IOTA commits $10M to advance tokenization in UAE

Korean Crypto Market’s Healthy Growth Requires Corporate ParticipationA healthy growth of the South Korean virtual asset industry needs the private sector’s investment in cryptocurrencies, a legal scholar argued at a recent international academic conference titled “Digital Financial Transition and International Trends in Commercial Law.”That’s according to a report by local news outlet Edaily. Namgung Ju-hyun, an assistant professor of commercial law at Sungkyunkwan University Law School, attended the two-day event hosted over the last weekend by the Korea Commercial Law Association to point out that the current restrictions on corporate investments in cryptocurrencies have not only increased speculation within the domestic market but have also hampered Korean companies’ endeavors in pursuing blockchain-powered projects.Banks and companiesProfessor Namgung addressed the current situation where Korean commercial banks are withholding real-name bank accounts from firms without specific legal grounds. This practice became common after the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information was revised in March 2021. This Act requires virtual asset service providers (VASPs) to adhere to anti-money laundering (AML) regulations; therefore, firms wishing to trade cryptocurrencies with the South Korean currency must have real-name accounts with domestic banks. While the Act doesn’t explicitly restrict issuing such accounts to corporations, banks have shown reluctance to do so.However, in countries like the United States, cryptocurrency trading in the corporate world is thriving. For instance, institutional investors at Coinbase, America’s largest crypto exchange, accounted for over 85% of the total trading volume in the first quarter, a rise from 76% during the same period last year.Photo by JESHOOTS.COM on UnsplashMinor altcoins’ strong presenceProfessor Namgung identified the prevalence of retail investors and their speculative behaviors as the primary issue plaguing the Korean crypto market. A case in point is a relatively large proportion of trades in minor altcoins. As per a report by the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC), the combined market cap of BTC and ETH accounted for only 33% in the domestic market, a contrast to their 58.2% share in the global market. Namgung underscored that the high trade volumes of volatile crypto assets contribute to the Kimchi premium, a phenomenon where crypto prices in Korea are higher than those in other countries.Namgung also mentioned that Korean companies like Hyundai Motor, Lotte Homeshopping, and Shinsegae, despite promoting projects based on non-fungible tokens (NFTs), face difficulties due to their inability to convert cryptocurrencies to cash on domestic crypto exchanges. In comparison, global companies like Nike are successfully leveraging NFTs for their projects and exploring new business opportunities.Role of financial authoritiesProfessor Namgung urged Korean financial authorities to devise guidelines that encourage corporate participation in the crypto market, eliminating uncertainties. As a step towards risk management, he recommended considering publicly traded companies or established firms of a certain size as initial participants in the crypto market.Input from international scholarsPrior to Professor Namgung’s talk, the international academic conference also featured presentations from foreign scholars, namely Mirella Pellegrini, a professor at LUISS University of Rome; Marco Bodellini, an associate lecturer in banking and financial law at Queen Mary University of London; and Albert H. Choi, a professor of law at the University of Michigan Law School.Professor Pellegrini discussed personalized financial products and investor protection in the digital market from the perspective of the European Union. Dr. Bodellini provided insights into central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) from a policy perspective, while Professor Choi focused on digital transformation and retail shareholder engagement.

