokens offered by HongKongDAO.

 

Series of crypto scams

Following the JPEX fraud allegations in September, Hong Kong faced another cryptocurrency exchange scandal involving Hounax in November. With at least 145 police reports filed and a sum of over HK$148 million ($19 million) involved, affected investors expressed frustration at what they deemed a slow response from regulatory bodies.

These incidents have reignited discussions about the need for more robust cryptocurrency regulations in Hong Kong. The city’s aspiration to become a global hub for crypto innovation and adoption faces challenges due to a lack of clear and consistent regulation, leaving investors vulnerable to fraud and manipulation.

In light of these developments, the SFC emphasized the importance of public caution regarding investment opportunities that seem too good to be true. The regulator urged vigilance against social media and instant messaging platforms where individuals, not investment professionals, might lure unsuspecting investors.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Jul 20, 2023

China’s Crypto Crackdown Reveals Capital Control Loopholes

China’s Crypto Crackdown Reveals Capital Control LoopholesChinese authorities have been stepping up their efforts to crack down on cryptocurrency-related crimes, and with that, uncovering how digital currencies are being used to bypass strict capital controls imposed by Beijing.China may be a few years into a crackdown against the use of cryptocurrencies but despite that, their use and particularly their use for illicit purposes continue. That’s according to a report on Wednesday by the South China Morning Post (SCMP).Photo by Christian Lue on UnsplashCombating capital outflowsThe rising trend of capital outflows has prompted Chinese authorities to take action. Two prominent cases illustrate the extent of these illegal activities and the value of assets seized.In Jingmen, a city in Hubei province, police disclosed details of an online gambling case involving digital currencies used to evade regulation. The case has implicated over 50,000 individuals and a turnover of billions of dollars. Although the specific virtual currency was not mentioned, authorities revealed that they had frozen multiple accounts with a combined value of $160 million.Meanwhile, in Shanxi province, police solved a money laundering case linked to 380 million yuan worth of USDT, the US dollar stablecoin issued by Tether. China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange is responsible for monitoring cross-border capital flows. Accordingly, it has taken steps to curb these illicit activities. Late last month, it fined ten firms in order to maintain order in the forex market.Digital yuan developmentThese recent cryptocurrency cases have exposed loopholes in China’s capital control system. Crypto mining and trading have long been banned by Chinese regulators. As an alternative, China has been actively developing its own central bank digital currency (CBDC), known as the digital yuan or e-CNY. 2023 has seen a raft of measures taken by various regional administrators throughout China to bring about further e-CNY adoption.However, the ban on cryptocurrencies and the launch of the e-CNY have driven many miners and traders underground or to overseas locations such as Hong Kong, which ironically, is vying to become a cryptocurrency hub. The continued depreciation of the yuan against the US dollar has intensified capital outflow pressures.Chinese bonds sell-offInternationally, fund managers have been selling significant amounts of Chinese securities since 2021. That goes against the current regional trend which sees emerging Asian markets experiencing substantial inflows of funds during the same period, according to the Institute of International Finance.That market activity has been in response to Chinese policies and escalating US-China tensions. An Atlantic Council report highlights that international institutional investors have been net sellers of approximately 1 trillion yuan in Chinese bonds since early 2022.China’s efforts to control capital outflows and stabilize the yuan’s value face ongoing challenges, as cryptocurrency-related crimes persist. While the crackdown exposes weaknesses in the country’s capital control system, it also underscores the difficulty authorities will have globally in trying to control digital currency use.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Jun 07, 2023

