Wemade Signs MOU with Hub71 to Expand WEMIX Ecosystem in the UAE

FPG Halts Withdrawals Following HackFloating Point Group (FPG), a prominent crypto prime brokerage platform, has temporarily halted trading, deposits, and withdrawals following a cyber security incident that occurred on Sunday.Photo by Thom Milkovic on UnsplashIncident responseFPG, headquartered in Singapore while maintaining a base in Hoboken, New Jersey in the United States, manages over $50 billion in assets. The firm took immediate action upon discovering the incident by engaging third-party forensics experts and law enforcement agencies.The company acknowledged the problem publicly via a tweet thread on Twitter on Wednesday. FPG stated that the company has locked all third-party accounts and secured its wallets while it investigates the extent and details of the breach. Although the full extent of the loss is still under investigation, the current estimate stands at approximately $15 million to $20 million in lost cryptocurrencies.Investigative cooperationIn response to the incident, FPG is collaborating with the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, regulatory bodies, and Chainalysis to comprehend the nature of the attack and initiate asset recovery measures. As the investigation involving those entities is ongoing, specific details are not being disclosed at this stage, but FPG has pledged to provide updates as new information becomes available.The cyber security incident comes six months after FPG obtained a SOC 2 certification, which verifies the implementation of robust security, privacy, and control measures by service organizations to ensure the reliable handling of sensitive data and systems.Originally founded in 2018 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the US, FPG functions as both a crypto prime brokerage platform and an agency trading desk for asset managers, offering access to liquidity across various markets. In December, FPG announced that its blockchain foundation customers accounted for 5% of the total treasury management market.Backed by prominent investors such as Coinbase Ventures, Anthony Scaramucci of SkyBridge Capital, and Naval Ravikant, the founder of AngelList, FPG has raised a total of $12 million in funding thus far.In August of the previous year, FPG successfully registered as a virtual asset service provider (VASP) in the Cayman Islands. This registration ensured the secure custody of customer assets and safeguarded them from the company’s creditors in the unlikely event of bankruptcy.Broader crypto issuesIt has not been a good couple of weeks for the crypto sector relative to hacks and platform withdrawal pauses. Within the past twenty four hours, two Asia-based crypto lending platforms, Haru Invest and Delio, have suspended withdrawals. In those cases, the issue is suspected to relate to platform contagion and solvency issues.Earlier this month, the Atomic Wallet platform was hacked despite the understanding that the project offered self-custodial wallets. Originally, the loss was estimated at $35 million, but more recent reports are now estimating that figure to be in excess of $100 million.As FPG continues its efforts to mitigate the aftermath of the cyber attack, industry participants eagerly await further updates and measures undertaken by the company to recover from this incident and restore trust among its clients.

HKX management has advised Hong Kong resident users of the platform to withdraw assets following the company’s decision to halt operations in Hong Kong.  The company publicized its decision on July 18, making the following statement on its website: “We would like to inform you that our management team has, after careful consideration, decided to withdraw our application for the Type 1 and Type 7 licenses under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571) and the virtual asset service provider license under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance (Cap. 615).”Photo by Zhe ZHANG on UnsplashCompliance strugglesHKX’s exit from Hong Kong is the latest in a series of crypto exchange withdrawals from the Chinese autonomous territory. Other exchanges such as OKX, KuCoin, Gate.io and Binance had all bowed out back in May.  HKX initially applied for a Hong Kong license in February. However, like many others, the exchange failed to comply with Hong Kong’s regulatory requirements. While Hong Kong has been making a concerted effort to establish a regulatory framework and licensing system in order to create the conditions for it to become a crypto hub, it has also been grappling with making regulations strict enough to stamp out fraud in the wake of the JPEX exchange scandal. With that, it appears that many exchanges are finding the regulatory requirements difficult to live with. Originally, 24 exchanges had applied for a virtual asset trading platform (VATP) license. As it stands today, 12 of those original applicants have dropped out, with one more having its application returned with no clarity emerging as to the reason why. HKX has suspended new user registrations. The company’s management has not suggested that they will reapply for a license and reboot the service at a later stage. The company had flagged its intentions back in May, suspending trading and deposit services on May 29. OKX announced on May 24 that it was withdrawing from the Hong Kong market, citing a review of its business strategy. Around the same timeframe, Gate.io withdrew from the market in Hong Kong having failed to achieve compliance in accordance with the new licensing requirements.  Notwithstanding that outcome, the firm suggested that it planned to revamp its platform in line with the Chinese autonomous territory’s licensing requirements, and return to the market once that had been achieved. In a notice posted to its website on May 22, it stated: “Gate.HK is actively working on the aforementioned overhaul. We plan to resume our business in Hong Kong in the future and contribute to the virtual asset ecosystem after obtaining the relevant licenses.” That overhaul has yet to be completed as right now, the platform only allows the withdrawal of funds by its previous Hong Kong-based customers. Back in May 2023, Eddie Yue, the CEO of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, suggested that there would be no light touch regulation in Hong Kong. HashKey Exchange, alongside OSL, was the first business to secure licensing under the new framework. In April, HasKey CEO Livio Weng told the Financial Times that these regulations block access to overseas investors while the local market in Hong Kong isn’t very big. It emerged in recent weeks that Hong Kong regulators are reviewing whether crypto regulation is “excessively stringent.” 