Strengthened KYC Spurs More Suspicious Transaction Reports from Korean Crypto ExchangesIn South Korea this year, there has been a significant surge in the number of suspicious transaction reports (STRs) related to cryptocurrencies, according to local news agency Yonhap.This increase is primarily attributed to cryptocurrency exchanges fortifying their Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures. This proactive response follows the controversy surrounding lawmaker Kim Nam-kuk’s significant virtual asset holdings, which were unveiled in May. His scandal came to light when a substantial amount of WEMIX tokens, valued in billions of Korean won, were transferred from the Bithumb exchange to the Upbit exchange. Upbit, deeming it a suspicious transaction, promptly reported the matter to the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission (FSC).Photo by ron dyar on UnsplashGrowing number of suspicious transaction reportsAs the scandal continued to gain traction, the political realm reached a consensus to conduct investigations into the cryptocurrency holdings of all lawmakers. Additionally, the National Human Rights Commission of Korea initiated the tracking of all lawmakers’ cryptocurrency holdings last month, a process set to span 90 days.Data received by lawmaker Yoon Young-deok on October 30 from the FIU reveals that the number of STRs originating from virtual asset service providers (VASPs) has reached 11,646 in the first nine months of this year. This figure has already exceeded last year’s total of 10,797 STRs.Under the current Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information, commonly referred to as the Financial Transaction Reporting Act, VASPs are mandated to report to the FIU if they have reasonable grounds to suspect that a customer’s financial transactions are connected to illicit property, money laundering, or terrorist financing. The Act has been in full effect since October 2021.In 2021, a total of 199 reports were submitted under this Act. The number of reports surged to over 10,000 the following year, and in the current year, it continues to grow at an even faster rate. The FIU reviews and analyzes these STRs in accordance with Article 10 of the Financial Transaction Reporting Act. It forwards the relevant information to law enforcement agencies only when it is deemed necessary for the investigation of a specific criminal case.Enhanced but varied approaches by exchangesCrypto exchanges have bolstered their customer verification requirements, especially for customers deemed to have a high risk of involvement in money laundering, in accordance with the Financial Transaction Reporting Act. This entails the need for additional scrutiny of the source of funds and the purpose behind transactions. Notably, if customer verification appears suspicious, exchanges are mandated to confirm the authenticity of the information using reliable documents.However, it’s important to note that the enforcement decree accompanying this Act grants exchanges the flexibility to verify documents based on their own business guidelines. This autonomy has been provided to assist exchanges in effectively mitigating money laundering risks by taking into account their individual business rights and characteristics.For instance, Upbit, South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, has implemented a fraud detection system (FDS) powered by artificial intelligence to continuously monitor and identify fraudulent transactions. This initiative has earned Upbit recognition from the FIU as an outstanding organization for reporting suspicious transactions during the first half of this year.On the contrary, Bithumb has devised and applies internal guidelines dedicated to anti-money laundering (AML) measures. The exchange has instituted a streamlined customer verification process for customers who are assessed as having a low likelihood of being engaged in money laundering activities. However, this simplified process is not extended to individuals from countries that have not adopted the recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF).Korbit monitors information related to customer verification through a dedicated department. It declines transactions for customers who have not undergone sufficient verification and validation procedures.Coinone’s AML department examines customer transactions comprehensively. It maintains ongoing reviews of customer information, business operations, risk assessments, and the source of funds. If any of these aspects are found to be suspicious or inadequate, the AML department proceeds with additional customer verification, including the disclosure of the source of funds.Some raise concerns about the inconsistency in customer verification standards for AML and STRs across different exchanges. When one exchange flags a transaction as suspicious, another might see it as routine. Such discrepancies highlight the need for uniform guidelines. Addressing this, the Digital Asset eXchange Association (DAXA), consisting of Korea’s five leading currency exchanges — Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax — has set up an AML division to devise standardized rules for STRs.

Uzbekistan Revamps Crypto Mining with New Regulatory FrameworkUzbekistan is ushering in a reset on its approach to cryptocurrency mining with the implementation of a new regulatory framework by the central Asian country’s National Agency of Perspective Projects (NAPP).Photo by Farhodjon Chinberdiev on UnsplashFocusing on solar powerThese freshly endorsed rules were announced earlier this week. They establish stringent guidelines for cryptocurrency mining operations within the country, reserving mining exclusively for registered legal entities and mandating the use of solar power.Under the sweeping regulations, individual miners are barred from participating in cryptocurrency mining activities, a move aimed at bringing structure and oversight to the expanding crypto mining sector within Uzbekistan’s borders.A key feature of the framework is the requirement for cryptocurrency miners to harness electricity generated by solar photovoltaic means. This environmentally conscious approach mirrors global endeavors to promote sustainability and clean energy sources in the crypto mining sector. Miners are also permitted to connect to the national electrical power grid, but only under specific conditions as outlined in the legislation.Safeguarding the power gridIn this respect, Uzbekistan is likely to be learning from the experiences of its northern neighbor, Kazakhstan. Following a ban on crypto mining in China in 2021, Kazakhstan suddenly became the second largest global center for Bitcoin mining. Unprepared for this eventuality, this mining activity caused major problems for the country’s power grid, resulting in blackouts and unrest.The NAPP underscores the necessity for mining operations and service providers to adhere to these newly established rules. To engage in cryptocurrency mining legally, entities must secure the requisite permits and licenses. These permits, valid for five years, come with strict reporting obligations, ensuring transparency and regulatory compliance.Moreover, cryptocurrency miners must prioritize the technical integrity of their electrical supply systems, emphasizing safety and reliability to prevent electrical accidents and maintain secure operating environments.In a bid to nurture a controlled and regulated cryptocurrency ecosystem, Uzbekistan’s crypto watchdog has already issued licenses to several entities, including a cryptocurrency exchange, a crypto depository, and ten other crypto trading platforms. Encouragingly, discussions have taken place with global exchanges like Binance, Huobi, and Bybit, signaling Uzbekistan’s ambitions to establish itself as a cryptocurrency hub.Ban on individual minersThe NAPP’s latest framework also outlaws the mining of anonymous cryptocurrencies designed to enhance transaction privacy, such as Monero (XMR). This measure aligns with international efforts to combat illicit activities linked to anonymous digital currencies.It’s worth noting that these new regulations represent the latest in a series of decrees by the Uzbek government, reiterating the ban on individual miners and the use of cryptocurrencies for domestic payments. Consequently, the full impact of these recent regulations on the nation’s cryptocurrency mining landscape remains to be seen.Uzbekistan’s decision to confine cryptocurrency mining to legal entities employing solar power reflects a growing understanding of the opportunity the activity provides to effectively exploit excess renewable power. In July, the President of eastern neighbor Kyrgyzstan put forward an ambitious project to use crypto mining to exploit the country’s hydro-electric power resources.