SEC Lawsuit Stalls Binance’s Gopax Acquisition Deal in South Korea

SEC Lawsuit Stalls Binance’s Gopax Acquisition Deal in South KoreaNothing exists in a vacuum, and on that basis, it appears that ripples emanating from the recent lawsuit filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States against global crypto exchange Binance have resulted in the company struggling to complete the acquisition of South Korea’s Gopax.Photo by Daniel Bernard on UnsplashSuspended pending reviewThe acquisition deal between Binance and South Korean crypto trading platform Gopax has hit a roadblock as a direct consequence of the lawsuit. The Financial Services Commission (FSC), the financial watchdog in South Korea, has put the acquisition on hold as it reviews the situation.Binance had acquired a majority stake in Gopax in February, with plans to re-enter the South Korean crypto market after a two-year absence. Gopax is a top five cryptocurrency exchange in South Korea, alongside Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, and Korbit. However, according to a report by local news media, the FSC has suspended Gopax’s executive change report filed on Tuesday in light of the SEC lawsuit. The report outlined the nomination of three Binance members, including Leon Singh Poong, as inside directors of Gopax.The FSC cited the allegations of securities law violations against Binance and the SEC’s request to freeze Binance.US assets as the reasons for its cautious approach.Gopax revivalThe significance of Binance’s acquisition of Gopax goes beyond its re-entry into the South Korean market. It also aimed to revive the struggling local crypto trading platform. In November 2022, Gopax faced challenges when it suspended withdrawals of principal and interest payments from its decentralized finance service, GoFi, following the collapse of the Bahamas-based FTX crypto exchange and the bankruptcy of Genesis, a US digital assets financial services firm.Digital Currency Group, the parent company of Genesis, was reportedly the second-largest shareholder of Gopax and a key business partner providing the GoFi product. Binance’s acquisition deal intended to inject new capital into Gopax to facilitate customer withdrawals and interest payments for GoFi.The SEC lawsuit against Binance alleges the exchange’s commingling of customers’ funds and violations of various securities laws. The SEC has filed 13 charges against Binance, its subsidiaries, and its CEO, Changpeng Zhao.Acquisition strategyBinance appears to have been pursuing an acquisition strategy in attempting to carve out a greater market share in Asian markets. Binance entered the Japanese market via acquisition in November 2022 when it purchased local crypto platform, Sakura Exchange BitCoin. At the end of last month, Binance announced that it was rebranding the business as Binance Japan and launching it as a stand alone bespoke platform dedicated to the Japanese market.In Thailand, the global crypto exchange has varied its approach, entering into a joint venture rather than a full acquisition. It has partnered with Gulf Innova, with the new entity, Gulf Binance, recently having been awarded a trading license by the Thai regulator.The outcome of the SEC lawsuit and its impact on Binance’s operations in South Korea remains uncertain. The FSC’s review process will consider the allegations against Binance and the implications of the SEC’s actions before making a decision on the Gopax acquisition. The crypto industry will closely monitor the developments as they unfold, as no doubt the saga will have broader implications for Binance and its expansion plans.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Oct 28, 2025

Chinese tech groups pause Hong Kong stablecoin plans amid regulatory scrutiny

Several leading Chinese technology firms have reportedly shelved their plans to launch stablecoins in Hong Kong, following regulatory pushback from the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) and the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC). According to the Financial Times, the authorities have expressed growing concerns over the risks posed by privately issued digital currencies, prompting companies to delay their initiatives.Photo by Jacky Yu on UnsplashBeijing’s focus on control and digital yuanThe companies’ hesitation underscores Beijing’s broader push to preserve control over its monetary system while advancing the rollout of its central bank digital currency (CBDC), the e-CNY. Earlier this month, the PBOC unveiled a new Shanghai-based center to oversee the e-CNY’s international operations, signaling China’s ambition to extend the digital yuan’s reach beyond its domestic market. Over the summer, companies including Ant Group, backed by Alibaba, and e-commerce platform JD.com signaled interest in Hong Kong’s pilot stablecoin initiative or in issuing crypto products such as tokenized deposits. Those plans are now on hold as firms assess policy signals from Beijing and weigh the implications for their businesses. Research efforts reflect China’s cautious approachChina’s cautious stance is also reflected in its research priorities. The National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), a vice-ministerial body under the Ministry of Science and Technology, has begun inviting grant applications for projects focused on stablecoins and cross-border regulatory frameworks. In announcing the initiative, the NSFC cautioned that the unchecked circulation of privately issued stablecoins could erode the effectiveness of the country’s capital controls. Globally, approaches to fiat-pegged digital assets diverge. In the United States, President Donald Trump in July signed the GENIUS Act, the country’s first stablecoin legislation, into law. A White House fact sheet argued that stablecoins could strengthen demand for U.S. Treasuries and reinforce the dollar’s standing as the world’s dominant reserve currency. In Europe, however, regulators remain wary. In a blog post that same month, European Central Bank (ECB) adviser Jürgen Schaaf warned that the widespread use of U.S. dollar-denominated stablecoins in the euro area could pose financial risks, noting that dollar-based tokens already account for the vast majority of global stablecoin market capitalization. Geopolitics adds to market volatilityThe recalibration by Chinese firms comes against a turbulent geopolitical backdrop. Cointelegraph, citing President Donald Trump’s interview with Fox News, reported that Trump is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping in South Korea during the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit, scheduled for Oct. 31 to Nov. 1. The anticipated meeting follows a string of shifting statements from Trump throughout October—ranging from skepticism about meeting Xi, to announcing new 100% tariffs on Chinese imports, and later adopting a more conciliatory tone. The back-and-forth has coincided with heightened volatility across crypto markets. Market turbulence deepened as a wave of liquidations swept through crypto derivatives, erasing nearly $20 billion in positions on Oct. 10, the largest such event on record. Bitcoin plunged to as low as $104,749 on Oct. 17 and has since rebounded to around $114,000 as of Oct. 28. The pullback by Chinese tech groups underscores the fine line regulators and firms must navigate: advancing digital finance innovation while safeguarding monetary stability and control. How that balance is managed across China, the U.S., and Europe will shape the future of stablecoins and define their place in the evolving global financial order. 

news
Loading