Energy Theft Results in Crypto Mining Operation Shutdown in BorneoAuthorities in Miri, a city on the island of Borneo in Malaysia, swiftly responded to a tip-off from the public, leading to the successful shutdown of an illegal cryptocurrency mining operation.According to local news source, The Borneo Post, during a well-executed raid, 34 mining servers were confiscated, all of which were illicitly drawing power through cable tapping.Photo by Muhammad Faiz Zulkeflee on UnsplashEnergy thieves turn to miningWhile Borneo offers some of the lowest energy prices in Malaysia, it continues to struggle with the problem of energy theft. That issue has been highlighted via a recent utility announcement. Sarawak Energy, the local energy provider, estimated that the criminal operation caused losses of approximately 6,000 Malaysian ringgits ($1,300) worth of stolen electricity each month.The rise of the Bitcoin mining industry in 2023 has brought about record-high network hash rates and network difficulty. While the growth of miners generally signifies the robustness of the Bitcoin network, smaller operators without the economies of scale enjoyed by larger corporations face challenges.One such challenge is energy generation to power their mining servers. In pursuit of higher profit potential with lower electricity rates, illegal mining operators are drawn to stealing electricity from the grid. By eliminating energy expenses, these illicit miners can accumulate profits and offset equipment costs.Fourth recent instanceThe recent incident marks the fourth major operation in Senadin, where Miri is located, where authorities have cracked down on power theft cases related to cryptocurrency mining in 2023. So far, over 137 Bitcoin mining servers have been seized during these operations.On the other side of the spectrum, legitimate crypto mining companies are actively securing funding to support their mining projects. Riot Platforms, for instance, invested a substantial $162.9 million to acquire 33,280 state-of-the-art equipment from MicroBT, a leading producer of mining machinery.In another example, Coinbase extended a $50 million credit line to Canadian cryptocurrency firm Hut 8 Mining, facilitating its operations. Furthermore, Volcano Energy, a public-private partnership in El Salvador, secured an initial funding of $250 million for its ambitious Bitcoin mining venture.Appropriate mining activityThe spate of recent instances of illegal mining in Borneo acts as a reminder of the importance of regulatory compliance and adherence to the law within the cryptocurrency industry. While the allure of lucrative profits may tempt some to engage in illegal activities, the consequences can be severe. Mining can be a positive societal force when applied within appropriate circumstances.A move by the President of Kyrgyzstan last week to harness crypto mining in order to utilize energy that is otherwise being wasted at the central Asian country’s Kambar-Ata-2 hydropower plant serves as a recent example of a positive use case for the activity.In Texas in the United States, crypto miners are collaborating with those that manage the local energy grid, turning off miners at times when the state is on the brink of suffering blackouts.As the crypto mining landscape continues to evolve, it is essential for both authorities and legitimate operators to work together in finding sustainable solutions that ensure the industry’s growth while maintaining the integrity of the energy infrastructure.